
Preventing the Immense Increase in the Life-Cycle Energy and Carbon Footprints of LLM-Powered Intelligent Chatbots
Peng Jiang, Christian Sonne, Wangliang Li, Fengqi You, Siming You
Preventing the Immense Increase in the Life-Cycle Energy and Carbon Footprints of LLM-Powered Intelligent Chatbots
Intelligent chatbots powered by large language models (LLMs) have recently been sweeping the world, with potential for a wide variety of industrial applications. Global frontier technology companies are feverishly participating in LLM-powered chatbot design and development, providing several alternatives beyond the famous ChatGPT. However, training, fine-tuning, and updating such intelligent chatbots consume substantial amounts of electricity, resulting in significant carbon emissions. The research and development of all intelligent LLMs and software, hardware manufacturing (e.g., graphics processing units and supercomputers), related data/operations management, and material recycling supporting chatbot services are associated with carbon emissions to varying extents. Attention should therefore be paid to the entire life-cycle energy and carbon footprints of LLM-powered intelligent chatbots in both the present and future in order to mitigate their climate change impact. In this work, we clarify and highlight the energy consumption and carbon emission implications of eight main phases throughout the life cycle of the development of such intelligent chatbots. Based on a life-cycle and interaction analysis of these phases, we propose a system-level solution with three strategic pathways to optimize the management of this industry and mitigate the related footprints. While anticipating the enormous potential of this advanced technology and its products, we make an appeal for a rethinking of the mitigation pathways and strategies of the life-cycle energy usage and carbon emissions of the LLM-powered intelligent chatbot industry and a reshaping of their energy and environmental implications at this early stage of development.
Large language models / Intelligent chatbots / Carbon emissions / Energy and environmental footprints / Life-cycle assessment / Global cooperation
[[1]] |
|
[[2]] |
|
[[3]] |
|
[[4]] |
|
[[5]] |
|
[[6]] |
Chat. openai.
|
[[7]] |
|
[[8]] |
What’s the next word in large language models? Nat Mach Intell 2023; 5 (4):331-2.
|
[[9]] |
|
[[10]] |
|
[[11]] |
|
[[12]] |
|
[[13]] |
|
[[14]] |
|
[[15]] |
|
[[16]] |
|
[[17]] |
|
[[18]] |
IEC 62890: 2020. Industrial-process measurement, control and automationlife- cycle-management for systems and components. Report. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2020.
|
[[19]] |
|
[[20]] |
|
[[21]] |
|
[[22]] |
|
[[23]] |
|
[[24]] |
|
[[25]] |
|
[[26]] |
|
[[27]] |
NVIDIA accused of needing 50000 H100 graphics cards to train GPT-5 for a starting price of 250000 GPT-5. Report. Warsaw: Kuai Technology; 2023.
|
[[28]] |
|
[[29]] |
|
[[30]] |
|
[[31]] |
|
[[32]] |
|
[[33]] |
Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks 1990-2018. Report. Washington: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2020.
|
[[34]] |
|
[[35]] |
|
[[36]] |
|
[[37]] |
|
[[38]] |
Power consumption when training artificial intelligence AI based large language models LLMs in 2023. Report. New York City: Statista; 2023.
|
[[39]] |
|
[[40]] |
|
[[41]] |
|
[[42]] |
AI chatbots: energy usage of 2023’s most popular chatbots (so far). Report. Spring: TRG Datacenters; 2023.
|
[[43]] |
According to ChatGPT, a single GPT query consumes 1567% (15x) more energy than a Google search query. Report. Reddit; 2023.
|
[[44]] |
ChatGPT’s energy use per query. Report. Towards Data Science; 2023.
|
[[45]] |
|
[[46]] |
|
[[47]] |
|
[[48]] |
|
[[49]] |
|
[[50]] |
|
[[51]] |
|
[[52]] |
|
[[53]] |
|
[[54]] |
|
[[55]] |
|
[[56]] |
|
[[57]] |
|
[[58]] |
|
[[59]] |
|
[[60]] |
|
[[61]] |
|
[[62]] |
|
[[63]] |
|
[[64]] |
|
[[65]] |
|
[[66]] |
Decarbonizing all means of transport key for sustainable growth, achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, secretary-general tells Beijing conference. Report. United Nations; 2021.
|
[[67]] |
|
[[68]] |
Zero waste international alliance. Report. San Diego: ZWIA; 2023.
|
[[69]] |
23 global cities and regions advance towards zero waste. Report. C40 Cities; 2018.
|
[[70]] |
|
[[71]] |
|
[[72]] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |