An Intelligent Quality Control Method for Manufacturing Processes Based on a Human-Cyber-Physical Knowledge Graph

Shilong Wang, Jinhan Yang, Bo Yang, Dong Li, Ling Kang

Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10) : 242-260.

PDF(7923 KB)
PDF(7923 KB)
Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10) : 242-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.03.022
Research
Article

An Intelligent Quality Control Method for Manufacturing Processes Based on a Human-Cyber-Physical Knowledge Graph

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Quality management is a constant and significant concern in enterprises. Effective determination of correct solutions for comprehensive problems helps avoid increased backtesting costs. This study proposes an intelligent quality control method for manufacturing processes based on a human-cyber-physical (HCP) knowledge graph, which is a systematic method that encompasses the following elements: data management and classification based on HCP ternary data, HCP ontology construction, knowledge extraction for constructing an HCP knowledge graph, and comprehensive application of quality control based on HCP knowledge. The proposed method implements case retrieval, automatic analysis, and assisted decision making based on an HCP knowledge graph, enabling quality monitoring, inspection, diagnosis, and maintenance strategies for quality control. In practical applications, the proposed modular and hierarchical HCP ontology exhibits significant superiority in terms of shareability and reusability of the acquired knowledge. Moreover, the HCP knowledge graph deeply integrates the provided HCP data and effectively supports comprehensive decision making. The proposed method was implemented in cases involving an automotive production line and a gear manufacturing process, and the effectiveness of the method was verified by the application system deployed. Furthermore, the proposed method can be extended to other manufacturing process quality control tasks.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Quality control / Human-cyber-physical ternary data / Knowledge graph

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shilong Wang, Jinhan Yang, Bo Yang, Dong Li, Ling Kang. An Intelligent Quality Control Method for Manufacturing Processes Based on a Human-Cyber-Physical Knowledge Graph. Engineering, 2024, 41(10): 242‒260 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.03.022

References

[1]
J. Zhou, P. Li, Y. Zhou, B. Wang, J. Zang, L. Meng. Toward new-generation intelligent manufacturing. Engineering, 4 (1) (2018), pp. 11-20.
[2]
G. Büchi, M. Cugno, R. Castagnoli. Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 150 (2020), Article 119790.
[3]
Li B, Chai X, Hou B, Zhang L, Zhou J, Liu Y. New generation artificial intelligence-driven intelligent manufacturing (NGAIIM). In: Proceeding of the 2018 IEEE Smartworld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI); 2018 Oct 8-12; Guangzhou, China. Piscataway: IEEE; 2018. p. 1864-9.
[4]
J. Zhou, Y. Zhou, B. Wang, J. Zang. Human-cyber-physical systems (HCPSs) in the context of new-generation intelligent manufacturing. Engineering, 5 (4) (2019), pp. 624-636.
[5]
X. Li, P. Zheng, J. Bao, L. Gao, X. Xu. Achieving cognitive mass personalization via the self-X cognitive manufacturing network: an industrial knowledge graph- and graph embedding-enabled pathway. Engineering, 22 (3) (2021), pp. 11-19.
[6]
C.A. Escobar, M.E. McGovern, R. Morales-Menendez. Quality 4.0: a review of big data challenges in manufacturing. J Intell Manuf, 32 (8) (2021), pp. 2319-2334.
[7]
A. Haq, M.B.C. Khoo. A new synthetic control chart for monitoring process mean using auxiliary information. J Stat Comput Simul, 86 (15) (2016), pp. 3068-3092.
[8]
J. Lee, H.A. Kao, S. Yang. Service innovation and smart analytics for Industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia CIRP, 16 (2014), pp. 3-8.
[9]
H. Tercan, T. Meisen. Machine learning and deep learning based predictive quality in manufacturing: a systematic review. J Intell Manuf, 33 (7) (2022), pp. 1879-1905.
[10]
P. Tambare, C. Meshram, C.C. Lee, R.J. Ramteke, A.L. Imoize. Performance measurement system and quality management in data-driven Industry 4.0: a review. Sensors, 22 (1) (2021), p. 224.
[11]
N. Yang, C. Yang, L. Wu, X. Shen, J. Jia, Z. Li, et al. Intelligent data-driven decision-making method for dynamic multisequence: an E-Seq2Seq-based SCUC expert system. IEEE Trans Industr Inform, 18 (5) (2022), pp. 3126-3137.
[12]
X. Li, C.H. Chen, P. Zheng, Z. Wang, Z. Jiang, Z. Jiang. A knowledge graph-aided concept-knowledge approach for evolutionary smart product-service system development. J Mech Des, 142 (10) (2020), Article 101403.
[13]
B. Yang, S. Wang, S. Li, F. Bi. Digital thread-driven proactive and reactive service composition for cloud manufacturing. IEEE Trans Industr Inform, 19 (3) (2023), pp. 2952-2962.
[14]
M. Yahya, J.G. Breslin, M.I. Ali. Semantic web and knowledge graphs for Industry 4.0. Appl Sci, 11 (11) (2021), p. 5110.
[15]
G. Buchgeher, D. Gabauer, J. Martinez-Gil, L. Ehrlinger. Knowledge graphs in manufacturing and production: a systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 9 (2020), pp. 55537-55554.
[16]
E. Maleki, F. Belkadi, N. Boli, B.J. Van Der Zwaag, K. Alexopoulos, S. Koukas, et al. Ontology-based framework enabling smart product-service systems: application of sensing systems for machine health monitoring. IEEE Internet Things J, 5 (6) (2018), pp. 4496-4505.
[17]
R. Wang, C.F. Cheung. Knowledge graph embedding learning system for defect diagnosis in additive manufacturing. Comput Ind, 149 (2023), Article 103912.
[18]
S.R. Ray, A.T. Jones. Manufacturing interoperability. J Intell Manuf, 17 (6) (2006), pp. 681-688.
[19]
A. Matsokis, D. Kiritsis. An ontology-based approach for product lifecycle management. Comput Ind, 61 (8) (2010), pp. 787-797.
[20]
Lemaignan S, Siadat A, Dantan JY, Semenenko A. MASON:a proposal for an ontology of manufacturing domain. In:Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications ( DIS'06); 2006 Jun 15-16; Prague, Czech Republic. Piscataway: IEEE; 2006. p. 195-200.
[21]
J. Wan, B. Chen, M. Imran, F. Tao, D. Li, C. Liu, et al. Toward dynamic resources management for IOT-based manufacturing. IEEE Commun Mag, 56 (2) (2018), pp. 52-59.
[22]
Y. Kitamura, Y. Koji, R. Mizoguchi. An ontological model of device function: industrial deployment and lessons learned. Appl Ontol, 1 (2006), pp. 237-262.
[23]
E. Prestes, J.L. Carbonera, S.R. Fiorini, V.A.M. Jorge, M. Abel, R. Madhavan, et al. Towards a core ontology for robotics and automation. Robot Auton Syst, 61 (11) (2013), pp. 1193-1204.
[24]
Cheng H, Zeng P, Xue L, Shi Z, Wang P, Yu H. Manufacturing ontology development based on Industry 4.0 demonstration production line. In:Proceedings of the 2016 Third International Conference on Trustworthy Systems and Their Applications (TSA); 2016 Sep 18-22; Wuhan, China. Piscataway; IEEE; 2016. p. 42-7.
[25]
E. Järvenpää, N. Siltala, O. Hylli, M. Lanz. The development of an ontology for describing the capabilities of manufacturing resources. J Intell Manuf, 30 (2) (2019), pp. 959-978.
[26]
J. Lin, C. Wu, R. Yared. An effective resource matching scheme based on a novel unified descriptive model for modern manufacturing industry systems. Electronics, 11 (8) (2022), p. 1187.
[27]
B. Zhou, B. Hua, X. Gu, Y. Lu, T. Peng, Y. Zheng, et al. An end-to-end tabular information-oriented causality event evolutionary knowledge graph for manufacturing documents. Adv Eng Inform, 50 (2021), Article 101441.
[28]
L. He, P. Jiang. Manufacturing knowledge graph: a connectivism to answer production problems query with knowledge reuse. IEEE Access, 7 (2019), pp. 101231-101244.
[29]
A. Zhou, D. Yu, W. Zhang. A research on intelligent fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on ontology and FMECA. Adv Eng Inform, 29 (1) (2015), pp. 115-125.
[30]
Y.H. Tung, S.S. Tseng, J.F. Weng, T.P. Lee, A.Y.H. Liao, W.N. Tsai, et al. A rule-based CBR approach for expert finding and problem diagnosis. Expert Syst Appl, 37 (3) (2010), pp. 2427-2438.
[31]
F. Xu, X. Liu, W. Chen, C. Zhou, B. Cao. Ontology-based method for fault diagnosis of loaders. Sensors, 18 (3) (2018), p. 729.
[32]
Q. Zhou, P. Yan, H. Liu, Y. Xin. A hybrid fault diagnosis method for mechanical components based on ontology and signal analysis. J Intell Manuf, 30 (4) (2019), pp. 1693-1715.
[33]
J. Chen, Z. Hu, J. Lu, X. Zheng, H. Zhang, D. Kiritsis. A data-knowledge hybrid driven method for gas turbine gas path diagnosis. Appl Sci, 12 (12) (2022), p. 5961.
[34]
J. Li, J. Xiang, J. Cheng. EARR: using rules to enhance the embedding of knowledge graph. Expert Syst Appl, 232 (2023), Article 120831.
[35]
T.M. De Farias, A. Roxin, C. Nicolle. SWRL rule-selection methodology for ontology interoperability. Data Knowl Eng, 105 (2016), pp. 53-72.
[36]
Li Z, Li Z, Guo X, Liang P, He KQ, Huang B. A transformation approach from informal descriptions of SWRL to built-in elements of protégé4.1. In:Proceedings of International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control:2012 Jun 24-26; Wuhan, China. Piscataway; IEEE; 2012. p. 322-7.
[37]
K. Du, B. Yang, S. Wang, Y. Chang, S. Li, G. Yi. Relation extraction for manufacturing knowledge graphs based on feature fusion of attention mechanism and graph convolution network. Knowl Base Syst, 255 (2022), Article 109703.
[38]
Xue L, Constant N, Roberts A, Kale M, Al-Rfou R, Siddhant A, et al. a massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies; 2021 Jun 6-11; online. Kerrville: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2021. p. 483-98.
[39]
Saxena A, Tripathi A, Talukdar P. Improving multi-hop question answering over knowledge graphs using knowledge base embeddings. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2020; 2020 Jul 5-10; online. Kerrville: Assoc Computational Linguistics-Acl; 2020. p. 4498-507.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(7923 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/