Prospects and Challenges of Multi-Use Offshore Platforms

C. Guedes Soares; Liang Li; Sheng Xu

doi:10.1016/j.eng.2026.03.011

Engineering ›› :202603011 DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2026.03.011

Views & Comments

research-article

Prospects and Challenges of Multi-Use Offshore Platforms

Author information +

History +

PDF

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

C. Guedes Soares, Liang Li, Sheng Xu. Prospects and Challenges of Multi-Use Offshore Platforms. Engineering 202603011 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2026.03.011

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Endo H. The behavior of a VLFS and an airplane during takeoff/landing run in wave condition. Mar Struct 2000; 13(4-5):477-91.

[2]	Suzuki H. Overview of Megafloat: concept, design criteria, analysis, and design. Mar Struct 2005; 18(2):111-32.

[3]	Wang C, Tay Z. Very large floating structures: applications, research and development. Procedia Eng 2011; 14:62-72.

[4]	Vincent Callebaut Architectures [Internet]. Paris: Vincent Callebaut Architectures; [cited 2025 Mar 20]. Available from:

[5]	Ling H, Yang P, Zhang Z, Wang Z. Complex wave loads and hydroelastic responses of a very large tourism floating platform ‘Ocean Diamond’. Ocean Eng 2022; 265:112608.

[6]	Wang Q, He C, Ding J, Geng Y, Cheng X, Zhang X, et al. Numerical and experimental studies on hydroelastic responses of a multiply-connected domain tourism platform in head waves. Ocean Eng 2024; 294:116795.

[7]	Ohmatsu S. Overview: research on wave loading and responses of VLFS. Mar Struct 2005; 18(2):149-68.

[8]	Ding J, Wu Y, Xie Z, Yang W, Wang S, Yu J, et al. Research on hydroelastic responses of VLFS in complex environments. Mar Struct 2021; 78:102978.

[9]	Palo P. Mobile offshore base: hydrodynamic advancements and remaining challenges. Mar Struct 2005; 18(2):133-47.

[10]	Remmers G, Taylor R. 1998 Jul 5-9; Lisbon,Mobile offshore base technologies. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 1998); Portugal. New York City: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME); 1998.

[11]	Lamas-Pardo M, Iglesias G, Carral L. A review of very large floating structures (VLFS) for coastal and offshore uses. Ocean Eng 2015; 109:677-90.

[12]	Ding J, Geng YC, Xu SW, Yang WN, Xie ZY. Experimental study on responses of an 8-module VLFS considering different encounter wave conditions. Mar Struct 2021; 78:102959.

[13]	Shi Q, Xu D, Zhang H, Zhao H, Ding J, Wu Y. A face-contact connector for modularized floating structures. Mar Struct 2022; 82:103149.

[14]	Amouzadrad P, Mohapatra S, Guedes Soares C. Review of recent developments on the hydroelastic response and gap resonance of multi-body floating structures. Ocean Eng 2024; 313:119398.

[15]	Flikkema MM, Lin FY, Van der Plank PP, Koning J, Waals O. Legal issues for artificial floating islands. Front Mar Sci 2021; 8:619462.

[16]	Wang G, Goldfeld Y, Drimer N. Expanding coastal cities—proof of feasibility for modular floating structures (MFS). J Clean Prod 2019; 222:520-38.

[17]	Wang G, Drimer N, Goldfeld Y. Modular floating structures (MFS) for offshore dwelling a hydrodynamic analysis in the frequency domain. Ocean Eng 2020; 216:107996.

[18]	Drummen I, Olbert G. Conceptual design of a modular floating multi-purpose island. Front Mar Sci 2021; 8:615222.

[19]	Montazeran AH, Wu YF. Modular floating structures: the optimal prismatic section. Ocean Eng 2025; 337:121882.

[20]	van den Burg S, Schupp MF, Depellegrin D, Barbanti A, Kerr S. Development of multi-use platforms at sea: barriers to realising blue growth. Ocean Eng 2020; 217:107983.

[21]	Flikkema M, Waals O. Space@Sea the floating solution. Front Mar Sci 2019; 6:553.

[22]	Díaz H, Guedes Soares C. Review of the current status, technology and future trends of offshore wind farms. Ocean Eng 2020; 209:107381.

[23]	Yeter B, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C. Evaluation of fatigue damage model predictions for fixed offshore wind turbine support structures. Int J Fatigue 2016; 87:71-80.

[24]	Yeter B, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C. Ultimate strength assessment of jacket offshore wind turbine support structures subjected to progressive bending loading. Ships Offshore Struct 2019; 14(2):165-75.

[25]	Skaare B. 2017 Jun 25-30; Trondheim, Development of the Hywind concept. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2017); Norway. New York City: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME); 2017.

[26]

Roddier D, Cermelli C, Aubault A, Peiffer A. 2017 Jun 25-30; Trondheim, Summary and conclusions of the full life-cycle of the WindFloat FOWT prototype project. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2017); Norway. New York City: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME); 2017.

[27]	Castro-Santos L, Martins E, Guedes Soares C. Cost assessment methodology for combined wind and wave floating offshore renewable energy systems. Renew Energy 2016; 97:866-80.

[28]	Castro-Santos L, Martins E, Guedes Soares C. Economic comparison of technological alternatives to harness offshore wind and wave energies. Energy 2017; 140:1121-30.

[29]	Kardakaris K, Boufidi I, Soukissian T. Offshore wind and wave energy complementarity in the Greek seas based on ERA5 data. Atmosphere 2021; 12(10):1360.

[30]	Vázquez R, Cabos W, Nieto-Borge JC, Gutiérrez C. Complementarity of offshore energy resources on the Spanish coasts: wind, wave, and photovoltaic energy. Renew Energy 2024; 224:120213.

[31]	Wang L, Moan T, Gao Z, Shi W. A review on the technical development of combined wind and wave energy conversion systems. Energy 2024; 294:130885

[32]	Cao F, Yu M, Liu B, Wei Z, Xue L, Han M, et al. Progress of combined wind and wave energy harvesting devices and related coupling simulation techniques. J Mar Sci Eng 2023; 11(1):212.

[33]	Hallak TS, Guedes Soares C. Overview of the recent developments in hybrid floating wind-wave platforms. J Mar Sci Appl 2025; 24(1):98-119.

[34]	Marino E, Gkantou M, Malekjafarian A, Bali S, Baniotopoulos C, van Beeck J, et al. Offshore renewable energies: exploring floating modular energy islands—materials, construction technologies, and life cycle assessment. J Ocean Eng Mar Energy 2025; 11(4):1157-82.

[35]	Kurniawati I, Beaumont B, Varghese R, Kostadinović D, Sokol I, Hemida H, et al. Conceptual design of a floating modular energy island for energy independency: a case study in Crete. Energies 2023; 16(16):5921.

[36]	Lopez G, Satymov R, Aghahosseini A, Bogdanov D, Oyewo AS, Breyer C. Ocean energy enabling a sustainable energy-industry transition for Hawaii. Renew Energy 2024; 237:121831.

[37]	McDonagh S, Ahmed S, Desmond C, Murphy JD. Hydrogen from offshore wind: Investor perspective on the profitability of a hybrid system including for curtailment. Appl Energy 2020; 265:114732.

[38]	Yan Y, Zhang H, Liao Q, Liang Y, Yan J. Roadmap to hybrid offshore system with hydrogen and power co-generation. Energy Convers Manage 2021; 247:114690.

[39]	Xu Z, Qin H. Fluid-structure interactions of cage based aquaculture: from structures to organisms. Ocean Eng 2020; 217:107961.

[40]	Faltinsen OM, Shen Y. Wave and current effects on floating fish farms. J Mar Sci Appl 2018; 17(3):284-96.

[41]	Mohapatra SC, Guedes Soares C. A review of the hydroelastic theoretical models of floating porous nets and floaters for offshore aquaculture. J Mar Sci Eng 2024; 12(10):1699.

[42]	Liu Z, Guedes Soares C. Sensitivity analysis of a numerical model of the dynamics of gravity cages subjected to current and waves. Ocean Eng 2023; 287:115715.

[43]	Zhang Y, Guo J, Liu Q, Huang W, Bi C, Zhao Y, et al. Storm damage risk assessment for offshore cage culture. Aquacult Eng 2021; 95:102198.

[44]	Chu YI, Wang CM, Park JC, Lader PF.Review of cage and containment tank designs for offshore fish farming. Aquaculture 2020; 519:734928.

[45]	Miao YJ, Ding J, Tian C, Chen XJ, Fan YL. Experimental and numerical study of a semi-submersible offshore fish farm under waves. Ocean Eng 2021; 225:108794.

[46]	Yue W, Wang Z, Ding W, Sheng S, Zhang Y, Huang Z, et al. Feasibility of Co-locating wave energy converters with offshore aquaculture: the pioneering case study of China’s Penghu platform. Ocean Eng 2023; 288:116039.

[47]	Cao S, Cheng Y, Duan J, Li J, Wang Y. Experimental study of a semi-submersible floating wind turbine with aquaculture cages under combined wind and irregular waves. Energy 2024; 306:132527.

[48]	Chen P, Kang Y, Xu S, Liu L, Cheng Z. Numerical modeling and dynamic response analysis of an integrated semi-submersible floating wind and aquaculture system. Renew Energy 2024; 225:120355.

[49]	Ji J, Zhou L, Liu B, Guedes Soares C. Experimental and numerical analysis of a bottom-supported aquaculture platform in uniform flow. Ocean Eng 2024; 311:118859.

[50]	Trip. com.Ocean star marine ranch and hotel at Yantai, China [Internet]. Shanghai: Trip.com Group; [cited 2025 Mar 20]. Available from:

[51]	Dalton G, Bardócz T, Blanch M, Campbell D, Johnson K, Lawrence G, et al. Feasibility of investment in blue growth multiple-use of space and multi-use platform projects; results of a novel assessment approach and case studies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2019; 107:338-59.

[52]	Union for the Mediterranean. Towards a sustainable blue economy in the Mediterranean region. 2024 ed. Report. Barcelona: Union for the Mediterranean; 2025.

[53]	Li C, Coolen JWP, Scherer L, Mogollón JM, Braeckman U, Vanaverbeke J, et al. Offshore wind energy and marine biodiversity in the North Sea: life cycle impact assessment for benthic communities. Environ Sci Technol 2023; 57(16):6455-64.

[54]	Jansen HM, Van Den Burg S, Bolman B, Jak RG, Kamermans P, Poelman M, et al. The feasibility of offshore aquaculture and its potential for multi-use in the North Sea. Aquacult Int 2016; 24(3):735-756.