Enhancing Safety in Aquaculture with Nanostructures: Hazard Detection and Elimination

Qingsong Zhang , Xilong Wang , Li Lian Wong , Shikai Liu , Ming Li , Guoqing Wang

Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (3) : 273 -290.

PDF (6621KB)
Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (3) :273 -290. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.044
Research
research-article
Enhancing Safety in Aquaculture with Nanostructures: Hazard Detection and Elimination
Author information +
History +
PDF (6621KB)

Abstract

Aquatic products play a crucial role in fulfilling the growing demand of the world’s population for food and provide essential health benefits owing to their high protein and omega-3 fatty acid concentrations that are often lacking in land-based diets. The rapid expansion of aquaculture as a burgeoning food production system has resulted in considerable food safety challenges, particularly concerning the presence of intrinsic toxins (e.g., marine toxins), environmental pollutants (e.g., heavy metals, microplastics, and pathogens), and regulatory issues. Notably, China’s maritime renaissance, which is reshaping the nation’s approach to food security and dietary structures, necessitates urgent solutions owing to its impact on one-fifth of the global population. In response to these pressing challenges, nanostructures have recently been investigated as promising tools for the detection and elimination of hazardous contaminants in aquaculture. Because of their large surface areas and adjustable physicochemical properties, nanostructures can be engineered with antibodies, aptamers, and functional ligands to function as indicators, signal amplifiers, photocatalysts, and separation tools across a wide range of targeted applications. This review presents the latest advancements in the application of nanostructures for safeguarding aquacultural environments and food products. It begins with an overview of aquacultural safety challenges and currently established solutions, followed by a comprehensive analysis of how diverse nanostructures are being utilized for the detection and elimination of hazardous substances from aquacultural systems and products. The review also presents a discussion on the integration of nanostructures into existing aquaculture practices, emphasizing the potential of nanostructures in revolutionizing hazard management by providing rapid, sensitive, and sustainable solutions. Finally, future perspectives on the integration of nanostructures for enhancing aquaculture safety are presented. By addressing both current challenges and future directions, this review underscores the transformative impact of nanostructures in fostering safer and more sustainable aquaculture, contributing to the advancement of global food security.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Aquatic food safety / Aquaculture / Nanostructures / Pathogen / Microplastics / Marine toxins detection / Elimination

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qingsong Zhang, Xilong Wang, Li Lian Wong, Shikai Liu, Ming Li, Guoqing Wang. Enhancing Safety in Aquaculture with Nanostructures: Hazard Detection and Elimination. Engineering, 2026, 58 (3) : 273-290 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.044

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Introduction

Aquatic products, including fish, shellfish, and aquatic plants, have played a pivotal role in culinary traditions and global food systems because of their nutrient profile and economic significance [1,2]. As the demand for protein and other nutritional components (e.g., omega-3 fatty acids) continues to surge with population growth, aquaculture’s steady supply of nutritious seafood is becoming crucial for food security and sustainable development [3,4]. Although practiced for over 2000 years, aquaculture has recently been transformed through emerging technologies in precise farming and productivity enhancement [5-8]. Recirculating aquaculture systems provide controlled environments for optimal fish growth and enable water conservation [9,10]. Big data and sensor technologies have been employed to monitor shrimp health, behavior, and growth, considerably enhancing farming productivity [11].

With the rapid growth of the production and consumption of aquatic products, ensuring the safety of aquaculture environments and foods remains challenging. Aquaculture systems are vulnerable to contamination with marine toxins, heavy metals, microplastics, and pathogenic bacteria. These contaminants enter the food chain through industrial runoff, improper waste disposal, and bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms [12]. Aquaculture products are at a greater risk of contamination than products from open seas (Fig. 1) [13]. Environmental pollution and improper handling along the supply chain pose significant risks to consumer health and industry sustainability [14]. Some shellfish contain intrinsic biological toxins and Vibrio marinopraesens, requiring careful handling [15,16]. Aquaculture environmental pollution approaches a tipping point as industrial wastewater containing contaminants enters aquaculture areas through rivers and runoff [17]. These hazards accumulate in aquatic organisms through ingestion and the food chain [18]. Additionally, aquatic products can be contaminated by microplastics during processing, storage, and packaging, potentially becoming breeding grounds for disease. Recent foodborne illness outbreaks from tainted products highlight the need for effective safety strategies.

Microplastics and heavy metals released from industrial and human activities enter rivers, lakes, and oceans, where they are accumulated in aquatic organisms and subsequently enter the human body through the food chain. Aquatic products can be contaminated with pathogens during farming, transportation, and processing, posing a risk to human health. Marine toxins produced by bacteria and harmful algal blooms accumulate in seafood such as shellfish and fish, which can cause food poisoning.

Monitoring and prevention of hazards such as marine toxins, heavy metals, microplastics, and pathogens from aquatic environments represent effective solutions to mitigate intoxication outbreaks [19]. Currently, major shortcomings exist in the detection and removal of hazards in aquatic products [20]. Most conventional detection methods for hazardous substances require complicated instrumentation and long-time tests, including inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and atomic absorption spectroscopy [21,22]. Marine toxin detection methods such as mouse-based bioassays and liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection have low specificity and high costs [23]. For pathogen detection, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requires skilled operators [24]. Microplastics are widely detected in aquatic products because these are ingested by aquatic organisms [25,26]. Conventional microscopic analysis cannot detect tiny plastic particles (e.g., nanoplastics) [27], necessitating simple methods for detection and removal [28,29]. This is crucial for China’s maritime renaissance, affecting one-fifth of world’s population [30], where over 80% of aquatic products come from aquaculture [31].

Addressing global food safety challenges requires innovative approaches combining advanced technologies with sound regulatory frameworks. Nanotechnology has emerged as a promising frontier for enhancing hazard detection and separation in aquaculture environments and products [32]. Nanostructures with unique physicochemical properties serve as a bridge between molecular- and nanoscale-hazards and macroscale sensors and absorbents [33-36]. Nanostructures have potential for timely detection, prevention, and removal of contaminants and pathogens from aquaculture environments. Their tiny sizes and large surface areas facilitate hazard recognition and binding. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) can be used as signal transducers for recognition events in optical and electrochemical sensing, enabling sensitive detection at low concentrations [37-40]. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have large surface areas and good adsorption capacities, which make them excellent adsorbents [41]. Surface modification provides nanostructures selectivity and stability against environmental factors, essential for practical applications [42]. Biocompatible nanostructures are increasingly used in contaminant detection and separation to avoid environmental concerns. For instance, biodegradable zein nanoparticles encapsulating eugenol and garlic essential oils have been developed as antimicrobial agents to prevent fish diseases, replacing potentially toxic silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) [43].

Advancements in the synthesis, characterization, and applications of nanostructures hold immense potential for safeguarding public health and for promoting the sustainability and competitiveness of the aquaculture and fisheries sectors. This review highlights the status of safety issues in aquatic products, revealing the multifaceted challenges persisting in the aquaculture industry. Subsequently, the collection of innovative investigations showcases the potential of nanostructure-based approaches for detecting and separating hazards from aquatic environments and products (Fig. 2). The groundbreaking utilization of engineered nanostructures to detect and quantify some of the most common hazardous substances, including marine toxins, heavy metals, microplastics, and pathogens, suggests potential in safeguarding the last line of defense for aquatic product safety. This review highlights the potential of nanostructures to revolutionize the aquaculture industry and contribute to a safer, more sustainable future for global food production.

2. Marine toxins

Toxins in aquatic environments are produced by bacteria, cyanobacteria, and microalgae, with shellfish and finfish as vectors [44]. The bioaccumulation of these marine toxins can cause widespread mortality among fish and shellfish, threatening human health through contaminated seafood consumption [45]. Paralytic shellfish poisoning by saxitoxin (STX) causes acute symptoms within 30 min, potentially leading to cardiovascular shock or respiratory paralysis [46]. The Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) recommends a limit of 800 μg STX equivalents per kilogram of shellfish flesh [47]. Okadaic acid (OA) ingestion causes gastrointestinal symptoms, including vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain [48]. The European Union (EU) allows maximum contamination of 160 μg OA equivalents per kilogram of shellfish flesh (Table 1) [49]. Brevetoxin (BTX) causes neurotoxic poisoning with gastrointestinal, neurological, and cardiovascular symptoms [50]. The CAC applies a threshold of 800 µg BTX-2 equivalents per kilogram of shellfish flesh (Table 1) [51]. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) causes dizziness and muscle weakness, with the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) applying a threshold of 44 µg TTX equivalents per kilogram shellfish flesh, and a dose of 0.5-3.0 mg of TTX can even be lethal for an adult (Table 1) [52]. Overall, monitoring marine toxins originating from aquatic environments and food is crucial for safeguarding aquatic organisms and ensuring aquatic food safety (Table 2 [41,48,53-56]).

Methods established to detect marine toxins include high-performance liquid chromatography [57], liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [58], and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [59]. Although these methods show good sensitivity and accuracy, they require complex operation, expensive equipment, and long test times. Because of the need for seafood safety, rapid on-site determination is required, even with reduced reproducibility. Nanostructures enable simple and rapid toxin detection owing to their reactivity and signaling capability [41]. Lai et al. [53] developed a colorimetric immunoassay using AuNPs tagged with glucose oxidase (GOx) and anti-BTX B antibodies for BTX B detection, using magnetic beads (MBs) (Fig. 3(a)). BTX B competed with a BTX-bovine serum albumin (BSA) conjugate that bridges the AuNPs tagged with anti-BTX antibody and GOx. After magnetic separation, unreacted complexes were introduced into an Ag(I)-3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) system. GOx catalyzed H2O2 production from glucose, converting SO32- to SO42-, releasing Ag+ from Ag2SO3 to react with TMB, producing blue color. Higher BTX concentration resulted in fewer antibodies binding to BTX-BSA conjugates on MBs. The optical signal intensity was inversely proportional to BTX concentration. The immunoassay showed a 0.1 parts per trillion (ppt) detection limit, with test results correlating to a BTX ELISA kit.

The colorimetric assay approach has limitations. The human eye shows low sensitivity to subtle color changes [60], and background color can interfere with detection accuracy. Fluorescence provides higher sensitivity and less interference with background color, which is suitable for toxin detection. Dou et al. [41] combined zirconium-based nanoscale MOFs (NMOFs) with two different aptamers to develop fluorescence-based NMOF-aptasensors 1 and 2 for the detection of STX and TTX, respectively. In this study, two zirconium-based NMOFs were constructed with Zr6 clusters as metal nodes, using 4,4′-(1,2-diphenylethene-1,2-diyl)dibenzoic acid and 1,2,4,5-tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl) benzene as their organic ligands, respectively. NMOF 1 and NMOF 2 emitted bright green and blue fluorescence originating from their ligands, respectively. The STX-aptamer and TTX-aptamer, tagged with tetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA), emitted red fluorescence under ultraviolet (UV)-visible light. When aptamers were anchored onto NMOFs, the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) was weak. Adding STX or TTX caused aptamers to bind targets and adopt specific configurations, enhancing the FRET effect (Fig. 3(b)). The enhanced FRET effect produced visible color changes under 350 nm-light: NMOF-aptasensor 1 shifted from yellow-green to orange, and NMOF-aptasensor 2 from purple to orange. This strategy enabled the detection of the marine toxins STX and TTX with detection limits of 1.2 (0.35 parts per billion (ppb)) and 3.1 mol∙L-1 (0.98 ppb), respectively). Testing in shellfish samples showed average recovery rates of 84.79% to 103.31%, with acceptable repeatability and precision. This research advances the combination of nucleic acid aptamers with nanostructures for toxin detection.

Aptamers such as single-stranded DNA or RNA have become popular recognition moieties owing to their stability, low cost, and comparable affinity with antibodies [61,62]. Combining aptamer recognition and nanostructures for signal transduction has created a platform for marine toxin detection. Zhao et al. [54] developed a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based aptameric nano swab sensor for OA through enhanced plasmon coupling. By packing AuNPs on a paper swab via chemical reduction and depositing three dimensional succulent-like silver particles (3D-SS), they created an effective SERS substrate. The electromagnetic field between the Au layer and 3D-SS particles amplified the SERS signal. The AuNP assembly generates first-stage enhancement through interparticle coupling, whereas 3D-SS particles provide second-stage amplification through an expanded surface area and lightning rod effect. An aptamer against OA was equipped on the bilayer interface, forming a sandwich with Ag nano-octahedral-tagged complementary DNA labeled with sulfo-cyanine3 (Cy3), providing third-phase enhancement (Fig. 3(c)). The aptamer complexes with OA and releases the tagged DNA in a turn-off assay. This multi-fold signal boost achieved sensitivity with a detection limit of 0.3 ng∙mL-1. Testing OA in Saxidomus purpuratus, Mytilus edulis, and Alectryonella plicatula yielded recovery rates of 94.2%-94.8%, 91.9%-106.4%, and 97.3%-104.3%, respectively, demonstrating the assay’s sensitivity and accuracy.

Ramalingam et al. [48] designed an electrochemical microfluidic biosensor chip for OA detection. The system consisted of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic chip with a screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE). The SPCE was modified by graphene-AuNP composite material and an OA-specific aptamer, using a ferro/ferricyanide redox probe for label-free electrochemical sensing. The interaction between the aptamer and OA caused changes in charge transfer, with higher OA concentrations decreasing the current output owing to the repulsion between the negatively charged redox probe [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- and aptamer sequence. However, the opposite occurred at lower concentrations (Fig. 3(d)). This method enables OA quantification based on electrical signals. The detection limit was 8.0 pmol∙L-1 (6.4 ppt), showing higher sensitivity than colorimetry, Raman spectroscopy, and fluorescence methods. Testing the OA concentration in mussels revealed a spiked recovery rate of 95.0%-104.1%, demonstrating reliable performance in complex food matrices. The electrochemical techniques enhanced detection reliability, whereas microfluidic biochips enabled convenient on-site testing.

Dual-mode detection strategy provides accurate signal readout for targeted analytes. Raza et al. [55] developed a nanozyme-based dual-mode immunosensor for TTX detection using Fe(III)-tannic acid/Prussian blue (Fe-TA@PB) nanocomposite conjugated with goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG). TTX-modified bovine serum albumin was immobilized on a microtiter plate as capture antigen. Increased TTX reduces IgG-conjugated Fe-TA@PB binding to immobilized TTX, causing reduced TMB oxidation and color change. The photothermal effect enables temperature-based detection using a smartphone infrared camera. TTX detection range is 0.1-100 ng∙mL-1, with limits of 0.26 ng∙mL-1 (colorimetric) and 0.44 ng∙mL-1 (photothermometric). Nanozyme composites are also used for STX detection. Cho et al. [56] developed an STX detection system using AuNP/Co3O4@Mg/ Al nanozyme and molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP). An STX-affinity peptide template enabled MIP-based indirect competitive detection. The system achieved a detection limit of 0.317 μg∙g-1 and high STX recovery (90.7%-97.4%) in real samples.

Although conventional techniques remain essential for confirmatory marine toxin analysis, nanotechnology-based biosensors enable rapid, sensitive, and field-deployable toxin detection. Integrating molecular recognition elements (e.g., aptamers and antibodies) with nanostructures provides signal amplification through optical enhancement, energy transfer, and nanozyme catalysis, enabling sub-ppt to low-ppb detection.

3. Heavy metal

Heavy metals present in terrestrial and aquatic systems have led to water pollution, a pervasive environmental challenge globally. Unlike organic pollutants that degrade, heavy metals persist owing to their nondegradable nature, causing long-term ecological consequences [63]. Mining, electroplating, smelting, chemical manufacturing, agriculture, and residential wastewater discharge contribute to heavy metal contamination of water resources and aquatic products [64,65]. Consumption of heavy metals through contaminated water or food can cause health issues, including neurotoxic effects, renal impairment, carcinogenic risks, and developmental delays [66]. The detection and removal of heavy metals from water have gained significant attention. Nanomaterials have advanced heavy metal detection and separation [67,68]. Their adsorptive properties and reactivity, resulting from surface effects, small size effects, quantum effects, and macro quantum tunneling, enable heavy-metal-ion detection and extraction [69]. New nanostructures have been developed for monitoring and removing heavy metals in water samples and aquatic products (Table 3 [70-79]).

3.1. Detection of heavy metals

Current professional instrumentation such as atomic absorption spectroscopy and ICP-MS can analyze heavy metal species accurately, but they are expensive, time-consuming, and require skilled laboratory operation [80]. For simple, low-cost detection for users without a professional background, nanostructures are increasingly used in heavy metal detection [81]. He et al. [70] developed a plasmonic silver film with SERS activity, called hydroxyoxime@Ag-polyvinylidene fluoride (HOX@Ag-PVDF), for ultra-sensitive Cu2+ detection. An in situ interfacial assembly method was utilized to modify the PVDF membrane with AgNPs and HOX molecules, which served as Raman reporters and target receptors. The oxygen and nitrogen atoms from the -OH and -C=N-OH groups, respectively, coordinate with Cu2+, causing proton dissociation and forming a square planar copper complex (Fig. 4(a)). The HOX@Ag-PVDF film showed increased intensity ratio between 1342 and 1322 cm-1 with increasing Cu2+ concentration. The method shows excellent selectivity for Cu2+ detection, with a 52.0 pmol∙L-1 detection limit. Cu2+ recoveries in river and tap water samples ranged from 90.8% to 103.7%, indicating potential for real applications.

According to the nanomaterials database, noble metal nanoparticles (e.g., Au and Ag) are among the most commonly used nanomaterials [82]. However, their high expense and disposable nature make them less preferred sensing materials for sustainability [83]. Wang et al. [71] developed recyclable nanoprobes for colorimetric detection of Hg2+. DNA-modified AuNPs are prepared with T-T mismatches within double-stranded DNA to recognize Hg2+, forming T-Hg2+-T complex at mismatch sites [84,85]. T-T mismatch disrupts terminal base pairing, causing entropy-based repulsion and dispersing AuNPs, making the solution red. When Hg2+ binds to T-T mismatched base pair, it transforms dispersed AuNPs into assemblies, redshifting the surface plasmon resonance peak and changing solution color from red to purple (Fig. 4(b)). Adding isopropyl alcohol recovers individual DNA-AuNPs through double stranded DNA (dsDNA) denaturation, partially releasing Hg2+. DNA-AuNPs can be recovered from nano-waste containing Hg2+ with over 80% efficiency. The recovered DNA-AuNPs show improved sensitivity, lowering detection limit from 18.5 to 0.2 nmol∙L-1. These probes successfully detect Hg2+ in Atlantic salmon muscle tissue with recovery rates of 106%-164%, demonstrating reliability in analysis. This approach offers a strategy for recyclability and sustainable nanomaterials development.

However, the aforementioned methods are designed for single heavy metal detection. El-Desoky et al. [72] developed an electrochemical sensor for concurrent detection of Pb2+, Bi3+, and Cu2+. The sensor consisted of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and graphene nanosheets mixed in a ratio of 2% (w/w) Fe3O4 to 5% (w/w) graphene. Square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry quantified these heavy metal ions through electrochemical reduction and oxidation on the electrode surface, with subsequent current changes enabling identification and quantification (Fig. 4(c)). Detection limits were 0.3 (0.06 ppb), 0.2 (0.05 ppb), and 0.9 nmol∙L-1 (0.06 ppb) for Pb2+, Bi3+, and Cu2+, respectively. In water sample tests, recoveries for Pb2+, Bi3+, and Cu2+ were 75.2%, 109.4%, and 109.3%, respectively, which were obtained using the standard addition method. The simultaneous detection of three different heavy metal ions using the electrochemical sensor enables field detection of multiple metal contaminants.

To further improve real-time detection capability in Raman spectroscopy and electrochemical detection, Li et al. [73] designed a novel smartphone-assisted fluorescence detection technique for swift identification of cadmium ions in oysters. The ratiometric probe comprised cadmium telluride (CdTe) quantum dots (QDs), silicon-oxide-coated copper nanoclusters (CuNCs@SiO2), and 1,10-phenanthroline (Phen). When exposed to Cd2+, the fluorescence emission of CdTe QDs increased owing to disrupted photo-induced hole transfer between QDs and Phen from Phen-Cd2+ complex formation. Using a smartphone and Color Picker application to convert fluorescence signals to RGB values, Li et al. [73] established a linear relationship between the green/red channel ratio and Cd2+ levels (Fig. 4(d)). Validation showed cadmium levels in oyster samples matched ICP-MS results, with concentrations in the ranges of 0.34-3.19 parts per million (ppm) (via smartphone detection) and 0.34-3.21 ppm (via ICP-MS). Aggregation-induced emission (AIE) nanomaterials enable fluorescence "turn-on" detection through restricted intramolecular motion. Hao et al. [74] developed carbon dots (CDs) with AIE properties for smartphone detection of Cu2+ and Hg2+. Cu2+ induces aggregation-enhanced fluorescence with 0.46 µmol∙L-1 detection limit, whereas Hg2+ causes static quenching via chemical complexation, resulting in a detection limit of 25.8 nmol∙L-1. By providing real-time smartphone feedback, nanostructures demonstrate significant potential in intelligent heavy metal detection [86-88].

Methods involving nanostructures offer enhanced sensitivity, selectivity, and portability compared with tranditional spectrometric and electrochemical methods. Current strategies rely on diverse mechanisms, including plasmonic detection using colorimetry or SERS, electrochemical sensing, and smartphone-assisted fluorescence quantification. Next-generation nano-sensors for heavy metals should be a combination of laboratory-grade accuracy and field-level practicality in aquaculture safety monitoring.

3.2. Removal of heavy metals

Conventional strategies for heavy metal contaminant removal include chemical precipitation, ion exchange, filtration membranes, and electrocoagulation [89]. However, these methods have drawbacks. Chemical precipitation uses many chemical reagents that may harm the environment or health. Filtration membranes effectively eliminate heavy metal ions but are expensive [90]. Electrocoagulation involves challenges such as electrode passivation, uneven anode dissolution, and inconsistent coagulant production during long-term operation [91]. Adsorption using nanomaterials is widely used for pollutant removal [92]. Their large surface areas provide abundant active sites for heavy-metal-ion adsorption. Yap et al. [78] developed a bio-sponge comprising an alginate network encapsulating reduced graphene oxide (GO) modified with iron oxide nanoparticles and attached multithiol pentaerythritol tetrakis (mercaptopropionate) molecules using photoinitiated thiol-ene click chemistry (Fig. 5(a)). Kinetic studies show that the adsorbent follows a pseudo-second-order model for Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions (coefficient of determination (R2) > 0.99), with electrostatic attraction as the main driving force. Upon deprotonation in an aqueous environment, the surface functional groups on the thiolated graphene bio-sponge (such as carboxyl, thiol, and oxygen-containing groups) become negatively charged, attracting positively charged Pb and Cd ions from water. The thiolated graphene bio-sponge showed high adsorption efficiency in milli-Q water (98.8% Pb2+ and 90.2% Cd2+); however, its adsorption efficiency decreased in seawater (63.1% Pb2+ and 36.1% Cd2+) because of blockage of adsorbent pores by organic matter. This result indicates the necessity of developing heavy-metal-adsorbing marine-specific materials.

Rubin Pedrazzo et al. [79] synthesized an eco-friendly nanosponge with dense carboxyl groups through polycondensation between citric acid and line caps (LCs), a pea starch derivative (Fig. 5(b)). The adsorption of cationic ions by nanosponge relies on negative charges in the polymer structure, forming complexes with metals. When introduced to artificial seawater with 50 ppm Cu2+, the nanosponges removed 80%-84% of Cu2+, achieving an adsorption capacity of 49-52 mg Cu2+ per gram. Although effective, the material required a 24 h treatment to achieve the maximum adsorption efficiency. To shorten adsorption time and improve efficiency, Safari et al. [75] developed a core-shell magnetic selenium nanocomposite (Fe3O4@SiO2@Se) for Hg2+ removal from water samples. The negatively charged selenium nanoparticles attract Hg2+ through electrostatic interactions (Fig. 5(c)), forming HgSe to extract Hg2+ from seawater. Hg2+ adsorption follows the Langmuir isotherm model (R2 > 0.997) with 70.4 mg∙g-1 maximum capacity and 0.0591 L∙mg-1 Langmuir constant. Fe3O4@SiO2@Se removes 94.28% of Hg2+ in seawater within 20 min, demonstrating potential for efficient heavy metal removal.

Organic mercury species are known for their higher toxicity compared to Hg2+ [93]. Ma et al. [76] developed a nanosorbent for adsorbing both organic and inorganic mercury, combining polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-based aerogel with MoS2 nanoflowers (MoS2NFs) (Fig. 5(d)). The adsorbent removes Hg2+ through chelate formation between mercury and sulfur and ion exchange with oxygen-containing groups, while eliminating MeHg through hydrophobic interactions. The PVA-5/75MoS2NF adsorbent maintained an optimal solid-liquid partition coefficient (Kd) of 107 at pH values 3 and 10, remaining stable in simulated polluted seawater. For high MeHg concentrations (100 ppb), the adsorbent achieved 90% removal efficiency. This nano-adsorbent enables simultaneous adsorption of organic and inorganic mercury, reducing aquatic heavy metal pollution. The discharge of radioactive wastewater in Japan concerns aquacultural industries. Cheng et al. [77] developed bacterial cellulose particles with nanoscale zero-valent iron (BCP-nZVI) for Co2+ and Sr2+ radionuclide adsorption, achieving 92.5% and 58.6% removal in seawater through redox, hydroxyl complexation mechanisms.

Removal of toxin metal ions (e.g., Cd2+, Pb2+, Cu2+, and Hg2+) using nanostructures involves target-specific capture and separation through magnetic separation, centrifugation, floating, and membrane filtration, based on chemical complexation and electrostatic attraction with functional ligands (e.g., carboxyl- and surlfur-containing groups).

4. Microplastics

Plastic products have led to severe plastic fragment pollution, now recognized as a major threat to organisms and human health [94,95]. These fragments are classified as macroplastics (>5000 μm), microplastics (1‒5000 μm), and nanoplastics [96]. Plastic pollution in aquatic ecosystems impacts the aquaculture environment, products, and fisheries development [97,98]. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) reported that 75 million to 199 million tonnes of plastic waste exists in oceans, comprising 85% of marine debris, with projections showing annual input reaching 23 million to 37 million tonnes by 2040 [99]. In response, nanostructures have been developed for detecting and removing plastic fragments in aquaculture environments and products (Table 4 [100-108]).

4.1. Detection of microplastics

Methods for detecting microplastics include visual inspection [109], fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy [110], pyrolysis gas chromatography mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) [111], and fluorescence staining [112]. Visual inspection only detects larger microplastics (> 500 µm) and shows variability owing to observer bias. FTIR spectroscopy analyzes single microplastic particles (> 10 µm) per sample, requires water-free samples, and is labor-intensive. Py-GC/MS destroys samples during analysis and has low efficiency. Fluorescence staining is affected by dye concentration, solvent type, and temperature, with poor reproducibility [113]. Nanostructure-based assays provide efficient monitoring of different-sized microplastics across environments. Lai et al. [100] developed a method using AuNPs to label common microplastics (polyethylene (PE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene (PP), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polystyrene (PS), and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)) of sizes 50-1200 nm in environmental water, quantifying them with single-particle ICP-MS (sp-ICP-MS) (Fig. 6(a)). The method combines acid digestion and cloud-point extraction, followed by AuNP labeling. It effectively detects microplastics in various water types (deionized water, drinking water, river water, lake water, outlet water of WWTP, and seawater), with recoveries of 72.9% to 92.8%. To minimize microplastics loss during sample pretreatment and improve analytical accuracy, Yang et al. [101] developed a method for analyzing nanoplastics (PS, 50-1000 nm) in water using membrane filtration and SERS (Fig. 6(b)). Silver nanowires (AgNWs) were self-assembled to form a filter membrane to concentrate nanoplastics, and detection was achieved using SERS activity to enhance the Raman signal. The membrane, self-assembled from AgNW of 60 nm diameter, combined physical interception and SERS activity. After filtering water samples, PS nanoplastics were captured, excited in situ, and detected with a 785 nm laser. The method solves nanoplastic separation and preconcentration issues, avoiding sample loss from transfer steps. High retention rates (> 86.7%) and detection sensitivity (0.1 ng∙mL-1) enable analysis of low concentration nanoplastics in aquatic environments.

Although SERS is widely used in environmental monitoring, uneven hot spot distribution causing detection inconsistency remains challenging. Inspired by dragonfly wings, Zhu et al. [102] developed a method for detecting nanoplastics (PS, 800 nm) using Ag/ZnO nanorod arrays on PDMS films as a photo-induced enhanced Raman spectroscopy (PIERS) substrate (Fig. 6(c)). The substrate adsorbs nanoplastics through hydrophobic interaction, with its periodic array improving detection reproducibility. UV light irradiation increases electron density between noble metal nanoparticles, enhancing SERS signal sensitivity. Detection limits in tap water, lake water, river water, and seawater were 25, 28, 35, and 60 μg∙mL-1, respectively, with recoveries from 94.8% to 102.4%.

Awada et al. [105] designed a fluorescencent probe using fluorescein-labeled hyaluronic-acid-conjugated polymer nanoparticles (F-HA-CPNs) for detecting microplastics (PP, PS, polycarbonate (PC), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and high-density polyethylene (HDPE)) (Fig. 6(d)). The nanoprobes form spherical particles of 194 nm diameter, with cores of diketopyrrolopyrrole-based polymer and surfaces functionalized with fluorescein-labeled hyaluronic acid. The probe binds to microplastics’ carbon backbone through van der Waals forces and hydrophobic interactions, achieving picomolar-level affinity (Kd = 3.4-14 pmol∙L-1), 105 times higher than free hyaluronic acid. Overall, the above nanostructure-enabled assays have demonstrated innovation for sensitive detection of microplastics in complex aquatic matrices, based on either the chemical labelling of microplastics or their intrinsic chemical structures.

4.2. Elimination of microplastics

Microplastic removal methods include membrane filtration [114], flocculation techniques [115], and biological removal [116]. However, membrane filtration requires regular filter maintenance; thus, it is costly. Flocculation techniques are affected by sample turbidity and flocculant ionic strength, risking chemical pollution. Biological methods have low efficiency and depend heavily on microorganism types and environmental conditions [117,118]. Nanomaterials with large specific surface areas effectively remove microplastics, offering potential solutions for aquatic contamination [119]. Grbic et al. [106] developed a method using hydrophobic iron nanoparticles to extract microplastics from water (Fig. 7(a)). The synthesized iron nanoparticles, modified with silane, adsorbed microplastics through hydrophobic interactions, achieving recovery rates of 93% (>1 mm), 81% (200 μm to 1 mm), and 92% (<20 μm) for microplastics of different sizes in environmental samples. However, the hydrophobic interactions of the nanoparticles with the microplastics are significantly weakened in the presence of lipophilic substances or biota (e.g., fat from fish tissue) in the sample. Chen et al. [107] fabricated a zirconium MOF (UiO-66-OH) that removes various nanoplastics from seawater through electrostatic, hydrogen bonding, and van der Waals interactions (Fig. 7(b)). The material achieved 95.5% removal efficiency and maintained 90.7% efficiency over ten cycles.

MOFs are promising adsorbents owing to their stability, large surface areas, microporous structures, and tunable properties. However, common MOF materials (e.g., UiO-66) require high temperature and pressure conditions with organic solvents. Pasanen et al. [103] synthesized a magnetic zeolite imidazolate framework (nano-Fe@ZIF-8) using n-butylamine and Fe2+ in aqueous solution at room temperature to remove PS microplastics from tap water (Fig. 7(c)). The hydrophobic ZIF-8 aggregates with PS microplastics through van der Waals forces. Its microporous structure (surface area: 1038 m2∙g-1) and small size ((50 ± 30) nm) enhance microplastic adsorption. The nano-Fe@ZIF-8 material can be magnetically recovered and removed ≥93.8% of polystyrene microspheres through hydrophobic interactions. However, magnetic nanomaterials and MOFs can release metal ions, posing ecological hazards, and are costly. Li et al. [108] developed nano oil-in-water (O-W) emulsions using olive oil to remove PS and PMMA microplastics from seawater, tea leaves, and toothpaste supernatant (Fig. 7(d)). The emulsions, used to remove microplastics from seawater, tea leaves, and toothpast supernatant, achieved removal rates of 75%, 80%, and 82%, respectively, through hydrophobic interactions, offering sustainable and environmentally friendly advantages of sustainability, environmental friendliness, and generalityfor microplastic pollution mitigation.

The degradation and chemical transformation of microplastics are crucial for sustainable development goals. Miao et al. [104] developed an electro-Fenton-like (EF-like) approach using a TiO2/graphite (TiO2/C) cathode to degrade PVC microplastics (100‒200 μm) in deionized water (Fig. 7(e)). The approach decomposed PVC through cathodic reductive dechlorination and hydroxyl radical oxidation. PVC underwent dechlorination by acquiring electrons from the TiO2/C cathode, followed by hydroxyl radical oxidation to produce oxygenated organic intermediates, which were then mineralized to carbon dioxide and water. The dechlorination efficiency and removal rate for PVC plastics were 75% and 56%, respectively. This result indicates that the method is a viable and environmentally friendly strategy for microplastic degradation and transformation.

Microplastic removal can be achieved through nanostructure-based surface adsorption via various interactions (e.g., van der Waals forces and electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions) through physical filtration, magnetic separation, and collection. Additionally, degradation of microplastics relies on electrochemical or hydroxyl radical oxidation enabled by nanostructures.

5. Pathogenic bacteria

Pathogenic bacteria are a major threat to China’s aquaculture industry, causing infectious diseases in economically important species such as shrimp, tilapia, and large yellow croaker [120]. Bacterial infections originating from Vibrio spp., Aeromonas hydrophila (A. hydrophila), and Edwardsiella tarda (E. tarda) cause mass mortalities and reduced feed conversion efficiency [121]. Antibiotic overuse has raised concerns about antimicrobial resistance and environmental contamination [122]. Foodborne pathogens such as Vibrio parahaemolyticus (V. parahaemolyticus) pose serious health and economic burdens globally [123]. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports 600 million annual foodborne illness cases, causing losses of 110 billion [124,125]. Rapid pathogen quantification in high-risk aquatic products is essential [126]. Nanomaterials development has created new methods for detecting and removing pathogenic bacteria in aquatic organisms and products (Table 5 [43,127-131]).

5.1. Detection of pathogenic bacteria

PCR and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) are currently the main methods for detecting pathogenic bacteria [132]. Although PCR and MALDI-TOF MS are highly reliable, these methods require complex preprocessing and analysis, which make them time-consuming [133]. Nanomaterial-based detection methods offer easier operation, high sensitivity, and faster testing for pathogen detection in aquatic products. Wu et al. [127] developed an efficient single-step method to detect V. parahaemolyticus in seafood using adapter-assisted SERS (Fig. 8(a)). The method uses cysteamine-modified gold-coated PDMS (Au-PDMS) film as SERS substrate, with 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA) and aptamer-modified AuNPs as signal probes, assembled through electrostatic interactions. When V. parahaemolyticus is present, the aptamer binds to bacterial surface protein, causing conformational change. The signal probe dissociates from the membrane surface, decreasing Raman intensity of 4-MBA at 1592 cm-1. Using PDMS membrane transparency and mechanical stability, this method combines aptamer affinity and the dual AuNP "hotspot" effect to achieve a wide linear range (1.2 × 102-1.2 × 106 colony forming unit (CFU)∙mL-1) and a low detection limit (12 CFU∙mL-1).

However, this method requires a large Raman spectrometer and prevents on-site detection. Xu et al. [129] developed a portable fluorescent biosensor with nanoparticles-based immunomagnetic separation for detecting bacterial pathogens in shrimps (Fig. 8(b)). The detection mechanism is based on the use of immunomagnetic nanobeads (immuno-MNBs) to specifically capture pathogenic bacteria and the use of CdSe/ZnS core/shell QDs modified with antibodies to label them. Consequently, an immuno-MNB-bacterial-QD "sandwich" complex is formed. The fluorescence intensity is measured by a portable spectrometer, with the process completed within 60 min. Detection limits for Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes), and Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium) in shrimp were 102, 103, and 103 CFU∙mL-1, respectively, with recoveries of 89%-111%. Wang et al. [130] developed an electrochemical aptamer sensor for rapid detection of V. parahaemolyticus in shrimps (Fig. 8(c)). The assay uses aptamer-modified magnetic nanometal organic frameworks as capture probes and AuNPs conjugated with ferrocene and phenylboronic acid as nano labels. The sandwich-type complex formed is magnetically adsorbed onto a screen-printed electrode (SPE), converting to an electrical signal. This detector recognizes V. parahaemolyticus at 10-108 CFU∙mL-1 within 20 min, with a 3 CFU∙mL-1 detection limit and 94%-107% recovery.

Compared with SERS, immunofluorescence bioassay, and electrochemical detection, colorimetric analysis enables quantitative on-site detection of pathogenic bacteria without instruments, offering easy operation and low cost. Fu et al. [131] developed a colorimetric method for detecting V. parahaemolyticus in oysters using immunomagnetic separation and Mn2+ ion-mediated AuNP aggregation (Fig. 8(d)). When V. parahaemolyticus is present, chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY)-MBs and IgG-MnO2 NPs bind to different sites of the target through antigen-antibody reactions, forming sandwich-type immune complexes. Unbound IgG-MnO2 NPs are removed magnetically. Adding ascorbic acid etches MnO2 to produce Mn2+ ions proportional to bacterial concentration. These ions interact with AuNPs’ carboxyl groups, causing aggregation and color change from red to blue. This method detects V. parahaemolyticus at 10-106 CFU∙mL-1 with 10 CFU∙mL-1 detection limit and 95.78%-101.83% recoveries, enabling on-site visual inspection. Combining nucleic acid amplification and AuNP indicators provides another colorimetric detection method [134]. Liu and Wang [135] integrated DNA-AuNPs with loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for V. parahaemolyticus detection. This naked-eye LAMP assay offers three advantages over PCR: specifically designed DNA sequences against the target gene enhance detection accuracy, completion within 50 min, and simple isothermal amplification without PCR instruments. These detection schemes use nanostructures as indicators and signal amplifiers coupled with aptamers, antibodies, and target gene-specific DNA sequences, facilitating selection based on accuracy, time, and cost requirements.

5.2. Inhibition of pathogenic bacteria

Antibiotics and other biocides effectively kill pathogens but require continuous use and cause drug-resistance concerns [136]. Because of their high surface-area-to-volume ratio for bacterial adsorption, nanostructures are gaining research attention [137]. Zhan et al. [128] removed pathogenic bacteria from water using magnetic Fe3O4/graphene (G-Fe3O4) composites (Fig. 9(a)). Graphene’s porous structure adsorbs and kills bacteria by disrupting cell walls, whereas Fe3O4's magnetic properties enable material separation and recycling. The G-Fe3O4 composite removes 94.8% of pathogenic bacteria, including E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Salmonella, and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), from river water. Protein nanoparticles, being green and sustainable, avoid toxic emissions that threaten health and environment. Luis et al. [43] developed zein nanoparticles with eugenol and garlic essential oil to treat fish pathogens (Fig. 9(b)). These 150 nm positively charged particles work through eugenol that destroys bacterial membranes and garlic’s allicin that inhibits enzymes. This combination enhances inhibition of A. hydrophila, E. tarda, and Streptococcus iniae (S. iniae). The nanocarrier enables sustained release, maintaining >82% active ingredients for 90 days and reducing nontarget toxicity with increased lethal concentration 50 (LC50). This approach combining plant compounds with nanotechnology advances fish disease treatment and sustainable fisheries.

The aforementioned antibacterial approaches mostly involve nonspecific bacteria-killing chemicals and nanostructures. For specific inhibition of pathogenic bacteria, Zhang et al. [138] developed a gold nanocluster (AuNC)-based nucleic acid delivery approach for bacterial gene suppression. The AuNCs enable efficient internalization of target gene-specific antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) into Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The ASOs are released from AuNCs within bacteria, enabling ∼70% knockdown of mecA in methicillin-resistant S. aureus, reducing antibiotic resistance and enhancing oxacillin treatment. They also used CDs to deliver empA-specific ASO to Vibrio anguillarum (V. anguillarum) for targeted EmpA suppression [139]. An adhesive hydrogel boosted ASO/CD concentrations at wound sites in seawater, preventing fin rot disease in turbot and offering solutions for underwater bacterial diseases.

6. Conclusions and perspectives

Aquaculture, practiced for over 2000 years, is now recognized as one of the most promising food production systems worldwide and is integral to human society’s sustenance. Recently, wastewater discharge from industrial activities and climate change have severely impacted the aquaculture environment and aquatic product safety. Monitoring and reducing hazardous substances in real-time during aquatic product production is an urgent problem requiring solutions. Nanostructure-based detection and elimination of various hazards offer efficient routes to isolate and remove harmful species from aquatic environments and products, thereby mitigating risks to consumer health and enhancing safety of aquatic organisms and foods. This paper provides a systematic overview of the applications of advanced nanostructures (e.g., AuNPs, AgNPs, MOFs, and magnetic nanoparticles) in detecting and eliminating common pollutants, such as marine toxins, heavy metals, microplastics, and pathogenic bacteria. These nanostructures improve pollutant detection efficiency while minimizing large-scale equipment use, lowering technical and cost barriers for public use, and enabling real-time monitoring. Although significant progress has been achieved in this field, research opportunities and challenges remain ahead.

(1) Enhancement of stability of nanostructures. High chemical and colloidal stability of nanostructures is crucial for their performance in detection and separation applications. Currently, nanostructures face aggregation or degradation issues in complex environments. Light irradiation, temperature, pH fluctuation, salinity and organic matter often lead to functionality decay and application failure. In aquaculture, nanostructure properties are affected by water salinity, pH and temperature. For example, antibodies attached to AuNPs through electrostatic interactions for biomolecular sensing [140] may be disrupted under different pH or salt conditions, compromising detection capability. Future nanostructure design should focus on stabilization in complex environments. Hydrophilic surface functionalization and charge optimization can maintain colloidal stability against contaminants, whereas chemical stability of reactive nanoparticles (e.g., AgNPs) can be improved by coating with inert compositions, such as SiO2 and polyaniline [141,142]. Polymeric coating with polyethylene glycol, PVA, or dextran creates a hydrophilic layer preventing agglomeration [143-145] and improves chemical stability by preventing oxidation [146].

(2) Enhancement of the detection sensitivity of nanostructures. Boosting nanoprobe sensitivity is essential for early detection of aquaculture hazards. Several strategies exist for sensitivity enhancement. Magnetic trapping and electrophoretic methods help preconcentrate analytes to lower detection limits. Signal amplification can be achieved through enzymatic amplification or nanoparticle enhancement. Efforts to optimize receptor molecular structures improve the target’s binding affinity. For example, the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment enables selection of high-affinity aptamers [147]. Locked nucleic acids enhance aptamer binding affinity in aquaculture water [148]. Engineering aptamers with multiple binding sites increases target affinity [149]. Selecting aptamers within complex matrices optimizes recognition and eliminates sample purification requirement [135].

(3) Enhancement of the multifunctionality of nanostructures. Integration of different functional properties into nanostructures enables multiple tasks, such as detection, capture, and removal of contaminants. Magnetic plasmonic nanocomposites containing magnetic and plasmonic nanoparticles allow optical detection and magnetic separation [150]. Plasmonic nanoparticles decorated with ZnO or TiO2 enable detection and photocatalytic degradation of toxins and microplastics, and pathogen elimination. MOFs with recognition moieties and nano-catalysts can detect, adsorb, and eliminate pollutants [151]. Molecular imprinting polymers with magnetic nanoparticles enable recognition and separation [152]. Multimodal sensors combining sensing modalities (e.g., colorimetry, fluorescence, SERS, and electrochemical sensing) can provide accurate detection capabilities [153,154]. Different functional nanoparticles coupled with distinct capture ligands enable multiplex detection and separation of various analytes. Responsive nanoparticles react to pH and temperature changes to facilitate contaminant detection and separation [155]. Microfluidic devices with nanomaterials serve as platforms for real-time detection and elimination of hazards [156,157].

(4) Production and application of sustainable nanostructures. Sustainable nanomaterials for detecting and eliminating contaminants from aquaculture environments can minimize environmental impact while maximizing effectiveness. AuNP-based detection nanoprobes, CDs, and nanostructures made from bioresources are ideal for commercial uses, owing to their synthesis ease, low cost, recyclability, and environmental compatibility. Noble metal nanoprobes with DNA can be produced and recycled for multiple applications [71,135]. Producing nanomaterials from waste products such as carbon- and silica-based nanostructures contributes to circular economy because of the conversion of waste into valuable resources. Industrial byproducts may be repurposed into nanomaterials. Biodegradable biopolymers, such as chitosan, alginate, cellulose, and polylactic acid, can be investigated as precursors for functional nanomaterials [158,159]. Green synthesis using bacteria or plant extracts as reducing agents should be developed for nanomaterial preparation [160,161]. The cost for treating 1 tonne of seawater containing heavy metals using high-carboxyl nanosponge is approximately 3000 CNY [78]; microplastics removal using Fe nanoparticles costs ∼1500 CNY [105]; pathogen elimination using magnetic G-Fe3O4 costs ∼2700 CNY [122]. Despite high costs, these nanomaterials provide excellent elimination performance without environmental harm. A sustainable supply chain should be developed with industrial partners, focusing on responsible sourcing and green chemistry. Stimuli-responsive nanomaterials have emerged as sustainable options, capturing targets under specific conditions and releasing them upon environmental changes [162,163]. A lifecycle assessment is needed to evaluate nanomaterial environmental impact.

(5) Development of standardized protocols and integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the design and application of nanostructures. AI algorithms such as deep learning can predict and design new nanomaterials for contaminant detection and elimination [164]. The functionality of nanomaterials can be optimized using AI through size, shape, and surface chemistry. For hazard detection applications, standardized methods for field testing using nanostructures are essential in aquaculture. Standardized devices should be developed for pretreating seawater, aquaculture water, and aquatic product samples to ensure consistent processing into comparable solutions for toxin detection. This approach would enhance result reliability and facilitate standardized methods for toxin detection. Once standardized protocols are established, integrating nanostructures-based testing into routine monitoring systems will improve hazard detection, enhanced by AI integration. Machine learning algorithms can be developed for sensor data analysis using spectral or image datasets. AI integration with spectroscopic techniques (e.g., Raman, FTIR, and UV-visible spectroscopy methods) can enhance hazard detection by training models to interpret spectral data and identify contaminants. Image datasets of microplastics, pathogens, and contaminants can train AI algorithms for automated identification based on physical properties, improving detection accuracy and reducing false results.

(6) Establishing standards and regulations for applying nanostructures in aquaculture. The aquaculture industry must address biosecurity, aquatic organism health, food safety, and environmental health. The use of nanostructures should align with established national and local standards. Standards and regulations must be examined and followed before applying nanostructures in hazard removal. The registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH) regulation provides a framework for managing chemical risks including nanostructures [165]. Nanostructures used for hazard removal in aquaculture must be registered and authorized accordingly. Risk assessment protocols should evaluate potential impacts on aquatic organisms, including toxicity and bioaccumulation. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 12878:2012 provides environmental monitoring guidelines in aquaculture, applicable to monitoring nanostructures’ impact [166]. ISO Technical Specifications (ISO/TS) 22002-3:2011 establishes food safety prerequisites to ensure that nanostructures do not compromise aquatic product safety [167]. Although nanostructure-based detection does not require the addition of nanostructures into foods, proper disposal is encouraged. ISO 45001:2018 requires safety management for workers handling nanostructures [168]. Regular updates on regulations and risk assessments are crucial for protecting aquatic ecosystems and public health.

References

[1]

Golden CD, Koehn JZ, Shepon A, Passarelli S, Free CM, Viana DF, et al. Aquatic foods to nourish nations. Nature 2021; 598:315-20.

[2]

Zhao K, Gaines SD, García Molinos J, Zhang M, Xu J. Effect of trade on global aquatic food consumption patterns. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1412.

[3]

Kelling I, Carrigan M, Johnson AF. Transforming the seafood supply system: challenges and strategies for resilience. Food Secur 2023; 15:1585-91.

[4]

Asche F, Eggert H, Oglend A, Roheim CA, Smith MD. Aquaculture: externalities and policy options. Rev Environ Econ Policy 2022; 16:282-305.

[5]

Yue K, Shen Y. An overview of disruptive technologies for aquaculture. Aquac Fish 2022; 7:111-20.

[6]

Dong SL, Cao L, Liu WJ, Huang M, Sun YX, Zhang YY, et al. System-specific aquaculture annual growth rates can mitigate the trilemma of production, pollution and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Nat Food 2025; 6:365-74.

[7]

Shah BR, Mraz J. Advances in nanotechnology for sustainable aquaculture and fisheries. Rev Aquacult 2020; 12:925-42.

[8]

Li Q, Huang L. RNA biopesticides: a cutting-edge approach to combatting aquaculture diseases and ensuring food security. Mod Agric 2024; 2:70006.

[9]

Aguilar-Alarcón P, Gonzalez SV, Simonsen MA, Borrero-Santiago AR, Sanchís J, Meriac A, et al. Characterizing changes of dissolved organic matter composition with the use of distinct feeds in recirculating aquaculture systems via high-resolution mass spectrometry. Sci Total Environ 2020; 749:142326.

[10]

Stevčić Č, Pulkkinen K, Pirhonen J. Efficiency of Daphnia magna in removal of green microalgae cultivated in Nordic recirculating aquaculture system wastewater. Algal Res 2020; 52:102108.

[11]

Peter NR, Raja N, Sunny A, Sarkar S. Optimizing brackishwater shrimp farming with IoT-enabled water quality monitoring and decision support system. Thalassas. Int J Mater Sci 2024; 40:101-13.

[12]

Gavrilescu M, Demnerová K, Aamand J, Agathos S, Fava F. Emerging pollutants in the environment: present and future challenges in biomonitoring, ecological risks and bioremediation. N Biotechnol 2015; 32:147-56.

[13]

Ahmad A, Sheikh Abdullah SR, Hasan HA, Othman AR, Ismail NI. Aquaculture industry: supply and demand, best practices, effluent and its current issues and treatment technology. J Environ Manage 2021; 287:112271.

[14]

Ahmed N, Thompson S, Glaser M. Global aquaculture productivity, environmental sustainability, and climate change adaptability. Environ Manag 2019; 63:159-72.

[15]

Guillotin S, Delcourt N. Marine neurotoxins’ effects on environmental and human health: an OMICS overview. Mar Drugs 2022; 20:18.

[16]

Sepala Dahanayake P, Majeed S, Kumarage PM, Heo GJ. Molluscan shellfish: a potential source of pathogenic and multidrug-resistant Vibrio spp. J Consum Prot Food Saf 2023; 18:227-42.

[17]

Garg S, Chowdhury ZZ, Faisal ANM, Rumjit NP, Thomas P. Impact of industrial wastewater on environment and human health. In: Roy S, Garg A, Garg S, Tran TA, editors. Advanced industrial wastewater treatment and reclamation of water:comparative study of water pollution index during pre-industrial, industrial period and prospect of wastewater treatment for water resource conservation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. p. 197-209.

[18]

Zhang H, Shen N, Li Y, Hu C, Yuan P. Source, transport, and toxicity of emerging contaminants in aquatic environments: a review on recent studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023; 30:121420-37.

[19]

Stentiford GD, Peeler EJ, Tyler CR, Bickley LK, Holt CC, Bass D, et al. A seafood risk tool for assessing and mitigating chemical and pathogen hazards in the aquaculture supply chain. Nat Food 2022; 3:169-78.

[20]

Rossatto A, Arlindo MZF, de Morais MS, de Souza TD, Ogrodowski CS. Microplastics in aquatic systems: a review of occurrence, monitoring and potential environmental risks. Environ Adv 2023; 13:100396.

[21]

Xu X, Yang S, Wang Y, Qian K. Nanomaterial-based sensors and strategies for heavy metal ion detection. Green Anal Chem 2022; 2:100020.

[22]

Li K, Yang H, Yuan X, Zhang M. Recent developments of heavy metals detection in traditional Chinese medicine by atomic spectrometry. Microchem J 2021; 160:105726.

[23]

Fang L, Li D, Xiao Q. Advances on shellfish posioning toxins and their detection technologies. Chin Fish Qual Suand 2017; 7:41-9. Chinese.

[24]

Xiang X, Shang Y, Zhang J, Ding Y, Wu Q. Advances in improvement strategies of digital nucleic acid amplification for pathogen detection. TrAC Trends Analyt Chem 2022; 149:116568.

[25]

Abbasi S, Soltani N, Keshavarzi B, Moore F, Turner A, Hassanaghaei M. Microplastics in different tissues of fish and prawn from the Musa estuary. Persian Gulf Chemosphere 2018; 205:80-7.

[26]

Fu J, Zhang L, Xiang K, Zhang Y, Wang G, Chen L. Microplastic-contaminated antibiotics as an emerging threat to mammalian liver: enhanced oxidative and inflammatory damages. Biomater Sci 2023; 11:4298-307.

[27]

Huang M, Si C, Qiu C, Wang G. Microplastics analysis: from qualitative to quantitative. Environ Sci: Adv 2024; 3:1652-68.

[28]

Shi C, Zhang Y, Shao Y, Ray SS, Wang B, Zhao Z, et al. A review on the occurrence, detection methods, and ecotoxicity of biodegradable microplastics in the aquatic environment: new cause for concern. TrAC Trends Analyt Chem 2024; 178:117832.

[29]

Fu J, Liu N, Peng Y, Wang G, Wang X, Wang Q, et al. An ultra-light sustainable sponge for elimination of microplastics and nanoplastics. J Hazard Mater 2023; 456:131685.

[30]

Li B, Liu Z. Measurement and evolution of high-quality development level of marine fishery in China. Chin Geogr Sci 2022; 32:251-67.

[31]

Zhang WB, Xie SQ, Xu H, Shan X, Xue C, Li D, et al. High-quality development strategy of fisheries in China. Strategic Study of CAE 2023; 25:137-48.

[32]

Kolupula KA, Prasad GS, Ch BP, Shiga N, Jasmeen P, Battapothula S. Harnessing nanotechnology for advancements in fisheries and aquaculture: a comprehensive review. Proc Indian Natl Sci 2024; 90:799-820.

[33]

Ally N, Gumbi B. A review on metal nanoparticles as nano-sensors for environmental detection of emerging contaminants. Mater Today Proc. In press.

[34]

He Z, Yin H, Chang C, Wang G, Liang X. Interfacing DNA with gold nanoparticles for heavy metal detection. Biosensors 2020; 10:167.

[35]

Khajeh M, Laurent S, Dastafkan K. Nanoadsorbents: classification, preparation, and applications (with emphasis on aqueous media). Chem Rev 2013; 113:7728-68.

[36]

Song C, Zhang J, Jiang X, Gan H, Zhu Y, Peng Q, et al. SPR/SERS dual-mode plasmonic biosensor via catalytic hairpin assembly-induced AuNP network. Biosens Bioelectron 2021; 190:113376.

[37]

Zhu C, Yang G, Li H, Du D, Lin Y. Electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on nanomaterials and nanostructures. Anal Chem 2015; 87:230-49.

[38]

Wang G, Wang Y, Chen L, Choo J. Nanomaterial-assisted aptamers for optical sensing. Biosens Bioelectron 2010; 25:1859-68.

[39]

Duan H, Tang SY, Goda K, Li M. Enhancing the sensitivity and stability of electrochemical aptamer-based sensors by AuNPs@MXene nanocomposite for continuous monitoring of biomarkers. Biosens Bioelectron 2024; 246:115918.

[40]

Duan H, Wang Y, Tang SY, Xiao TH, Goda K, Li M. A CRISPR-Cas12a powered electrochemical sensor based on gold nanoparticles and MXene composite for enhanced nucleic acid detection. Sens Actuators B Chem 2023; 380:133342.

[41]

Dou X, Xu S, Jiang Y, Ding Z, Xie J. Aptamers-functionalized nanoscale MOFs for saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin sensing in sea foods through FRET. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2023; 284:121827.

[42]

Zhou Y, Chen Q, Huang G, Huang S, Lin C, Lin X, et al. Oriented-aptamer encoded magnetic nanosensor with laser-induced fluorescence for ultrasensitive test of okadaic acid. Talanta 2024; 266:124984.

[43]

Luis AIS, Campos EVR, de Oliveira JL, Guilger-Casagrande M, de Lima R, Castanha RF, et al. Zein nanoparticles impregnated with eugenol and garlic essential oils for treating fish pathogens. ACS Omega 2020; 5:15557-66.

[44]

Morabito S, Silvestro S, Faggio C. How the marine biotoxins affect human health. Nat Prod Res 2018; 32:621-31.

[45]

Reguera B, Velo-Suárez L, Raine R, Park MG. Harmful dinophysis species: a review. Harmful Algae 2012; 14:87-106.

[46]

Thi YVN, Vu TD, Do VQ, Ngo AD, Show PL, Chu DT. Residual toxins on aquatic animals in the Pacific areas: current findings and potential health effects. Sci Total Environ 2024; 906:167390.

[47]

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO). Codex Stan 292-2008: Standard for live and raw bivalve molluscs. Codex Alimentarius. Rome: FAO; 2015.

[48]

Ramalingam S, Chand R, Singh CB, Singh A. Phosphorene-gold nanocomposite based microfluidic aptasensor for the detection of okadaic acid. Biosens Bioelectron 2019; 135:14-21.

[49]

O’Mahony M. EU regulatory risk management of marine biotoxins in the marine bivalve mollusc food-chain. Toxins 2018; 10(3):118.

[50]

Watkins SM, Reich A, Fleming LE, Hammond R. Neurotoxic shellfish poisoning. Mar Drugs 2008; 6:431-55.

[51]

Raposo-Garcia S, Costas C, Louzao MC, Vieytes MR, Vale C, Botana LM, et al. Synergistic effect of brevetoxin BTX-3 and ciguatoxin CTX3C in human voltage-gated Nav1.6 sodium channels. Chem Res Toxicol 2023; 36 (12):1990-2000.

[52]

Ling S, Chen Q, Zhang Y, Wang R, Jin N, Pan J, et al. Development of ELISA and colloidal gold immunoassay for tetrodotoxin detetcion based on monoclonal antibody. Biosens Bioelectron 2015; 71:256-60.

[53]

Lai W, Zhuang J, Tang D. Novel colorimetric immunoassay for ultrasensitive monitoring of brevetoxin B based on enzyme-controlled chemical conversion of sulfite to sulfate. J Agric Food Chem 2015; 63:1982-9.

[54]

Zhao P, Liu H, Zhu P, Ge S, Zhang L, Yu JH. Multiple cooperative amplification paper SERS aptasensor based on AuNPs/3D succulent-like silver for okadaic acid quantization. Sens Actuators B Chem 2021; 344:130174.

[55]

Raza SHA, Jia BZ, Li JM, Yin QC, Zhou WY, Pant SD, et al. Prussian blue anchored Fe(III)-tannic acid composite-mediated colorimetric and photothermal dual-mode immunosensor for the detection of tetrodotoxin. Food Control 2025; 174:111246.

[56]

Cho CH, Kim JH, Padalkar NS, Reddy YVM, Park TJ, Park JY, et al. Nanozyme-assisted molecularly imprinted polymer-based indirect competitive ELISA for the detection of marine biotoxin. Biosens Bioelectron 2024; 255:116269.

[57]

Jen HC, Nguyen TAT, Wu YJ, Hoang T, Arakawa O, Lin WF, et al. Tetrodotoxin and paralytic shellfish poisons in gastropod species from Vietnam analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Food Drug Anal 2014; 22:178-88.

[58]

Jang JH, Lee JS, Yotsu-Yamashita M. LC/MS analysis of tetrodotoxin and its deoxy analogs in the marine puffer fish fugu niphobles from the southern coast of Korea, and in the brackishwater puffer fishes tetraodon nigroviridis and tetraodon biocellatus from Southeast Asia. Mar Drugs 2010; 8:1049-58.

[59]

Chu FS, Fan TS. Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for saxitoxin in shellfish. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 1985; 68:13-6.

[60]

Rao H, Huang H, Zhang X, Xue X, Luo M, Liu H, et al. A simple thermometer-based photothermometric assay for alkaline phosphatase activity based on target-induced nanoprobe generation. New J Chem 2020; 44:17753-60.

[61]

Dunn MR, Jimenez RM, Chaput JC.Analysis of aptamer discovery and technology. Nat Rev Chem 2017; 1:0076.

[62]

Wang Y, Duan H, Yalikun Y, Cheng S, Li M. A pendulum-type electrochemical aptamer-based sensor for continuous, real-time and stable detection of proteins. Talanta 2024; 266:125026.

[63]

Hassan M, Naidu R, Du J, Qi F, Ahsan MA, Liu YJ. Magnetic responsive mesoporous alginate/b-cyclodextrin polymer beads enhance selectivity and adsorption of heavy metal ions. Int J Biol Macromol 2022; 207:826-40.

[64]

Bakhtiari S, Salari M, Shahrashoub M, Zeidabadinejad A, Sharma G, Sillanpää M. A comprehensive review on green and eco-friendly nano-adsorbents for the removal of heavy metal ions: synthesis, adsorption mechanisms, and applications. Curr Pollut Rep 2024; 10:1-39.

[65]

Zhang Y, Zhang L, Wang L, Wang G, Komiyama M, Liang X. Colorimetric determination of mercury(II) ion based on DNA-assisted amalgamation: a comparison study on gold, silver and Ag@Au Nanoplates. Mikrochim Acta 2019; 186:713.

[66]

Balali-Mood M, Naseri K, Tahergorabi Z, Khazdair MR, Sadeghi M. Toxic mechanisms of five heavy metals: mercury, lead, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:643972.

[67]

Song Y, Xie R, Tian M, Mao B, Chai F. Controllable synthesis of bifunctional magnetic carbon dots for rapid fluorescent detection and reversible removal of Hg2+. J Hazard Mater 2023; 457:131683.

[68]

Diao W, Wang G, Wang L, Zhang L, Ding S, Takarada T, et al. Opposite effects of flexible single-stranded DNA regions and rigid loops in DNAzyme on colloidal nanoparticle stability for "Turn-On" plasmonic detection of lead ions. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2020; 3(10):7003-10.

[69]

Jiang Z, Li L, Huang H, He W, Ming W. Progress in laser ablation and biological synthesis processes: "Top-Down" and "Bottom-Up" approaches for the green synthesis of Au/Ag nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23(23):14658.

[70]

He L, Ding K, Luo J, Li Q, Tan J, Hu J. Hydrophobic plasmonic silver membrane as SERS-active catcher for rapid and ultrasensitive Cu(II) detection. J Hazard Mater 2022; 440:129731.

[71]

Wang L, He Z, Chen Q, Wang G, Liang X, Takarada T, et al. Refreshing DNA-based nanoprobes by alcohol for heavy metal detection: toward sustainable sensing nanomaterials. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2023; 11:3611-20.

[72]

El-Desoky HS, Beltagi AM, Ghoneim MM, El-Hadad AI. The first utilization of graphene nano-sheets and synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a synergistic electrodeposition platform for simultaneous voltammetric determination of some toxic heavy metal ions in various real environmental water samples. Microchem J 2022; 175:106966.

[73]

Li W, Zhang X, Hu X, Shi Y, Li Z, Huang X, et al. A smartphone-integrated ratiometric fluorescence sensor for visual detection of cadmium ions. J Hazard Mater 2021; 408:124872.

[74]

Hao Y, Ji F, Li T, Tian M, Han X, Chai F, et al. Portable smartphone platform utilizing AIE-featured carbon dots for multivariate visual detection for Cu2+, Hg2+ and BSA in real samples. Food Chem 2024; 446:138843.

[75]

Safari N, Ghanemi K, Buazar F. Selenium functionalized magnetic nanocomposite as an effective mercury(II) ion scavenger from environmental water and industrial wastewater samples. J Environ Manage 2020; 276:111263.

[76]

Ma CB, Du Y, Du B, Wang H, Wang E. Investigation of an eco-friendly aerogel as a substrate for the immobilization of MoS2 nanoflowers for removal of mercury species from aqueous solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 2018; 525:251-9.

[77]

Cheng R, Chen Y, Kang M, Jiang P, Shi L, Zheng J, et al. Anchoring nanoscale zero-valent iron within bacterial cellulose particles for boosting efficient adsorption of Co(II) and Sr(II) from seawater: dual system and varying adsorption mechanisms. J Environ Sci 2025; 154:457-69.

[78]

Yap PL, Auyoong YL, Hassan K, Farivar F, Tran DNH, Ma J, et al. Multithiol functionalized graphene bio-sponge via photoinitiated thiol-ene click chemistry for efficient heavy metal ions adsorption. Chem Eng J 2020; 395:124965.

[79]

Rubin Pedrazzo A, Smarra A, Caldera F, Musso G, Dhakar NK, Cecone C, et al. Eco-friendly b-cyclodextrin and linecaps polymers for the removal of heavy metals. Polymers 2019; 11(10):1658.

[80]

Abu Ali H, Nabok A, Smith T, Al SM. Inhibition biosensor based on DC and AC electrical measurements of bacteria samples. Procedia Technol 2017; 27:129-30.

[81]

Sudarman F, Shiddiq M, Armynah B, Tahir D. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) synthesis methods as heavy-metal sensors: a review. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2023; 20:9351-68.

[82]

Hansen SF, Hansen OFH, Nielsen MB. Advances and challenges towards consumerization of nanomaterials. Nat Nanotechnol 2020; 15:964-5.

[83]

Marcelino MY, Borges FA, Scorzoni L, de Lacorte SJ, Garms BC, Niemeyer JC, et al.Synthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles and their toxicity in alternative methods to the use of mammals. J Environ Chem Eng 2021; 9:106779.

[84]

Miyake Y, Togashi H, Tashiro M, Yamaguchi H, Oda S, Kudo M, et al. MercuryII-mediated formation of thymine-HgII -thymine base pairs in DNA duplexes. J Am Chem Soc 2006; 128:2172-3.

[85]

Zhang L, Zhao C, Zhang Y, Wang L, Wang G, Kanayama N, et al. Chemically fueled plasmon switching of gold nanorods by single-base pairing of surface-grafted DNA. Langmuir 2019; 35:11710-6.

[86]

Tang W, Chen S, Song Y, Tian M, Yan R, Mao B, et al. Controllable fabrication of high-quantum-yield bimetallic gold/silver nanoclusters as multivariate sensing probe for Hg2+, H2O2, and glutathione based on AIE and peroxidase mimicking activity. J Hazard Mater 2024; 480:136254.

[87]

Wu H, Xie R, Hao Y, Pang J, Gao H, Qu F, et al. Portable smartphone-integrated AuAg nanoclusters electrospun membranes for multivariate fluorescent sensing of Hg2+, Cu2+ and L-histidine in water and food samples. Food Chem 2023; 418:135961.

[88]

Xie R, Su D, Song Y, Sun P, Mao B, Tian M, et al. The synthesis of gold nanoclusters with high stability and their application in fluorometric detection for Hg2+ and cell imaging. Talanta 2023; 260:124573.

[89]

Qasem NAA, Mohammed RH, Lawal DU. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review. npj Clean Water 2021; 4:36.

[90]

Irshad MA, Nawaz R, Wojciechowska E, Mohsin M, Nawrot N, Nasim I, et al. Application of nanomaterials for cadmium adsorption for sustainable treatment of wastewater: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 2023; 234:54.

[91]

Alkhadra MA, Su X, Suss ME, Tian H, Guyes EN, Shocron AN, et al. Electrochemical methods for water purification, ion separations, and energy conversion. Chem Rev 2022; 122(16):13547-635.

[92]

Irshad MA, Nawaz R, Rehman MZ, Adrees M, Rizwan M, Ali S, et al. Synthesis, characterization and advanced sustainable applications of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2021; 212:111978.

[93]

Polak-Juszczak L. Total mercury and methylmercury in garfish (Belone belone) of different body weights, sizes, ages, and sexes. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2023; 79:127220.

[94]

Ogonowski M, Gerdes Z, Gorokhova E. What we know and what we think we know about microplastic effects—a critical perspective. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 2018; 1:41-6.

[95]

Su L, Xiong X, Zhang Y, Wu C, Xu X, Sun C, et al. Global transportation of plastics and microplastics: a critical review of pathways and influences. Sci Total Environ 2022; 831:154884.

[96]

Sharma VK, Ma X, Lichtfouse E, Robert D. Nanoplastics are potentially more dangerous than microplastics. Environ Chem Lett 2023; 21:1933-6.

[97]

Pan Z, Liu Q, Xu J, Li W, Lin H. Microplastic contamination in seafood from Dongshan Bay in southeastern China and its health risk implication for human consumption. Environ Pollut 2022; 303:119163.

[98]

Rochman CM, Tahir A, Williams SL, Baxa DV, Lam R, Miller JT, et al. Anthropogenic debris in seafood: plastic debris and fibers from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human consumption. Sci Rep 2015; 5:14340.

[99]

United Nations Environment Programme. From pollution to solution:a global assessment of marine litter and plastic pollution. Report. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme; 2021.

[100]

Lai Y, Dong L, Li Q, Li P, Hao Z, Yu S, et al. Counting nanoplastics in environmental waters by single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy after cloud-point extraction and in situ labeling of gold nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 2021; 55:4783-91.

[101]

Yang Q, Zhang S, Su J, Li S, Lv X, Chen J, et al. Identification of trace polystyrene nanoplastics down to 50 nm by the hyphenated method of filtration and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy based on silver nanowire membranes. Environ Sci Technol 2022; 56:10818-28.

[102]

Zhu Z, Han K, Feng Y, Li Z, Zhang A, Wang T, et al. Biomimetic Ag/ZnO@PDMS hybrid nanorod array-mediated photo-induced enhanced Raman spectroscopy sensor for quantitative and visualized analysis of microplastics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2023; 15(30):36988-98.

[103]

Pasanen F, Fuller RO, Maya F. Fast and simultaneous removal of microplastics and plastic-derived endocrine disruptors using a magnetic ZIF-8 nanocomposite. Chem Eng J 2023; 455:140405.

[104]

Miao F, Liu Y, Gao M, Yu X, Xiao P, Wang M, et al. Degradation of polyvinyl chloride microplastics via an electro-Fenton-like system with a TiO2/graphite cathode. J Hazard Mater 2020; 399:123023.

[105]

Awada A, Potter M, Wijerathne D, Gauld JW, Mutus B, Rondeau-Gagné S, et al. Conjugated polymer nanoparticles as a universal high-affinity probe for the selective detection of microplastics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2022; 14:46562-8.

[106]

Grbic J, Nguyen B, Guo E, You JB, Sinton D, Rochman CM, et al. Magnetic extraction of microplastics from environmental samples. Environ Sci Technol Lett 2019; 6:68-72.

[107]

Chen Y, Chen Y, Miao C, Wang Y, Gao G, Yang R, et al. Metal-organic framework-based foams for efficient microplastics removal. J Mater Chem A Mater Energy Sustain 2020;8:14644-52.

[108]

Li Y, Fu J, Peng L, Sun X, Wang G, Wang Y, et al. A sustainable emulsion for separation and Raman identification of microplastics and nanoplastics. Chem Eng J 2023; 469:143992.

[109]

Renner G, Schmidt TC, Schram J. Analytical methodologies for monitoring micro(nano)plastics: which are fit for purpose? Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 2018; 1:55-61.

[110]

Chen Y, Wen D, Pei J, Fei Y, Ouyang D, Zhang H, et al. Identification and quantification of microplastics using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy: current status and future prospects. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 2020; 18:14-9.

[111]

Goedecke C, Dittmann D, Eisentraut P, Wiesner Y, Schartel B, Klack P, et al. Evaluation of thermoanalytical methods equipped with evolved gas analysis for the detection of microplastic in environmental samples. J Anal Appl Pyrol 2020; 152:104961.

[112]

Monteleone A, Wenzel F, Langhals H, Dietrich D. New application for the identification and differentiation of microplastics based on fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). J Environ Chem Eng 2021; 9:104769.

[113]

Zhou F, Wang X, Wang G, Zuo Y. A rapid method for detecting microplastics based on fluorescence lifetime imaging technology (FLIM). Toxics 2022; 10 (3):118.

[114]

Li L, Xu G, Yu H, Xing J. Dynamic membrane for micro-particle removal in wastewater treatment: performance and influencing factors. Sci Total Environ 2018; 627:332-40.

[115]

Ma B, Xue W, Ding Y, Hu C, Liu H, Qu J. Removal characteristics of microplastics by Fe-based coagulants during drinking water treatment. J Environ Sci 2019; 78:267-75.

[116]

Dawson AL, Kawaguchi S, King CK, Townsend KA, King R, Huston WM, et al. Turning microplastics into nanoplastics through digestive fragmentation by Antarctic krill. Nat Commun 2018; 9:1001.

[117]

Muthulakshmi L, Mohan S, Tatarchuk T. Microplastics in water: types, detection, and removal strategies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023; 30:84933-48.

[118]

Padervand M, Lichtfouse E, Robert D, Wang C. Removal of microplastics from the environment. A review. Environ Chem Lett 2020; 18:807-28.

[119]

Liu N, Ji Y, Tang F, Fu J, Qiu C, Wang R, et al. Flash elimination of nano-/microplastics from complex matrices with record efficiency and sustainability. Chem Eng J 2025; 515:163238.

[120]

Xi W, Zhang X, Zhu X, Wang J, Xue H, Pan H. Distribution patterns and influential factors of pathogenic bacteria in freshwater aquaculture sediments. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2024; 31:16028-47.

[121]

Irshath AA, Rajan AP, Vimal S, Prabhakaran VS, Ganesan R. Bacterial pathogenesis in various fish diseases: recent advances and specific challenges in vaccine development. Vaccines 2023; 11:470.

[122]

Okeke ES, Chukwudozie KI, Nyaruaba R, Ita RE, Oladipo A, Ejeromedoghene O, et al. Antibiotic resistance in aquaculture and aquatic organisms: a review of current nanotechnology applications for sustainable management. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2022; 29:69241-74.

[123]

Yang C, Li Y, Jiang M, Wang L, Jiang Y, Hu L, et al. Outbreak dynamics of foodborne pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus over a seventeen year period implies hidden reservoirs. Nat Microbiol 2022; 7:1221-9.

[124]

World Health Organization. Food safety. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.

[125]

World Health Organization. WHO steps up action to improve food safety and protect people from disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.

[126]

Qi X, Alifu X, Chen J, Luo W, Wang J, Yu Y, et al. Descriptive study of foodborne disease using disease monitoring data in Zhejiang Province, China, 2016-2020. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1831.

[127]

Wu S, Duan N, Shen M, Wang J, Wang Z. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic single step detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus using gold coated polydimethylsiloxane as the active substrate and aptamer modified gold nanoparticles. Mikrochim Acta 2019; 186:401.

[128]

Zhan S, Zhu D, Ma S, Yu W, Jia Y, Li Y, et al. Highly efficient removal of pathogenic bacteria with magnetic graphene composite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2015; 7:4290-8.

[129]

Xu L, Lu Z, Cao L, Pang H, Zhang Q, Fu Y, et al. In-field detection of multiple pathogenic bacteria in food products using a portable fluorescent biosensing system. Food Control 2017; 75:21-8.

[130]

Wang W, Tan L, Wu J, Li T, Xie H, Wu D, et al. A universal signal-on electrochemical assay for rapid on-site quantitation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus using aptamer modified magnetic metal-organic framework and phenylboronic acid-ferrocene co-immobilized nanolabel. Anal Chim Acta 2020; 1133:128-36.

[131]

Fu K, Zheng Y, Li J, Liu Y, Pang B, Song X, et al. Colorimetric immunoassay for rapid detection of Vibrio parahemolyticus vased on Mn2+ mediates the assembly of gold nanoparticles. J Agric Food Chem 2018; 66:9516-21.

[132]

Váradi L, Luo JL, Hibbs DE, Perry JD, Anderson RJ, Orenga S, et al. Methods for the detection and identification of pathogenic bacteria: past, present, and future. Chem Soc Rev 2017; 46:4818-32.

[133]

Shen Y, Zhang Y, Gao ZF, Ye Y, Wu Q, Chen HY, et al. Recent advances in nanotechnology for simultaneous detection of multiple pathogenic bacteria. Nano Today 2021; 38:101121.

[134]

Zhang X, Tian Y, Shi Y, Liu J, Zhao C, Chang C, et al. Naked-eye LAMP assay of M. tuberculosis in sputum by in situ Au nanoprobe identification: for the in vitro diagnostics of tuberculosis. ACS Infect Dis 2024; 10: 2668-78.

[135]

Liu F, Wang G. OligoA-tailed DNA for dense functionalization of gold nanoparticles and nanorods in minutes without thiol-modification: unlocking cross-disciplinary applications. Biomater Sci 2025; 13:2503-13.

[136]

Ogunsona EO, Muthuraj R, Ojogbo E, Valerio O, Mekonnen TH. Engineered nanomaterials for antimicrobial applications: a review. Appl Mater Today 2020; 18:100473.

[137]

Weir E, Lawlor A, Whelan A, Regan F. The use of nanoparticles in anti-microbial materials and their characterization. Analyst 2008; 133:835-45.

[138]

Zhang Q, Leng X, Peng L, Lin H, Xuan G, Zhang W, et al. Streamlining bacterial gene regulation via nucleic acid delivery with gold nanoclusters. Small 2025; 21:2411723.

[139]

Zhang Q, Lu M, Ou R, Lin H, Xuan G, Wang X, et al. Nanodot-inspired precise bacterial gene suppression in a smart hydrogel bandage for underwater wound healing. Adv Sci 2025; 12:2415169.

[140]

Huang J, Lin H, Chen T, Chen C, Chang H, Chen C. Signal amplified gold nanoparticles for cancer diagnosis on paper-based analytical devices. ACS Sens 2018; 3:174-82.

[141]

Wang G, Chen Z, Chen L. Mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods: towards sensitive colorimetric sensing of ascorbic acid via target-induced silver overcoating. Nanoscale 2011; 3:1756-9.

[142]

Xing Y, Li L, Ai X, Fu L. Polyaniline-coated upconversion nanoparticles with upconverting luminescent and photothermal conversion properties for photothermal cancer therapy. Int J Nanomed 2016; 11:4327-38.

[143]

Shi L, Zhang J, Zhao M, Tang S, Cheng X, Zhang W, et al. Effects of polyethylene glycol on the surface of nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Nanoscale 2021; 13:10748-64.

[144]

Song B, Cho CW. Applying polyvinyl alcohol to the preparation of various nanoparticles. J Pharm Investig 2024; 54:249-66.

[145]

Gao S, Torrente-Rodríguez RM, Pedrero M, Pingarrón JM, Campuzano S, Rocha-Martín J, et al. Dextran-coated nanoparticles as immunosensing platforms: consideration of polyaldehyde density, nanoparticle size and functionality. Talanta 2022; 247:123549.

[146]

Del Prado-Audelo ML, Caballero-Florán IH, Sharifi-Rad J, Mendoza-Muñoz N, González-Torres M, Urbán-Morlán Z, et al. Chitosan-decorated nanoparticles for drug delivery. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2020; 59:101896.

[147]

Zhu C, Feng Z, Qin H, Chen L, Yan M, Li L, et al. Recent progress of SELEX methods for screening nucleic acid aptamers. Talanta 2024; 266:124998.

[148]

Zhang X, Wang L, Liu J, Zhang Z, Zhou L, Huang X, et al. Generation and identification of novel DNA aptamers with antiviral activities against largemouth bass virus (LMBV). Aquaculture 2022; 547:737478.

[149]

Elskens JP, Elskens JM, Madder A. Chemical modification of aptamers for increased binding affinity in diagnostic applications: current status and future prospects. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21(12):4522.

[150]

Rezaei B, Yari P, Sanders SM, Wang H, Chugh VK, Liang S, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles: a review on synthesis, characterization, functionalization, and biomedical applications. Small 2024; 20:2304848.

[151]

Liu S, Huo Y, Li G, Huang L, Wang T, Gao Z. Aptamer-controlled reversible colorimetric assay: high-activity bimetallic organic frameworks for the efficient sensing of marine biotoxins. Chem Eng J 2023; 469:144027.

[152]

Speltini A, Scalabrini A, Maraschi F, Sturini M, Profumo A. Newest applications of molecularly imprinted polymers for extraction of contaminants from environmental and food matrices: a review. Anal Chim Acta 2017; 974:1-26.

[153]

Tang X, Jiang H, Wen R, Xue D, Zeng W, Han Y, et al. Advancements and challenges on SERS-based multimodal biosensors for biotoxin detection. Trends Food Sci Technol 2024; 152:104672.

[154]

Wei Q, Zhu X, Zhang D, Liu H, Sun B. Innovative nanomaterials drive dual and multi-mode sensing strategies in food safety. Trends Food Sci Technol 2024; 151:104636.

[155]

Kong L, Wang L, Shi Y, Peng L, Liang X, Wang G, et al. DNA-functionalized silver nanoparticles in an alcoholic solvent for environment-dictated multimodal actuation. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2022; 5(8):10321-30.

[156]

Silvanir FWH, Chia WY, Ende S, Chia SR, Chew KW, et al. Nanomaterials in aquaculture disinfection, water quality monitoring, and wastewater remediation. J Environ Chem Eng 2024; 12(5):113947.

[157]

Diep Trinh TN, Trinh KTL, Lee NY. Microfluidic advances in food safety control.Food Res Int 2024; 176:113799.

[158]

Kumari SVG, Pakshirajan K, Pugazhenthi G. Recent advances and future prospects of cellulose, starch, chitosan, polylactic acid and polyhydroxyalkanoates for sustainable food packaging applications. Int J Biol Macromol 2022; 221:163-82.

[159]

Zhang L, Ma X, Wang G, Liang X, Mitomo H, Pike A, et al. Non-origami DNA for functional nanostructures: from structural control to advanced applications. Nano Today 2021; 39:101154.

[160]

El-Sayyad GS, Elfadil D, Mosleh MA, Hasanien YA, Mostafa A, Abdelkader RS, et al. Eco-friendly strategies for biological synthesis of green nanoparticles with promising applications. BioNanoSci 2024; 14:3617-59.

[161]

Alsaiari NS, Alzahrani FM, Amari A, Osman H, Harharah HN, Elboughdiri N, et al. Plant and microbial approaches as green methods for the synthesis of nanomaterials: synthesis, applications, and future perspectives. Molecules 2023; 28:463.

[162]

Shah RA, Frazar EM, Hilt JZ. Recent developments in stimuli responsive nanomaterials and their bionanotechnology applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2020; 30:103-11.

[163]

Chen X, Wu D, Chen Z. Biomedical applications of stimuli-responsive nanomaterials. MedComm 2024; 5:e643.

[164]

Tao H, Wu T, Aldeghi M, Wu TC, Aspuru-Guzik A, Kumacheva E, et al. Nanoparticle synthesis assisted by machine learning. Nat Rev Mater 2021; 6:701-16.

[165]

Béal S, Deschamps M, Solal P. European Union REACH regulation. In: Marciano A, Ramello GB, editors. Encyclopedia of law and economics. New York City. Springer; 2020. p. 1-5.

[166]

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 12878: 2012 Environmental monitoring of the impacts from marine finfish farms on soft bottom. ISO standard. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2012.

[167]

International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 22002-3: 2011 Programmes prérequis pour la sécurité des denrées alimentaires—partie 3: agriculture. ISO standard. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2015.

[168]

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 45001: 2018 Occupational health and safety management systems—requirements with guidance for use. ISO standard. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2018.

PDF (6621KB)

7602

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/