Regulation of Oxygen Activity by Lattice Confinement over NixMg1−xO Catalysts for Renewable Hydrogen Production

Hao Tian, Chunlei Pei, Sai Chen, Yang Wu, Zhi-Jian Zhao, Jinlong Gong

Engineering ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5) : 62-69.

PDF(4678 KB)
PDF(4678 KB)
Engineering ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5) : 62-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.08.029
Article

Regulation of Oxygen Activity by Lattice Confinement over NixMg1−xO Catalysts for Renewable Hydrogen Production

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The chemical looping steam reforming (CLSR) of bioethanol is an energy-efficient and carbon-neutral approach of hydrogen production. This paper describes the use of a NixMg1−xO solid solution as the oxygen carrier (OC) in the CLSR of bioethanol. Due to the regulation effect of Mg2+ in NixMg1−xO, a three-stage reaction mechanism of the CLSR process is proposed. The surface oxygen of NixMg1−xO initially causes complete oxidation of the ethanol. Subsequently, H2O and bulk oxygen confined by Mg2+ react with ethanol to form CH3COO* followed by H2 over partially reduced NixMg1−xO. Once the bulk oxygen is consumed, the ethanol steam reforming process is promoted by the metallic nickel in the stage III. As a result, Ni0.4Mg0.6O exhibits a high H2 selectivity (4.72 mol H2 per mole ethanol) with a low steam-to-carbon molar ratio of 1, and remains stable over 30 CLSR cycles. The design of this solid-solution OC provides a versatile strategy for manipulating the chemical looping process.

Keywords

Chemical looping / Ethanol steam reforming / Nickel / Hydrogen production / Solid solution

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hao Tian, Chunlei Pei, Sai Chen, Yang Wu, Zhi-Jian Zhao, Jinlong Gong. Regulation of Oxygen Activity by Lattice Confinement over NixMg1−xO Catalysts for Renewable Hydrogen Production. Engineering, 2022, 12(5): 62‒69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.08.029

References

[1]
Hosseini SE, Wahid MA. Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016;57:850–66.
[2]
Liu T, Liu D, Qu F, Wang D, Zhang L, Ge R, et al. Enhanced electrocatalysis for energy-efficient hydrogen production over cop catalyst with nonelectroactive Zn as a promoter. Adv Energy Mater 2017;7(15):1700020.
[3]
Liu D, Liu T, Zhang L, Qu F, Du G, Asiri AM, et al. High-performance urea electrolysis towards less energy-intensive electrochemical hydrogen production using a bifunctional catalyst electrode. J Mater Chem A 2017;5 (7):3208–13.
[4]
Tang C, Qu F, Asiri AM, Luo Y, Sun X. CoP nanoarray: a robust non-noble-metal hydrogen-generating catalyst toward effective hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Inorg Chem Front 2017;4(4):659–62.
[5]
Nikolaidis P, Poullikkas A. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;67:597–611.
[6]
Mendiara T, García-Labiano F, Abad A, Gayán P, de Diego LF, Izquierdo MT, et al. Negative CO2 emissions through the use of biofuels in chemical looping technology: a review. Appl Energy 2018;232:657–84.
[7]
Xie Z, Liu Z, Wang Y, Jin Z. Applied catalysis for sustainable development of chemical industry in China. Natl Sci Rev 2015;2(2):167–82.
[8]
Rosmaninho MG, Moura FCC, Souza LR, Nogueira RK, Gomes GM, Nascimento JS, et al. Investigation of iron oxide reduction by ethanol as a potential route to produce hydrogen. Appl Catal B Environ 2012;115–116:45–52.
[9]
Li D, Li X, Gong J. Catalytic reforming of oxygenates: state of the art and future prospects. Chem Rev 2016;116(19):11529–653.
[10]
Yang F, Deng D, Pan X, Fu Q, Bao X. Understanding nano effects in catalysis. Natl Sci Rev 2015;2(2):183–201.
[11]
Liu Y, Zhao G, Wang D, Li Y. Heterogeneous catalysis for green chemistry based on nanocrystals. Natl Sci Rev 2015;2(2):150–66.
[12]
Dharanipragada NVRA, Galvita VV, Poelman H, Buelens LC, Detavernier C, Marin GB. Bifunctional Co- and Ni-ferrites for catalyst-assisted chemical looping with alcohols. Appl Catal B Environ 2018;222:59–72.
[13]
Haribal VP, Chen Y, Neal L, Li F. Intensification of ethylene production from naphtha via a redox oxy-cracking scheme: process simulations and analysis. Engineering 2018;4(5):714–21.
[14]
Zeng L, Cheng Z, Fan JA, Fan LS, Gong J. Metal oxide redox chemistry for chemical looping processes. Nat Rev Chem 2018;2(11):349–64.
[15]
Cheng Z, Qin L, Fan JA, Fan LS. New insight into the development of oxygen carrier materials for chemical looping systems. Engineering 2018;4 (3):343–51.
[16]
Chung C, Qin L, Shah V, Fan LS. Chemically and physically robust, commercially-viable iron-based composite oxygen carriers sustainable over 3000 redox cycles at high temperatures for chemical looping applications. Energy Environ Sci 2017;10(11):2318–23.
[17]
Han L, Zhou Z, Bollas GM. Model-based analysis of chemical-looping combustion experiments. Part I: structural identifiability of kinetic models for NiO reduction. AIChE J 2016;62(7):2419–31.
[18]
Jiang B, Dou B, Wang K, Zhang C, Song Y, Chen H, et al. Hydrogen production by chemical looping steam reforming of ethanol using NiO/montmorillonite oxygen carriers in a fixed-bed reactor. Chem Eng J 2016;298:96–106.
[19]
Richardson JT, Scates RM, Twigg MV. X-ray diffraction study of the hydrogen reduction of NiO/a-Al2O3 steam reforming catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 2004;267(1–2):35–46.
[20]
Cheng F, Dupont V, Twigg MV. Temperature-programmed reduction of nickel steam reforming catalyst with glucose. Appl Catal A Gen 2016;527:1–8.
[21]
Giannakeas N, Lea-Langton A, Dupont V, Twigg MV. Hydrogen from scrap tyre oil via steam reforming and chemical looping in a packed bed reactor. Appl Catal B Environ 2012;126:249–57.
[22]
Yoshida T, Tanaka T, Yoshida H, Funabiki T, Yoshida S. Study on the dispersion of nickel ions in the NiOMgO system by X-ray absorption fine structure. J Phys Chem 1996;100(6):2302–9.
[23]
Zhao Y, Hu L, Gao S, Liao M, Sang L, Wu L. One-step self-assembly fabrication of high quality NixMg1–xO bowl-shaped array film and its enhanced photocurrent by Mg2+ doping. Adv Funct Mater 2015;25(21):3256–63.
[24]
Saitoh T, Kinoshita K, Inada M. Bandgap bowing in Ni1xMgxO alloy. Appl Phys Lett 2018;112(4):041904.
[25]
Wei GCT, Wuensch BJ. Composition dependence of 63Ni diffusion in singlecrystal NiO–MgO solid solutions. J Am Ceram Soc 1973;56(11):562–5.
[26]
de Masi R, Reinicke D, Müller F, Steiner P, Hüfner S. The suppression of NiO reduction in Fe/NiO systems by use of an ultrathin MgO buffer layer, investigated by photoemission and low energy electron diffraction. Surf Sci 2002;516(1–2):L51521.
[27]
Huang JJ, Liu W, Yang YH. Phase interactions in Mg–Ni–Al–O oxygen carriers for chemical looping applications. Chem Eng J 2017;326:470–6.
[28]
Denton AR, Ashcroft NW. Vegard’s law. Phys Rev A 1991;43(6):3161–4.
[29]
Hu YH, Ruckenstein E. An optimum NiO content in the CO2 reforming of CH4 with NiO/MgO solid solution catalysts. Catal Lett 1996;36(3–4):145–9.
[30]
Helali Z, Jedidi A, Syzgantseva OA, Calatayud M, Minot C. Scaling reducibility of metal oxides. Theor Chem Acc 2017;136(9):100.
[31]
Niedermeier CA, Råsander M, Rhode S, Kachkanov V, Zou B, Alford N, et al. Band gap bowing in NixMg1xO. Sci Rep 2016;6(1):31230.
[32]
Blank SL, Pask JA. Diffusion of iron and nickel in magnesium oxide single crystals. J Am Ceram Soc 1969;52(12):669–75.
[33]
Coenen K, Gallucci F, Mezari B, Hensen E. van Sint Annaland M. An in-situ IR study on the adsorption of CO2 and H2O on hydrotalcites. J CO2 Util 2018;24:228–39.
[34]
Ferencz Z, Erdohelyi A, Baán K, Oszkó A, Óvári L, Kónya Z, et al. Effects of } support and Rh additive on Co-based catalysts in the ethanol steam reforming reaction. ACS Catal 2014;4(4):1205–18.
[35]
Zanchet D, Santos JBO, Damyanova S, Gallo JMR, Bueno JMC. Toward understanding metal-catalyzed ethanol reforming. ACS Catal 2015;5 (6):3841–63.
[36]
Chu PK, Li L. Characterization of amorphous and nanocrystalline carbon films. Mater Chem Phys 2006;96(2–3):253–77.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(4678 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/