Ion Transport Mechanisms in Janus Nanofiltration Membranes with Asymmetric Charge Distribution: Quantitative Analysis of Electromigration Effects Driven by Charge Gradients

Yu-Xuan Sun; Zhen-Yuan Wang; Liu-Yong Zhao; Rui-Hao Liu; Wu-Cong Wang; Mei-Ling Liu; Shi-Peng Sun; Weihong Xing

doi:10.1016/j.eng.2025.08.035

Engineering ›› DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2025.08.035

review-article

Ion Transport Mechanisms in Janus Nanofiltration Membranes with Asymmetric Charge Distribution: Quantitative Analysis of Electromigration Effects Driven by Charge Gradients

Yu-Xuan Sun ^a^,^b^,^#
, Zhen-Yuan Wang ^a^,^b^,^#
, Liu-Yong Zhao ^a^,^b
, Rui-Hao Liu ^a
, Wu-Cong Wang ^a^,^b
, Mei-Ling Liu ^a^,^b^,^c
, Shi-Peng Sun ^a^,^b^,^c^,^*
, Weihong Xing ^a^,^b^,^c

Author information +

History +

PDF (2760KB)

Abstract

Rising freshwater scarcity in arid regions requires advanced desalination and resource recovery technologies to address brackish water threats to agriculture, drinking water, and ecosystems. Charge-asymmetric Janus nanofiltration (NF) membranes demonstrate significant potential for resource recovery in brackish water treatment, particularly enabling efficient ion-selective separation. However, current models remain limited to qualitative speculation regarding the ion transport mechanisms in Janus membranes, as they fail to incorporate quantitative descriptions of axial charge heterogeneity. Herein, we address this gap by integrating axial charge distribution into the Donnan Steric Pore Model with Dielectric Exclusion (DSPM-DE). A charge-asymmetric Janus membrane (R90-AC) was fabricated by coating a positively charged polyelectrolyte layer onto a commercial NF membrane (R90-SC). The axial-charge-distributed DSPM-DE model reduced prediction deviations for six ions in brackish water systems to < 8 %, outperforming conventional models (deviations > 16 %). Theoretical simulations revealed an intrinsic electric field (18.87 mV·μm⁻¹) within Janus structures, driving anomalous electromigration contributions exceeding 100 % for cations and −50 % to −20 % for anions. This “electrostatic diode” effect was experimentally validated, with Mg²⁺ forward flux (2.69 × 10⁻² mol·m⁻²·h⁻¹) surpassing reverse flux (2.98 × 10⁻³ mol·m⁻²·h⁻¹) by nearly an order of magnitude. The study bridges theoretical modeling and practical structure design, offering a robust framework for tailoring charge-asymmetric structures in ion-selective separations.

Keywords

Brackish water treatment / Janus nanofiltration / Asymmetric charge distributions / DSPM-DE model / Ion transport mechanisms

Highlight

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Yu-Xuan Sun, Zhen-Yuan Wang, Liu-Yong Zhao, Rui-Hao Liu, Wu-Cong Wang, Mei-Ling Liu, Shi-Peng Sun, Weihong Xing. Ion Transport Mechanisms in Janus Nanofiltration Membranes with Asymmetric Charge Distribution: Quantitative Analysis of Electromigration Effects Driven by Charge Gradients. Engineering DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2025.08.035

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Aljohani MS.Synergistic efficiency of the desilication of brackish underground water in Saudi Arabia by coupling γ-radiation and Fenton process: membrane scaling prevention in reverse osmosis process.Radiat Phys Chem 2017; 141:245-250.

[2]	Pan SY, Haddad AZ, Kumar A, Wang SW.Brackish water desalination using reverse osmosis and capacitive deionization at the water–energy nexus.Water Res 2020; 183:116064.

[3]	Mohallel SA.Hydrogeochemical tracers to assess the groundwater in El Saieda Basin, western desert, Aswan, Egypt.Appl Water Sci 2024; 14(7):157.

[4]	Bonner R, Germishuizen C, Franzsen S.Prediction of nanofiltration rejection performance in brackish water reverse osmosis brine treatment processes.J Water Process Eng 2019; 32:100900.

[5]	Merchán D, Auqu LFé, Acero P, Gimeno MJ, Causap Jé.Geochemical processes controlling water salinization in an irrigated basin in Spain: identification of natural and anthropogenic influence.Sci Total Environ 2015; 502:330-343.

[6]	Mussa KR, Mjemah IC.Using hydrogeochemical facies and signatures for groundwater characterization and evolution assessment in aquifers with contrasting climate and geology in Tanzania.Appl Water Sci 2023; 13(10):201.

[7]	Xu C.Design concept of an automated irrigation system for simulating saltwater intrusion in a mesocosm experiment.Engineering 2017; 9(6):563-574.

[8]	Zhao X, Peng W, Chen K, Qiu X, Sun L.Potential hydraulic connectivity of coal mine aquifers based on statistical analysis of hydrogeochemistry.Water Sci Eng 2022; 15(4):285-293.

[9]	Zhang Y, Yang F, Sun H, Bai Y, Li S, Shao L.Building a highly stable ultrathin nanoporous layer assisted by glucose for desalination.Engineering 2022; 16:247-255.

[10]	Jia TZ, Rong MY, Chen CT, Yong WF, Lau SK, Zhou RF, et al.Recent advances in nanofiltration-based hybrid processes.Desalination 2023; 565:116852.

[11]	Liu ML, Zhang CX, Tang MJ, Sun SP, Xing W, Lee YM.Evolution of functional nanochannel membranes.Prog Mater Sci 2023; 139:101162.

[12]	Zhao J, Gleason KK.Solvent-less vapor-phase fabrication of membranes for sustainable separation processes.Engineering 2020; 6(12):1432-1442.

[13]	Zhang CX, Fan RJ, Chen Q, Wang Y, Zhang H, Liu ML, et al.Reconstructing electrically conductive nanofiltration membranes with an aniline-functionalized carbon nanotubes interlayer for highly effective toxic organic treatment.Environ Sci Technol 2024; 58(37):16632-16641.

[14]	Peng HY, Lau SK, Yong WF.Recent advances of thin film composite nanofiltration membranes for Mg²⁺/Li⁺ separation.Adv Membr 2024; 4:100093.

[15]	Hou L, Xian W, Bing S, Song Y, Sun Q, Zhang L, et al.Understanding the ion transport behavior across nanofluidic membranes in response to the charge variations.Adv Funct Mater 2021; 31(16):2009970.

[16]	Fan RJ, Zhang CX, Xiong F, Niu LH, Ruan XX, Wang X, et al.In search of nanofiltration membranes for efficient lithium extraction from carbonate-type salt lakes.Desalination 2025; 601:118596.

[17]	Yang HC, Hou J, Chen V, Xu ZK.Janus membranes: exploring duality for advanced separation.Angew Chem Int Ed 2016; 55(43):13398-13407.

[18]	Wang W, Zhang Y, Yang X, Sun H, Wu Y, Shao L.Monovalent cation exchange membranes with Janus charged structure for ion separation.Engineering 2023; 25:204-213.

[19]	Puhan MR, Sarkar P, Amal R, Nagendraprasad G, Reddy KA, Sutariya B, et al.Unraveling anomalies in preferential liquid transport through the intrinsic pores of cyclodextrin in polyester nanofilms.Adv Mater 2024; 36:2404164.

[20]	Montes JM de Oca, Dhanasekaran J, Córdoba A, Darling SB, de JJPablo.Ionic transport in electrostatic Janus membranes. an explicit solvent molecular dynamic simulation.ACS Nano 2022; 16(3):3768-3775.

[21]	Yang HC, Xie Y, Hou J, Cheetham AK, Chen V, Darling SB.Janus membranes: creating asymmetry for energy efficiency.Adv Mater 2018; 30(43):1801495.

[22]	Ma Z, Wang C, Li R, Zhao Y, Zhang C, Ren LF, et al.Fouling- and chlorine-resistant bilayer heterostructured Janus charged nanofiltration membranes constructed via novel electrospray polymerization-based method.J Membr Sci 2024; 690:122178.

[23]	Li H, Yu Z, Lin Y, Zhang W, Lai C, Xia L, et al.Janus membrane with simultaneously robust scaling, wetting and fouling resistance for hypersaline organic wastewater treatment via membrane distillation.J Membr Sci 2025; 719:123766.

[24]	Liu S, Wu C, Hung WS, Lu X, Lee KR.One-step constructed ultrathin Janus polyamide nanofilms with opposite charges for highly efficient nanofiltration.J Mater Chem A Mater Energy Sustain 2017; 5(44):22988-22996.

[25]	Meng L, Shi W, Li Y, Li X, Tong X, Wang Z.Janus membranes at the water–energy nexus: a critical review.Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2023; 318:102937.

[26]	Wang R, Wu J, Zheng J, Chen B, Zhu X.Janus membrane with tailored upper and lower surface charges for ion penetration manipulation in high-performance nanofiltration.J Membr Sci 2023; 667:121191.

[27]	Guo C, Li N, Qian X, Shi J, Jing M, Teng K, et al.Ultra-thin double Janus nanofiltration membrane for separation of Li⁺ and Mg²⁺: “drag” effect from carboxyl-containing negative interlayer.Separ Purif Tech 2020; 230:115567.

[28]	Guo C, Qian Y, Liu P, Zhang Q, Zeng X, Xu Z, et al.One-step construction of the positively/negatively charged ultrathin Janus nanofiltration membrane for the separation of Li⁺ and Mg²⁺.ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2023; 15(3):4814-4825.

[29]	Yu L, Zhang Y, Xu L, Liu Q, Borjigin B, Hou D, et al.One step prepared Janus acid-resistant nanofiltration membranes with opposite surface charges for acidic wastewater treatment.Separ Purif Tech 2020; 250:117245.

[30]	Hoffman JR, Phillip WA.Dual-functional nanofiltration membranes exhibit multifaceted ion rejection and antifouling performance.ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2020; 12(17):19944-19954.

[31]	Hu D, Pan S, Chen Y, Wang Y, Ma R, Liu C, et al.Janus charged nanofiltration membranes modified with amino polymer brush for enhanced Mg²⁺/Li⁺ separation.Separ Purif Tech 2025; 361:131339.

[32]	Bandini S, Vezzani D.Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization.Chem Eng Sci 2003; 58(15):3303-3326.

[33]	Bandini S, Mazzoni C.Modelling the amphoteric behaviour of polyamide nanofiltration membranes.Desalination 2005; 184(1–3):327-336.

[34]	Yaroshchuk A, Bruening ML, Zholkovskiy E.Modelling nanofiltration of electrolyte solutions.Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2019; 268:39-63.

[35]	Zhai X, Lin S, Li X, Wang Z.The hidden role of the dielectric effect in nanofiltration: a novel perspective to unravel new ion separation mechanisms.Environ Sci Technol 2024; 58(35):15874-15884.

[36]	Saavedra A, Vald Hés, Velásquez J, Hernández S.Comparative analysis of Donnan steric partitioning pore model and dielectric exclusion applied to the fractionation of aqueous saline solutions through nanofiltration.ChemEngineering 2024; 8(2):39.

[37]	Cao T, Wang L, Pataroque KE, Wang R, Elimelech M.Relating solute–membrane electrostatic interactions to solute permeability in reverse osmosis membranes.Environ Sci Technol 2025; 59(11):5819-5828.

[38]	Junker MA, te EBrinke, Vall CMCompte, Lammertink RGH, de JGrooth, de WMVos.Asymmetric polyelectrolyte multilayer nanofiltration membranes: structural characterisation via transport phenomena.J Membr Sci 2023; 681:121718.

[39]	Liu Y, Sipe JM, Xu W, Zhu X, Bai L, Xu D, et al.Study on the mechanisms for the influence of nanomaterials on the separation performance of nanocomposite membrane from a modeling perspective.Desalination 2022; 532:115740.

[40]	Yang Y, Mo J, Cheng Y, Yang Y, Li X.Unraveling the transport mechanism of trace organic compounds through loose nanofiltration membranes.Separ Purif Tech 2025; 359:130826.

[41]	Liu W, Wang XM, Li D, Gao Y, Wang K, Huang X.Dominant mechanism of nanofiltration for chloride/sulfate ion separation in high salinity solutions: the quantification of pore size-influenced dielectric exclusion.Environ Sci Technol 2025; 59(11):5848-5855.

[42]	Geraldes V, Brites AMAlves.Computer program for simulation of mass transport in nanofiltration membranes.J Membr Sci 2008; 321(2):172-182.

[43]	Zhai X, Hu J, Chu Z, Zou J, Li X, Wang Z.Rethinking nanofiltration membrane design for breaking the trade-off in Li/Mg separation: a comprehensive analysis based on the separation factor-lithium flux (S-JLi) framework.J Membr Sci 2025; 717:123558.

[44]	Rehman D, Sheriff F, Lienhard JH.Quantifying uncertainty in nanofiltration transport models for enhanced metals recovery.Water Res 2023; 243:120325.

[45]	Wang Y, Wang Q, Xia QC, Yang WJ, Wang XX, Sun SP, et al.Nanocapsule controlled interfacial polymerization finely tunes membrane surface charge for precise molecular sieving.Chem Eng J 2021; 409:128198.

[46]	Cui C, Luo C, Tian T, Feng R, Li AK, Sun SP, et al.Comparative evaluation of acid-resistant nanofiltration membranes for heavy metal removal in acidic wastewater.Desalination 2024; 576:117349.

[47]	Zhang H, Quan X, Fan X, Yi G, Chen S, Yu H, et al.Improving ion rejection of conductive nanofiltration membrane through electrically enhanced surface charge density.Environ Sci Technol 2018; 53(2):868-877.