
A Chinese–French Study on Nuclear Energy and the Environment
Xiangeng Zhao, Qizhen Ye, Sébastien Candel, Dominique Vignon, Robert Guillaumont
Engineering ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7) : 159-172.
A Chinese–French Study on Nuclear Energy and the Environment
This article focuses on the environmental impact of nuclear energy and addresses the following major environmental issues associated with nuclear power generation: ① controlling the radioactive discharge from nuclear installations under normal operation and evaluating their non-radioactive environmental impact (water withdrawals and non-radioactive discharges); ② long-term management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (radwaste), notably that disposed off in geological repositories; ③ prevention and mitigation of severe nuclear accidents and their radioactive releases and; ④ improving nuclear safety to restrict its environmental impact and to contribute toward the public acceptance of nuclear energy. Nuclear energy, with its very low emissions of green house gases, has a unique capacity to generate massive and on-demand dispatchable amounts of electricity. The annual effective radiation dose delivered to the public surrounding nuclear power plants under normal operation is negligible. Considerable efforts have been made to define sustainable management of high-level long-lived radwaste that is disposed in geological formations. The return of experience from severe nuclear accidents in the past has informed and propelled major improvements in several aspects of nuclear energy production—including reactor design and operational management as well as in the development of accident-management guidelines— and has proved to be highly valuable. The environmental risks in the event of a severe accident have been substantially reduced and protocols have been established to minimize the release of radioactive materials and avoid the large-scale evacuation of people in the event of a severe nuclear accident. Efforts must be continued to improve reactor safety and enhance the transparency of the industry and the authorities that support and control nuclear power to further reduce the environmental impact.
Nuclear energy / Environmental impact / Radwaste management / Severe nuclear accidents / Nuclear safety
[1] |
International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2022. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2022.
|
[2] |
World Nuclear Association. World Nuclear Performance Report 2022. London: World Nuclear Association; 2022.
|
[3] |
Eurostat. Nuclear energy statistics [Internet]. Luxembourg: Eurostat; 2022 Dec [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Nuclear_energy_statistics.
|
[4] |
China Nuclear Energy Association. National nuclear power operation [Internet]. Beijing: China Nuclear Energy Association; 2023 Feb 2 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.china-nea.cn/site/content/42324.html.
|
[5] |
The Xinhua News Agency. The 14th Five-Year Plan (2021–2025). Beijing: The Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China; 2021 Mar 13 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/ content_5592681.htm. Chinese.
|
[6] |
UNFCCC. The United Nations framework convention on climate change. New York City: United Nations; 1992.
|
[7] |
UNFCCC. The Paris Agreement. New York City: United Nations; 2016.
|
[8] |
IEA. Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector [Internet]. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2021 May [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050.
|
[9] |
ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford: Elsevier; 2007.
|
[10] |
ASN. ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2017 [Internet]. Paris: French Nuclear Safety Authority; 2018 Jun 27 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: http://www.french-nuclear-safety.fr/ Information/Publications/ASN-s-annual-reports/ASN-Report-on-the-state-ofnuclear-safety-and-radiation-protection-in-France-in-2017.
|
[11] |
NCRP. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP Report No.160. Bethesda: National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements; 2009.
|
[12] |
Pang Z, Liu S. Radiation level in China. Beijng: China Atomic Energy Publishing and Media Co., Ltd.; 2011.
|
[13] |
United Nations Environment Programme. Radiation effects and sources [Internet]. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme; 2016 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/ 7790.
|
[14] |
ASN. ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2021 [Internet]. Paris: French Nuclear Safety Authority; 2022 Jul 7 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.french-nuclear-safety.fr/ asn-informs/publications/asn-s-annual-reports/asn-report-on-the-state-ofnuclear-safety-and-radiation-protection-in-france-in-2021.
|
[15] |
‘‘Assessment on radioactive environmental impact from both nuclear power chain and coal power chain” Group. Assessment on radioactive environmental impact from different power sources. Beijing: China Atomic Energy Press; 2017. Chinese.
|
[16] |
Laurier D, Bernier MO, Jacob S, Bernier MO, Leuraud K, Metz C, et al. Epidemiological studies of leukemias around nuclear facilities in children and young adults: a critical review [Internet]. Paris: Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire; 2008 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www. irsn.fr/rapport-dexpertise/etudes-epidemiologiques-des-leucemies-autour-desinstallations-nucleaires-chez. French.
|
[17] |
Spix C, Schmiedel S, Kaatsch P, Schulze-Rath R, Blettner M. Case-control study on childhood cancer in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Germany 1980– 2003. Eur J Cancer 2008;44(2):275–84.
|
[18] |
UNECE. Carbon neutrality in the UNECE region: integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity sources [Internet]. Genève: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe; 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-08/LCA_0708_correction.pdf.
|
[19] |
Fritsche UR, Berndes G, Cowie AL, Dale VH, Kline KL, Langeveld H, et al. Global land outlook working paper—energy and land use. Bonn: UNCCD and IRENA; 2017.
|
[20] |
Department of Energy. Quadrennial technology review: an assessment of energy technologies and research opportunities [Internet]. Washington, DC: Department of Energy; 2015 Sep [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https:// www.energy.gov/quadrennial-technology-review-2015.
|
[21] |
IEA. The role of critical minerals in clean energy transitions—analysis [Internet]. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2022 Mar [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-inclean-energy-transitions.
|
[22] |
Bright new world. Materials use in a clean energy future [Internet]. 2021 Jun 26 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.brightnewworld. org/media/2021/1/27/materials-use-project.
|
[23] |
IEA. Greenhouse gas emissions from energy data explorer [Internet]. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2021 Nov 10 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/greenhouse-gasemissions-from-energy-data-explorer.
|
[24] |
Global CCS Institute. Global status of CCS 2022. Report. Washington, DC: Global CCS Institute; 2022 Oct.
|
[25] |
Government of France. National plan for management and disposal of radioactive materials and waste. Paris: Ministry of Ecological Transition and Territorial Cohesion Ministry of Energy Transition Secretary of State for the Sea; 2013. French.
|
[26] |
Pan Z, Hu S, Liu S; Research Group on Waste Disposal Management Strategy. Report on the Key Consulting Project of China Academy of Engineering: strategic research on radioactive waste management in China. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Engineering; Report. 2018. Chinese.
|
[27] |
National Nuclear Safety Administration (China) National Reporting Commission. Fourth national report for the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. Report. Beijing: National Nuclear Safety Administration; 2017.
|
[28] |
Government of China. Research and development planning guide for highlevel radioactive waste geological disposal. 2006 Feb. Chinese.
|
[29] |
Serp J, Poinssot C, Bourg S. Assessment of the anticipated environmental footprint of future nuclear energy systems. Evidence of the beneficial effect of extensive recycling. Energies 2017;10(9):1445.
|
[30] |
Poinssot C, Bourg S, Ouvrier N, Combernoux N, Rostaing C, Vargas-Gonzalez M, et al. Assessment of the environmental footprint of nuclear energy systems. Comparison between closed and open fuel cycles. Energy 2014;69:199–211.
|
[31] |
GPO. Report of The President’s commission on the accident at Three Mile Island. Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information; 1979.
|
[32] |
IAEA. INSAG-1: summary report on the post-accident review meeting on the Chernobyl accident. Report. Vienna: IAEA; 1986.
|
[33] |
IAEA. Environmental consequences of the chernobyl accident and their remediation: twenty years of experience. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006.
|
[34] |
IAEA, WHO, UNDP, FAO, UNEP, UN-OCHA, et al. Chernobyl’s legacy: health, environmental and socio-economic impacts and recommendations to the governments of belarus, the Russian federation and Ukraine. 2nd ed. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006.
|
[35] |
UNSCEAR. Health effects due to radiation from the Chernobyl accident. Vienna: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 2011.
|
[36] |
Pan Z. How much impact of Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents on human health. China Nuclear Power 2018;11(1):11–4. Chinese.
|
[37] |
IAEA. The Fukushima Daiichi accident—report by the director general. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2015.
|
[38] |
The National Diet of Japan. The official report of the Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission—executive summary. Report. Tokyo: The National Diet of Japan; 2012.
|
[39] |
Sornette D, Kröger W, Wheatley S. New ways and needs for exploiting nuclear energy. Berlin: Springer; 2019.
|
[40] |
USNRC. Reactor safety study: an assessment of accident risks in US commercial nuclear power plants [NUREG-75/014(WASH-1400)]. Washington, DC: United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1975.
|
[41] |
USNRC. Severe accident risks: an assessment for five US nuclear power plants [NUREG-1150]. Washington, DC: United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1990.
|
[42] |
Chai G, Yang Z, Xiao J, Wang Y, Ding C, Zhong Y. Nuclear safety improvement actions and safety requirements in post-Fukushima era. A Energy Sci Technol 2022;56(3):399–409. Chinese.
|
[43] |
Yang Z, Li F, Chai G. Status and perspective of China’s nuclear safety philosophy and requirements in the post-Fukushima era. Front Energy Res 2022;9:819634.
|
[44] |
IAEA. Computer security at nuclear facilities—IAEA nuclear security series No. 17. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2011.
|
[45] |
IAEA. Fundamental safety principles: safety fundamentals. Principles 1 and 2. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |