Early Opportunities for Onshore and Offshore CCUS Deployment in the Chinese Cement Industry

Jing-Li Fan; Yifan Mao; Kai Li; Xian Zhang

doi:10.1016/j.eng.2024.09.011

PDF(4464 KB)

Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 348-362. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.09.011

Research

Article

Early Opportunities for Onshore and Offshore CCUS Deployment in the Chinese Cement Industry

Jing-Li Fan^a^,^b ,
Yifan Mao^a^,^b ,
Kai Li^a^,^b ,
Xian Zhang^c^,^*

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The promotion of deep decarbonization in the cement industry is crucial for mitigating global climate change, a key component of which is carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology. Despite its importance, there is a lack of empirical assessments of early opportunities for CCUS implementation in the cement sector. In this study, a comprehensive onshore and offshore source–sink matching optimization assessment framework for CCUS retrofitting in the cement industry, called the SSM-Cement framework, is proposed. The framework comprises four main modules: the cement plant suitability screening module, the storage site assessment module, the source–sink matching optimization model module, and the economic assessment module. By applying this framework to China, 919 candidates are initially screened from 1132 existing cement plants. Further, 603 CCUS-ready cement plants are identified, and are found to achieve a cumulative emission reduction of 18.5 Gt CO₂ from 2030 to 2060 by meeting the CCUS feasibility conditions for constructing both onshore and offshore CO₂ transportation routes. The levelized cost of cement (LCOC) is found to range from 30 to 96 (mean 73) USD·(t cement)⁻¹, while the levelized carbon avoidance cost (LCAC) ranges from −5 to 140 (mean 88) USD·(t CO₂)⁻¹. The northeastern and northwestern regions of China are considered priority areas for CCUS implementation, with the LCAC concentrated in the range of 35 to 70 USD·(t CO₂)⁻¹. In addition to onshore storage of 15.8 Gt CO₂ from 2030 to 2060, offshore storage would contribute 2.7 Gt of decarbonization for coastal cement plants, with comparable LCACs around 90 USD·(t CO₂)⁻¹.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Cement industry / Carbon capture, utilization, and storage / Levelized cost of cement / Source–sink matching / Offshore storage continental shale oil

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download citation ▾

Jing-Li Fan, Yifan Mao, Kai Li, Xian Zhang. Early Opportunities for Onshore and Offshore CCUS Deployment in the Chinese Cement Industry. Engineering, 2025, 46(3): 348‒362 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.09.011

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Road map update for carbon capture, utilization, and storage demonstration and deployment in the People’s Republic of China. Report. Metro Manila: Asian Development Bank; 2022.

[2]	Paltsev S, Morris J, Kheshgi H, Herzog H.Hard-to-abate sectors: the role of industrial carbon capture and storage (CCS) in emission mitigation.Appl Energy 2021; 300:117322.

[3]	Cement. Report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2022.

[4]	Watari T, Cao Z, Hata S, Nansai K.Efficient use of cement and concrete to reduce reliance on supply-side technologies for net-zero emissions.Nature Commun 2022; 13:4158.

[5]	Global energy review: CO2 emissions in 2021. Report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2022.

[6]	[The EU reached a provisional agreement to set up an EU carbon border adjustment mechanism]. Report. Beijing: Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China; 2022. Chinese.

[7]	Achieving net zero heavy industry sectors in G7 members. Report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2022.

[8]	Wei Y, Chen K, Kang J, Chen W, Wang X, Zhang X.Policy and management of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality: a literature review.Engineering 2022; 14:52-63.

[9]	Zhang S, Chen W.China’s energy transition pathway in a carbon neutral vision.Engineering 2022; 14:64-76.

[10]	The GCCA 2050 cement and concrete industry roadmap for net zero concrete. Report. London: Global Cement and Concrete Association; 2021.

[11]	An energy sector roadmap to carbon neutrality in China. Report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2021.

[12]	Monteiro J, Roussanaly S.CCUS scenarios for the cement industry: is CO₂ utilization feasible?. J CO2 Util, 61 (2022), Article 102015

[13]	Ostovari H, Müller L, Skocek J, Bardow A.From unavoidable CO₂ source to CO₂ sink? A cement industry based on CO₂ mineralization.Environ Sci Technol 2021; 55:5212-5223.

[14]	Ren M, Ma T, Fang C, Liu X, Guo C, Zhang S, et al.Negative emission technology is key to decarbonizing China’s cement industry.Appl Energy 2023; 329:120254.

[15]	Nhuchhen DR, Sit SP, Layzell DB.Decarbonization of cement production in a hydrogen economy.Appl Energy 2022; 317:119180.

[16]	Zhang S, Worrell E, Crijns-Graus W.Evaluating co-benefits of energy efficiency and air pollution abatement in China’s cement industry.Appl Energy 2015; 147:192-213.

[17]	Li N, Ma D, Chen W.Quantifying the impacts of decarbonisation in China’s cement sector: a perspective from an integrated assessment approach.Appl Energy 2017; 185:1840-1848.

[18]	Climate change 2022: mitigation of climate change. Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2022.

[19]	Zhang X, Gao X.The pathway toward carbon neutrality: challenges and countermeasures.Engineering 2022; 14:1-2.

[20]	Ma J, Li L, Wang H, Du Y, Ma J, Zhang X, et al.Carbon capture and storage: history and the road ahead.Engineering 2022; 14:33-43.

[21]	Global status of CCS 2021. Report. Docklands: Global CCS Institute; 2021.

[22]	Global costs of carbon capture and storage. Report. Docklands: Global CCS Institute; 2017.

[23]	Yang L, Wei N, Lv H, Zhang X.Optimal deployment for carbon capture enables more than half of China’s coal-fired power plant to achieve low-carbon transformation.iScience 2022; 25:105664.

[24]	Zhang C, Yu B, Chen J, Wei Y.Green transition pathways for cement industry in China.Resour Conserv Recycl 2021; 166:105355.

[25]	Xu J, Fleiter T, Fan Y, Eichhammer W.CO₂ emissions reduction potential in China’s cement industry compared to IEA’s cement technology roadmap up to 2050.Appl Energy 2014; 130:592-602.

[26]	Zhou W, Jiang D, Chen D, Griffy-Brown C, Jin Y, Zhu B.Capturing CO₂ from cement plants: a priority for reducing CO₂ emissions in China.Energy 2016; 106:464-474.

[27]	Hasan MMF, Boukouvala F, First EL, Floudas CA.Nationwide, regional, and statewide CO₂ capture, utilization, and sequestration supply chain network optimization.Ind Eng Chem Res 2014; 53:7489-7506.

[28]	Garg A, Shukla PR, Parihar S, Singh U, Kankal B.Cost-effective architecture of carbon capture and storage (CCS) grid in India.Int J Greenh Gas Control 2017; 66:129-146.

[29]	Wang Y, Wen Z, Xu M, Kosajan V.The carbon–energy–water nexus of the carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology deployment schemes: a case study in China’s cement industry.Appl Energy 2024; 362:122991.

[30]	Zhang K, Lau HC, Liu S, Li H.Carbon capture and storage in the coastal region of China between Shanghai and Hainan.Energy 2022; 247:123470.

[31]	Yao X, Zhong P, Zhang X, Zhu L.Business model design for the carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) project in China.Energy Policy 2018; 121:519-533.

[32]	Chen W, Lu X, Lei Y, Chen JF.A comparison of incentive policies for the optimal layout of CCUS clusters in China’s coal-fired power plants toward carbon neutrality.Engineering 2021; 7:1692-1695.

[33]

Guo

, Bai

, Liu

, Luo

, Hao

, Lv

, et al.Heterogeneous variations on historical and future trends of CO₂ and multiple air pollutants from the cement production process in China: emission inventory, spatial–temporal characteristics, and scenario projections.Environ Sci Technol 2022; 56:14306-14314.

[34]	Cement. Report. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey; 2022.

[35]	Tan C, Yu X, Guan Y.A technology-driven pathway to net-zero carbon emissions for China’s cement industry.Appl Energy 2022; 325:119804.

[36]	Fan JL, Fu J, Zhang X, Li K, Zhou W, Hubacek K, et al.Co-firing plants with retrofitted carbon capture and storage for power-sector emissions mitigation.Nat Clim Change 2023; 13:807-815.

[37]	[Cement industry green development level assessment report 2022]. Report. Beijing: Environmental Impact Assessment; 2022. Chinese.

[38]	Tang L, Ruan J, Bo X, Mi Z, Wang S, Dong G, et al.Plant-level real-time monitoring data reveal substantial abatement potential of air pollution and CO₂ in China’s cement sector.One Earth 2022; 5:892-906.

[39]	2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2006.

[40]	Shen L, Zhao J, Wang L, Liu L, Wang Y, Yao Y, et al.Calculation and evaluation on carbon emission factor of cement production in China.Chin Sci Bull 2016; 61:2926-2938.

[41]	Ma J, Xu L, Sui M.Analysis of factors affecting carbon emission in cement production.Cem Technol 2021; 6:28-35.

[42]	Zhao JA, Zheng ZQ, Cao Z, Yao JH.Spatial and causal analysis of discrepancies in CO₂ emission factors for cement production among provinces in China.Resour Sci 2016; 38:1791-1800.

[43]	National Bureau of Statistics. China energy statistics yearbook 2017. Beijing: China Statistics Press; 2018.

[44]	[Building materials industry phase out of outdated production capacity guidance catalogue (2019 edition)]. China Building Materials 2019;12:38–40. Chinese.

[45]	Development roadmap of carbon capture, utilization and storage technology in China. Beijing: Ministry of Science and Technology; 2019. Chinese.

[46]	Global status of CCS: CCS vital to achieve net-zero. Report. Docklands: Global CCS Institute; 2020.

[47]	Special report on carbon capture utilisation and storage: CCUS in clean energy transitions. Report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2020.

[48]	Yang L, Xu M, Yang Y, Fan J, Zhang X.Comparison of subsidy schemes for carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) investment based on real option approach: evidence from China.Appl Energy 2019; 255:113828.

[49]	Fan J, Xu M, Wei S, Shen S, Diao Y, Zhang X.Carbon reduction potential of China’s coal-fired power plants based on a CCUS source–sink matching model.Resour Conserv Recycl 2021; 168:105320.

[50]	Fan JL, Yu P, Li K, Xu M, Zhang X.A levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) comparison of coal-to-hydrogen with CCS and water electrolysis powered by renewable energy in China.Energy 2022; 242:123003.

[51]	Fan J, Li Z, Li K, Zhang X.Modelling plant-level abatement costs and effects of incentive policies for coal-fired power generation retrofitted with CCUS.Energy Policy 2022; 165:112959.

[52]	Fan J, Wei S, Yang L, Wang H, Zhong P, Zhang X.Comparison of the LCOE between coal-fired power plants with CCS and main low-carbon generation technologies: evidence from China.Energy 2019; 176:143-155.

[53]	Filimonova IV, Kozhevin VD, Provornaya IV, Komarova AV, Nemov VY.Green energy through the LCOE indicator.Energy Reports 2022; 8:887-893.

[54]	Wei N, Liu S, Wei F, Li X.Assessment of emission reduction potential of CO₂ capture, geological utilization, and storage in cement industry of China.Environl Sci 2023; 44(12):6621-6629.

[55]	Fan JL, Li Z, Ding Z, Li K, Zhang X.Investment decisions on carbon capture utilization and storage retrofit of Chinese coal-fired power plants based on real option and source–sink matching models.Energy Economics 2023; 126:106972.

[56]	Fan JL, Wei S, Shen S, Xu M, Zhang X.Geological storage potential of CO₂ emissions for China’s coal-fired power plants: a city-level analysis.Int J Greenh Gas Control 2021; 106:103278.

[57]	Fan JL, Shen S, Wei SJ, Xu M, Zhang X.Near-term CO₂ storage potential for coal-fired power plants in China: a county-level source–sink matching assessment.Appl Energy 2020; 279:115878.

[58]	Goodman A, Bromhal G, Strazisar B, Rodosta T, Guthrie WF, Allen D, et al.Comparison of methods for geologic storage of carbon dioxide in saline formations.Int J Greenh Gas Control 2013; 18:329-342.

[59]	Baik E, Sanchez DL, Turner PA, Mach KJ, Field CB, Benson SM.Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018; 115:3290-3295.

[60]	Guoyu L, Minggang L.Atlas of China’s petroliferous basins. (2nd ed.), Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing (2002)

[61]	Energy & natural resources. Report. Andover: S&P Global; 2019.

[62]	CNY USD exchange rate. Report. Beijing: Bank of China; 2022.

[63]	World energy outlook 2022. Report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2022.

[64]	Energy technology perspectives 2020, special report on carbon capture utilisation and storage, CCUS in clean energy transitions. Report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2020.

[65]	[Development roadmap of carbon capture, utilization and storage technology in China]. Report. Beijing: Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China; 2019. Chinese.

[66]	Technology readiness and costs of CCS. Report. Docklands: Global CCS Institute; 2021.

[67]	Roussanaly S, Fu C, Voldsund M, Anantharaman R, Spinelli M, Romano M.Techno-economic analysis of MEA CO₂ capture from a cement kiln—impact of steam supply scenario.Energy Procedia 2017; 114:6229-6239.

[68]	Liang X, Li J.Assessing the value of retrofitting cement plants for carbon capture: a case study of a cement plant in Guangdong, China.Energy Convers Manage 2012; 64:454-465.

[69]	Tian Q, Zhao D, Li Z, Zhu Q.Robust and stepwise optimization design for CO₂ pipeline transportation.Int J Greenh Gas Control 2017; 58:10-18.

[70]	Zhang D, Wang Z, Sun J, Zhang L, Zheng L.Economic evaluation of CO₂ pipeline transport in China.Energy Convers Manage 2012; 55:127-135.

[71]	Sanchez DL, Johnson N, McCoy ST, Turner PA, Mach KJ.Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018; 115:4875-4880.

[72]	Wei N, Li X, Dahowski RT, Davidson CL, Liu S, Zha Y.Economic evaluation on CO₂-EOR of onshore oil fields in China.Int J Greenh Gas Control 2015; 37:170-181.