Towards Carbon-Neutral Ironmaking: Stepwise Integration of Biocarbon in PCI with Combustion Behavior Characterization and Injection Limit Evaluation

Min-Woo Kim; Min-Jong Ku; Jongho Kim; Gyoung-Min Kim; Chung-Hwan Jeon; Dae-Gyun Lee

doi:10.1016/j.eng.2025.12.004

Engineering ›› :202512004 DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2025.12.004

Research

research-article

Towards Carbon-Neutral Ironmaking: Stepwise Integration of Biocarbon in PCI with Combustion Behavior Characterization and Injection Limit Evaluation

Author information +

History +

PDF (3267KB)

Abstract

As the steel industry is intended to be carbon-neutral, transitional solutions are required before full-scale hydrogen-based reduction becomes viable. One such strategy is the partial replacement of pulverized coal injection (PCI) with high-quality biocarbon in blast furnace (BF) operations. Raw biomass presents challenges, such as low grindability, high ash content, and low energy density, which can be mitigated through torrefaction and carbonization. This study evaluates the combustion behavior and injection limits of four biocarbon samples (mildly torrefied biomass (MTB), hard torrefied biomass (HTB), mildly carbonized biomass (MCB), and hard carbonized biomass (HCB)) using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), drop tube furnace (DTF), and laminar flow reactor (LFR) experiments. Results show that as biomass is carbonized, its combustion kinetics increasingly resemble those of PCI coal. Co-firing tests confirmed improved performance at higher blending ratios, especially with highly treated samples, such as HCB, due to enhanced fragmentation and char reactivity. Injection limits were determined based on combustion performance, heating value (±5% of PCI coal), and ash content (< 10%). The MTB and HCB exceeded these limits at approximately 27%-30% blending, indicating the need for an adjusted fuel input. Overall, biocarbon shows strong potential as a PCI substitute, offering a feasible low-carbon pathway for existing BF systems.

Keywords

Blast furnace / Biomass / Maximum injection limit / Torrefaction / Biochar

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Min-Woo Kim, Min-Jong Ku, Jongho Kim, Gyoung-Min Kim, Chung-Hwan Jeon, Dae-Gyun Lee. Towards Carbon-Neutral Ironmaking: Stepwise Integration of Biocarbon in PCI with Combustion Behavior Characterization and Injection Limit Evaluation. Engineering 202512004 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2025.12.004

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Emissions measurement and data collection for a net zero steel industry. Report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2023.

[2]	Wang C, Nilsson L, Larsson M, Boden A, Sundqvist L, Wikstrom J. Alternative fuels injection to BF and their impacts to the integrated steel works. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Process Development in Iron and Steelmaking; 2012. TIB; 2012. p. 557-66.

[3]	Blast furnace CO₂ reduction initiatives. Report. Tokyo: JFE Steel Corporation; 2013.

[4]	Fan Z, Friedmann SJ. low-carbon production of iron and steel: technology options, economic assessment, and policy. Joule 2021; 5(4):829-62.

[5]	Yi SH, Choi ME, Kim DH, Ko CK, Park WI, Kim SY. FINEX^® as an environmentally sustainable ironmaking process. Ironmak Steelmak 2019;46:625-31.

[6]	Exploring hydrogen with POSCO #3: the future of steel—Hydrogen-based steelmaking.Report. Pohang: POSCO Newsroom; 2021.

[7]	The future of hydrogen. Report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2019.

[8]	Ishaq H, Dincer I, Crawford C. A review on hydrogen production and utilization: challenges and opportunities. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2022;47:26238-64.

[9]	Sun M, Pang K, Barati M, Meng X. Hydrogen-based reduction technologies in low-carbon sustainable ironmaking and steelmaking: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2024;10:10-25.

[10]	Lee DG, Kim MW, Bae YH, Kim KM, Kim GM, Jeon CH. FINEX PCI fuel diversification for techno-economical operations: impact of high-volatile coal agglomeration on combustion. Fuel 2025;381:133582.

[11]	Japan’s Kobelco to use torrefied biomass in steelmaking. Report. London: Argus Media group; 2025.

[12]	Decarbonizing steel:how biochar is reshaping the industry. Report. Raipur: BigMint; 2024.

[13]	Q&A:US cleantech firm to start biochar plant in Quebec. Report. London: Argus Media group; 2025.

[14]	Minnesota biochar and the future of making steel. Report. Duluth: Natural Resources Research Institute; 2024.

[15]	Wang S, Chai Y, Wang Y, Luo G, An S. Review on the application and development of biochar in ironmaking production. Metals 2023; 13:1844.

[16]	Ibitoye SE, Loha C, Mahamood RM, Jen TC, Alam M, Sarkar I. An overview of biochar production techniques and application in iron and steel industries. Bioresour Bioprocess 2024;11:65.

[17]	Suopajärvi H, Umeki K, Mousa E, Hedayati A, Romar H, Kemppainen A. Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking—status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO₂ steel production technologies. Appl Energy 2018;213:384-407.

[18]	Li B, Li D, Hu J, Zhu X, Wang H, Jeon CH, et al. Carbon emission of municipal solid waste under different classification methods in the context of carbon neutrality: a case study of Yunnan Province, China. Fuel 2024;372:132167.

[19]	Quan S, Zeng Y, Wu Y, Kim R-G, Li Z, Han Y, et al. Ash thermomechanical properties and combustion characteristics during co-combustion of anthracite and biomass for CFB combustors. Biomass Bioenergy 2025;198:107868.

[20]	Yang X, Li D, Zhu X, Zhu T, Mun TY, Wang H, et al. Interaction of ilmenite oxygen carrier with wheat straw ash during chemical looping combustion: mechanisms and performance variation. Fuel 2024;374:132434.

[21]	Wang X, Yang X, Yang H, Zhang M, Zhou T, Zhu X, et al. Fate of phosphate compounds during chemical looping combustion of agrofuel: impacts on physical-chemical properties of ilmenite and mechanisms. Powder Technol 2025;461:121097.

[22]	Quan S, Mei J, Li D, Huang Y, Li Z, Zhu X, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of kinetic reaction mechanisms for NO and N₂O emissions during NH₃/H₂ combustion across multi-temperature regimes. J Energy Inst 2025;123:102260.

[23]	Zhang A, Li D, Zhu X, Kim GM, Zeng Y, Jeon Ch, et al. A molten salt-mediated biomass gasification process for high-yield hydrogen production with in situ carbon capture: experiments, simulation and ANN prediction. Energy Convers Manag 2025;332:119735.

[24]	Lee BH, Sh L, Lee DG, Jeon CH. Effect of torrefaction and ashless process on combustion and NO_x emission behaviors of woody and herbaceous biomass. Energies 2021;151:106133.

[25]	Noh YH, Lee DG, Park JH, Song GS, Kim JS, Park SJ, et al. Ashless herbaceous biomass for slagging and fouling reduction in solid-fuel boiler. Fuel 2025;379:132957.

[26]	Jannisa K, Attaso K, Wipawee D. Waste-to-energy conversion of rubberwood residues for enhanced biomass fuels: process optimization and eco-efficiency evaluation. Energies 2024; 17(21):5444.

[27]	Bhautik G, Uplabdhi T, Anil KS, Mithilesh KJ. Impact of torrefaction on thermal behavior of wheat straw and groundnut stalk biomass: kinetic and thermodynamic study. Fuel Commun 2022;112:100073.

[28]	Lee DG, Lee JH, Kim GM, Jeong JS, Kim SM, Jeon CH. The initial ash deposition formation in horizontal combustion reactor for blending torrefied biomass wood pellet and coals. Renew Energy 2024;226:120198.

[29]	Kim GM, Choi JH, Jeon CH, Lim DH. Effects of cofiring coal and biomass fuel on the pulverized coal injection combustion zone in blast furnaces. Energies 2022;15:655.

[30]	Evaluation of combustion behaviour of coal blends for PCI. Report. Brisbane: ACARP; 2020.

[31]	Du SW, Chen WH, Lucas JA. Pulverized coal burnout in blast furnace simulated by a drop tube furnace. Energy 2010; 35(2):5576-81.

[32]	Stančin H, Mikulčić H, Manić N, Stojiljiković D, Vujanović M, Wang X, et al. Thermogravimetric and kinetic analysis of biomass and polyurethane foam mixtures co-pyrolysis. Energy 2021;237:121592.

[33]	Zhai M, Guo L, Zhang Y, Dong P, Qi G, Huang Y. Kinetic parameters of biomass pyrolysis by TGA. BioResources 2021;16:7428-43.

[34]	Standard test method for moisture in the analysis sample of coal and coke. Report. West Conshohocken: Advancing Standards Transforming Markets International; 2025.

[35]	Standard test method for volatile matter in the analysis sample of coal and coke. Report. West Conshohocken: Advancing Standards Transforming Markets International; 2025.

[36]	Standard practice for proximate analysis of coal and coke. Report. West Conshohocken: Advancing Standards Transforming Markets International; 2021.

[37]	Standard test method for ash in the analysis sample of coal and coke from coal. Report. West Conshohocken: Advancing Standards Transforming Markets International; 2020.

[38]	Standard test methods for determination of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen in analysis samples of coal and coke. Report. West Conshohocken: Advancing Standards Transforming Markets International; 2021.

[39]	Standard test method for gross calorific value of coal and coke. Report. West Conshohocken: Advancing Standards Transforming Markets International; 2019.

[40]	Anthony DB, Howard JB. Coal devolatilization and hydrogasification. AIChE J 1976;22:625-56.

[41]	Li H, Elliott L, Rogers H, Wall T. Comparative study on the combustion performance of coals on a pilot-scale test rig simulating blast furnace pulverized coal injection and a lab-scale drop-tube furnace. Energy fuels 2025;28:363-8.

[42]	Stuiver M, Polach HA. Discussion reporting of ¹⁴C data. Radiocarbon 1977;19:355-63.

[43]	Klein MG, Mous DJW, Gottdang A. A compact 1MV multi-element AMS system. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B 2006;249:764-7.

[44]	Bae YH, Lee DG, Kim KM, Kim MW, Zeng Y, Jeon CH. Numerical analysis of fuel-flexible FINEX PCI raceway: natural gas co-firing with advanced coal fragmentation model. Energy 2025;319:135061.

[45]	Lee DG, Kim MW, Ku MJ, Bae YH, Kim KM, Kim GM. Combustion visualization analysis of alternative fuels in the pulverized coal injection raceway through laminar flow reactor. Heliyon 2024; 10:e36238.

[46]	Bennett P, Fukushima T. Impact of PCI coal quality on blast furnace operations. Report. Brisbane: ACARP; 2007.

[47]	Queensland high energy coals for the PCI market—advantages for low volatile coal. Report. Queensland: Queensland Government.

[48]	Carpentar AM. Use of PCI in blast furnaces. Report. Paris: IEA Clean Coal Centre; 2006.

[49]	Sitarz J, Pahle M, Osorio S, Luderer G, Pietzcker R. EU carbon prices signal high policy credibility and farsighted actors. Nat Energy 2024;9:691-702.