Resilience Models for Tunnel Recovery After Earthquakes

Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (11) : 320 -345. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2025.06.028

Article

Author information +

History +

Received	Accepted	Published
2024-09-13	2025-06-23	2025-06-27
Issue Date	Revised Date
2025-06-27	2025-05-05

PDF (10664KB)

Abstract

Tunnels are a crucial component of urban infrastructure, continuously exposed to various hazards, threats, and stressors. Events such as earthquakes, fires, and floods, along with aging and construction-related disturbances, pose significant challenges to tunnel resilience. Reliable fragility, restoration, and traffic reinstatement models are essential for assessing and quantifying resilience, as they allow infrastructure operators to prioritize maintenance and adapt to evolving threats in complex transportation systems. Although the vulnerability and fragility of tunnels have been widely researched over the last decade, studies focusing on tunnel restoration to quantify resilience remain scarce. This gap prevents operators from implementing proactive and reactive adaptation measures to ensure seamless tunnel functionality. To address this issue, this study presents a novel, fit-for-purpose, damage-level-dependent probabilistic approach for quantifying tunnel recovery. It introduces the first realistic, practice-led restoration models that enable resilience quantification in tunnels. To develop these models, a global expert survey was conducted to establish reinstatement (traffic capacity) and restoration (structural capacity) models tailored to tunnel resilience assessments. A detailed questionnaire was designed to gather expert input on required restoration tasks, their duration, sequencing, and cost. The survey focused primarily on damage induced by seismic events, incorporating idle times and traffic capacity gains over time. The results were then used to generate deterministic and probabilistic reinstatement and restoration models. The deterministic models are intended for practical applications, while the probabilistic models account for epistemic uncertainties and are presented in a reproducible format for further development across different hazards and applications. A case study is included to demonstrate the resilience assessment of a typical tunnel using the newly developed restoration models. The findings will help infrastructure operators and city planners to accurately assess tunnel resilience, enabling informed investment decisions.

Keywords

Tunnel / Resilience assessment / Expert opinion survey / Restoration model / Functionality loss

Highlight

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Zhong-Kai Huang, Nian-Chen Zeng, Dong-Mei Zhang, Sotirios Argyroudis, Stergios-Aristoteles Mitoulis. Resilience Models for Tunnel Recovery After Earthquakes. Engineering, 2025, 54(11): 320-345 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2025.06.028

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Sterling RL.Advances in underground construction help provide quality of life for modern societies.Engineering 2017; 3(6):780-781.

[2]	Zhao Y, Li PF.A Statistical analysis of China’s traffic tunnel development data.Engineering 2018; 4(1):3-5.

[3]	Meguid MA, Saada O, Nunes MA, Mattar J.Physical modeling of tunnels in soft ground: a review.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2008; 23(2):185-198.

[4]	Qian QH.Present state, problems and development trends of urban underground space in China.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2016; 55:280-289.

[5]	Mandal T, Rao KR, Tiwari G.Evacuation of metro stations: a review.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 140:105304.

[6]	Koks EE, Rozenberg J, Zorn C, Tariverdi M, Vousdoukas M, Fraser SA, et al.A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets.Nat Commun 2019; 10(1):2677.

[7]	Pescaroli G, Alexander D.Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters.Nat Hazards 2016; 82(1):175-192.

[8]	Padgett JE, Panakkal P, González-Dueñas C.Infrastructure impacts and vulnerability to coastal flood events.S. Brody, Y. Lee, B. Kothuis (Eds.), Coastal flood risk reduction, Elsevier, Amsterdam 2022; 151-165.

[9]	Padgett J, DesRoches R, Nielson B, Yashinsky M, Kwon OS, Burdette N, et al.Bridge damage and repair costs from Hurricane Katrina.J Bridge Eng 2008; 13(1):6-14.

[10]	Ozcan AK, Gokceoglu C.Statistical assessment of geological and geomorphological factors on building damages caused by the February 6, 2023 earthquakes in the Amanos region of Türkiye.Nat Hazards Rev 2025; 26(1):04024052.

[11]	Galasso C, Opabola EA.The 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence: finding a path to a more resilient, sustainable, and equitable society.Commun Eng 2024; 3(1):24.

[12]	Apostolaki S, Karahan S, Riga E, Tsinidis G, Gokceoglu C, Pitilakis K.Seismic performance of tunnels and verification of available seismic risk models for the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2025; 156:106185.

[13]	Wang WL, Wang TT, Su JJ, Lin CH, Seng CR, Huang TH.Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2001; 16(3):133-150.

[14]	Wang TT, Kwok OLA, Jeng FS.Seismic response of tunnels revealed in two decades following the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake (Mw 7.6) in Taiwan: a review.Eng Geol 2021; 287:106090.

[15]	Callisto L, Ricci C.Interpretation and back-analysis of the damage observed in a deep tunnel after the 2016 Norcia earthquake in Italy.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2019; 89:238-248.

[16]	Carter MR, Howard MP, Owens N, Register D, Kennedy J, Pecheux K, et al.Effects of catastrophic events on transportation system management and operations.Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation; 2002.

[17]	Li YZ, Ingason H.Overview of research on fire safety in underground road and railway tunnels.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2018; 81:568-589.

[18]	Hong H.The progress and controlling situation of Daegu subway fire disaster.In: Proceedings of the Sixth Asia–Oceania Symposium on Fire Science and Technology, 2004 Mar 17–20, Daegu, Korea. Seoul: Korean Institute of Fire Science & Engineering; 2004. p. 28–46.

[19]	Sun ML, Liang HW, Zhu YQ, Gao XQ, Liu H, Zhu ZG.Deformation and failure mode analysis of the tunnel structure based on the tunnel-related landslides cases.Front Earth Sci 2022; 10:906884.

[20]	Sosa EM, Thompson GJ, Barbero EJ.Testing of full-scale inflatable plug for flood mitigation in tunnels.Transp Res Rec 2014; 2407(1):59-67.

[21]	Yang H, Zhao L, Chen J.Metro system inundation in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.Sustainability 2022; 14(15):9292.

[22]	Cheng R, Chen W, Hao H, Li J.A state-of-the-art review of road tunnel subjected to blast loads.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2021; 112:103911.

[23]	Colglazier W.Sustainable development agenda: 2030.Science 2015; 349(6252):1048-1050.

[24]	Opabola EA, Galasso C.Informing disaster-risk management policies for education infrastructure using scenario-based recovery analyses.Nat Commun 2024; 15(1):325.

[25]	Linkov I, Bridges T, Creutzig F, Decker J, Fox-Lent C, Kröger W, et al.Changing the resilience paradigm.Nat Clim Chang 2014; 4(6):407-409.

[26]	Achillopoulou DV, Mitoulis SA, Argyroudis SA, Wang Y.Monitoring of transport infrastructure exposed to multiple hazards: a roadmap for building resilience.Sci Total Environ 2020; 746:141001.

[27]	Blockley D, Agarwal J, Godfrey P.Infrastructure resilience for high-impact low-chance risks.Proc Inst Civ Eng Civ Eng 2012; 165(6):13-19.

[28]	Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M.Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience.Eng Struct 2010; 32(11):3639-3649.

[29]	Psyrras NK, Sextos AG.Safety of buried steel natural gas pipelines under earthquake-induced ground shaking: a review.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2018; 106:254-277.

[30]

Kopiika N, Mitoulis SA, Ninic J.Resilience framework for aged bridges subjected to human-induced hazard-case study in Ukraine.In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Coordinating Engineering for Sustainability and Resilience, 2024 May 29–31, Timișoara, Romania. Cham: Springer Nature; 2024. p. 50–62.

[31]	Cimellaro GP, Renschler C, Reinhorn AM, Arendt L.PEOPLES: a framework for evaluating resilience.J Struct Eng 2016; 142(10):04016063.

[32]	Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, Lee GC, O TD’Rourke, Reinhorn AM, et al.A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.Earthq Spectra 2003; 19(4):733-752.

[33]	Argyroudis SA, Mitoulis SA, Hofer L, Zanini MA, Tubaldi E, Frangopol DM.Resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure in a multi-hazard environment: case study on transport assets.Sci Total Environ 2020; 714:136854.

[34]	Mitoulis SA, Argyroudis SA, Loli M, Imam B.Restoration models for quantifying flood resilience of bridges.Eng Struct 2021; 238:112180.

[35]	Argyroudis SA.Resilience metrics for transport networks: a review and practical examples for bridges.Proc Inst Civ Eng-Bridge Eng 2022; 175(3):179-192.

[36]	Chen X, Shen J, Bao X, Wu X, Tang W, Cui H.A review of seismic resilience of shield tunnels.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 136:105075.

[37]	Makhoul N, Roohi M, van JWde Lindt, Sousa H, Santos LO, Argyroudis S, et al.Seismic resilience of interdependent built environment for integrating structural health monitoring and emerging technologies in decision-making.Struct Eng Int 2024; 34(1):19-33.

[38]	Orlacchio M, Chioccarelli E, Iervolino I.State-dependent fragility functions for Italian building classes.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2024; 182:108685.

[39]	Rincon R, Padgett JE.Fragility modeling practices and their implications on risk and resilience analysis: from the structure to the network scale.Earthq Spectra 2024; 40(1):647-673.

[40]	Argyroudis SA, Mitoulis SA, Winter MG, Kaynia AM.Fragility of transport assets exposed to multiple hazards: state-of-the-art review toward infrastructural resilience.Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2019; 191:106567.

[41]	Silva V, Akkar S, Baker J, Bazzurro P, Castro JM, Crowley H, et al.Current challenges and future trends in analytical fragility and vulnerability modeling.Earthq Spectra 2019; 35(4):1927-1952.

[42]	Long X, Ma Y, Miao Y, Ye L, Zhou W.Longitudinal seismic fragility analysis of long tunnels under multiple support excitation.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2023; 164:107608.

[43]	Stefanidou SP, Kappos AJ.Bridge-specific fragility analysis: when is it really necessary?.Bull Earthq Eng 2019; 17(4):2245-2280.

[44]	Wilson G, Wilson TM, Deligne NI, Blake DM, Cole JW.Framework for developing volcanic fragility and vulnerability functions for critical infrastructure.J Appl Volcanol 2017; 6(1):14.

[45]	Dong Z, Kuo C, Yin J, Wen S, Liu G, Gou Y.Examination of longitudinal seismic vulnerability of shield tunnels utilizing incremental dynamic analysis.Front Earth Sci 2021; 9:779879.

[46]	Huang ZK, Pitilakis K, Tsinidis G, Argyroudis S, Zhang DM.Seismic vulnerability of circular tunnels in soft soil deposits: the case of Shanghai metropolitan system.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2020; 98:103341.

[47]	Nguyen DD, Park D, Shamsher S, Nguyen VQ, Lee TH.Seismic vulnerability assessment of rectangular cut-and-cover subway tunnels.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2019; 86:247-261.

[48]	Kazemi F, Asgarkhani N, Jankowski R.Machine learning-based seismic fragility and seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete structures.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2023; 166:107761.

[49]	Amorosi A, Boldini D.Numerical modelling of the transverse dynamic behaviour of circular tunnels in clayey soils.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2009; 29(6):1059-1072.

[50]	Cabangon LT, Elia G, Rouainia M.Modelling the transverse behaviour of circular tunnels in structured clayey soils during earthquakes.Acta Geotech 2019; 14(1):163-178.

[51]	Li P, Song EX.Three-dimensional numerical analysis for the longitudinal seismic response of tunnels under an asynchronous wave input.Comput Geotech 2015; 63:229-243.

[52]	Liu C, Peng Z, Cui J, Huang X, Li Y, Chen W.Development of crack and damage in shield tunnel lining under seismic loading: refined 3D finite element modeling and analyses.Thin-walled Struct 2023; 185:110647.

[53]	Tsinidis G.Response of urban single and twin circular tunnels subjected to transversal ground seismic shaking.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2018; 76:177-193.

[54]	Duan Y, Zhao M, Huang J, Li H, Du X.Analytical solution for circular tunnel under obliquely incident P waves considering different contact conditions.Shock Vib 2021; 2021(1):1-23.

[55]	Li H, Zhao M, Huang J, Lia W, Zhao X, Du X.Simplified analytical solutions for deep tunnels subjected to vertically incident shear wave with arbitrary vibration direction.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2022; 156:107245.

[56]	Li H, Zhou N, Huang J, Zhao M, Liao W, Zhao X, et al.Analytical solution of longitudinal seismic response of circular tunnel across soil–rock stratum based on improved elastic foundation beam model.Comput Geotech 2023; 159:105383.

[57]	Zhao W, Gao H, Chen W, Xie P.Analytical study on seismic response of subsea tunnels in a multi-layered seabed subjected to P- and SV-waves.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 134:105015.

[58]	Chen Z, Bian M.Dynamic centrifuge test and numerical modelling of the seismic response of the tunnel in cohesive soil foundation.Buildings 2022; 12(3):337.

[59]	Moghadam MR, Baziar MH.Seismic ground motion amplification pattern induced by a subway tunnel: shaking table testing and numerical simulation.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2016; 83:81-97.

[60]	Zhang S, Yuan Y, Yang Y, Li C, Yu H.Experimental investigation of seismic performance of segmental tunnel with secondary lining under strong earthquake.Structures 2024; 60:105833.

[61]	Hu H, Qiu WG.Study on earthquake damage characteristic on mountain tunnel and analysis.Appl Mech Mater 2011; 94:1078-1081.

[62]	Shen Y, Gao B, Yang X, Tao S.Seismic damage mechanism and dynamic deformation characteristic analysis of mountain tunnel after Wenchuan earthquake.Eng Geol 2014; 180:85-98.

[63]	Huang Z.Resilience evaluation of shallow circular tunnels subjected to earthquakes using fragility functions.Appl Sci 2022; 12(9):4728.

[64]	Huang Z, Zhang D, Pitilakis K, Tsinidis G, Huang H, Zhang D, et al.Resilience assessment of tunnels: framework and application for tunnels in alluvial deposits exposed to seismic hazard.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2022; 162:107456.

[65]	Xu C, Hu H, Wang H.A theoretical study on the resilience evaluation method of operational road tunnel systems.Appl Sci 2023; 13(24):13279.

[66]	Anwar GA, Dong Y.Seismic resilience of retrofitted RC buildings.Earthq Eng Eng Vib 2020; 19(3):561-571.

[67]	Biondini F, Camnasio E, Titi A.Seismic resilience of concrete structures under corrosion.Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2015; 44(14):2445-2466.

[68]	Shang Q, Wang T, Li J.A quantitative framework to evaluate the seismic resilience of hospital systems.J Earthq Eng 2022; 26(7):3364-3388.

[69]	Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M.Seismic resilience of a hospital system.Struct Infrastruct Eng 2010; 6(1–2):127-144.

[70]	Zhou Y, Wu H, Gu AQ.Earthquake engineering: from earthquake resistance, energy dissipation, and isolation, to resilience.Eng Mech 2019; 36(6):1-12.

[71]	Dec Aò, Bocchini P, Frangopol DM.A probabilistic approach for the prediction of seismic resilience of bridges.Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2013; 42(10):1469-1487.

[72]	Misra S, Padgett JE, Barbosa AR, Webb BM.An expert opinion survey on post-hazard restoration of roadways and bridges: data and key insights.Earthq Spectra 2020; 36(2):983-1004.

[73]	Gidaris I, Padgett JE, Barbosa AR, Chen S, Cox D, Webb B, et al.Multiple-hazard fragility and restoration models of highway bridges for regional risk and resilience assessment in the United States: state-of-the-art review.J Struct Eng 2017; 143(3):04016188.

[74]	Bocchini P, Deco A, Frangopol DM.Probabilistic functionality recovery model for resilience analysis.In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability (IABMAS) Conference, 2012 Jul 8–12, Stresa, Italy. London: CRC Press; 2012. p. 1920–7.

[75]	Bocchini P, Frangopol DM.Optimal resilience-and cost-based postdisaster intervention prioritization for bridges along a highway segment.J Bridge Eng 2012; 17(1):117-129.

[76]	Padgett JE, DesRoches R.Bridge functionality relationships for improved seismic risk assessment of transportation networks.Earthq Spectra 2007; 23(1):115-130.

[77]	Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS).Hazus 4.2 S P3: Hazus earthquake model technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA-NIB S; 2020.

[78]	Tubaldi E, Macorini L, Izzuddin BA, Manes C, Laio F.A framework for probabilistic assessment of clear-water scour around bridge piers.Struct Saf 2017; 69:11-22.

[79]	G B50157–2013: Code for design of metro.Chinese standard.Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China; 2013. Chinese.

[80]	Tsinidis G, Karatzetzou A, Stefanidou S.On the effects of salient parameters for an efficient assessment of seismic response and fragility of circular tunnels in clayey deposits.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2024; 178:108490.

[81]	Cabangon LT, Elia G, Rouainia M, Keawsawasvong S, Ornthammarath T.Seismic vulnerability of shallow tunnels subjected to far-field long-period ground motions.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2024; 176:108313.

[82]	Mair RJ.Tunnelling and geotechnics: new horizons.Geotechnique 2008; 58(9):695-736.

[83]	Pinto F, Whittle AJ.Ground movements due to shallow tunnels in soft ground. I: analytical solutions.J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2014; 140(4):04013040.

[84]	Huang HW, Zhang DM.Resilience analysis of shield tunnel lining under extreme surcharge: characterization and field application.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2016; 51:301-312.

[85]	British Tunnelling Society; Institution of Civil Engineers.Tunnel lining design guide.London: Thomas Telford Publishing; 2004.

[86]	DG J08-11-99: Shanghai foundation design code.Chinese standard.Shanghai: Shanghai Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban-Rural Development; 2013. Chinese.

[87]	Argyroudis SA, Pitilakis KD.Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2012; 35:1-12.

[88]	Le TS, Huh J, Park JH.Earthquake fragility assessment of the underground tunnel using an efficient SSI analysis approach.Z Angew Math Phys 2014; 2(12):1073.

[89]	Jamshidi M Avanaki, Hoseini A, Vahdani S, de CSantos, de Ala Fuente.Seismic fragility curves for vulnerability assessment of steel fiber reinforced concrete segmental tunnel linings.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2018; 78:259-274.

[90]	Argyroudis S, Tsinidis G, Gatti F, Pitilakis K.Effects of SSI and lining corrosion on the seismic vulnerability of shallow circular tunnels.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2017; 98:244-256.

[91]	Huang G, Qiu W, Zhang J.Modelling seismic fragility of a rock mountain tunnel based on support vector machine.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2017; 102:160-171.

[92]	Reddy AD, Singh A.A new post-seismic damage classification for rock tunnels based on analysis of 26 global earthquakes.Geotech Geol Eng 2024; 42(8):6997-7023.

[93]	Reddy AD, Singh A.A simplistic method for assessing seismic damage in rock tunnels before earthquake: part 1: damage prediction and validation using seismic damage classification of tunnels.Rock Mech Rock Eng 2024; 57(8):11001-11032.

[94]	Zhang D, Zhai W, Huang H, Chapman D.Robust retrofitting design for rehabilitation of segmental tunnel linings: using the example of steel plates.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2019; 83:231-242.

[95]	Zhang D, Liu Z, Wang R, Zhang D.Influence of grouting on rehabilitation of an over-deformed operating shield tunnel lining in soft clay.Acta Geotech 2019; 14(4):1227-1247.

[96]	Kunita M, Takemata R, Iai Y.Restoration of a tunnel damaged by earthquake.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 1994; 9(4):439-448.

[97]	Jiang Y, Wang L, Zhang B, Dai X, Ye J, Sun B, et al.Tunnel lining detection and retrofitting.Autom Construct 2023; 152:104881.

[98]	Zhang DM, Zhang DM, Soga K, Huang HW, Wang F.Rehabilitation of overdeformed metro tunnel in Shanghai by multiple repair measures.J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2019; 145(11):04019101.

[99]	Tang Y, Zhu Z, Ba Z, Lee VW, Gong W.Running safety assessment of trains considering post-earthquake damage state of bridge–track system.Eng Struct 2023; 287:116187.

[100]

Wang H, Xiao J, Li S, Zhai C.Resilience assessment and optimization method of city road network in the post-earthquake emergency period.Earthq Eng Eng Vib 2024; 23(5):765-779.

[101]

Wu S, Wu Z, Zhang C.Rock burst prediction probability model based on case analysis.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2019; 93:103069.

[102]

Karamlou A, Bocchini P.Functionality-fragility surfaces.Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2017; 46(10):1687-1709.

[103]

El AK Haj, Soubra AH, Fajoui J.Probabilistic analysis of an offshore monopile foundation taking into account the soil spatial variability.Comput Geotech 2019; 106:205-216.

[104]

Chen Y, Liu W, Ai D, Zhu H, Du Y.Probabilistic reliability assessment method for max ground settlement prediction of subway tunnel under uncertain construction information.Comput Geotech 2025; 177:106805.

[105]

Zhang H, Wu Y, Yang S.Probabilistic analysis of tunnel convergence in spatially variable soil based on Gaussian process regression.Eng Appl Artif Intell 2024; 131:107840.

[106]

Zou Y, Zhang Y, Liu H, Liu H, Miao Y.Performance-based seismic assessment of shield tunnels by incorporating a nonlinear pseudostatic analysis approach for the soil–tunnel interaction.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2021; 114:103981.

[107]

Argyroudis SA, Nasiopoulos G, Mantadakis N, Mitoulis SA.Cost-based resilience assessment of bridges subjected to earthquakes.Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ 2021; 12(2):209-222.

[108]

Pang Y, Wang X.Cloud–IDA–MSA conversion of fragility curves for efficient and high-fidelity resilience assessment.J Struct Eng 2021; 147(5):04021049.

[109]

Zhou L, Alam MS, Dong Y, Feng R.Seismic resilience assessment of extended pile shaft supported coastal bridges considering scour and uniform corrosion effects.Eng Struct 2024; 304:117643.

[110]

Gonzalez C, Niño M, Jaimes MA.Event-based assessment of seismic resilience in Mexican school buildings.Bull Earthq Eng 2020; 18(14):6313-6336.

[111]

Reed DA, Kapur KC, Christie RD.Methodology for assessing the resilience of networked infrastructure.IEEE Syst J 2009; 3(2):174-180.

[112]

Samadian D, Ghafory-Ashtiany M, Naderpour H, Eghbali M.Seismic resilience evaluation based on vulnerability curves for existing and retrofitted typical RC school buildings.Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2019; 127:105844.

[113]

Trump BD, Mitoulis S, Argyroudis S, Kiker G, Palma-Oliveira J, Horton R, et al.Threat-agnostic resilience: Framing and applications.Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2025; 124:105535.

[114]

Sun J, Bathgate K, Zhang Z.Bayesian network-based resilience assessment of interdependent infrastructure systems under optimal resource allocation strategies.Resil Cities Struct 2024; 3(2):46-56.

[115]

Roohi M, Ghasemi S, Sediek O, Jeon H, van JWde Lindt, Shields M, et al.Multi-disciplinary seismic resilience modeling for developing mitigation policies and recovery planning.Resil Cities Struct 2024; 3(2):66-84.

[116]

Gogate NG, Shelake AG, Band P.Selection of most significant risk factors for Indian tunnel projects: an integrated fuzzy-based MCDM approach.Int J Constr Manag 2024; 24(2):161-176.

[117]

Han K, Zhang D, Chen X, Su D, Ju JWW, Lin XT, et al.A resilience assessment framework for existing underground structures under adjacent construction disturbance.Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 141:105339.

[118]

Coussement K, Benoit DF, Antioco M.A Bayesian approach for incorporating expert opinions into decision support systems: a case study of online consumer-satisfaction detection.Decis Support Syst 2015; 79:24-32.

[119]

Fan M, Liu Y, Liu K, Zhang C, Li Y, Liu X, et al.Constructing a resilience assessment index system for tuberculosis healthcare services under public health emergencies: a modified Delphi study.Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2025; 18:1057-1067.