PDF(2344 KB)
A Temporal–Spatial Atlas of Peripheral Nerve Evoked Cortex Potential in Rat: A Novel Testbed to Explore the Responding Patterns of the Brain to Peripheral Nerves
Xiaofeng Yin, Jiuxu Deng, Bo Chen, Bo Jin, Xinyi Gu, Zhidan Qi, Kunpeng Leng, Baoguo Jiang
Engineering ›› 2022, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (7) : 147-155.
PDF(2344 KB)
PDF(2344 KB)
A Temporal–Spatial Atlas of Peripheral Nerve Evoked Cortex Potential in Rat: A Novel Testbed to Explore the Responding Patterns of the Brain to Peripheral Nerves
Observing the dynamic progress of the brain in response to peripheral nerve stimulation as a whole is the basis for a deeper understanding of overall brain function; however, it remains a great challenge. In this work, a novel mini-invasive orthogonal recording method is developed to observe the overall evoked cortex potential (ECP) in rat brain. A typical ECP atlas with recognizable waveforms in the rat cortex corresponding to the median, ulnar, and radial nerve trunks and subdivided branches is acquired. Reproducible exciting temporal–spatial progress in the rat brain is obtained and visualized for the first time. Changes in the ECPs and exciting sequences in the cortex four months after median nerve transection are also observed. The results suggest that the brain's response to peripheral stimulation has precise and reproducible temporal–spatial properties. This resource can serve as a testbed to explore the overall functional interaction and dynamic remodeling mechanisms between the peripheral and central nervous systems over time.
Peripheral nerve / Brain / Evoked cortex potential / Temporal–spatial / Atlas
| [1] |
Alivisatos AP, Chun M, Church G, Greenspan R, Roukes M, Yuste R. The brain activity map project and the challenge of functional connectomics. Neuron 2012;74(6):970–4.
|
| [2] |
Bekhtereva NP. Certain general physiological principles of human brain functioning. Fiziol Cheloveka 1986;12(5):817–30. Russian.
|
| [3] |
Birbaumer N. Brain–computer-interface research: coming of age. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117(3):479–83.
|
| [4] |
Donoghue JP. Connecting cortex to machines: recent advances in brain interfaces. Nat Neurosci 2002;5(S11):1085–8.
|
| [5] |
Fox MD, Raichle ME. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8(9):700–11.
|
| [6] |
Kempermann G, Gage FH. New nerve cells for the adult brain. Sci Am 1999;280 (5):48–53.
|
| [7] |
Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Winkler J, Gage FH. New nerve cells for the adult brain. Adult neurogenesis and stem cell concepts in neurologic research. Nervenarzt 1998;69(10):851–7. German.
|
| [8] |
Albanese SA, Spadaro JA, Lubicky JP, Henderson NA. Somatosensory cortical evoked potential changes after deformity correction. Spine 1991;16(8 Suppl): S371–4.
|
| [9] |
Allison T, McCarthy G, Luby M, Puce A, Spencer DD. Localization of functional regions of human mesial cortex by somatosensory evoked potential recording and by cortical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996;100 (2):126–40.
|
| [10] |
Bai X, Towle VL, van Drongelen W, He B. Cortical potential imaging of somatosensory evoked potentials by means of the boundary element method in pediatric epilepsy patients. Brain Topogr 2011;23(4):333–43.
|
| [11] |
Custead R, Oh H, Rosner AO, Barlow S. Adaptation of the cortical somatosensory evoked potential following pulsed pneumatic stimulation of the lower face in adults. Brain Res 2015;1622:81–90.
|
| [12] |
Evilsizor MN, Ray-Jones HF, Ellis TW Jr., Lifshitz J, Ziebell JM. Microglia in experimental brain injury: implications on neuronal injury and circuit remodeling. In: Kobeissy FH, editor. Brain neurotrauma: molecular, neuropsychological, and rehabilitation aspects. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2015.
|
| [13] |
Hirano M, Kubota S, Koizume Y, Tanaka S, Funase K. Different effects of implicit and explicit motor sequence learning on latency of motor evoked potential evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation on the primary motor cortex. Front Hum Neurosci 2017;10:671.
|
| [14] |
Huang Y, Mucke L. Alzheimer mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Cell 2012;148(6):1204–22.
|
| [15] |
Kondo R, Saito S, Kuroki A, Sato S, Katakura K, Kayama T. Significance and usefulness of corticospinal motor evoked potential monitoring for lesions adjacent to primary motor cortex. No To Shinkei 2004;56(6):496–502. Japanese.
|
| [16] |
Li BH, Lohmann JS, Schuler HG, Cronin AJ. Preservation of the cortical somatosensory-evoked potential during dexmedetomidine infusion in rats. Anesth Analg 2003;96(4):1155–60.
|
| [17] |
Rowed DW, Houlden DA, Basavakumar DG. Somatosensory evoked potential identification of sensorimotor cortex in removal of intracranial neoplasms. Can J Neurol Sci 1997;24(2):116–20.
|
| [18] |
Son E, Ichida J, Wainger B, Toma J, Rafuse V, Woolf C, et al. Conversion of mouse and human fibroblasts into functional spinal motor neurons. Cell Stem Cell 2011;9(3):205–18.
|
| [19] |
Zhang ZG, Chopp M. Promoting brain remodeling to aid in stroke recovery. Trends Mol Med 2015;21(9):543–8.
|
| [20] |
Zvereva ZF, Ravikovich MA, Sovetov AN. The electrophysiological characteristics of the compensatory and restorative processes in the central nervous system of neurosurgical patients in relation to the lateralization of the injury. Patol Fiziol Eksp Ter 1990;(4):22–5. Russian.
|
| [21] |
Crist RE, Lebedev MA. Multielectrode recording in behaving monkeys. In: Nicolelis MAL, editor. Methods for neural ensemble recordings. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008.
|
| [22] |
McNaughton BL, O’Keefe J, Barnes CA. The stereotrode: a new technique for simultaneous isolation of several single units in the central nervous system from multiple unit records. J Neurosci Methods 1983;8(4):391–7.
|
| [23] |
Mathiesen C, Caesar K, Akgören N, Lauritzen M. Modification of activitydependent increases of cerebral blood flow by excitatory synaptic activity and spikes in rat cerebellar cortex. J Physiol 1998;512(Pt 2):555–66.
|
| [24] |
Henze DA, Borhegyi Z, Csicsvari J, Mamiya A, Harris KD, Buzsáki G. Intracellular features predicted by extracellular recordings in the hippocampus in vivo. J Neurophysiol 2000;84(1):390–400.
|
| [25] |
Jimbo Y, Robinson HP, Kawana A. Strengthening of synchronized activity by tetanic stimulation in cortical cultures: application of planar electrode arrays. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998;45(11):1297–304.
|
| [26] |
Khazipov R, Zaynutdinova D, Ogievetsky E, Valeeva G, Mitrukhina O, Manent JB, et al. Atlas of the postnatal rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Front Neuroanat 2015;9:161.
|
| [27] |
Paxinos G, Watson CRR, Emson PC. AChE-stained horizontal sections of the rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. J Neurosci Methods 1980;3(2):129–49.
|
| [28] |
Markram H. The human brain project. Sci Am 2012;306(6):50–5.
|
| [29] |
Abbott A. Neuroscience: solving the brain. Nature 2013;499(7458):272–4.
|
| [30] |
Underwood E. Brain project draws presidential interest, but mixed reactions. Science 2013;339(6123):1022–3.
|
| [31] |
Leshner AI. Seize the neuroscience moment. Science 2013;342(6158):533.
|
| [32] |
Wadman M. Behind the scenes of a brain-mapping moon shot. Nature 2013;495(7439):19.
|
| [33] |
Benison AM, Rector DM, Barth DS. Hemispheric mapping of secondary somatosensory cortex in the rat. J Neurophysiol 2007;97(1):200–7.
|
| [34] |
Kimura J. Kugelberg lecture. Principles and pitfalls of nerve conduction studies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1999;50:12–5.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
AI Summary
