Exploring Electric Vehicle Purchases and Residential Choices in a Two-Dimensional Monocentric City: An Agent-Based Microeconomic Model

Chao Shu, Yue Bao, Ziyou Gao, Zaihan Gao

Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 316-330.

PDF(4318 KB)
PDF(4318 KB)
Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 316-330. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.12.001
Research
Article

Exploring Electric Vehicle Purchases and Residential Choices in a Two-Dimensional Monocentric City: An Agent-Based Microeconomic Model

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Vehicle electrification, an important method for reducing carbon emissions from road transport, has been promoted globally. In this study, we analyze how individuals adapt to this transition in transportation and its subsequent impact on urban structure. Considering the varying travel costs associated with electric and fuel vehicles, we analyze the dynamic choices of households concerning house locations and vehicle types in a two-dimensional monocentric city. A spatial equilibrium is developed to model the interactions between urban density, vehicle age and vehicle type. An agent-based microeconomic residential choice model dynamically coupled with a house rent market is developed to analyze household choices of home locations and vehicle energy types, considering vehicle ages and competition for public charging piles. Key findings from our proposed models show that the proportion of electric vehicles (EVs) peaks at over 50% by the end of the first scrappage period, accompanied by more than a 40% increase in commuting distance and time compared to the scenario with only fuel vehicles. Simulation experiments on a theoretical grid indicate that heterogeneity-induced residential segregation can lead to urban sprawl and congestion. Furthermore, households with EVs tend to be located farther from the city center, and an increase in EV ownership contributes to urban expansion. Our study provides insights into how individuals adapt to EV transitions and the resulting impacts on home locations and land use changes. It offers a novel perspective on the dynamic interactions between EV adoption and urban development.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Electric vehicles / Two-dimensional monocentric city / Agent-based model / Residential segregation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chao Shu, Yue Bao, Ziyou Gao, Zaihan Gao. Exploring Electric Vehicle Purchases and Residential Choices in a Two-Dimensional Monocentric City: An Agent-Based Microeconomic Model. Engineering, 2025, 46(3): 316‒330 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.12.001

References

[1]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Global warming of 1.5 °C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022.
[2]
Kalghatgi G.Development of fuel/engine systems-the way forward to sustainable transport.Engineering 2019; 5(3):510-518.
[3]
International Energy Agency (IEA). Tracking clean energy progress 2023. Report. Paris: IEA; 2023.
[4]
Küfeoğlu S, Khah Kok Hong D.Emissions performance of electric vehicles—a case study from the United Kingdom.Appl Energy 2020; 260:241.
[5]
Yao S, Bian Z, Hasan MK, Ding R, Li S, Wang Y, et al.A bibliometric review on electric vehicle (EV) energy efficiency and emission effect research.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023; 30(42):95172-95196.
[6]
US Department of Transportation. Electric vehicle types [Internet]. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation; [cited 2023 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.transportation.gov/rural/ev/toolkit/ev-basics/vehicle-types.
[7]
BloombergNEF (BNEF). Electric vehicle outlook 2024 [Internet]. London: BloombergNEF (BNEF); [cited 2024 Dec 5]. Available from: https://about.bnef.com/electric-vehicle-outlook/.
[8]
Pelegov DV, Chanaron JJ.Electric car market analysis using open data: sales, volatility assessment, and forecasting.Sustainability 2022; 15(1):399.
[9]
International Energy Agency (IEA). Global EV outlook 2023: catching up with climate ambitions, global EV outlook. Report. Paris: IEA; 2023.
[10]
Rietmann N, Hügler B, Lieven T.Forecasting the trajectory of electric vehicle sales and the consequences for worldwide CO2 emissions.J Clean Prod 2020; 261:121038.
[11]
Kelley Blue Book. Kelley blue book reports new-vehicle transaction prices continue to tumble down 3.5% year over year in January [Internet]. Irvine: Kelley Blue Book; 2024 Feb 13 [cited 2024 Apr 7]. Available from: https://mediaroom.kbb.com/2024-02-13-Kelley-Blue-Book-Reports-New-Vehicle-Transaction-Prices-Continue-to-Tumble,-Down-3-5-Year-Over-Year-in-January.
[12]
International Energy Agency (IEA). Global EV outlook 2024-moving towards increased affordability. Report. Paris: IEA; 2024.
[13]
Haghani M, Sprei F, Kazemzadeh K, Shahhoseini Z, Aghaei J.Trends in electric vehicles research.Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2023; 123:103881.
[14]
Wang S, Li J, Zhao D.The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: evidence from China.Transport Res A Policy Pract 2017; 105:14-26.
[15]
Duarte G, Silva A, Baptista P.Assessment of wireless charging impacts based on real-world driving patterns: case study in Lisbon.Portugal. Sustain Cities Soc 2021; 71:102952.
[16]
Rietmann N, Lieven T.How policy measures succeeded to promote electric mobility-worldwide review and outlook.J Clean Prod 2019; 206:66-75.
[17]
Klein M, Lüpke L, Günther M.Home charging and electric vehicle diffusion: agent-based simulation using choice-based conjoint data.Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2020; 88:102475.
[18]
Hardman S, Jenn A, Tal G, Axsen J, Beard G, Daina N, et al.A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure.Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2018; 62:508-523.
[19]
Fevang E, Figenbaum E, Fridstr Løm, Halse AH, Hauge KE, Johansen BG, et al.Who goes electric? The anatomy of electric car ownership in Norway.Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2021; 92:102727.
[20]
Proost S, Thisse JF.What can be learned from spatial economics?.J Econ Lit 2019; 57(3):575-643.
[21]
Wangsness PB, Proost S, R KLødseth.Vehicle choices and urban transport externalities. Are Norwegian policy makers getting it right?.Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2020; 86:102384.
[22]
Ma J, Zhu Y, Chen D, Zhang C, Song M, Zhang H, et al.Analysis of urban electric vehicle adoption based on operating costs in urban transportation network.Systems 2023; 11(3):149.
[23]
Fiori C, Arcidiacono V, Fontaras G, Makridis M, Mattas K, Marzano V, et al.The effect of electrified mobility on the relationship between traffic conditions and energy consumption.Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2019; 67:275-290.
[24]
Rezvani Z, Jansson J, Bodin J.Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: a review and research agenda.Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2015; 34:122-136.
[25]
Klinger T, Lanzendorf M.Moving between mobility cultures: what affects the travel behavior of new residents?.Transportation 2016; 43(2):243-271.
[26]
Cano ZP, Banham D, Ye S, Hintennach A, Lu J, Fowler M, et al.Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets.Nat Energy 2018; 3(4):279-289.
[27]
Haddadian G, Khodayar M, Shahidehpour M.Accelerating the global adoption of electric vehicles: barriers and drivers.Electr J 2015; 28(10):53-68.
[28]
Krupa JS, Rizzo DM, Eppstein MJ, Lanute DB, Gaalema DE, Lakkaraju K, et al.Analysis of a consumer survey on plug-in hybrid electric vehicles.Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 2014; 64:14-31.
[29]
Mounce R, Nelson JD.On the potential for one-way electric vehicle car-sharing in future mobility systems.Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 2019; 120:17-30.
[30]
Dumortier J, Siddiki S, Carley S, Cisney J, Krause RM, Lane BW, et al.Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on consumers’ intent to purchase a hybrid or plug-in electric vehicle.Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 2015; 72:71-86.
[31]
Gillingham K, Munk-Nielsen A.A tale of two tails: commuting and the fuel price response in driving.J Urban Econ 2019; 109:27-40.
[32]
Maggi E, Vallino E.Price-based and motivation-based policies for sustainable urban commuting: an agent-based model.Res Transp Bus Manag 2021; 39:100588.
[33]
Wasesa M, Hidayat T, Andariesta DT, Natha MG, Attazahri AK, Afrianto MA, et al.Economic and environmental assessments of an integrated lithium-ion battery waste recycling supply chain: a hybrid simulation approach.J Clean Prod 2022; 379:134625.
[34]
Pagani M, Korosec W, Chokani N, Abhari RS.User behaviour and electric vehicle charging infra-structure: an agent-based model assessment.Appl Energy 2019; 254:113680.
[35]
Gnann T, Plotz P, Kühn A, Wietschel M.Modelling market diffusion of electric vehicles with real world driving data—German market and policy options.Transp Res Policy Pract 2015; 77:95-112.
[36]
Melliger MA, Van Vliet OP, Liimatainen H.Anxiety vs reality-sufficiency of battery electric vehicle range in Switzerland and Finland.Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2018; 65:101-115.
[37]
He X, Zhan W, Hu Y.Consumer purchase intention of electric vehicles in China: the roles of perception and personality.J Clean Prod 2018; 204:1060-1069.
[38]
Palmer C.Lagging charging infrastructure threatens to roadblock electric vehicle future.Engineering 2023; 25:3-5.
[39]
Fulton L, Jenn A, Tal G.GFEI working paper 16: can we reach 100 million electric cars worldwide by 2030? A modelling/scenario analysis [Internet].London: Global Fuel Economy Initiative; 2017 May 31 [cited 2023 Dec 1]. Available from: www.globalfueleconomy.org/data-and-research/publications/gfei-working-paper-16.
[40]
Plug In America. Understanding electric vehicle charging. Los Angeles: Plug in America; 2011 Jan 31 [cited 2023 Dec 1]. Available from: http://www.pluginamerica.org/drivers-seat/understanding-electric-vehicle-charging.
[41]
Zhang XQ, Zhao CZ, Huang JQ, Zhang Q.Recent advances in energy chemical engineering of next-generation lithium batteries.Engineering 2018; 4(6):831-847.
[42]
Egbue O, Long S.Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions.Energy Policy 2012; 48:717-729.
[43]
Sovacool BK, Kester J, Noel L, de Rubens GZ.The demographics of decarbonizing transport: the influence of gender, education, occupation, age, and household size on electric mobility preferences in the Nordic region.Glob Environ Change 2018; 52:86-100.
[44]
Liao F, Molin E, van Wee B.Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review.Transp Rev 2017; 37(3):252-275.
[45]
Chen Z, Liu W, Yin Y.Deployment of stationary and dynamic charging infrastructure for electric vehicles along traffic corridors.Transp Res C Emerg Technol 2017; 77:185-206.
[46]
Berkeley N, Jarvis D, Jones A.Analysing the take up of battery electric vehicles: an investigation of barriers amongst drivers in the UK.Transp Res D Transp Environ 2018; 63:466-481.
[47]
Kumar RR, Alok K.Adoption of electric vehicle: a literature review and prospects for sustainability.J Clean Prod 2020; 253:119911.
[48]
Tarei PK, Chand P, Gupta H.Barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: evidence from India.J Clean Prod 2021; 291:125847.
[49]
Abbasi AR, Baleanu D.Recent developments of energy management strategies in microgrids: an updated and comprehensive review and classification.Energy Convers Manage 2023; 297:117723.
[50]
Abbasi AR, Mohammadi M.Probabilistic load flow in distribution networks: an updated and comprehensive review with a new classification proposal.Electr Power Syst Res 2023; 222:109497.
[51]
Rahmani K, Kavousifard F, Abbasi A.Consideration effect of wind farms on the network reconfiguration in the distribution systems in an uncertain environment.J Exp Theor Artif Intell 2017; 29(5):995-1009.
[52]
Abbasi A, Seifi A.Fast and perfect damping circuit for ferro resonance phenomena in coupling capacitor voltage transformers.Electr Power Compon Syst 2009; 37(4):393-402.
[53]
Meurs H, Haaijer R.Spatial structure and mobility.Transp Res D Transp Environ 2001; 6:429-446.
[54]
N Pæss.Residential location, transport rationales and daily-life travel behavior: the case of Hangzhou metropolitan, area.China. Prog Plann 2013; 79:5-54.
[55]
Aditjandra PT, Mulley C, Nelson JD.The influence of neighborhood design on travel behavior: empirical evidence from North East England.Transp Policy 2013; 26:54-65.
[56]
Gim THT.The relationships between land use measures and travel behavior: a meta-analytic approach.Transp Plann Technol 2013; 36(5):413-434.
[57]
Handy S, Cao X, Mokhtarian P.Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California.Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2005; 10(6):427-444.
[58]
Alonso W.Location and land use: toward a general theory of land rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1964)
[59]
de la Barra T.Integrated land use and transport modeling: decision chains and hierarchies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)
[60]
Waddell PA.Household choice and urban structure: a re-assessment of the behavioural foundations of urban models of housing, labor and transportation markets. The Routledge, London (2018)
[61]
Wingo Jr L.Transportation and urban land.Washington: Resources for the Future; l96l.
[62]
Chang JS.Models of the relationship between transport and land-use: a review.Transp Rev 2006; 26(3):325-350.
[63]
Mcfadden D.Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers of econometrics, Academic Press, New York City (1973)
[64]
Pinjari AR, Bhat CR.Activity-based travel demand analysis.A handbook of transport economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, Gloucestershire 2011; 213-248.
[65]
Muth RF.Cities and Housing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1969)
[66]
Mills ES.Studies in the structure of the urban economy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1972)
[67]
Wegener M.Overview of land-use transport models.Handbook of transport geography and spatial systems, Emerald Publishing, Leeds 2004; 127-146.
[68]
Spencer D.Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals.J Archit 2009; 14(3):446-450.
[69]
An L.Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: review of agent-based models.Ecol Modell 2012; 229:25-36.
[70]
Bonabeau E.Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems.PNAS 2002; 99(Suppl 3):7280-7287.
[71]
Epstein JM.Agent-based computational models and generative social science.Complexity 1999; 4(5):41-60.
[72]
Manson SM, Sun S, Bonsal D.Agent-based modeling and complexity.A. Heppenstall, A. Crooks, L. See, M. Batty (Eds.), Agent-based models of geographical system, Springer, Berlin 2012; 125-139.
[73]
Mehdizadeh M, Nordfjaern T, Klockner CA.A systematic review of the agent-based modelling/simulation paradigm in mobility transition.Technol Forecast Soc Change 2022; 184:122011.
[74]
O D’Sullivan, Millington J, Perry G, Wainwright J.Agent-based models—because they’re worth it?.A. Heppenstall, A. Crooks, L. See, M. Batty (Eds.), Agent-based models of geographical systems, Springer, Berlin 2012; 109-123.
[75]
Schindler M, Caruso G.Emerging urban form—emerging pollution: modelling endogenous health and environmental effects of traffic on residential choice.Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci 2020; 47(3):437-456.
[76]
Elgowainy H, Han J, Ward J, Joseck F, Gohlke D, Lindauer A, et al.Cradle-to-grave lifecycle analysis of U.S. light-duty vehicle-fuel pathways: a greenhouse gas emissions and economic assessment of near term (2015) and future (2025–2030) technologies.Report. Washington, DC: USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE); 2016.
[77]
Tikoudis I, Verhoef ET, van Ommeren JN.On revenue recycling and the welfare effects of second-best congestion pricing in a monocentric city.J Urban Econ 2015; 89:32-47.
[78]
Larson W, Zhao W.Self-driving cars and the city: effects on sprawl, energy consumption, and housing affordability.Reg Sci Urban Econ 2020; 81:103484.
[79]
Candia D, Verhoef E.Tradable mobility permits in a monocentric city with preexisting labor taxation: a general equilibrium perspective.Transp Res Part B Methodol 2022; 163:145-165.
[80]
Compostella J, Fulton LM, De Kleine R, Kim HC, Wallington TJ.Near- (2020) and long-term (2030–2035) costs of automated, electrified, and shared mobility in the United States.Transp Policy 2020; 85:54-66.
[81]
Larson W, Liu F, Yezer A.Energy footprint of the city: effects of urban land use and transportation policies.J Urban Econ 2012; 72(2–3):147-159.
[82]
US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Next generation simulation (NGSIM) vehicle trajectories and supporting data. [Dataset] Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation; [cited 2024 Aug 3]. Available from: https://datahub.transportation.gov/stories/s/Next-Generation-Simulation-NGSIM-Open-Data/i5zb-xe34/.
[83]
University of Naples Federico II.MULTITUDE Project [Internet].Campania: University of Naples Federico II; [cited 2024 Aug 3]. Available from: http://www.multitude-project.eu.
[84]
Hu X, Xu L, Lin X, Pecht M.Battery lifetime prognostics.Joule 2020; 4(2):310-346.
[85]
Li Y, Liu K, Foley AM, Zülke A, Berecibar M, Nanini-Maury E, et al.Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: a review.Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2019; 113:109254.
[86]
Lunz B, Yan Z, Gerschler JB, Sauer DU.Influence of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging strategies on charging and battery degradation costs.Energy Policy 2012; 46:511-519.
[87]
Neubauer J, Pesaran A.The ability of battery second use strategies to impact plug-in electric vehicle prices and serve utility energy storage applications.J Power Sources 2011; 196(23):10351-10358.
[88]
Wood E, Alexander M, Bradley TH.Investigation of battery end-of-life conditions for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles.J Power Sources 2011; 196(11):5147-5154.
[89]
Zhou M, Jin H, Wang W.A review of vehicle fuel consumption models to evaluate eco-driving and eco-routing.Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2016; 49:203-218.
[90]
Motamen Salehi F, Morina A, Neville A.The effect of soot and diesel contamination on wear and friction of engine oil pump.Tribol Int 2017; 115:285-296.
[91]
Greene DL, Liu J, Khattak AJ, Wali B, Hopson JL, Goeltz R.How does on-road fuel economy vary with vehicle cumulative mileage and daily use?.Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2017; 55:142-161.
[92]
Caruso G, Peeters D, Cavailh Jès, Rounsevell M.Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model.Reg Sci Urban Econ 2007; 37(5):542-567.
[93]
Caruso G, Vuidel G, Cavailh Jès, Frankhauser P, Peeters D, Thomas I.Morphological similarities between DBM and a microeconomic model of sprawl.J Geogr Syst 2011; 13(1):31-48.
[94]
Beijing Transport Institute. Beijing transport development annual report. Report. Beijing: Beijing Transport Institute; 2023. Chinese.
[95]
Cai J, Huang B, Song Y.Using multi-source geospatial big data to identify the structure of polycentric cities.Remote Sens Environ 2017; 202:210-221.
[96]
Hyra DS.Conceptualizing the new urban renewal: comparing the past to the present.Urban Aff Rev 2012; 48(4):498-527.
[97]
Mills ES, Tan JP.A comparison of urban population density functions in developed and developing countries.Urban Stud 1980; 17(3):313-321.
[98]
Pan H, Deal B, Chen Y, Hewings G.A reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based?—Evidence from Chicago.Reg Sci Urban Econ 2018; 70:215-228.
[99]
Fujita M, Thisse JF.Economics of agglomeration. cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
[100]
Fujita M.Urban economic theory: land use and city size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)
[101]
Parker DC, Filatova T.A conceptual design for a bilateral agent-based land market with heterogeneous economic agents.Comput Environ Urban Syst 2008; 32(6):454-463.
[102]
International Energy Agency (IEA). Global EV outlook 2020—entering the decade of electric drive? Report. Paris: IEA; 2020.
[103]
International Energy Agency (IEA). The role of critical minerals in clean energy transitions. Report. Paris: IEA; 2021.
[104]
Li J, Lu M, Lu T.Constructing compact cities: how urban regeneration can enhance growth and relieve congestion.Econ Model 2022; 113:105828.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(4318 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/