Nematbakhsh A, Bachynski EE, Gao Z, Moan T. Comparison of wave load effects on a TLP wind turbine by using computational fluid dynamics and potential flow theory approaches. Appl Ocean Res 2015; 53:142-54.

Sulovsky I, de Hauteclocque G, Greco M, Prpić-Oršić J. Comparative study of potential flow and CFD in the assessment of seakeeping and added resistance of ships. J Mar Sci Eng 2023; 11(3):641.

Babanin A, Bernardino M, Von Bock Und Polach F, Campos R, Ding J, Van Essen S, et al. Report of committee I.1: environment. In: Proceedings of the 21st international ship and offshore structures congress, 2022 Sep 11-15, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Alexandria: SNAME; 2022.

Hermundstad OA, Chai S, De Hauteclocque G, Dong S, Fang CC, Johannessen TB, et al. Report of Committee I.2: loads. In: Proceedings of the 21st international ship and offshore structures congress, 2022 Sep 11-15, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Alexandria: SNAME; 2022.

Tavakoli S, Khojasteh D, Haghani M, Hirdaris S. A review on the progress and research directions of ocean engineering. Ocean Eng 2023; 272:113617.

Temarel P, Bai W, Bruns A, Derbanne Q, Dessi D, Dhavalikar S, et al. Prediction of wave-induced loads on ships: progress and challenges. Ocean Eng 2016; 119:274-308.

Wang J, Wan D. Application progress of computational fluid dynamic techniques for complex viscous flows in ship and ocean engineering. J Mar Sci Appl 2020; 19(1):1-16.

Zhang W, Calderon-Sanchez J, Duque D, Souto-Iglesias A. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) applications in floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) dynamics: a review. Appl Ocean Res 2024; 150:104075.

Mirjalili S, Ivey CB, Mani A. Comparison between the diffuse interface and volume of fluid methods for simulating two-phase flows. Int J Multiph Flow 2019; 116:221-38.

Ubbink O, Issa RI. A method for capturing sharp fluid interfaces on arbitrary meshes. J Comput Phys 1999; 153(1):26-50.

Muzaferija S. Peric M, Sames PC, Schellin TE. A two-fluid Navier-Stokes solver to simulate water entry. In: Proceeding of the 22nd symposium of naval hydrodynamics, 1998 Aug 9-14, Washington, DC, USA. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999, p. 638-51.

Darwish M, Moukalled F. Convective schemes for capturing interfaces of free-surface flows on unstructured grids. Numer Heat Transf B 2006; 49(1):19-42.

Heyns JA, Malan AG, Harms TM, Oxtoby OF. Development of a compressive surface capturing formulation for modelling free-surface flow by using the volume-of-fluid approach. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2013; 71(6):788-804.

Zhang D, Jiang C, Liang D, Chen Z, Yang Y, Shi Y. A refined volume-of-fluid algorithm for capturing sharp fluid interfaces on arbitrary meshes. J Comput Phys 2014; 274:709-36.

Rusche H. Computational fluid dynamics of dispersed two-phase flows at high phase fractions [dissertation]. London: Imperial College London; 2002.

Larsen BE, Fuhrman DR, Roenby J. Performance of interFoam on the simulation of progressive waves. Coast Eng J 2019; 61(3):380-400.

Xiao F, Honma Y, Kono T. A simple algebraic interface capturing scheme using hyperbolic tangent function. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2005; 48(9):1023-40.

Yokoi K. Efficient implementation of THINC scheme: a simple and practical smoothed VOF algorithm. J Comput Phys 2007; 226(2):1985-2002.

Xiao F, Ii S, Chen C. Revisit to the THINC scheme: a simple algebraic VOF algorithm. J Comput Phys 2011; 230(19):7086-92.

Cifani P, Michalek WR, Priems GJM, Kuerten JGM, van der Geld CWM, Geurts BJ. A comparison between the surface compression method and an interface reconstruction method for the VOF approach. Comput Fluids 2016; 136:421-35.

Noh WF, Woodward P. SLIC (simple line interface calculation). In: Vooren AI, Zandbergen PJ, editors. Proceedings of the Fifth international conference on numerical methods in fluid dynamics, 1976 Jun 28-Jul 2, Enschede, The Netherlands. Berlin: Springer Nature; 1976. p. 330-40.

Youngs DL. Time-dependent multi-material flow with large fluid distortion. In: Numerical methods for fluid dynamics. New York City: Academic Press; 1982. p. 273-85.

Roenby J, Bredmose H, Jasak H. A computational method for sharp interface advection. R Soc Open Sci 2016; 3(11):160405.

Scheufler H, Roenby J. Accurate and efficient surface reconstruction from volume fraction data on general meshes. J Comput Phys 2019; 383:1-23.

Cummins SJ, Francois MM, Kothe DB. Estimating curvature from volume fractions. Comput Struc 2005; 83(6-7):425-34.

Esteban A, López J, Gómez P, Zanzi C, Roenby J, Hernández J. A comparative study of two open-source state-of-the-art geometric VOF methods. Comput Fluids 2023; 250:105725.

Scheufler H, Roenby J. TwoPhaseFlow: a framework for developing two phase flow solvers in OpenFOAM. OpenFOAM^® J 2023; 3:200-24.

Dai D, Tong AY. Analytical interface reconstruction algorithms in the PLIC-VOF method for 3D polyhedral unstructured meshes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2019; 91(5):213-27.

López J, Hernández J. gVOF: an open-source package for unsplit geometric volume of fluid methods on arbitrary grids. Comput Phys Commun 2022; 277:108400.

Osher S, Sethian JA. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 1988; 79(1):12-49.

Sethian JA, Smereka P. Level set methods for fluid interfaces. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2003; 35(1):341-72.

du Chéné A, Min C, Gibou F. Second-order accurate computation of curvatures in a level set framework using novel high-order reinitialization schemes. J Sci Comput 2008; 35(2-3):114-31.

Enright D, Fedkiw R, Ferziger J, Mitchell I. A hybrid particle level set method for improved interface capturing. J Comput Phys 2002; 183(1):83-116.

Herrmann M. A balanced force refined level set grid method for two-phase flows on unstructured flow solver grids. J Comput Phys 2008; 227(4):2674-706.

Gibou F, Fedkiw R, Osher S. A review of level-set methods and some recent applications. J Comput Phys 2018; 353:82-109.

Olsson E, Kreiss G. A conservative level set method for two phase flow. J Comput Phys 2005; 210(1):225-46.

Olsson E, Kreiss G, Zahedi S. A conservative level set method for two phase flow II. J Comput Phys 2007; 225(1):785-807.

Chiodi R, Desjardins O. A reformulation of the conservative level set reinitialization equation for accurate and robust simulation of complex multiphase flows. J Comput Phys 2017; 343:186-200.

Shervani-Tabar N, Vasilyev OV. Stabilized conservative level set method. J Comput Phys 2018; 375:1033-44.

Bahbah C, Khalloufi M, Larcher A, Mesri Y, Coupez T, Valette R, et al. Conservative and adaptive level-set method for the simulation of two-fluid flows. Comput Fluids 2019; 191:104223.

Sussman M, Puckett EG. A coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for computing 3D and axisymmetric incompressible two-phase flows. J Comput Phys 2000; 162(2):301-37.

Kunkelmann C, Stephan P. Modification and extension of a standard volume-of-fluid solver for simulating boiling heat transfer. In: Pereira JCF, Sequeira A, editors. Proceedings of the 5th European conference on computational fluid dynamics ECCOMAS CFD2010, 2010 Jun 14-17, Lisbon, Portugal. Barcelona: CIMNE Congress Bureau; 2010.

Albadawi A, Donoghue DB, Robinson AJ, Murray DB, Delauré YMC. Influence of surface tension implementation in volume of fluid and coupled volume of fluid with level set methods for bubble growth and detachment. Int J Multiph Flow 2013; 53:11-28.

Wang Z, Yang J, Koo B, Stern F. A coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for sharp interface simulation of plunging breaking waves. Int J Multiph Flow 2009; 35(3):227-46.

Dianat M, Skarysz M, Garmory A. A coupled level set and volume of fluid method for automotive exterior water management applications. Int J Multiph Flow 2017; 91:19-38.

Skarysz M, Garmory A, Dianat M. An iterative interface reconstruction method for PLIC in general convex grids as part of a coupled level set volume of fluid solver. J Comput Phys 2018; 368:254-76.

Zhao Y, Chen HC. A new coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method to capture free surface on an overset grid system. Int J Multiph Flow 2017; 90:144-55.

Afshar MA. Numerical wave generation in OpenFOAM® [dissertation]. Goeteborg: Chalmers University of Technology; 2010.

Fedkiw RP, Aslam T, Merriman B, Osher S. A non-oscillatory Eulerian approach to interfaces in multimaterial flows (the ghost fluid method). J Comput Phys 1999; 152(2):457-92.

Kang M, Fedkiw RP, Liu XD. A boundary condition capturing method for multiphase incompressible flow. J Sci Comput 2000; 15(3):323-60.

Huang J, Carrica PM, Stern F. Coupled ghost fluid/two-phase level set method for curvilinear body-fitted grids. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2007; 55(9):867-97.

Yang J, Stern F. Sharp interface immersed-boundary/level-set method for wave-body interactions. J Comput Phys 2009; 228(17):6590-616.

Wang Z, Stern F. Volume-of-fluid based two-phase flow methods on structured multiblock and overset grids. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2022; 94(6):557-82.

Vukčević V, Jasak H, Gatin I. Implementation of the ghost fluid method for free surface flows in polyhedral finite volume framework. Comput Fluids 2017; 153:1-19.

Peltonen P, Kanninen P, Laurila E, Vuorinen V. The ghost fluid method for OpenFOAM: a comparative study in marine context. Ocean Eng 2020; 216:108007.

Peltonen P, Kanninen P, Laurila E, Vuorinen V. Scaling effects on the free surface backward facing step flow. Phys Fluids 2021; 33(4):042106.

Kanninen P, Peltonen P, Vuorinen V. Full-scale ship stern wave with the modelled and resolved turbulence including the hull roughness effect. Ocean Eng 2022; 245:110434.

Chen S, Zhao W, Wan D. On the scattering of focused wave by a finite surface-piercing circular cylinder: a numerical investigation. Phys Fluids 2022; 34(3):035132.

Kamath A, Fleit G, Bihs H. Investigation of free surface turbulence damping in RANS simulations for complex free surface flows. Water 2019; 11(3):456.

Devolder B, Troch P, Rauwoens P. Performance of a buoyancy-modified k-x and k-x SST turbulence model for simulating wave breaking under regular waves using OpenFOAM®. Coast Eng 2018; 138:49-65.

Larsen BE, Fuhrman DR. On the over-production of turbulence beneath surface waves in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes models. J Fluid Mech 2018; 853:419-60.

Willden RHJ, Graham JMR. Numerical prediction of VIV on long flexible circular cylinders. J Fluids Struct 2001; 15(3-4):659-69.

Willden RHJ, Graham JMR. Multi-modal vortex-induced vibrations of a vertical riser pipe subject to a uniform current profile. Eur J Mech B/Fluids 2004; 23(1):209-18.

Huang Z, Deng Z, Liu D, Bai Y. Numerical simulation for VIV of a long flexible cylinder in the time domain. Ships Offshore Struct 2018; 13(Supp1):214-27.

Duanmu Y, Zou L, Wan D. Numerical analysis of multi-modal vibrations of a vertical riser in step currents. Ocean Eng 2018; 152:428-42.

Fu B, Wan D. Numerical study of vibrations of a vertical tension riser excited at the top end. J Ocean Eng Sci 2017; 2(4):268-78.

Fu B, Zou L, Wan D. Numerical study of vortex-induced vibrations of a flexible cylinder in an oscillatory flow. J Fluids Struct 2018; 77:170-81.

Deng D, Zhao W, Wan D. Vortex-induced vibration prediction of a flexible cylinder by three-dimensional strip model. Ocean Eng 2020; 205:107318.

Hu H, Zhao W, Wan D. Vortex-induced vibration of a slender flexible riser with grooved and spanwise strips subject to uniform currents. Phys Fluids 2022; 34(12):125131.

Yin D, Passano E, Jiang F, Lie H, Wu J, Ye N, et al. State-of-the-art review of vortex-induced motions of floating offshore wind turbine structures. J Mar Sci Eng 2022; 10(8):1021.

Spalart PR. Detached-eddy simulation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2009; 41(1):181-202.

Kim SJ, Spernjak D, Holmes S, Vinayan V, Antony A. Vortex-induced motion of floating structures:CFD sensitivity considerations of turbulence model and mesh refinement. In: Proceedings of the 34th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering; 2015 May 31-Jun 5, St. John’s, NL, Canada. New York City: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME); 2015. p. V002T08A057.

Kara M, Kaufmann J, Gordon R, Sharma P, Lu J. Application of CFD for computing VIM of floating structures. In: Proceedings of the offshore technology conference, 2016 May 2-5, Houston, Texas, USA. London: Onepetro; 2016. p. OTC-26950-MS.

Chen CR, Chen HC. Simulation of vortex-induced motions of a deep draft semi-submersible in current. Ocean Eng 2016; 118:107-16.

Sørensen JN, Shen WZ. Numerical modeling of wind turbine wakes. J Fluids Eng 2002; 124(2):393-9.

Bachant P, Goude A, Wosnik M. Actuator line modeling of vertical-axis turbines. arXiv: 1605.01449; 2016.

Stevens RJAM, Martínez-Tossas LA, Meneveau C. Comparison of wind farm large eddy simulations using actuator disk and actuator line models with wind tunnel experiments. Renew Energy 2018; 116:470-8.

Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Noack RW, Stern F. Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids. Comput Fluids 2007; 36(9):1415-33.

Shen Z, Wan D. RANS computations of added resistance and motions of a ship in head waves. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 2013; 23:263-71.

Shen Z, Wan D, Carrica PM. Dynamic overset grids in OpenFOAM with application to KCS self-propulsion and maneuvering. Ocean Eng 2015; 108:287-306.

Dullweber A, Leimkuhler B, McLachlan R. Symplectic splitting methods for rigid body molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 1997; 107(15):5840-51.

Dunbar AJ, Craven BA, Paterson EG. Development and validation of a tightly coupled CFD/6-DOF solver for simulating floating offshore wind turbine platforms. Ocean Eng 2015;110(Pt A):98-105.

Chow JH, Ng EYK. Strongly coupled partitioned six degree-of-freedom rigid body motion solver with Aitken’s dynamic under-relaxation. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 2016; 8(4):320-9.

Bruinsma N, Paulsen BT, Jacobsen NG. Validation and application of a fully nonlinear numerical wave tank for simulating floating offshore wind turbines. Ocean Eng 2018; 147:647-58.

Devolder B, Troch P, Rauwoens P. Accelerated numerical simulations of a heaving floating body by coupling a motion solver with a two-phase fluid solver. Comput Math Appl 2019; 77(6):1605-25.

Roenby J, Aliyar S, Bredmose H. A robust algorithm for computational floating body dynamics. R Soc Open Sci 2024; 11(4):231453.

Jasak H, Tuković Ž. Dynamic mesh handling in OpenFOAM applied to fluid-structure interaction simulations. In: Proceedings of the fifth European conference on computational fluid dynamics ECCOMAS CFD 2010, 2010 Jun 14-17, Lisbon, Portugal. Barcelona: CIMNE Congress Bureau; 2010.

Chen H, Hall M. CFD simulation of floating body motion with mooring dynamics: coupling MoorDyn with OpenFOAM. Appl Ocean Res 2022; 124:103210.

Helenbrook BT. Mesh deformation using the biharmonic operator. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2003; 56(7):1007-21.

Batina JT. Unsteady Euler airfoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes. AIAA J 1990; 28(8):1381-8.

Yang Z, Mavriplis D. Unstructured dynamic meshes with higher-order time integration schemes for the unsteady Navier-Stokes equations. In: Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, 2005 Jan 10-13, Reno, NV, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2005. 2005. p. 1-13.

Shamsaei B, Newman JC. Comparison of linear and non-linear elasticity large displacement mesh deformation in computational fluid dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 46th AIAA fluid dynamics conference, 2016 Jun 13-17, Washington, DC, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2016. p. 3183.

Estruch O, Lehmkuhl O, Borrell R, Pérez Segarra CD, Oliva A. A parallel radial basis function interpolation method for unstructured dynamic meshes. Comput Fluids 2013; 80:44-54.

Li CN, Wei Q, Gong CL, Gu LX. An efficient multiple point selection study for mesh deformation using radial basis functions. Aerosp Sci Technol 2017; 71:580-91.

Tang X, Luo J, Liu F. Adjoint aerodynamic optimization of a transonic fan rotor blade with a localized two-level mesh deformation method. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018; 72:267-77.

Witteveen J. Explicit and robust inverse distance weighting mesh deformation for CFD. In: Proceedings of the 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, 2010 Jan 4-7, Orlando, FL, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2010. p. 1-10.

Tran TT, Kim DH. Fully coupled aero-hydrodynamic analysis of a semi-submersible FOWT using a dynamic fluid body interaction approach. Renew Energy 2016; 92:244-61.

Chandar DDJ. On overset interpolation strategies and conservation on unstructured grids in OpenFOAM. Comput Phys Commun 2019; 239:72-83.

Teschner F, Mundt Ch. Fully conservative overset mesh to overcome the blunt body metric singularity in finite difference methods. Shock Waves 2022; 32(3):295-312.

Quon EW, Smith MJ. Advanced data transfer strategies for overset computational methods. Comput Fluids 2015; 117:88-102.

Rinaldi E, Colonna P, Pecnik R. Flux-conserving treatment of non-conformal interfaces for finite-volume discretization of conservation laws. Comput Fluids 2015; 120:126-39.

Griffith BE, Patankar NA. Immersed methods for fluid-structure interaction. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2020; 52(1):421-48.

Kim W, Choi H. Immersed boundary methods for fluid-structure interaction: a review. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2019; 75:301-9.

Verzicco R. Immersed boundary methods: historical perspective and future outlook. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2023; 55(1):129-55.

Peskin CS. Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. J Comput Phys 1972; 10(2):252-71.

Goldstein D, Handler R, Sirovich L. Modeling a no-slip flow boundary with an external force field. J Comput Phys 1993; 105(2):354-66.

Saiki EM, Biringen S. Numerical simulation of a cylinder in uniform flow: application of a virtual boundary method. J Comput Phys 1996; 123(2):450-65.

Mohd-Yosuf J. Combined immersed-boundary/B-spline methods for simulations of flow in complex geometries. Annu Res Briefs 1997; 1997:317-27.

Majumdar S, Iaccarino G, Durbin P. RANS solvers with adaptive structured boundary non-conforming grids. Annu Res Briefs 2001; 2001:353-66.

Tseng YH, Ferziger JH. A ghost-cell immersed boundary method for flow in complex geometry. J Comput Phys 2003; 192(2):593-623.

Souza PRC, Neto HR, Villar MM, Vedovotto JM, Cavalini Jr AA, Neto AS. Multi-phase fluid-structure interaction using adaptive mesh refinement and immersed boundary method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2022; 44(4):152.

Borthwick A, Cruz León S, Jozsa J. Adaptive quadtree model of shallow-flow hydrodynamics. J Hydraul Res 2001; 39(4):413-24.

Popinet S. An accurate adaptive solver for surface-tension-driven interfacial flows. J Comput Phys 2009; 228(16):5838-66.

Popinet S. Gerris: a tree-based adaptive solver for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries. J Comput Phys 2003; 190(2):572-600.

Fuster D, Bagué A, Boeck T, Le Moyne L, Leboissetier A, Popinet S, et al. Simulation of primary atomization with an octree adaptive mesh refinement and VOF method. Int J Multiph Flow 2009; 35(6):550-65.

Sui Y, Spelt PD. Validation and modification of asymptotic analysis of slow and rapid droplet spreading by numerical simulation. J Fluid Mech 2013; 715:283-313.

Gunney BTN, Anderson RW. Advances in patch-based adaptive mesh refinement scalability. J Parallel Distrib Comput 2016; 89:65-84.

Liu Y, Peng Y, Wan D. Numerical investigation on interaction between a semi-submersible platform and its mooring system. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2015 34th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, 2015 May 31-Jun 05, St. John’s, NL, Canada. New York City: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME); 2015. p. V007T06A071.

Smith RJ, MacFarlane CJ. Statics of a three component mooring line. Ocean Eng 2001; 28(7):899-914.

Quallen S, Xing T. CFD simulation of a floating offshore wind turbine system using a variable-speed generator-torque controller. Renew Energy 2016; 97:230-42.

Gutiérrez-Romero JE, García-Espinosa J, Serván-Camas B, Zamora-Parra B. Non-linear dynamic analysis of the response of moored floating structures. Mar Struct 2016; 49:116-37.

Palm J, Eskilsson C, Paredes GM, Bergdahl L. Coupled mooring analysis for floating wave energy converters using CFD: formulation and validation. Int J Mar Energy 2016; 16:83-99.

Cevasco D, Collu M, Rizzo C, Hall M. On mooring line tension and fatigue prediction for offshore vertical axis wind turbines: a comparison of lumped mass and quasi-static approaches. Wind Eng 2018; 42(2):97-107.

Burmester S, Vaz G, Gueydon S, el Moctar O. Investigation of a semi-submersible floating wind turbine in surge decay using CFD. Ship Technol Res 2020; 67(1):2-14.

Jiang C, el Moctar O, Schellin TE, Paredes GM. Comparative study of mathematical models for mooring systems coupled with CFD. Ships Offshore Struct 2021; 16(9):942-54.

Chen H, Medina TA, Cercos-Pita JL. CFD simulation of multiple moored floating structures using OpenFOAM: an open-access mooring restraints library. Ocean Eng 2024; 303:117697.

Ducrozet G, Engsig-Karup AP, Bingham HB, Ferrant P. A non-linear wave decomposition model for efficient wave-structure interaction. Part A: formulation, validations and analysis. J Comput Phys 2014; 257:863-83.

Vukčević V, Jasak H, Malenica Š. Decomposition model for naval hydrodynamic applications, part II: verification and validation. Ocean Eng 2016; 121:76-88.

Li Z. Two-phase spectral wave explicit Navier-Stokes equations method for wave-structure interactions [dissertation]. Nantes: École centrale de Nantes; 2018.

Yu J, Yao C, Liu L, Dong G, Zhang Z. Numerical study on wave-structure interaction based on functional decomposition method. Ocean Eng 2022; 266:113067.

Dommermuth DG. The laminar interactions of a pair of vortex tubes with a free surface. J Fluid Mech 1993; 246:91-115.

Ferrant P, Gentaz L, Le Touze D. A new RANSE/potential approach for water wave diffraction. In: Proceedings of the 5th numerical towing tank. Symposium 2002 (NuTTS’02), 2002 Sep 29-Oct 2, Pornichet, France. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc.; 2002. p. 1-6.

Aliyar S, Ducrozet G, Bouscasse B, Sriram V, Ferrant P. Efficiency and accuracy of the domain and functional decomposition strategies for the wave-structure interaction problem. Ocean Eng 2022; 266:112568.

Lao T, Li Z, Wang Z, Wang Z, Yang Z. Generation of incident wave in two-phase flow simulation based on field decomposition. Ocean Eng 2023; 285:115256.

Shen C, Chen NZ. A SWENSE-based wave-induced loading simulation for a semi-submersible FOWT platform. Ocean Eng 2024; 311:118950.

Ducrozet G, Bonnefoy F, Le Touzé D, Ferrant P. A modified high-order spectral method for wavemaker modeling in a numerical wave tank. Eur J Mech BFluids 2012; 34:19-34.

Colicchio G, Greco M, Faltinsen OM. A BEM-level set domain-decomposition strategy for non-linear and fragmented interfacial flows. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2006; 67(10):1385-419.

Paulsen BT, Bredmose H, Bingham HB. An efficient domain decomposition strategy for wave loads on surface piercing circular cylinders. Coast Eng 2014; 86:57-76.

Zhuang Y, Wan D. Parametric study of a new HOS-CFD coupling method. J Hydrodynam 2021; 33(1):43-54.

Zhuang Y, Zhao W, Wan D. The nonlinearity of scattering waves due to interaction between focusing waves and floating production storage and offloading. Phys Fluids 2023; 35(10):107113.

Zhong W, Wang W, Wan D. Coupling potential and viscous flow models with domain decomposition for wave propagations. J Hydrodynam 2022; 34(5):826-48.

Zheng J, Wang N, Wan D, Strijhak S. Numerical investigations of coupled aeroelastic performance of wind turbines by elastic actuator line model. Appl Energy 2023; 330:120361.

Liu Y, Xiao Q, Incecik A, Peyrard C. Aeroelastic analysis of a floating offshore wind turbine in platform-induced surge motion using a fully coupled CFD-MBD method. Wind Energy 2019; 22(1):1-20.

Wang Q, Sprague MA, Jonkman J, Johnson N, Jonkman B. BeamDyn: a high-fidelity wind turbine blade solver in the FAST modular framework. Wind Energy 2017; 20(8):143962.

Wu X, Feng K, Li Q. A numerical method for the dynamics analysis of blade fracture faults in wind turbines using geometrically exact beam theory and its validation. Energies 2024; 17(4):824.

Benra FK, Dohmen HJ, Pei J, Schuster S, Wan B. A comparison of one-way and two-way coupling methods for numerical analysis of fluid-structure interactions. J Appl Math 2011; 2011(1):853560.

Lakshmynarayanana PAK, Hirdaris S. Comparison of nonlinear one- and two-way FFSI methods for the prediction of the symmetric response of a containership in waves. Ocean Eng 2020; 203:107179.

Takami T, Iijima K. Numerical investigation into combined global and local hydroelastic response in a large container ship based on two-way coupled CFD and FEA. J Mar Sci Technol 2020; 25(2):346-62.

Xiao J, Liu C, Han B, Wan D, Wang J. A two-way coupled fluid-structure interaction method for predicting the slamming loads and structural responses on a stiffened wedge. Phys Fluids 2024; 36(7):077123.

Rodriguez SN, Jaworski JW. Strongly-coupled aeroelastic free-vortex wake framework for floating offshore wind turbine rotors. Part 1: numerical framework. Renew Energy 2019; 141:1127-45.

Rodriguez SN, Jaworski JW. Strongly-coupled aeroelastic free-vortex wake framework for floating offshore wind turbine rotors. Part 2: application. Renew Energy 2020; 149:1018-31.

Liu Y, Xiao Q. Development of a fully coupled aero-hydro-mooring-elastic tool for floating offshore wind turbines. J Hydrodynam 2019; 31(1):21-33.

Huang Y, Wan D, Hu C. Numerical analysis of aero-hydrodynamic responses of floating offshore wind turbine considering blade deformation. In: Proceedings of the 31st international ocean and polar engineering conference, 2021 Jun 20-25, Rhodes, Greece. Mountain View: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE); 2021. p. 450-8.

Huang Y, Xiao Q, Wan D. Wake interaction between two floating offshore wind turbines with blade deformation. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2022 41st international conference on ocean offshore and arctic engineering, 2010 Jun 5-10, Hamburg, Germany. Washington: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME); 2022. p. V008T09A014.

Cui T, Kamath A, Wang W, Yuan L, Han D, Bihs H. Focused plunging breaking waves impact on pile group in finite water depth. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 2022; 144(3):031202.

Peng NN, Chow KW. A numerical wave tank with large eddy simulation for wave breaking. Ocean Eng 2022; 266:112555.

Kamath A, Alagan Chella M, Bihs H, Arntsen ØA. Breaking wave interaction with a vertical cylinder and the effect of breaker location. Ocean Eng 2016; 128:105-15.

Gu ZH, Wen HL, Yu CH, Sheu TWH. Interface-preserving level set method for simulating dam-break flows. J Comput Phys 2018; 374:249-80.

Liu S, Ong MC, Obhrai C, Gatin I, Vukčević V. Influences of free surface jump conditions and different k - x SST turbulence models on breaking wave modelling. Ocean Eng 2020; 217:107746.

Ferro P, Landel P, Pescheux M, Guillot S. Development of a free surface flow solver using the ghost fluid method on OpenFOAM. Ocean Eng 2022; 253:111236.

Bhushan S, El Fajri O, Hubbard G, Chambers B, Kees C. Assessment of numerical methods for plunging breaking wave predictions. J Mar Sci Eng 2021; 9(3):264.

Nicolici S, Bilegan RM. Fluid structure interaction modeling of liquid sloshing phenomena in flexible tanks. Nucl Eng Des 2013; 258:51-6.

Tahmasebi MK, Shamsoddini R, Abolpour B. Performances of different turbulence models for simulating shallow water sloshing in rectangular tank. J Mar Sci Appl 2020; 19(3):381-7.

Vallés Rebollo X, Sadeghi E, Kusano I, García-Granada AA. Study of the sloshing dynamics in partially filled rectangular tanks with submerged baffles using VOF and LES turbulence methods for different impact angles. Computation 2022; 10(12):225.

Zhuang Y, Wang G, Wan D, Wu J. Numerical simulations of FPSO with sloshing tanks in a random freak waves. J Hydrodynam 2022; 34(3):491-8.

Wang C, Teng J, Huang GPG. Numerical simulation of sloshing motion inside a two dimensional rectangular tank by level set method. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 2011; 21(1):5-31.

Bai W, Liu X, Koh CG. Numerical study of violent LNG sloshing induced by realistic ship motions using level set method. Ocean Eng 2015; 97:100-13.

Battaglia L, Cruchaga M, Storti M, D’Elía J, Núñez Aedo J, Reinoso R. Numerical modelling of 3D sloshing experiments in rectangular tanks. Appl Math Model 2018; 59:357-78.

Yu J, Yue B, Ma B. Isogeometric analysis with level set method for large-amplitude liquid sloshing. Ocean Eng 2022; 265:112613.

Zhao Y, Chen HC. Numerical simulation of 3D sloshing flow in partially filled LNG tank using a coupled level-set and volume-of-fluid method. Ocean Eng 2015; 104:10-30.

Liu D, Tang W, Wang J, Xue H, Wang K. Modelling of liquid sloshing using CLSVOF method and very large eddy simulation. Ocean Eng 2017; 129:160-76.

Cai L, Zhou J, Zhou F, Xie W, Nie Y. Numerical simulation of 2D liquid sloshing. Int J Appl Mech 2012; 04(2):1250014.

Xin J, Shi F, Jin Q, Ma L. Gradient-augmented level set two-phase flow method with pretreated reinitialization for three-dimensional violent sloshing. J Fluids Eng 2019; 142(1):011402.

Dias F, Ghidaglia JM. Slamming: recent progress in the evaluation of impact pressures. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2018; 50(1):243-73.

Huang S, Jiao J, Chen C. Numerical prediction of ship motion and slamming load characteristics in cross wave. J Mar Sci Technol 2022; 27(1):104-24.

Jiao J, Huang S, Tezdogan T, Terziev M, Guedes SC. Slamming and green water loads on a ship sailing in regular waves predicted by a coupled CFD-FEA approach. Ocean Eng 2021; 241:110107.

Xin J, Shi F, Fan S, Jin Q. A sharp interface multiphase flow model for two-dimensional water impact of a symmetric and asymmetric wedge. Appl Ocean Res 2022; 119:102988.

Elhimer M, Jacques N, El Malki AA, Gabillet C. The influence of aeration and compressibility on slamming loads during cone water entry. J Fluids Struct 2017; 70:24-46.

Gatin I, Vladimir N, Malenica Š, Jasak H. Green sea loads in irregular waves with finite volume method. Ocean Eng 2019; 171:554-64.

Gatin I, Liu S, Vukčević V, Jasak H. Finite volume method for general compressible naval hydrodynamics. Ocean Eng 2020; 196:106773.

Wang Z, Suh J, Yang J, Stern F. Sharp interface LES of breaking waves by an interface piercing body in orthogonal curvilinear coordinates. In: Proceedings of the 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, 2012 Jan 9-12, Nashville, TN, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2012. p. 1111.

Benitz MA, Carlson DW, Seyed-Aghazadeh B, Modarres-Sadeghi Y, Lackner MA, Schmidt DP. CFD simulations and experimental measurements of flow past free-surface piercing, finite length cylinders with varying aspect ratios. Comput Fluids 2016; 136:247-59.

Chen S, Zhao W, Wan D. Turbulent structures and characteristics of flows past a vertical surface-piercing finite circular cylinder. Phys Fluids 2022; 34(1):015115.

Lefevre C, Constantinides Y, Kim JW, Henneke M, Gordon R, Jang H, et al. Guidelines for CFD simulations of spar VIM. Proceedings of the 32nd international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, Nantes, France, 2013.

Hu X, Zhang X, You Y. Numerical studies on vortex-induced motions of a semi-submersible with four columns based on IDDES model. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2017 36th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, 2017 Jun 25-30, Trondheim, Norway. Washington: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME); 2017. p. V001T01A056.

Kim SJ, Spernjak D, Mejia-Alvarez R, Vinayan V, Sterenborg J, Antony A, et al. Numerical simulation of vortex-induced motion of a deep-draft paired-column semi-submersible offshore platform. Ocean Eng 2018; 149:291-304.

Zhao W, Wei Z, Wan D. Numerical investigation on the effects of current headings on vortex induced motions of a semi-submersible. J Hydrodynam 2022; 34(3):382-94.

Jia L, Sang S, Shi X, Shen F. Investigation on numerical simulation of VIV of deep-sea flexible risers. Appl Sci 2023; 13(14):8096.

Hu H, Pan Z, Zhao W, Wan D. Numerical investigation of vortex-induced vibrational responses to a flexible tensioned riser with symmetric grooves in uniform currents. Ocean Eng 2023; 271:113780.

Chen L, Basu B, Nielsen SRK. A coupled finite difference mooring dynamics model for floating offshore wind turbine analysis. Ocean Eng 2018; 162:304-15.

Lee SC, Song S, Park S. Platform motions and mooring system coupled solver for a moored floating platform in a wave. Processes 2021; 9(8):1393.

Huang H, Gu H, Chen HC. A new method to couple FEM mooring program with CFD to simulate six-DOF responses of a moored body. Ocean Eng 2022; 250:110944.

Long Y, Liu Y, Zhao Z, Liu F. Coupling a nonlinear finite element mooring model with an overset CFD solver for dynamic analysis of floating structures in waves. Ocean Eng 2024; 307:118183.

Huang Y, Cheng P, Wan D. Numerical analysis of a floating offshore wind turbine by coupled aero-hydrodynamic simulation. J Mar Sci Appl 2019; 18(1):82-92.

Zhao R, Creech ACW, Borthwick AGL, Venugopal V, Nishino T. Aerodynamic analysis of a two-bladed vertical-axis wind turbine using a coupled unsteady RANS and actuator line model. Energies 2020; 13(4):776.

Piscaglia F, Ghioldi F. GPU acceleration of CFD simulations in OpenFOAM. Aerospace 2023; 10(9):792.

Fresca S, Manzoni A. Real-time simulation of parameter-dependent fluid flows through deep learning-based reduced order models. Fluids 2021; 6(7):259.