Structural Elucidation and Mechanisms-Guided Engineering of a Promiscuous Esterase for Enhanced Polyurethane Depolymerization

Jiawei Liu , Mingna Zheng , Yuan Wen , Wei Xia , Xu Han , Jie Zhou , Weidong Liu , Ren Wei , Yanwei Li , Weiliang Dong , Min Jiang

Engineering ›› : 202602008

PDF (1951KB)
Engineering ›› :202602008 DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2026.02.008
Research
research-article
Structural Elucidation and Mechanisms-Guided Engineering of a Promiscuous Esterase for Enhanced Polyurethane Depolymerization
Author information +
History +
PDF (1951KB)

Abstract

Polyurethane (PU) is highly resistant to biodegradation, primarily due to the intrinsic stability of its urethane bond. Aside from a small number of amidases reported to hydrolyze (poly)urethane bonds, several promiscuous esterases have also been found to catalyze PU degradation. In this study, we clarified the ligand-free crystal structure of Aes72, an esterase enzyme that exhibits promiscuous hydrolytic activity toward carbamate and amide bonds, at a high resolution of 1.80 Å. We investigated the catalytic mechanism underlying urethane bond cleavage by Aes72 using multiscale quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) simulations. Our findings indicate that the reaction mechanism consists of four concerted elementary steps, with the nucleophilic attack (step i) identified as the rate-determining step. The subsequent structure-guided engineering of Aes72 yielded several enhanced single mutants, ultimately resulting in a superior double mutant, F276A/L141I. This variant exhibited approximately a two-fold increase in catalytic efficacy toward bis(4-hydroxybutyl) (methylenebis(4,1-phenylene)) dicarbamate (BMC) hydrolysis and significantly enhanced degradation performance on two distinct polyether-based PU materials compared to the wild-type enzyme. Our findings provide essential mechanistic insights into the structure-function relationship of the promiscuous esterase Aes72 in PU degradation and demonstrate its potential applicability in bio-based plastic recycling.

Keywords

Esterase structure / Substrate pocket engineering / PU biodegradation / QM/MM analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiawei Liu, Mingna Zheng, Yuan Wen, Wei Xia, Xu Han, Jie Zhou, Weidong Liu, Ren Wei, Yanwei Li, Weiliang Dong, Min Jiang. Structural Elucidation and Mechanisms-Guided Engineering of a Promiscuous Esterase for Enhanced Polyurethane Depolymerization. Engineering 202602008 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2026.02.008

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Plastics—the fast facts 2024 [Internet]. Brussels: Plastics Europe; 2024 [cited 2025 Jan 20]. Available from: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-fast-facts-2024/.

[2]

Li M, Zhang S. Coupling waste plastic upgrading and CO2 photoreduction to high-value chemicals by a binuclear Re-Ru heterogeneous catalyst. ACS Catal 2024; 14(9):6717-27.

[3]

Shi Y, Diao X, Ji N, Ding H, Ya Z, Xu D, et al. Advances and challenges for catalytic recycling and upgrading of real-world mixed plastic waste. ACS Catal 2025; 15(2):841-68.

[4]

Ya Z, Tang L, Xu D, Wang H, Zhang S. Photoreforming of waste plastic by B-doped carbon nitride nanotube: atomic-level modulation and mechanism insights. AIChE J 2025; 71(5):e18740.

[5]

Zia KM, Bhatti HN, Ahmad BI. Methods for polyurethane and polyurethane composites, recycling and recovery: a review. React Funct Polym 2007; 67(8):675-92.

[6]

Liu J, He J, Xue R, Xu B, Qian X, Xin F, et al. Biodegradation and up-cycling of polyurethanes: progress, challenges, and prospects. Biotechnol Adv 2021;48:107730.

[7]

Tournier V, Topham CM, Gilles A, David B, Folgoas C, Moya-Leclair E, et al. An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles. Nature 2020; 580(7802):216-9.

[8]

Wei R, Weber G, Blank LM, Bornscheuer UT. Process insights for harnessing biotechnology for plastic depolymerization. Nat Chem Eng 2025; 2(2):110-7.

[9]

Mican J, Jaradat DMM, Liu W, Weber G, Mazurenko S, Bornscheuer UT, et al. Exploring new galaxies: perspectives on the discovery of novel PET-degrading enzymes. Appl Catal B 2024;342:123404.

[10]

Seo H, Hong H, Park J, Lee SH, Ki D, Ryu A, et al. Landscape profiling of PET depolymerases using a natural sequence cluster framework. Science 2025; 387(6729):eadp5637.

[11]

Xue R, Qiu C, Zhou X, Cheng Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, et al. Enzymatic upcycling of PET waste to calcium terephthalate for battery anodes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2024; 63(1):e202313633.

[12]

Arnal G, Anglade J, Gavalda S, Tournier V, Chabot N, Bornscheuer UT, et al. Assessment of four engineered PET degrading enzymes considering large-scale industrial applications. ACS Catal 2023; 13(20):13156-66.

[13]

Wei R, von Haugwitz G, Pfaff L, Mican J, Badenhorst CPS, Liu W, et al. Mechanism-based design of efficient PET hydrolases. ACS Catal 2022; 12(6):3382-96.

[14]

Liu J, Xin K, Zhang T, Wen Y, Li D, Wei R, et al. Identification and characterization of a fungal cutinase-like enzyme CpCut1 from Cladosporium sp. P 7 for polyurethane degradation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2024; 90(4). e01477-23.

[15]

Liu J, Zeng Q, Lei H, Xin K, Xu A, Wei R, et al. Biodegradation of polyester polyurethane by Cladosporium sp. P7: evaluating its degradation capacity and metabolic pathways. J Hazard Mater 2023;448:130776.

[16]

Raczyń ska A, Góra A, André I. An overview on polyurethane-degrading enzymes. Biotechnol Adv 2024;77:108439.

[17]

Jiang Z, Chen X, Xue H, Li Z, Lei J, Yu M, et al. Novel polyurethane-degrading cutinase BaCut 1 from Blastobotrys sp. G-9 with potential role in plastic bio-recycling. J Hazard Mater 2024;472:134493.

[18]

Zhang L, Cao K, Liu H, Wang Y, Zhang B, Han H, et al. Discovery of a polyester polyurethane-degrading bacterium from a coastal mudflat and identification of its degrading enzyme. J Hazard Mater 2025;483:136659.

[19]

Branson Y, Liu J, Schmidt L, Griebel J, Prager A, Stieler L, et al. One-pot depolymerization of mixed plastics using a dual enzyme system. ChemSusChem 2025; 18(9):e202402416.

[20]

Bayer T, Palm GJ, Berndt L, Meinert H, Branson Y, Schmidt L, et al. Structural elucidation of a metagenomic urethanase and its engineering towards enhanced hydrolysis profiles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2024; 63(38): e202404492.

[21]

Paiva P, Teixeira LMC, Wei R, Liu W, Weber G, Morth JP, et al. Unveiling the enzymatic pathway of UMG-SP2 urethanase: insights into polyurethane degradation at the atomic level. Chem Sci 2025; 16(5):2437-52.

[22]

Rotilio L, Bayer T, Meinert H, Teixeira LMC, Johansen MB, Sommerfeldt A, et al. Structural and functional characterization of an amidase targeting a polyurethane for sustainable recycling. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2025; 64(7): e202419535.

[23]

Li Z, Han X, Cong L, Singh P, Paiva P, Branson Y, et al. Structure-guided engineering of a versatile urethanase improves its polyurethane depolymerization activity. Adv Sci 2025; 12(13):2416019.

[24]

Bittner N, Nefzger H, Behnken G, Jäger G, Behnken S, Reisky L inventors; Covestro Deutschland AG, assignee. Novel urethanases for the enzymatic degradation of polyurethanes. United States patent US20210269834A1. 2021 Sep 2.

[25]

Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. In: Carter CW, Methods in enzymology. New York City:Academic Press; 1997. p. 307-26.

[26]

McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Cryst 2007; 40(Pt 4):658-74.

[27]

Winn MD, Ballard CC, Cowtan KD, Dodson EJ, Emsley P, Evans PR, et al. Overview of the CCP 4 suite and current developments. Biol Crystallogr 2011; 67(Pt 4):235-42.

[28]

Murshudov GN, Skubák P, Lebedev AA, Pannu NS, Steiner RA, Nicholls RA, et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Biol Crystallogr 2011; 67(Pt 4):355-67.

[29]

Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Biol Crystallogr 2004; 60(Pt 12):2126-32.

[30]

Brünger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, DeLano WL, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, et al. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Cryst 1998; 54(D5):905-21.

[31]

Eberhardt J, Santos-Martins D, Tillack AF, Forli S. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: new docking methods, expanded force field, and python bindings. J Chem Inf Model 2021; 61(8):3891-8.

[32]

Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 2009; 30(16):2785-91.

[33]

Cvitkovic JP, Pauplis CD, Kaminski GA. PKA17—a coarse-grain grid-based methodology and web-based software for predicting protein pKa shifts. J Comput Chem 2019; 40(18):1718-26.

[34]

Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, et al. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01. Wallingford: Gaussian, Inc.; 2016.

[35]

Zhao Y, Truhlar DG. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor Chem Acc 2008; 120(1-3):215-41.

[36]

Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 2010; 31(2):455-61.

[37]

Zoete V, Cuendet MA, Grosdidier A, Michielin O. SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J Comput Chem 2011; 32(11):2359-68.

[38]

Metz S, Kästner J, Sokol AA, Keal TW, Sherwood P. ChemShell—a modular software package for QM/MM simulations. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 2014; 4(2):101-10.

[39]

Di Bisceglie F, Quartinello F, Vielnascher R, Guebitz GM, Pellis A. Cutinase-catalyzed polyester-polyurethane degradation: elucidation of the hydrolysis mechanism. Polymers 2022; 14(3):411.

[40]

Hao W, Li Y, Shan Q, Han T, Li W, He S, et al. Characterization of human S-adenosyl-homocysteine hydrolase in vitro and identification of its potential inhibitors. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2017; 32(1):1209-15.

[41]

Terholsen H, Myrtollari K, Larva M, Möller C, Taden A, Kourist R, et al. Spectrophotometric and fluorimetric high-throughput assays for phenolic acid decarboxylase. ChemBioChem 2023; 24(16):e202300207.

[42]

Chen C, Guan BH, Geng Q, Zheng YC, Chen Q, Pan J, et al. Enhanced thermostability of Candida ketoreductase by computation-based cross-regional combinatorial mutagenesis. ACS Catal 2023; 13(11):7407-16.

[43]

Wang F, Hou Y, Zhou J, Li Z, Huang Y, Cui Z. Purification of an amide hydrolase DamH from Delftia sp. T3-6 and its gene cloning, expression, and biochemical characterization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014; 98(17):7491-9.

[44]

Albery WJ, Knowles JR. Evolution of enzyme function and the development of catalytic efficiency. Biochemistry 1976; 15(25):5631-40.

[45]

Ceccarelli EA, Carrillo N, Roveri OA. Efficiency function for comparing catalytic competence. Trends Biotechnol 2008; 26(3):117-8.

[46]

Mandrich L, Merone L, Pezzullo M, Cipolla L, Nicotra F, Rossi M, et al. Role of the N terminus in enzyme activity, stability and specificity in thermophilic esterases belonging to the HSL family. J Mol Biol 2005; 345(3):501-12.

[47]

Li PY, Chen XL, Ji P, Li CY, Wang P, Zhang Y, et al. Interdomain hydrophobic interactions modulate the thermostability of microbial esterases from the hormone-sensitive lipase family. J Biol Chem 2015; 290(17):11188-98.

[48]

Mandrich L, Menchise V, Alterio V, De Simone G, Pedone C, Rossi M, et al. Functional and structural features of the oxyanion hole in a thermophilic esterase from Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius. Proteins 2008; 71(4):1721-31.

[49]

Eisenthal R, Danson MJ, Hough DW. Catalytic efficiency and kcat/KM: a useful comparator? Trends Biotechnol 2007; 25(6):247-9.

[50]

Petrović ZS, Xu Y, Milić J, Glenn G, Klamczynski A. Biodegradation of thermoplastic polyurethanes from vegetable oils. J Polym Environ 2010; 18(2):94-7.

[51]

Hamid SH, Amin MB, Maadhah AG, editors. Handbook of polymer degradation. New York City: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 1992.

[52]

Skleničková K, Abbrent S, Halecký M, Kočí V, Beneš H. Biodegradability and ecotoxicity of polyurethane foams: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2022; 52(2):157-202.

[53]

Magnin A, Pollet E, Phalip V, Avérous L. Evaluation of biological degradation of polyurethanes. Biotechnol Adv 2020;39:107457.

PDF (1951KB)

365

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/