China Can Achieve Carbon Neutrality in Line with the Paris Agreement’s 2 °C Target: Navigating Global Emissions Scenarios, Warming Levels, and Extreme Event Projections

Xiaoye Zhang, Junting Zhong, Xiliang Zhang, Da Zhang, Changhong Miao, Deying Wang, Lifeng Guo

Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 207-214.

PDF(715 KB)
PDF(715 KB)
Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 207-214. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.11.023
Research
Review

China Can Achieve Carbon Neutrality in Line with the Paris Agreement’s 2 °C Target: Navigating Global Emissions Scenarios, Warming Levels, and Extreme Event Projections

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper proposes that China, under the challenge of balancing its development and security, can aim for the Paris Agreement’s goal to limit global warming to no more than 2 °C by actively seeking carbon-peak and carbon-neutrality pathways that align with China’s national conditions, rather than following the idealized path toward the 1.5 °C target by initially relying on extensive negative-emission technologies such as direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS). This work suggests that pursuing a 1.5 °C target is increasingly less feasible for China, as it would potentially incur 3–4 times the cost of pursuing the 2 °C target. With China being likely to achieve a peak in its emissions around 2028, at about 12.8 billion tonnes of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2), and become carbon neutral, projected global warming levels may be less severe after the 2050s than previously estimated. This could reduce the risk potential of climate tipping points and extreme events, especially considering that the other two major carbon emitters in the world (Europe and North America) have already passed their carbon peaks. While natural carbon sinks will contribute to China’s carbon neutrality efforts, they are not expected to be decisive in the transition stages. This research also addresses the growing focus on climate overshoot, tipping points, extreme events, loss and damage, and methane reductions in international climate cooperation, emphasizing the need to balance these issues with China’s development, security, and fairness considerations. China’s pursuit of carbon neutrality will have significant implications for global emissions scenarios, warming levels, and extreme event projections, as well as for climate change hotspots of international concern, such as climate tipping points, the climate crisis, and the notion that the world has moved from a warming to a boiling era. Possible research recommendations for global emissions scenarios based on China’s 2 °C target pathway are also summarized.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Climate change / 2 °C target / Carbon neutrality / Emission scenarios / Balanced mitigation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaoye Zhang, Junting Zhong, Xiliang Zhang, Da Zhang, Changhong Miao, Deying Wang, Lifeng Guo. China Can Achieve Carbon Neutrality in Line with the Paris Agreement’s 2 °C Target: Navigating Global Emissions Scenarios, Warming Levels, and Extreme Event Projections. Engineering, 2025, 44(1): 207‒214 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.11.023

References

[1]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPC C). Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Chen Y, et al., editors. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC; 2021.
[2]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPC C). Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Report. Geneva: IPCC; 2022.
[3]
United Nations Climate Change. The Paris Agreement. Report. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 2015.
[4]
Guo L, Zhang X, Zhong J, Wang D, Miao C, Zhao L, et al. Construction and application of a regional kilometer-scale carbon source and sink assimilation inversion system (CCMVS-R). Engineering 2024; 33:263-275.
[5]
Wu CY, Zhang XY, Guo LF, Zhong JT, Wang DY, Miao CH, et al. An inversion model based on GEOS-Chem for estimating global and China’s terrestrial carbon fluxes in 2019. Adv Clim Chang Res 2023; 14(1):49-61.
[6]
Zhong J, Zhang X, Guo L, Wang D, Miao C, Zhang X. Ongoing CO2 monitoring verify CO2 emissions and sinks in China during 2018–2021. Sci Bull 2023; 68(20):2467-2476.
[7]
Zhang D, Huang XD, Zhong JT, Guo LF, Guo SY, Wang DY, et al. A representative CO2 emissions pathway for China toward carbon neutrality under the Paris Agreement’s 2 °C target. Adv Clim Chang Res 2023; 14(6):941-951.
[8]
Meinshausen M, Raper SCB, Wigley TML. Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6—Part 1: model description and calibration. Atmos Chem Phys 2011; 11(4):1417-1456.
[9]
Leach NJ, Jenkins S, Nicholls Z, Smith CJ, Lynch J, Cain M, et al. FaIRv2.0.0: a generalized impulse response model for climate uncertainty and future scenario exploration. Geosci Model Dev 2021; 14(5):3007-3036.
[10]
Millar RJ, Nicholls ZR, Friedlingstein P, Allen MR. A modified impulse-response representation of the global near-surface air temperature and atmospheric concentration response to carbon dioxide emissions. Atmos Chem Phys 2017; 17(11):7213-7228.
[11]
Sandstad M, Aamaas B, Johansen AN, Lund MT, Peters G, Samset BH, et al. CICERO simple climate model (CICERO-SCM v1.1.1)—an improved simple climate model with a parameter calibration tool. Geosci Model Dev 2024;17(17):6589–625.
[12]
Trumper K. The natural fix: the role of ecosystems in climate mitigation: a UNEP rapid response assessment. Report. Kenya: UN Environment Programme; 2009.
[13]
Daba MH, Dejene SW. The role of biodiversity and ecosystem services in carbon sequestration and its implication for climate change mitigation. Env Sci Nat Resour 2018; 11(2):1-10.
[14]
Seddon N, Chausson A, Berry P, Girardin CA, Smith A, Turner B. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2020; 375(1794):20190120.
[15]
Jiang F, Chen JM, Zhou L, Ju W, Zhang H, Machida T, et al. A comprehensive estimate of recent carbon sinks in China using both top–down and bottom–up approaches. Sci Rep 2016; 6(1):22130.
[16]
Piao S, Fang J, Ciais P, Peylin P, Huang Y, Sitch S, et al. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature 2009; 458(7241):1009-1013.
[17]
Wang J, Feng L, Palmer PI, Liu Y, Fang S, Bösch H, et al. Large Chinese land carbon sink estimated from atmospheric carbon dioxide data. Nature 2020; 586(7831):720-723.
[18]
Piao S, Yue C, Ding J, Guo Z. Perspectives on the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the ‘carbon neutrality’ strategy. Sci China Earth Sci 2022; 65(6):1178-1186.
[19]
Ruane AC. AR6 synthesis report of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Report. Geneva: IPCC; 2024.
[20]
Wang Z, Li W, Li Y, Qin C, Lv C, Liu Y. The ’three lines one permit’ policy: an integrated environmental regulation in China. Resour Conserv Recycling 2020; 163:105101.
[21]
Schleussner CF, Ganti G, Lejeune Q, Zhu B, Pfleiderer P, Prütz R, et al. Overconfidence in climate overshoot. Nature 2024; 634(8033):366-373.
[22]
Climate Overshoot Commission. Reducing the risks of climate overshoot. Report. Paris: Climate Overshoot Commission; 2023.
[23]
McQueen N, Gomes KV, McCormick C, Blumanthal K, Pisciotta M, Wilcox J. A review of direct air capture (DAC): scaling up commercial technologies and innovating for the future. Prog Energ 2021; 3(3):032001.
[24]
Breyer C, Fasihi M, Bajamundi C, Creutzig F. Direct air capture of CO2: a key technology for ambitious climate change mitigation. Joule 2019; 3(9):2053-2057.
[25]
Chauvy R, Dubois L. Life cycle and techno-economic assessments of direct air capture processes: an integrated review. Int J Energy Res 2022; 46(8):10320-10344.
[26]
Metz B, Davidson O, De Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L. Summary for policymakers. Report. Geneva: IPCC; 2005.
[27]
Hansen J, Johnson D, Lacis A, Lebedeff S, Lee P, Rind D, et al. Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science 1981; 213(4511):957-966.
[28]
International Energy Agency (IE A). CO2 emissions in 2023. Report. Paris: IEA; 2024.
[29]
World Meteorological Organization (WM O). WMO greenhouse gas bulletin. Report. Geneva: WMO; 2022.
[30]
Lenton TM, Held H, Kriegler E, Hall JW, Lucht W, Rahmstorf S, et al. Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008; 105(6):1786-1793.
[31]
Steffen W, Rockström J, Richardson K, Lenton TM, Folke C, Liverman D, et al. Trajectories of the Earth system in the Anthropocene. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2018; 115(33):8252-8259.
[32]
Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009; 461(7263):472-475.
[33]
Ritchie PD, Clarke JJ, Cox PM, Huntingford C. Overshooting tipping point thresholds in a changing climate. Nature 2021; 592(7855):517-523.
[34]
Ritchie PDL, Clarke JJ, Cox PM, Huntingford C. Overshooting tipping point thresholds in a changing climate. Nature 2021; 592:517-523.
[35]
Robinson A, Calov R, Ganopolski A. Multistability and critical thresholds of the Greenland ice sheet. Nat Clim Change 2012; 2:429-432.
[36]
Wang S, Foster A, Lenz EA, Kessler JD, Stroeve JC, Anderson LO, et al. Mechanisms and impacts of Earth system tipping elements. Rev Geophys 2023; 61(1):e2021RG000757.
[37]
Tuholske C, Caylor K, Funk C, Verdin A, Sweeney S, Grace K, et al. Global urban population exposure to extreme heat. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2021; 118(41):e2024792118.
[38]
Seneviratne SI, Zhang X, Adnan M, Badi W, Dereczynski C, Di Luca A, et al. Chapter 11: weather and climate extreme events in a changing climate. In: Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.
[39]
Hoell AJ, Herring SC, Stott P. Explaining extreme events from a climate perspective II. In: Proceedings of the 104th AMS Annual Meeting; 2024 Jan 28–Feb 1; Baltimore, MD, USA; 2024. Washington, DC: American Meteorological Society (AMS); 2024.
[40]
Auffhammer M. Quantifying economic damages from climate change. J Econ Perspect 2018; 32(4):33-52.
[41]
Stern N. The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY (2007).
[42]
Mechler R, Bouwer LM, Schinko T, Surminski S, Linnerooth-Bayer J. Loss and damage from climate change: concepts, methods and policy options. Springer Nature, Berlin (2019).
[43]
International Energy Agency (IE A). Global methane tracker 2023. Report. Paris: IEA; 2023.
[44]
Saunois M, Stavert AR, Poulter B, Bousquet P, Canadell JG, Jackson RB, et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst Sci Data 2020; 12(3):1561-1623.
[45]
Jiang J, Yin D, Sun Z, Ye B, Zhou N. Global trend of methane abatement inventions and widening mismatch with methane emissions. Nat Clim Chang 2024; 14(4):393.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(715 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/