Coupled Urban Risks: A Complex Systems Perspective with a People-Centric Focus

Min Ouyang, Zekai Cheng, Jiaxin Ma, Hongwei Wang, Stergios Aristoteles Mitoulis

Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 44-50.

PDF(644 KB)
PDF(644 KB)
Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 44-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.12.023
Research
Perspective

Coupled Urban Risks: A Complex Systems Perspective with a People-Centric Focus

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The complexity of coupled risks, which refer to the compounded effects of interacting uncertainties across multiple interdependent objectives, is inherent to cities functioning as dynamic, interdependent systems. A disruption in one domain ripples across various urban systems, often with unforeseen consequences. Central to this complexity are people, whose behaviors, needs, and vulnerabilities shape risk evolution and response effectiveness. Realizing cities as complex systems centered on human needs and behaviors is essential to understanding the complexities of coupled urban risks. This paper adopts a complex systems perspective to examine the intricacies of coupled urban risks, emphasizing the critical role of human decisions and behavior in shaping these dynamics. We focus on two key dimensions: cascading hazards in urban environments and cascading failures across interdependent exposed systems in cities. Existing risk assessment models often fail to capture the complexity of these processes, particularly when factoring in human decision-making. To tackle these challenges, we advocate for a standardized taxonomy of cascading hazards, urban components, and their interactions. At its core is a people-centric perspective, emphasizing the bidirectional interactions between people and the systems that serve them. Building on this foundation, we argue the need for an integrated, people-centric risk assessment framework that evaluates event impacts in relation to the hierarchical needs of people and incorporates their preparedness and response capacities. By leveraging real-time data, advanced simulations, and innovative validation methods, this framework aims to enhance the accuracy of coupled urban risk modeling. To effectively manage coupled urban risks, cities can draw from proven strategies in real complex systems. However, given the escalating uncertainties and complexities associated with climate change, prioritizing people-centric strategies is crucial. This approach will empower cities to build resilience not only against known hazards but also against evolving and unforeseen challenges in an increasingly uncertain world.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Coupled urban risks / People-centric / Risk management

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Min Ouyang, Zekai Cheng, Jiaxin Ma, Hongwei Wang, Stergios Aristoteles Mitoulis. Coupled Urban Risks: A Complex Systems Perspective with a People-Centric Focus. Engineering, 2025, 44(1): 44‒50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.12.023

References

[1]
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDR R), International Science Council (IS C). Hazard definition & classification review: technical report. Report. Nairobi: UNDRR; 2020.
[2]
World Bank Group. Urban development [Internet]. Washington, DC: World Bank Group; 2023 Apr 3 [cited 2024 Dec 7]. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/overview.
[3]
Elmqvist T, Andersson E, Frantzeskaki N, McPhearson T, Olsson P, Gaffney O, et al. Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nat Sustain 2019; 2(4):267-273.
[4]
Helbing D. Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature 2013; 497(7447):51-59.
[5]
State Council Disaster Investigation Team. Investigation report on the “7·20” heavy rain disaster in Zhengzhou, Henan Province. Report. Beijing: State Council of China; 2022. Chinese.
[6]
Batty M. Modelling cities as dynamic systems. Nature 1971; 231(5303):425-428.
[7]
Bettencourt LMA. Introduction to urban science: evidence and theory of cities as complex systems. Cambridge: The MIT Press 2021.
[8]
Caldarelli G, Arcaute E, Barthelemy M, Batty M, Gershenson C, Helbing D, et al. The role of complexity for digital twins of cities. Nat Comput Sci 2023; 3(5):374-381.
[9]
Aerts JCJH, Botzen WJ, Clarke KC, Cutter SL, Hall JW, Merz B, et al. Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment. Nat Clim Chang 2018; 8(3):193-199.
[10]
Pelling M. The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Routledge, London (2003).
[11]
World Meteorological Organization, Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency, United Nations Development Program, International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Multi-hazard early warning systems: a checklist. In: Outcome of the First Multi-hazard Early Warning Conference; 2017 May 22–23; Cancún, Mexico. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization (WMO); 2018.
[12]
Raymond C, Horton RM, Zscheischler J, Martius O, AghaKouchak A, Balch J, et al. Understanding and managing connected extreme events. Nat Clim Chang 2020; 10(7):611-621.
[13]
Schill C, Anderies JM, Lindahl T, Folke C, Polasky S, Cárdenas JC, et al. A more dynamic understanding of human behaviour for the Anthropocene. Nat Sustain 2019; 2(12):1075-1082.
[14]
Pescaroli G, Alexander D. Understanding compound, interconnected, interacting, and cascading risks: a holistic framework. Risk Anal 2018; 38(11):2245-2257.
[15]
World Economic Forum. Global risks report 2023. Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2023.
[16]
Argyroudis SA, Mitoulis SA, Chatzi E, Baker JW, Brilakis I, Gkoumas K, et al. Digital technologies can enhance climate resilience of critical infrastructure. Clim Risk Manage 2022; 35:100387.
[17]
AghaKouchak A, Huning LS, Chiang F, Sadegh M, Vahedifard F, Mazdiyasni O, et al. How do natural hazards cascade to cause disasters?. Nature 2018; 561(7724):458-460.
[18]
Tuholske C, Caylor K, Funk C, Verdin A, Sweeney S, Grace K, et al. Global urban population exposure to extreme heat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2021; 118(41):e2024792118.
[19]
Jongman B. The fraction of the global population at risk of floods is growing. Nature 2021; 596(7870):37-38.
[20]
Jing R, Heft-Neal S, Chavas DR, Griswold M, Wang Z, Clark-Ginsberg A, et al. Global population profile of tropical cyclone exposure from 2002 to 2019. Nature 2024; 626(7999):549-554.
[21]
Tellman B, Sullivan JA, Kuhn C, Kettner AJ, Doyle CS, Brakenridge GR, et al. Satellite imaging reveals increased proportion of population exposed to floods. Nature 2021; 596(7870):80-86.
[22]
Lindersson S, Raffetti E, Rusca M, Brandimarte L, M Jård, Di G Baldassarre. The wider the gap between rich and poor the higher the flood mortality. Nat Sustain 2023; 6(8):995-1005.
[23]
Vestby J, Schutte S, Tollefsen AF, Buhaug H. Societal determinants of flood-induced displacement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2024; 121(3):e2206188120.
[24]
Ronco M, Tárraga JM, Muñoz J, Piles M, Marco ES, Wang Q, et al. Exploring interactions between socioeconomic context and natural hazards on human population displacement. Nat Commun 2023; 14(1):8004.
[25]
Siragusa A. Atlas of the human planet 2017: global exposure to natural hazards. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2017).
[26]
Koks EE, Rozenberg J, Zorn C, Tariverdi M, Vousdoukas M, Fraser SA, et al. A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets. Nat Commun 2019; 10(1):2677.
[27]
Liu K, Wang Q, Wang M, Koks EE. Global transportation infrastructure exposure to the change of precipitation in a warmer world. Nat Commun 2023; 14(1):2541.
[28]
McDaniels T, Chang S, Peterson K, Mikawoz J, Reed D. Empirical framework for characterizing infrastructure failure interdependencies. J Infrastruct Syst 2007; 13(3):175-184.
[29]
Ouyang M. Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2014; 121:43-60.
[30]
Rinaldi SM, Peerenboom JP, Kelly TK. Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Contr Syst Mag 2001; 21(6):11-25.
[31]
Buldyrev SV, Parshani R, Paul G, Stanley HE, Havlin S. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 2010; 464(7291):1025-1028.
[32]
Artime O, Grassia M, De M Domenico, Gleeson JP, Makse HA, Mangioni G, et al. Robustness and resilience of complex networks. Nat Rev Phys 2024; 6(2):114-131.
[33]
Ouyang M, Wang Z. Resilience assessment of interdependent infrastructure systems: with a focus on joint restoration modeling and analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2015; 141:74-82.
[34]
Montoya-Rincon JP, Mejia-Manrique SA, Azad S, Ghandehari M, Harmsen EW, Khanbilvardi R, et al. A socio-technical approach for the assessment of critical infrastructure system vulnerability in extreme weather events. Nat Energy 2023; 8(9):1002-1012.
[35]
Hassan EM, Mahmoud HN. Orchestrating performance of healthcare networks subjected to the compound events of natural disasters and pandemic. Nat Commun 2021; 12(1):1338.
[36]
Dargin J, Berk A, Mostafavi A. Assessment of household-level food–energy–water nexus vulnerability during disasters. Sustain Cities Soc 2020; 62:102366.
[37]
Batty M. Digital twins in city planning. Nat Comput Sci 2024; 4(3):192-199.
[38]
Meerow S, Newell JP. Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why?. Urban Geogr 2019; 40(3):309-329.
[39]
Tzachor A, Sabri S, Richards CE, Rajabifard A, Acuto M. Potential and limitations of digital twins to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Sustain 2022; 5(10):822-829.
[40]
Keys PW, Galaz V, Dyer M, Matthews N, Folke C, Nyström M, et al. Anthropocene risk. Nat Sustain 2019; 2(8):667-673.
[41]
Miller SJ, Dee LE, Hayden MT, Jarrett U, Carrico AR, Brauman KA, et al. Telecoupled systems are rewired by risks. Nat Sustain 2024; 7(3):247-254.
[42]
Logan TM, Guikema SD. Reframing resilience: equitable access to essential services. Risk Anal 2020; 40(8):1538-1553.
[43]
Cheng Z, Ouyang M, Du C, Hong L, Wang H. Boundary effects on road network vulnerability in cities. Cities 2024; 154:105321.
[44]
Dong L, Duarte F, Duranton G, Santi P, Barthelemy M, Batty M, et al. Defining a city-delineating urban areas using cell-phone data. Nature Cities 2024; 1(2):117-125.
[45]
Jean N, Burke M, Xie M, Davis WM, Lobell DB, Ermon S. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science 2016; 353(6301):790-794.
[46]
Barreras F, Watts DJ. The exciting potential and daunting challenge of using GPS human-mobility data for epidemic modeling. Nat Comput Sci 2024; 4(6):398-411.
[47]
Levin R, Chao DL, Wenger EA, Proctor JL. Insights into population behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic from cell phone mobility data and manifold learning. Nat Comput Sci 2021; 1(9):588-597.
[48]
Bakshy E, Messing S, Adamic LA. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 2015; 348(6239):1130-1132.
[49]
Burke M, Driscoll A, Lobell DB, Ermon S. Using satellite imagery to understand and promote sustainable development. Science 2021; 371(6535):eabe8628.
[50]
Eakin H, Bojórquez-Tapia LA, Janssen MA, Georgescu M, Manuel-Navarrete D, Vivoni ER, et al. Urban resilience efforts must consider social and political forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017; 114(2):186-189.
[51]
Tullos D. How to achieve better flood-risk governance in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018; 115(15):3731-3734.
[52]
Khatri A. Message to mayors: cities need nature. Nature 2022; 601(7893):299.
[53]
Völker B. Disaster recovery via social capital. Nat Sustain 2021; 5(2):96-97.
[54]
Hino M, Nance E. Five ways to ensure flood-risk research helps the most vulnerable. Nature 2021; 595(7865):27-29.
[55]
Michel-Kerjan E. We must build resilience into our communities. Nature 2015; 524(7566):389.
[56]
Tupper AC, Fearnley CJ. Disaster early-warning systems can succeed—but collective action is needed. Nature 2023; 623(7987):478-482.
[57]
Mervis J. DOE lab would probe climate effects on poor communities. Science 2023; 380(6650):1095.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(644 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/