Experimental Investigation on Thermoacoustic and Structural Dynamics in a Premixed Arrayed Micro-Tube Hydrogen Combustor

Xiao Han; Ziyu Qin; Yuzhen Lin; Yunxin Chang; Juan Guzmán-Iñigo; Chi Zhang

doi:10.1016/j.eng.2026.04.017

Engineering ›› :202604017 DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2026.04.017

research-article

Experimental Investigation on Thermoacoustic and Structural Dynamics in a Premixed Arrayed Micro-Tube Hydrogen Combustor

Xiao Han ^a^,^b
, Ziyu Qin ^a^,^b^,^c
, Yuzhen Lin ^a^,^b^,^*
, Yunxin Chang ^a^,^b
, Juan Guzmán-Iñigo ^d
, Chi Zhang ^a^,^b

Author information +

History +

PDF (5284KB)

Abstract

Thermoacoustic instability remains a major challenge in the development of hydrogen micromix combustors. This study presents the design of a full-scale premixed-array microtube hydrogen combustor. Jet-in-crossflow micromixing technology was employed, resulting in relatively uniform mixing within each injector tube. Subsequently, the thermoacoustic dynamics were investigated. A low-order thermoacoustic model was used to characterize the experimentally observed longitudinal acoustic oscillations, with a deviation of 1.6% in the predicted modal frequency. After the onset of thermoacoustic instability, intermittent high-amplitude burst oscillations emerged amid low-amplitude combustion noise at moderate equivalence ratios, as quantified using recurrence quantification metrics. As the equivalence ratio increased further, the bursts gradually dominated the pressure fluctuations, eventually leading to an intense limit-cycle oscillation above 1800 Pa. Collective synchronization among individual flames was a key factor in distinguishing intermittent from limit-cycle oscillations. The phase difference between the heat-release fluctuations of different flame elements was nearly fixed during limit-cycle oscillation, whereas intermittent oscillation showed weaker phase synchronization. Finally, the structural vibration induced by thermoacoustic oscillations was found to be spatially anisotropic and to exhibit a linear amplitude relationship. The derived proportional coefficient was 8.5 m⋅(s²⋅kPa)⁻¹, which facilitates quantitative evaluation of the strength of thermoacoustically induced vibration. The structural dynamics exhibited a significant response gain in the high-frequency regime. This study sheds light on understanding the instability and broadening the operability of the hydrogen combustor.

Keywords

Hydrogen micromix combustor / Thermoacoustic instability / Intermittency / Structural vibration

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Xiao Han, Ziyu Qin, Yuzhen Lin, Yunxin Chang, Juan Guzmán-Iñigo, Chi Zhang. Experimental Investigation on Thermoacoustic and Structural Dynamics in a Premixed Arrayed Micro-Tube Hydrogen Combustor. Engineering 202604017 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2026.04.017

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Wei YM, Chen K, Kang JN, Chen W, Wang XY, Zhang X . Policy and management of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality: a literature review. Engineering (Beijing) 2022; 14:52-63.

[2]	Pitsch H. The transition to sustainable combustion: hydrogen— and carbon—based future fuels and methods for dealing with their challenges. Proc Combust Inst 2024; 40(1—4):105638.

[3]	Huang Z. Fuel blend combustion for decarbonization. Proc Combust Inst 2024; 40(1—4):105776.

[4]	Funke HHW, Beckmann N, Keinz J, Horikawa A . 30 years of dry—low—nox micromix combustor research for hydrogen—rich fuels—an overview of past and present activities. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2021; 143(7):071002.

[5]	Funke HW, Beckmann N, Abanteriba S . An overview on dry low nox micromix combustor development for hydrogen—rich gas turbine applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2019; 44(13):6978—90.

[6]

Marek C, Smith T, Kundu K . Low emission hydrogen combustors for gas turbines using lean direct injection. In: Proceedings of the 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit; 2005 Jul 10—13; Tucson, AZ, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2005. p. 3776.

[7]	York WD, Ziminsky WS, Yilmaz E . Development and testing of a low NO_x hydrogen combustion system for heavy—duty gas turbines. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2013; 135(2):022001.

[8]

Weiland NT, Sidwell TG, Strakey PA . Testing of a hydrogen dilute diffusion array injector at gas turbine conditions. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition; 2011 Jun 6—10; Vancouver, BC, Canada. New York City: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME); 2011. p. 1239-47.

[9]	Choi J, Rajasegar R, Lee W, Lee T, Yoo J . Hydrogen enhancement on a mesoscale swirl stabilized burner array. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021;46(46):23906—15.

[10]	Moon K, Martin R, Schuermans B, Noiray N . Transfer functions of lean fully—and technically—premixed jet—stabilized turbulent hydrogen flames. Proc Combust Inst 2024; 40(1—4):105256.

[11]	Jin U, Kim KT . Experimental investigation of combustion dynamics and nox/co emissions from densely distributed lean—premixed multinozzle CH₄/C₃H₈/H₂/air flames. Combust Flame 2021; 229:111410.

[12]	Kang H, Lee T, Jin U, Kim KT . Experimental investigation of combustion instabilities of a mesoscale multinozzle array in a lean—premixed combustor. Proc Combust Inst 2021; 38(4):6035—42.

[13]	Poinsot T. Prediction and control of combustion instabilities in real engines. Proc Combust Inst 2017; 36(1):1-28.

[14]	Candel S, Durox D, Schuller T, Bourgouin JF, Moeck JP . Dynamics of swirling flames. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2014; 46(1):147-73.

[15]	O’Connor J. Understanding the role of flow dynamics in thermoacoustic combustion instability. Proc Combust Inst 2023; 39(4):4583-610.

[16]	Morgans AS, Yang D . Thermoacoustic instability in combustors. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2025; 57:9-13.

[17]	Lee T, Kim KT . Combustion dynamics of lean fully—premixed hydrogen—air flames in a mesoscale multinozzle array. Combust Flame 2020; 218:234-46.

[18]	Kang H, Kim KT . Combustion dynamics of multi—element lean—premixed hydrogen—air flame ensemble. Combust Flame 2021; 233:111585.

[19]	Durocher A, Fan L, Füri M, Bourque G, Bergthorson JM, Yun S, et al. Phase—averaged, 3D OH—LIF reconstruction for multi—nozzle, micromixed hydrogen combustion. Proc Combust Inst 2024; 40:105561.

[20]	Æsøy E, Aguilar JG, Wiseman S, Bothien MR, Worth NA, Dawson JR . Scaling and prediction of transfer functions in lean premixed H₂/CH₄—flames. Combust Flame 2020; 215:269-82.

[21]	Garcia AM, Le Bras S, Prager J, Haringer M, Polifke W . Large eddy simulation of the dynamics of lean premixed flames using global reaction mechanisms calibrated for CH₄—H₂ fuel blends. Phys Fluids 2022;34(9):34.

[22]	Kang H, Yoon C, Kim KT . Experimental and numerical investigations of forced response of multi—element lean—premixed hydrogen flames. Combust Flame 2023; 258:113079.

[23]	Guan Y, Gupta V, Li LK . Intermittency route to self—excited chaotic thermoacoustic oscillations. J Fluid Mech 2020; 894:R3.

[24]	Nair V, Thampi G, Sujith R . Intermittency route to thermoacoustic instability in turbulent combustors. J Fluid Mech 2014; 756:470-87.

[25]	Kabiraj L, Sujith RI . Nonlinear self—excited thermoacoustic oscillations: intermittency and flame blowout. J Fluid Mech 2012; 713:376-97.

[26]	Roy A, Singh S, Nair A, Chaudhuri S, Sujith RI . Flame dynamics during intermittency and secondary bifurcation to longitudinal thermoacoustic instability in a swirl—stabilized annular combustor. Proc Combust Inst 2021; 38(4):6221—30.

[27]	Bonciolini G, Faure—Beaulieu A, Bourquard C, Noiray N . Low order modelling of thermoacoustic instabilities and intermittency: flame response delay and nonlinearity. Combust Flame 2021; 226:396-411.

[28]	Bhavi RS, Pavithran I, Roy A, Sujith R . Abrupt transitions in turbulent thermoacoustic systems. J Sound Vibrat 2023; 547:117478.

[29]	Lee M. Coupling and synchronisation effects on local lock—in of two thermoacoustic oscillators in a stochastic environment. J Fluid Mech 2025; 1017:R2.

[30]	Lieuwen TC, Yang V . Combustion instabilities in gas turbine engines: operational experience, fundamental mechanisms, and modeling. Reston: The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.; 2005.

[31]	Pozarlik AK, Kok JB . Fluid—structure interaction in combustion system of a gas turbine—effect of liner vibrations. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2014; 136(9):091502.

[32]	Shahi M, Kok JB, Roman Casado JC, Pozarlik AK . Strongly coupled fluid—structure interaction in a three—dimensional model combustor during limit cycle oscillations. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2018; 140(6):061505.

[33]	Xia Y, Sharkey P, Verma I, Khaware A, Cokljat D . Prediction of thermoacoustic instability and fluid—structure interactions for gas turbine combustor. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2022; 144(9):091005.

[34]	Can Altunlu A, van der Hoogt PJ, de Boer A . Sensitivity of combustion driven structural dynamics and damage to thermo—acoustic instability: combustion—acoustics—vibration. J Eng Gas Turbine Power 2014; 136(5):051501.

[35]	Rubio—Rubio M, Veiga—López F, Martínez—Ruiz D, Fernández—Tarrazo E, Sánchez—Sanz M . Suppression of thermoacoustic instabilities by flame—structure interaction. Proc Combust Inst 2023; 39(2):1577-85.

[36]	Qin Z, Lin Y, Han M, Han X, Zhang X, He P, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation on the thermoacoustic—induced vibration in a centrally—staged combustor. Combust Flame 2025; 273:113890.

[37]	Qin Z, Song H, Han X, Li L, Lin Y, Xu L . Fuel stratification effects on thermoacoustic instability for swirl spray flame in an aero—engine centrally—staged combustor. Aerosp Sci Technol 2025; 161:110163.

[38]	Schuller T, Durox D, Palies P, Candel S . Acoustic decoupling of longitudinal modes in generic combustion systems. Combust Flame 2012; 159(5):1921—31.

[39]	Han X, Laera D, Yang D, Zhang C, Wang J, Hui X, et al. Flame interactions in a stratified swirl burner: flame stabilization, combustion instabilities and beating oscillations. Combust Flame 2020; 212:500-9.

[40]	Abarbanel HD, Brown R, Sidorowich JJ, Tsimring LS . The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems. Rev Mod Phys 1993; 65(4):1331—92.

[41]	Kennel MB, Brown R, Abarbanel HD . Determining embedding dimension for phase—space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys Rev A 1992; 45(6):3403-11.

[42]	Marwan N, Romano MC, Thiel M, Kurths J . Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems. Phys Rep 2007; 438(5—6):237-329.

[43]	Kantz H, Schreiber T. Nonlinear time series analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.

[44]	Grassberger P, Procaccia I . Characterization of strange attractors. Phys Rev Lett 1983; 50(5):346-9.

[45]	Hernandez—Rivera R, Troiani G, Pagliaroli T, Hernandez—Guerrero A . Detection of the thermoacoustic combustion instabilities of a slot burner based on a diagonal—wise recurrence quantification. Phys Fluids 2019;31(12):31.

[46]	Dowling AP . Nonlinear self—excited oscillations of a ducted flame. J Fluid Mech 1997; 346:271-90.

[47]	Durox D, Schuller T, Noiray N, Candel S . Experimental analysis of nonlinear flame transfer functions for different flame geometries. Proc Combust Inst 2009; 32(1):1391—8.

[48]	Schuller T, Durox D, Candel S . A unified model for the prediction of laminar flame transfer functions: comparisons between conical and v—flame dynamics. Combust Flame 2003; 134(1—2):21-34.

[49]	Polifke W, Lawn C . On the low—frequency limit of flame transfer functions. Combust Flame 2007; 151(3):437-51.

[50]	Li J, Morgans AS . Time domain simulations of nonlinear thermoacoustic behaviour in a simple combustor using a wave—based approach. J Sound Vibrat 2015; 346:345-60.

[51]	Rayleigh L . The explanation of certain acoustical phenomena. Nature 1878; 18(455):319—21.

[52]	Palies P, Durox D, Schuller T, Candel S . The combined dynamics of swirler and turbulent premixed swirling flames. Combust Flame 2010; 157(9):1698-717.