碳汇生态产品价值实现是生态产品价值实现体系中的关键组成部分，其相关理论阐释和实践探索对我国协同推进生态文明建设与“双碳”目标实现具有重要意义。本文从生态产品价值实现的理论基础出发，构建了碳汇生态产品价值实现的理论分析框架，厘清了碳汇生态产品的内涵及价值实现的逻辑链条。在此基础上，结合典型实践案例，对我国当前四种主要的价值实现路径的机制差异、参与主体、优势局限、适用场景等进行系统比较分析，识别出制度体系碎片化、市场体系不成熟、收益分配机制不合理、基层参与机制与激励体系缺失以及计量核算标准体系不足等五大关键制约问题。针对上述问题，提出统筹国家与地方协同治理、完善碳汇市场体系建设、优化生态价值实现机制、增强基层和多元主体参与能力、提升量化与确权水平等方面的对策建议。本研究不仅丰富了碳汇生态产品价值实现的理论分析视角，也为我国碳中和目标下的生态产品制度创新提供了实证支撑与政策参考。

The value realization of carbon sink ecological products is a vital component of the broader ecological product value realization system. Its theoretical elaboration and practical exploration are of great significance to synergistically advance ecological civilization construction and the achievement of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. Based on the theoretical foundations of ecological product value realization, this study constructs an analytical framework for the value realization of carbon sink ecological products, clarifying their conceptual connotations and the logical chain of value realization. On this basis, and drawing on representative practical cases, it compares four major value realization pathways currently applied in China in terms of their mechanisms, participating stakeholders, strengths and limitations, and applicable scenarios. The analysis further identifies five critical constraints: fragmented institutional systems, underdeveloped market mechanisms, unreasonable benefit-sharing arrangements, weak grassroots participation and incentive mechanisms, and insufficient measurement and accounting standards. In response to these challenges, the study proposes targeted policy implications, including strengthening national-local collaborative governance, improving the construction of carbon sink market systems, optimizing ecological value realization mechanisms, enhancing the participation capacity of grassroots and diverse stakeholders, and improving quantification and rights confirmation systems. This study not only enriches the theoretical perspective on carbon sink ecological product value realization but also provides empirical evidence and policy references to support institutional innovation in ecological products under the framework of China's carbon neutrality strategy.