Theoretical Framework for a Polymorphic Network Environment

Jiangxing Wu, Junfei Li, Penghao Sun, Yuxiang Hu, Ziyong Li

Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8) : 222-234.

PDF(1708 KB)
PDF(1708 KB)
Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8) : 222-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.01.018
Research
Article

Theoretical Framework for a Polymorphic Network Environment

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The question of whether an ideal network exists with global scalability in its full life cycle has always been a first-principles problem in the research of network systems and architectures. Thus far, it has not been possible to scientifically practice the design criteria of an ideal network in a unimorphic network system, making it difficult to adapt to known services with clear application scenarios while supporting the ever-growing future services with unexpected characteristics. Here, we theoretically prove that no unimorphic network system can simultaneously meet the scalability requirement in a full cycle in three dimensions-the service-level agreement (S), multiplexity (M), and variousness (V)-which we name as the "impossible SMV triangle" dilemma. It is only by transforming the current network development paradigm that the contradiction between global scalability and a unified network infrastructure can be resolved from the perspectives of thinking, methodology, and practice norms. In this paper, we propose a theoretical framework called the polymorphic network environment (PNE), the first principle of which is to separate or decouple application network systems from the infrastructure environment and, under the given resource conditions, use core technologies such as the elementization of network baselines, the dynamic aggregation of resources, and collaborative software and hardware arrangements to generate the capability of the "network of networks." This makes it possible to construct an ideal network system that is designed for change and capable of symbiosis and coexistence with the generative network mor-pha in the spatiotemporal dimensions. An environment test for principle verification shows that the generated representative application network modalities can not only coexist without mutual influence but also independently match well-defined multimedia services or custom services under the constraints of technical and economic indicators.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Polymorphic network environment / Impossible triangle / Network development paradigm / Future network

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiangxing Wu, Junfei Li, Penghao Sun, Yuxiang Hu, Ziyong Li. Theoretical Framework for a Polymorphic Network Environment. Engineering, 2024, 39(8): 222‒234 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.01.018

References

[1]
J. Wu. On the revolution of the information network development paradigm. Sci China Inf Sci, 65 (11) (2022), Article 213301.
[2]
Dai M. Research on networking technology of digital terrestrial television single frequency network. In: Proceedingsof 2020 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing IWCMC; Jun 15-19 2020 ; Limassol, Cyprus; 2020.
[3]
A.S. Acampora, M. Naghshineh. An architecture and methodology for mobile-executed handoff in cellular ATM networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Comm, 12 (8) (1994), pp. 1365-1375.
[4]
H. Yuksel, Ö. Altunay. Host-to-host TCP/IP connection over serial ports using visible light communication. Phys Commun, 43 (2020), Article 101222.
[5]
J. Wu. Thoughts on the development of novel network technology. Sci China Inf Sci, 61 (10) (2018), Article 101301.
[6]
Naik P, Shaw DK, Vutukuru M. NFVPerf: online performance monitoring and bottleneck detection for NFV. In:Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN). 2016 Nov 7- 10; Palo Alto, CA, USA; 2016.
[7]
X. Fei, F. Liu, Q. Zhang, H. Jin, H. Hu. Paving the way for NFV acceleration: a taxonomy, survey and future directions. ACM Comput Surv, 53 (4) (2020), p. 73.
[8]
H. Zhang, W. Quan, H. Chao, C. Qiao. Smart identifier network: a collaborative architecture for the future Internet. IEEE Netw, 30 (3) (2016), pp. 46-51.
[9]
L. Zhang, A. Afanasyev, J. Burke, V. Jacobson, K. Claffy, P. Crowley, et al. Named data networking. Comput Commun Rev, 44 (3) (2014), pp. 66-73.
[10]
D. Raychaudhuri, K. Nagaraja, A. Venkataramani. MobilityFirst: a robust and trustworthy mobility-centric architecture for the future internet. Mob Comput Commun Rev, 16 (3) (2012), pp. 2-13.
[11]
J. Farkas, L.L. Bello, C. Gunther. Time-sensitive networking standards. IEEE Commun Stand Mag, 2 (2) (2018), pp. 20-21.
[12]
H. Zhang, W. Su, W. Quan. Smart collaborative identifier network: a promising design for future Internet. Springer, Berlin (2016).
[13]
Li R, Makhijani K, Dong L. New IP: a data packet framework to evolve the Internet. In:Proceedings of IEEE 21st International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR). 2020 May 11- 14; Newark, NJ, USA; 2020.
[14]
W.R. Ashby. An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman & Hall, London (1956).
[15]
R.M. May. Will a large complex system be stability>. Nature, 238 (5364) (1972), pp. 413-414.
[16]
P. Petersen. Riemannian geometry. Springer, New York City (2006).
[17]
F. Cadger, K. Curran, J. Santos, S. Moffett. A survey of geographical routing in wireless ad-hoc networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor, 15 (2) (2013), pp. 621-653.
[18]
L. Seno, S. Vitturi, C. Zunino. Analysis of Ethernet PowerLink wireless extensions based on the IEEE 802.11 WLAN. IEEE Trans Industr Inform, 5 (2) (2009), pp. 86-98.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1708 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/