Reinforcement Learning-Driven Optimization of Additively Manufactured Lattices for Enhancement of Mechanical Stiffness and Lightweight Property

Ju-Chan Yuk; Suk-Hee Park

doi:10.1016/j.eng.2025.08.043

Engineering ›› :202508043 DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2025.08.043

Article

research-article

Reinforcement Learning-Driven Optimization of Additively Manufactured Lattices for Enhancement of Mechanical Stiffness and Lightweight Property

Ju-Chan Yuk
, Suk-Hee Park ^*

Author information +

History +

PDF (4649KB)

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has been extensively used in various industries to produce complex-shaped parts, enabling the application of advanced design methodologies for lightweight and mechanically optimized structures. Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful tool for optimizing complex structural designs in various mechanical systems. In this study, an RL-based strategy is proposed to optimize the design of three-dimensional lattice structures. RL is employed to optimize the shape variables of each unit cell in a lattice with the aim of maximizing the mechanical stiffness while retaining a lightweight design. The research object is a body-centered cubic (BCC) lattice with strut geometries adjusted through RL optimization to enhance structural performance. The RL environment, which incorporates the state, reward, and action, is integrated into a finite element method simulation, in which the actions derive a set of optimal design variables through the learning process. The feasibility and effectiveness of the RL-generated designs are validated by fabricating optimized structures using a vat photopolymerization AM process and experimentally testing them under three-point bending. The results demonstrate that the RL-optimized lattice structures exhibit superior performance compared to traditional BCC lattice designs. This study highlights the potential of RL for design optimization and its broad applicability in various engineering systems that require complex mechanical components.

Keywords

Reinforcement learning / Additive manufacturing / Design optimization / Lightweight design / Body-centered cubic lattice

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Ju-Chan Yuk, Suk-Hee Park. Reinforcement Learning-Driven Optimization of Additively Manufactured Lattices for Enhancement of Mechanical Stiffness and Lightweight Property. Engineering 202508043 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2025.08.043

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Dizon JRC, Espera AH, Chen Q, Advincula RC. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Addit Manuf 2018; 20:44-67.

[2]	Shi X, Liao W, Li P, Zhang C, Liu T, Wang C, et al. Comparison of compression performance and energy absorption of lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Adv Eng Mater 2020; 22(11):2000453.

[3]	Sajjad U, Rehman T, Ali M, Park CW, Yan WM. Manufacturing and potential applications of lattice structures in thermal systems: a comprehensive review of recent advances. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2022; 198:123352.

[4]	Bayat M, Zinovieva O, Ferrari F, Ayas C, Langelaar M, Spangenberg J, et al. Holistic computational design within additive manufacturing through topology optimization combined with multiphysics multi-scale materials and process modelling. Prog Mater Sci 2023; 138:101129.

[5]	Zhao M, Li X, Zhang DZ, Zhai W. TPMS-based interpenetrating lattice structures: design, mechanical properties and multiscale optimization. Int J Mech Sci 2023; 244:108092.

[6]	Xiao A, Seepersad C, Allen J, Rosen D, Mistree F. Design for manufacturing: application of collaborative multidisciplinary decision-making methodology. Eng Optim 2007; 39(4):429-51.

[7]	Peng C, Tran P, Rutz E. Accelerating hybrid lattice structures design with machine learning. Mater Sci Addit Manuf 2024; 3(2):3430.

[8]	Zhou T, Gani R, Sundmacher K. Hybrid data-driven and mechanistic modeling approaches for multiscale material and process design. Engineering 2021; 7(9):1231-8.

[9]	Xie J, Sun L, Zhao YF. On the data quality and imbalance in machine learning-based design and manufacturing—a systematic review. Engineering 2024; 45:105-31.

[10]	Liu F, Jiang X, Wang X, Wang L. Machine learning-based design and optimization of curved beams for multistable structures and metamaterials. Extreme Mech Lett 2020; 41:101002.

[11]	Li M, Li S, Tian Y, Fu Y, Pei Y, Zhu W, et al. A deep learning convolutional neural network and multi-layer perceptron hybrid fusion model for predicting the mechanical properties of carbon fiber. Mater Des 2023; 227:111760.

[12]	Yamanaka A, Kamijyo R, Koenuma K, Watanabe I, Kuwabara T. Deep neural network approach to estimate biaxial stress-strain curves of sheet metals. Mater Des 2020; 195:108970.

[13]	Kazemi H, Seepersad CC, Kim HA. Multiphysics design optimization via generative adversarial networks. J Mech Des 2022; 144(12):121702.

[14]	Yang Z, Yu CH, Buehler MJ. Deep learning model to predict complex stress and strain fields in hierarchical composites. Sci Adv 2021; 7(15):eabd7416.

[15]	Wang L, Chan YC, Ahmed F, Liu Z, Zhu P, Chen W. Deep generative modeling for mechanistic-based learning and design of metamaterial systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2020; 372:113377.

[16]	Dineva K, Atanasova T. Systematic look at machine learning algorithms-advantages, disadvantages and practical applications In: Proceedings of the 20th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2020; 2020 Aug 16-25; Albena, Bulgaria. Vienna: SGEM; 2020. p. 317-24.

[17]	Chi H, Zhang Y, Tang TLE, Mirabella L, Dalloro L, Song L, et al. Universal machine learning for topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2021; 375:112739.

[18]	Chibani S, Coudert FX. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of materials properties. APL Mater 2020; 8(8):080701.

[19]	Shakya AK, Pillai G, Chakrabarty S. Reinforcement learning algorithms: a brief survey. Expert Syst Appl 2023; 231:120495.

[20]	Brown NK, Garland AP, Fadel GM, Li G. Deep reinforcement learning for engineering design through topology optimization of elementally discretized design domains. Mater Des 2022; 218:110672.

[21]	Hui X, Wang H, Li W, Bai J, Qin F, He G. Multi-object aerodynamic design optimization using deep reinforcement learning. AIP Adv 2021; 11(8):085311.

[22]	Sui F, Guo R, Zhang Z, Gu GX, Lin L. Deep reinforcement learning for digital materials design. ACS Mater Lett 2021; 3(10):1433-9.

[23]	Li R, Zhang C, Xie W, Gong Y, Ding F, Dai H, et al. Deep reinforcement learning empowers automated inverse design and optimization of photonic crystals for nanoscale laser cavities. Nanophotonics 2023; 12(2):319-34.

[24]	Gamrath G, Gleixner A, Koch T, Miltenberger M, Martin A, Weninger D. Tackling industrial-scale supply chain problems by mixed-integer programming. J Comput Math 2019; 37(6):866-88.

[25]	Tran T. Decomposition models for complex scheduling applications [dissertation]. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2017.

[26]

Shengren H, Salazar EM, Vergara PP, Palensky P. Performance comparison of deep RL algorithms for energy systems optimal scheduling. In:Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe); 2022 Oct 10-12; Novi Sad, Serbia. Piscataway: IEEE; 2022. p. 1-6.

[27]	Schulman J, Wolski F, Dhariwal P, Radford A, Klimov O. Proximal policy optimization algorithms 2017. arXiv:1707.06347.

[28]	Wang Y, He H, Tan X. Truly proximal policy optimization. In: Proceedings of the 35th Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence Conference; 2019 Jul 22-25; Tel Aviv, Israel. New York city: PLMR; 2020. p. 113-22.

[29]	Zhu W, Rosendo A. A functional clipping approach for policy optimization algorithms. IEEE Access 2021; 9:96056-63.

[30]	Feng Z, Huang M, Wu D, Wu EQ, Yuen C. Multi-agent reinforcement learning with policy clipping and average evaluation for UAV-assisted communication Markov game. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2023; 24(12):14281-93.

[31]	Zhou S, Jin K, Buehler MJ. Understanding plant biomass via computational modeling. Adv Mater 2021; 33(28):2003206.

[32]	Kim JE, Park K. Multiscale topology optimization combining density-based optimization and lattice enhancement for additive manufacturing. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Technol 2021; 8(4):1197-208.

[33]	Callister WD. Materials Science and Engineering. 5th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1999.

[34]	Kang D, Park S, Son Y, Yeon S, Kim SH, Kim I. Multi-lattice inner structures for high-strength and light-weight in metal selective laser melting process. Mater Des 2019; 175:107786.

[35]	Bai L, Yi C, Chen X, Sun Y, Zhang J. Effective design of the graded strut of BCC lattice structure for improving mechanical properties. Materials 2019; 12(13):2192.

[36]	Chua C, Sing SL, Chua CK. Characterisation of in-situ alloyed titanium-tantalum lattice structures by laser powder bed fusion using finite element analysis. Virtual Phys Prototyp 2023; 18(1):e2138463.

[37]	Chua C, Liu Y, Williams RJ, Chua CK, Sing SL. In-process and post-process strategies for part quality assessment in metal powder bed fusion: a review. J Manuf Syst 2024; 73:75-105.

[38]	Su J, Ng WL, An J, Yeong WY, Chua CK, Sing SL. Achieving sustainability by additive manufacturing: a state-of-the-art review and perspectives. Virtual Phys Prototyp 2024; 19(1):e2438899.

[39]	Kim H, Kim KH, Jeong J, Lee Y, Jung ID. Recent progress on materials for functional additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Addit Manuf 2024; 3(2):3323.

[40]	Spadoni A, Ruzzene M. Numerical and experimental analysis of the static compliance of chiral truss-core airfoils. J Mech Mater Struct 2007; 2(5):965-81.