A General Model for Predicting Machining Deformation Fields in Structural Components with Varying Geometries Using a Geometry-Oriented Neural Operator

Zhiwei Zhao , Changqing Liu , Yan Jin , Yifan Zhang , Yingguang Li

Engineering ››

PDF (3220KB)
Engineering ›› DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2025.08.036
review-article
A General Model for Predicting Machining Deformation Fields in Structural Components with Varying Geometries Using a Geometry-Oriented Neural Operator
Author information +
History +
PDF (3220KB)

Abstract

Controlling machining deformations resulting from unbalanced stress fields inside structural components is a significant challenge in the manufacturing industry. Prediction of machining deformation fields is fundamental for deformation control and requires numerous iterations to optimize the machining process. Conventional prediction methods such as numerical analysis are tailored to a fixed geometry, making them time-consuming and inefficient for components with various geometries. In this study, a general data-driven model is proposed for predicting machining deformation fields in components with varying geometries and stress fields. This model is based on a geometry-oriented neural operator that incorporates global geometry information into the function space, modeling the relationship between the input function (stress fields) and the output function (deformation fields). Global geometric information is extracted using a graph neural network applied to a geometric graph and embedded into the input and output function space through an encoder-query framework. The proposed model achieved low root-mean-squared errors ranging from 0.001 to 0.016 mm, with maximum prediction errors between 0.003and 0.047 mm across different types of components, including beams and frames. The main contribution of this research is the significant advancement in the application of neural operators to the development of general models for predicting machining deformation. The underlying principles of the proposed model provide an important reference for wider applications related to the control of machining deformation in the context of digital and intelligent manufacturing.

Keywords

Structural components / Machining deformation field prediction / General model / Neural operator

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhiwei Zhao, Changqing Liu, Yan Jin, Yifan Zhang, Yingguang Li. A General Model for Predicting Machining Deformation Fields in Structural Components with Varying Geometries Using a Geometry-Oriented Neural Operator. Engineering DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2025.08.036

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Zoch HW.Distortion engineering: vision or ready to application?.Materialwiss Werkstofftech 2009; 40(5–6):342-348.

[2]

Aurrekoetxea M, Llanos I, Zelaieta O, López LNde Lacalle.Towards advanced prediction and control of machining distortion: a comprehensive review.Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022; 122(7–8):2823-2848.

[3]

Akhtar W, Lazoglu I, Liang SY.Prediction and control of residual stress-based distortions in the machining of aerospace parts: a review.J Manuf Process 2022; 76:106-122.

[4]

Zhao Z, Liu C, Li Y, Gao J.A new method for inferencing and representing a workpiece residual stress field using monitored deformation force data.Engineering 2023; 22:49-59.

[5]

Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Zhang D, Luo M.Milling distortion prediction for thin-walled component based on the average MIRS in specimen machining.Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020; 111(11–12):3379-3392.

[6]

Hussain A, Lazoglu I.Distortion in milling of structural parts.CIRP Ann 2019; 68(1):105-108.

[7]

Prete AD, Franchi R, Antermite F, Donatiello I.Numerical simulation of machining distortions on a forged aerospace component following a one and a multi-step approaches.AIP Conf Proc 2018; 1960(1):070009.

[8]

D L’Alvise, Chantzis D, Schoinochoritis B, Salonitis K.Modelling of part distortion due to residual stresses relaxation: an aerOnautical case study.Procedia CIRP 2015; 31:447-452.

[9]

Cerutti X, Mocellin K.Parallel finite element tool to predict distortion induced by initial residual stresses during machining of aeronautical parts.Int J Mater Form 2015; 8(2):255-268.

[10]

Ma K, Goetz R, Srivatsa SK.Modeling of residual stress and machining distortion in aerospace components.D.U. Furrer, S.L. Semiatin (Eds.), Metals Process Simulation (22B.), ASM International, Materials Park 2010; 386-407.

[11]

Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE.Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations.J Comput Phys 2019; 378:686-707.

[12]

Kovachki N, Li Z, Liu B, Azizzadenesheli K, Bhattacharya K, Stuart A, et al.Neural operator: learning maps between function spaces with applications to PDEs.J Mach Learn Res 2023; 24(1):4061-14057.

[13]

Liu G, Zhao Z, Fu Y, Xu J, Li Z.Deformation analysis and error prediction in machining of thin-walled honeycomb-core sandwich structural parts.Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2018; 95(9–12):3875-3886.

[14]

Rodríguez-Sánchez AE, Ledesma-Orozco E, Ledesma S.Part distortion optimization of aluminum-based aircraft structures using finite element modeling and artificial neural networks.CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2020; 31:595-606.

[15]

Zhao Z, Li Y, Liu C, Gao J.On-line part deformation prediction based on deep learning.J Intell Manuf 2020; 31(3):561-574.

[16]

Zhao Z, Li Y, Liu C, Chen Z, Chen J, Wang L.A subsequent-machining-deformation prediction method based on the latent field estimation using deformation force.J Manuf Syst 2022; 63:224-237.

[17]

Azizzadenesheli K, Kovachki N, Li Z, Liu-Schiaffini M, Kossaifi J, Anandkumar A.Neural operators for accelerating scientific simulations and design.Nat Rev Phys 2024; 6(5):320-328.

[18]

Lu L, Jin P, Pang G, Zhang Z, Karniadakis GE.Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators.Nat Mach Intell 2021; 3(3):218-229.

[19]

Li Z, Kovachki NB, Azizzadenesheli K, Liu B, Bhattacharya K, Stuart A, et al. Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations, OpenReview.net, Virtual Event, Austria. Ithaca (2021), pp. 1-16

[20]

Huang P, Leng Y, Lian C, Liu H.Porous-DeepONet: learning the solution operators of parametric reactive transport equations in porous media.Engineering 2024; 39:94-103.

[21]

Jin P, Meng S, Lu L.MIONet: learning multiple-input operators via tensor product.SIAM J Sci Comput 2022; 44(6):A3490-A3514.

[22]

Yin M, Zhang E, Yu Y, Karniadakis GE.Interfacing finite elements with deep neural operators for fast multiscale modeling of mechanics problems.Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2022; 402:115027.

[23]

Chen G, Liu X, Meng Q, Chen L, Liu C, Li Y.Learning neural operators on riemannian manifolds.Natl Sci Open 2024; 6(3):20240001.

[24]

He J, Koric S, Abueidda D, Najafi A, Jasiuk I.Geom-DeepONet: a point-cloud-based deep operator network for field predictions on 3D parameterized geometries.Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2024; 429:117130.

[25]

Li Z, Kovachki N, Choy C, Li B, Kossaifi J, Otta S, et al. Geometry-informed neural operator for large-scale 3D PDEs, Curran Associates Inc., New Orleans, LA, USA. New York City (2023), pp. 35836-35854

[26]

Hao Z, Wang Z, Su H, Ying C, Dong Y, Liu S, et al. GNOT: a general neural operator transformer for operator learning, PMLR, Honolulu, HI, USA. New York city (2023), pp. 12556-12569

[27]

Li Z, Huang DZ, Liu B, Anandkumar A. Fourier neural operator with learned deformations for PDEs on general geometries, 24 (1) (2023), pp. 18539-18618

[28]

Yin M, Charon N, Brody R, Lu L, Trayanova N, Maggioni M.DIMON: learning solution operators of partial differential equations on a diffeomorphic family of domains.2024. ar Xiv:2402.07250v1.

[29]

Zhao Z, Liu C, Li Y, Chen Z, Liu X.Diffeomorphism neural operator for various domains and parameters of partial differential equations., 8 (2025), p. 15

PDF (3220KB)

226

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/