Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.021

Visible Light-Induced 3D Bioprinting Technologies and Corresponding Bioink Materials for Tissue Engineering: A Review

a Centre for Translational Medicine Research and Development, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
b Key Laboratory of Health Informatics, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
c AO Research Institute, Davos CH-7270, Switzerland
d Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
Guangdong Engineering Laboratory of Biomaterials Additive Manufacturing, Shenzhen 518055, China

Received: 2019-09-03 Revised: 2020-05-23 Accepted: 2020-05-26 Available online: 2020-09-30

Next Previous

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting based on traditional 3D printing is an emerging technology that is used to precisely assemble biocompatible materials and cells or bioactive factors into advanced tissue engineering solutions. Similar technology, particularly photo-cured bioprinting strategies, plays an important role in the field of tissue engineering research. The successful implementation of 3D bioprinting
is based on the properties of photopolymerized materials. Photocrosslinkable hydrogel is an attractive biomaterial that is polymerized rapidly and enables process control in space and time. Photopolymerization is frequently initiated by ultraviolet (UV) or visible light. However, UV light may cause cell damage and thereby, affect cell viability. Thus, visible light is considered to be more biocompatible than UV light for bioprinting. In this review, we provide an overview of photo curing-based bioprinting technologies, and describe a visible light crosslinkable bioink, including its crosslinking mechanisms, types of visible light initiator, and biomedical applications. We also discuss existing challenges and prospects of visible light-induced 3D bioprinting devices and hydrogels in biomedical areas.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

References

[ 1 ] Yan Q, Dong H, Su J, Han J, Song Bo, Wei Q, et al. A review of 3D printing technology for medical applications. Engineering 2018;4(5):729–42. link1

[ 2 ] Zhao P, Gu H, Mi H, Rao C, Fu J, Turng LS. Fabrication of scaffolds in tissue engineering: a review. Front Mech Eng 2018;13(1):107–19. link1

[ 3 ] Lu B, Li D, Tian X. Development trends in additive manufacturing and 3D printing. Engineering 2015;1(1):85–9. link1

[ 4 ] An J, Teoh JEM, Suntornnond R, Chua CK. Design and 3D printing of scaffolds and tissues. Engineering 2015;1(2):261–8. link1

[ 5 ] Kamoun EA, Kenawy ER, Chen X. A review on polymeric hydrogel membranes for wound dressing applications: PVA-based hydrogel dressings. J Adv Res 2017;8(3):217–33. link1

[ 6 ] Farkas B, Dante S, Brandi F. Photoinitiator-free 3D scaffolds fabricated by excimer laser photocuring. Nanotechnology 2017;28(3):034001. link1

[ 7 ] Pereira RF, Bártolo PJ. 3D photo-fabrication for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Engineering 2015;1(1):090–112. link1

[ 8 ] Hull CW, inventor; UVP, Inc, assignee. Apparatus for production of threedimensional objects by stereolithography. US patents US4575330A. 1986 March 11. link1

[ 9 ] Cui H, Nowicki M, Fisher JP, Zhang LG. 3D bioprinting for organ regeneration. Adv Healthcare Mater 2017;6(1):1601118. link1

[10] Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P. A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2012;33(26):6020–41. link1

[11] Zhang YS, Khademhosseini A. Advances in engineering hydrogels. Science 2017;356(6337):eaaf3627. link1

[12] Liang R, Wang Li, Yu H, Khan A, Ul Amin B, Khan RU. Molecular design, synthesis and biomedical applications of stimuli-responsive shape memory hydrogels. Eur Polym J 2019;114:380–96. link1

[13] LiX, Sun Q, Li Q, Kawazoe N, Chen G. Functional hydrogels with tunable structures and properties for tissue engineering applications. Front Chem 2018;6:499. link1

[14] Brown TE, Anseth KS. Spatiotemporal hydrogel biomaterials for regenerative medicine. Chem Soc Rev 2017;46(21):6532–52. link1

[15] De la Vega L, Lee C, Sharma R, Amereh M, Willerth SM. 3D bioprinting models of neural tissues: the current state of the field and future directions. Brain Res Bull 2019;150:240–9. link1

[16] Choi JR, Yong KW, Choi JY, Cowie AC. Recent advances in photo-crosslinkable hydrogels for biomedical applications. Biotechniques 2019;66(1):40–53. link1

[17] Yao H, Wang J, Mi S. Photo processing for biomedical hydrogels design and functionality: a review. Polymers 2017;10(1):11. link1

[18] Thakur T, Xavier JR, Cross L, Jaiswal MK, Mondragon E, Kaunas R, et al. Photocrosslinkable and elastomeric hydrogels for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res 2016;104(4):879–88. link1

[19] Khoshakhlagh P, Bowser DA, Brown JQ, Moore MJ. Comparison of visible and UVA phototoxicity in neural culture systems micropatterned with digital projection photolithography. J Biomed Mater Res 2019;107(1):134–44. link1

[20] Petta D, Armiento AR, Grijpma D, Alini M, Eglin D, D’Este M. 3D bioprinting of a hyaluronan bioink through enzymatic- and visible light-crosslinking. Biofabrication 2018;10(4):044104. link1

[21] Zimmermann R, Hentschel C, Schron F, Moedder D, Buettner T, Atallah P, et al. High resolution bioprinting of multi-component hydrogels. Biofabrication 2019;11(4):045008. link1

[22] Sasaki H, Rothrauff BB, Alexander PG, Lin H, Gottardi R, Fu FH, et al. In vitro repair of meniscal radial tear with hydrogels seeded with adipose stem cells and TGF-beta 3. Am J Sports Med 2018;46(10):2402–13. link1

[23] Hyun H, Park MH, Jo G, Kim SY, Chun HJ, Yang DH. Photo-cured glycol chitosan hydrogel for ovarian cancer drug delivery. Mar Drugs 2019;17(1):41. link1

[24] Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, Zhang X, Zhong W, Xing M. 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: a review of recent trends and advances. Bioact Mater 2018;3(2):144–56. link1

[25] Acosta-Vélez GF, Zhu TZ, Linsley CS, Wu BM. Photocurable poly(ethylene glycol) as a bioink for the inkjet 3D pharming of hydrophobic drugs. Int J Pharm 2018;546(1–2):145–53. link1

[26] Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B, Samanipour R, Ghosh S, Kim K. A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks. Biofabrication 2015;7(4):045009. link1

[27] Lim KS, Levato R, Costa PF, Castilho MD, Alcala-Orozco CR, van Dorenmalen KMA, et al. Bio-resin for high resolution lithography-based biofabrication of complex cell-laden constructs. Biofabrication 2018;10(3):034101. link1

[28] Bernal PN, Delrot P, Loterie D, Li Y, Malda J, Moser C, et al. Volumetric bioprinting of complex living-tissue constructs within seconds. Adv Mater 2019;31(42):e1904209. link1

[29] Acosta-Vélez GF, Linsley CS, Craig MC, Wu BM. Photocurable bioink for the inkjet 3D pharming of hydrophilic drugs. Bioengineering 2017;4(1):11. link1

[30] Poldervaart MT, Goversen B, de Ruijter M, Abbadessa A, Melchels FPW, Oner FC, et al. 3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. PLoS ONE 2017;12(6):e0177628. link1

[31] Xu C, Lee W, Dai G, Hong Yi. Highly elastic biodegradable single-network hydrogel for cell printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018;10(12): 9969–79. link1

[32] Sakai S, Ohi H, Hotta T, Kamei H, Taya M. Differentiation potential of human adipose stem cells bioprinted with hyaluronic acid/gelatin-based bioink through microextrusion and visible light-initiated crosslinking. Biopolymers 2018;109(2):e23080. link1

[33] Sakai S, Kamei H, Mori T, Hotta T, Ohi H, Nakahata M, et al. Visible lightinduced hydrogelation of an alginate derivative and application to stereolithographic bioprinting using a visible light projector and acid red. Biomacromolecules 2018;19(2):672–9. link1

[34] Gao G, Yonezawa T, Hubbell K, Dai G, Cui X. Inkjet-bioprinted acrylated peptides and PEG hydrogel with human mesenchymal stem cells promote robust bone and cartilage formation with minimal printhead clogging. Biotechnol J 2015;10(10):1568–77. link1

[35] Gu BK, Choi DJ, Park SJ, Kim MS, Kang CM, Kim CH. 3-dimensional bioprinting for tissue engineering applications. Biomater Res 2016;20(1):12. link1

[36] Panwar A, Tan LP. Current status of bioinks for micro-extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Molecules 2016;21(6):685. link1

[37] Holzl K, Lin S, Tytgat L, van Vlierberghe S, Gu L, Ovsianikov A. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 2016;8 (3):032002. link1

[38] Ouyang L, Highley CB, Sun W, Burdick JA. A generalizable strategy for the 3D bioprinting of hydrogels from nonviscous photo-crosslinkable inks. Adv Mater 2017;29(8):1604983. link1

[39] Lim KS, Schon BS, Mekhileri NV, Brown GCJ, Chia CM, Prabakar S, et al. New visible-light photoinitiating system for improved print fidelity in gelatinbased bioinks. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2016;2(10):1752–62. link1

[40] Valot L, Martinez J, Mehdi A, Subra G. Chemical insights into bioinks for 3D printing. Chem Soc Rev 2019;48(15):4049–86. link1

[41] Zeng Y, Yan Y, Yan H, Liu C, Li P, Dong P, et al. 3D printing of hydroxyapatite scaffolds with good mechanical and biocompatible properties by digital light processing. J Mater Sci 2018;53(9):6291–301. link1

[42] Deng S, Wu J, Dickey MD, Zhao Q, Xie T. Rapid open-air digital light 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer. Adv Mater 2019;31(39):1903970. link1

[43] Zhu W, Ma X, Gou M, Mei D, Zhang K, Chen S. 3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2016;40: 103–12. link1

[44] Kelly BE, Bhattacharya I, Heidari H, Shusteff M, Spadaccini CM, Taylor HK. Volumetric additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction. Science 2019;363(6431):1075–9. link1

[45] Mendes-Felipe C, Oliveira J, Etxebarria I, Vilas-Vilela JL, Lanceros-Mendez S. State-of-the-art and future challenges of UV curable polymer-based smart materials for printing technologies. Adv Mater Technol 2019;4(3):1800618. link1

[46] Pahoff S, Meinert C, Bas O, Nguyen L, Klein TJ, Hutmacher DW. Effect of gelatin source and photoinitiator type on chondrocyte redifferentiation in gelatin methacryloyl-based tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. J Mater Chem B Mater Biol Med 2019;7(10):1761–72. link1

[47] Fu A, Gwon K, Kim M, Tae G, Kornfield JA. Visible-light-initiated thiol– acrylate photopolymerization of heparin-based hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2015;16(2):497–506. link1

[48] Petta D, Grijpma DW, Alini M, Eglin D, D’Este M. Three-dimensional printing of a tyramine hyaluronan derivative with double gelation mechanism for independent tuning of shear thinning and postprinting curing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2018;4(8):3088–98. link1

[49] Fairbanks BD, Schwartz MP, Bowman CN, Anseth KS. Photoinitiated polymerization of PEG-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2,4,6- trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: polymerization rate and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials 2009;30(35):6702–7. link1

[50] Wang Z, Jin X, Dai Ru, Holzman JF, Kim K. An ultrafast hydrogel photocrosslinking method for direct laser bioprinting. RSC Adv 2016;6 (25):21099–104. link1

[51] Nguyen AK, Goering PL, Reipa V, Narayan RJ. Toxicity and photosensitizing assessment of gelatin methacryloyl-based hydrogels photoinitiated with lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate in human primary renal proximal tubule epithelial cells. Biointerphases 2019;14(2):021007. link1

[52] Hu J, Hou Y, Park H, Choi B, Hou S, Chung A, et al. Visible light crosslinkable chitosan hydrogels for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2012;8(5):1730–8. link1

[53] Kamoun EA, El-Betany A, Menzel H, Chen X. Influence of photoinitiator concentration and irradiation time on the crosslinking performance of visible-light activated pullulan-HEMA hydrogels. Int J Biol Macromol 2018;120:1884–92. link1

[54] Donnelly PE, Chen T, Finch A, Brial C, Maher SA, Torzilli PA. Photocrosslinked tyramine-substituted hyaluronate hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties improve immediate tissue–hydrogel interfacial strength in articular cartilage. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2017;28(6):582–600. link1

[55] Al-Abboodi A, Zhang S, Al-Saady M, Ong JW, Chan PPY, Fu J. Printing in situ tissue sealant with visible-light-crosslinked porous hydrogel. Biomed Mater 2019;14(4):045010. link1

[56] Bertlein S, Brown G, Lim KS, Jungst T, Boeck T, Blunk T, et al. thiol–ene clickable gelatin: a platform bioink for multiple 3D biofabrication technologies. Adv Mater 2017;29(44):1703404. link1

[57] Lin H, Cheng AM, Alexander PG, Beck AM, Tuan RS. Cartilage tissue engineering application of injectable gelatin hydrogel with in situ visiblelight-activated gelation capability in both air and aqueous solution. Tissue Eng Part A 2014;20(17-18):2402–11. link1

[58] Greene T, Lin TY, Andrisani OM, Lin CC. Comparative study of visible light polymerized gelatin hydrogels for 3D culture of hepatic progenitor cells. J Appl Polym Sci 2017;134(11):44585. link1

[59] Gwon K, Kim E, Tae G. Heparin–hyaluronic acid hydrogel in support of cellular activities of 3D encapsulated adipose derived stem cells. Acta Biomater 2017;49:284–95. link1

[60] Kerscher P, Kaczmarek JA, Head SE, Ellis ME, Seeto WJ, Kim J, et al. Direct production of human cardiac tissues by pluripotent stem cell encapsulation in gelatin methacryloyl. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2017;3(8):1499–509. link1

[61] Shoichet MS, Li RH, White ML, Winn SR. Stability of hydrogels used in cell encapsulation: an in vitro comparison of alginate and agarose. Biotechnol Bioeng 1996;50(4):374–81. link1

[62] Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y, Fu J, Suo H. 3D bioprinting of low-concentration cellladen gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018;10(8):6849–57. link1

[63] Beck EC, Barragan M, Libeer TB, Kieweg SL, Converse GL, Hopkins RA, et al. Chondroinduction from naturally derived cartilage matrix: a comparison between devitalized and decellularized cartilage encapsulated in hydrogel pastes. Tissue Eng Part A 2016;22(7-8):665–79. link1

[64] Hoyle C, Bowman C. Thiol–ene click chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed 2010;49 (9):1540–73. link1

[65] Zhu H, Yang X, Genin GM, Lu TJ, Xu F, Lin M. The relationship between thiol– acrylate photopolymerization kinetics and hydrogel mechanics: an improved model incorporating photobleaching and thiol–Michael addition. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018;88:160–9. link1

[66] Hao Y, Lin CC. Degradable thiol–acrylate hydrogels as tunable matrices for three-dimensional hepatic culture: degradable thiol–acrylate hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res 2014;102(11):3813–27. link1

[67] Lin CC, Ki CS, Shih H. Thiol–norbornene photoclick hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. J Appl Polym Sci 2015;132(8):41563. link1

[68] Shih H, Liu HY, Lin CC. Improving gelation efficiency and cytocompatibility of visible light polymerized thiol–norbornene hydrogels via addition of soluble tyrosine. Biomater Sci 2017;5(3):589–99. link1

[69] Fancy DA, Denison C, Kim K, Xie Y, Holdeman T, Amini F, et al. Scope, limitations and mechanistic aspects of the photo-induced cross-linking of proteins by water-soluble metal complexes. Chem Biol 2000;7(9):697–708. link1

[70] Loebel C, Broguiere N, Alini M, Zenobi-Wong M, Eglin D. Microfabrication of photo-cross-linked hyaluronan hydrogels by single- and two-photon tyramine oxidation. Biomacromolecules 2015;16(9):2624–30. link1

[71] Mazaki T, Shiozaki Y, Yamane K, Yoshida A, Nakamura M, Yoshida Y, et al. A novel, visible light-induced, rapidly cross-linkable gelatin scaffold for osteochondral tissue engineering. Sci Rep 2015;4(1):4457. link1

[72] Kumar SA, Allen SC, Tasnim N, Akter T, Park S, Kumar A, et al. The applicability of furfuryl-gelatin as a novel bioink for tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res 2019;107(2):314–23. link1

[73] Tytgat L, Van Damme L, Van Hoorick J, Declercq H, Thienpont H, Ottevaere H, et al. Additive manufacturing of photo-crosslinked gelatin scaffolds for adipose tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2019;94:340–50. link1

[74] Yoon SJ, Yoo Y, Nam SE, Hyun H, Lee DW, Um S, et al. The cocktail effect of BMP-2 and TGF-b1 loaded in visible light-cured glycol chitosan hydrogels for the enhancement of bone formation in a rat tibial defect model. Mar Drugs 2018;16(10):351. link1

[75] Lu M, Liu Yi, Huang YC, Huang CJ, Tsai WB. Fabrication of photo-crosslinkable glycol chitosan hydrogel as a tissue adhesive. Carbohydr Polym 2018;181:668–74. link1

[76] Chen P, Ning L, Qiu P, Mo J, Mei S, Xia C, et al. Photo-crosslinked gelatin– hyaluronic acid methacrylate hydrogel-committed nucleus pulposus-like differentiation of adipose stromal cells for intervertebral disc repair. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2019;13(4):682–93. link1

[77] Gramlich WM, Kim IL, Burdick JA. Synthesis and orthogonal photopatterning of hyaluronic acid hydrogels with thiol–norbornene chemistry. Biomaterials 2013;34(38):9803–11. link1

[78] Vega SL, Kwon MY, Song KH, Wang C, Mauck RL, Han L, et al. Combinatorial hydrogels with biochemical gradients for screening 3D cellular microenvironments. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):614. link1

[79] Kim SH, Yeon YK, Lee JM, Chao JR, Lee YJ, Seo YB, et al. Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):1620. link1

[80] Jeon O, Bouhadir KH, Mansour JM, Alsberg E. Photocrosslinked alginate hydrogels with tunable biodegradation rates and mechanical properties. Biomaterials 2009;30(14):2724–34. link1

[81] Ooi HW, Mota C, ten Cate AT, Calore A, Moroni L, Baker MB. Thiol–ene alginate hydrogels as versatile bioinks for bioprinting. Biomacromolecules 2018;19(8):3390–400. link1

[82] Stichler S, Jungst T, Schamel M, Zilkowski I, Kuhlmann M, Böck T, et al. Thiol–ene clickable poly(glycidol) hydrogels for biofabrication. Ann Biomed Eng 2017;45(1):273–85. link1

[83] Cristovão AF, Sousa D, Silvestre F, Ropio I, Gaspar A, Henriques C, et al. Customized tracheal design using 3D printing of a polymer hydrogel: influence of UV laser cross-linking on mechanical properties. 3D Print Med 2019;5(1):12. link1

[84] Posritong S, Flores Chavez R, Chu TMG, Bruzzaniti A. A Pyk2 inhibitor incorporated into a PEGDA-gelatin hydrogel promotes osteoblast activity and mineral deposition. Biomed Mater 2019;14(2):025015. link1

[85] Lin H, Beck AM, Shimomura K, Sohn J, Fritch MR, Deng Y, et al. Optimization of photocrosslinked gelatin/hyaluronic acid hybrid scaffold for the repair of cartilage defect. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2019;13(8):1418–29. link1

[86] Campiglio CE, Contessi Negrini N, Fare S, Draghi L. Cross-linking strategies for electrospun gelatin scaffolds. Materials 2019;12(15):2476. link1

[87] Van Den Bulcke AI, Bogdanov B, De Rooze N, Schacht EH, Cornelissen M, Berghmans H. Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2000;1(1):31–8. link1

[88] Liang X, Wang X, Xu Qi, Lu Y, et al. Rubbery chitosan/carrageenan hydrogels constructed through an electroneutrality system and their potential application as cartilage scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2018;19(2):340–52. link1

[89] Cheng YL, Chen F. Preparation and characterization of photocured poly (ecaprolactone) diacrylate/poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate/chitosan for photopolymerization-type 3D printing tissue engineering scaffold application. Mater Sci Eng C 2017;81:66–73. link1

[90] Toole BP. Hyaluronan: from extracellular glue to pericellular cue. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4(7):528–39. link1

[91] Suo A, Xu W, Wang Y, Sun T, Ji L, Qian J. Dual-degradable and injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel mimicking extracellular matrix for 3D culture of breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Carbohydr Polym 2019;211:336–48. link1

[92] Highley CB, Prestwich GD, Burdick JA. Recent advances in hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2016;40: 35–40. link1

[93] Hinton TJ, Jallerat Q, Palchesko RN, Park JH, Grodzicki MS, Shue HJ, et al. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci Adv 2015;1(9): e1500758. link1

[94] Inoue S, Tanaka K, Arisaka F, Kimura S, Ohtomo K, Mizuno S. Silk fibroin of Bombyx mori is secreted, assembling a high molecular mass elementary unit consisting of H-chain, L-chain, and P25, with a 6:6:1 molar ratio. J Biol Chem 2000;275(51):40517–28. link1

[95] Shi L, Wang F, Zhu W, Xu Z, Fuchs S, Hilborn J, et al. Self-healing silk fibroinbased hydrogel for bone regeneration: dynamic metal-ligand self-assembly approach. Adv Funct Mater 2017;27(37):1700591. link1

[96] Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 2012;37(1):106–26. link1

[97] Chaicharoenaudomrung N, Kunhorm P, Promjantuek W, Heebkaew N, Rujanapun N, Noisa P. Fabrication of 3D calcium-alginate scaffolds for human glioblastoma modeling and anticancer drug response evaluation. J Cell Physiol 2019;234(11):20085–97. link1

[98] Hasan Shahriari M, Shokrgozar MA, Bonakdar S, Yousefi F, Negahdari B, Yeganeh H. In situ forming hydrogels based on polyethylene glycol itaconate for tissue engineering application. Bull Mater Sci 2019;42(4):193. link1

[99] Hao Y, Shih H, Munˇoz Z, Kemp A, Lin CC. Visible light cured thiol–vinyl hydrogels with tunable degradation for 3D cell culture. Acta Biomater 2014;10(1):104–14. link1

[100] Li H, Zheng H, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Tong W, Gao C. Preparation of photoresponsive poly(ethylene glycol) microparticles and their influence on cell viability. J Colloid Interface Sci 2018;514:182–9. link1

[101] Liang J, Guo Z, Timmerman A, Grijpma D, Poot A. Enhanced mechanical and cell adhesive properties of photo-crosslinked PEG hydrogels by incorporation of gelatin in the networks. Biomed Mater 2019;14(2):024102. link1

[102] Bal T, Nazli C, Okcu A, Duruksu G, Karaöz E, Kizilel S. Mesenchymal stem cells and ligand incorporation in biomimetic poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels significantly improve insulin secretion from pancreatic islets. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2017;11(3):694–703. link1

[103] Wang Z, Kumar H, Tian Z, Jin X, Holzman JF,Menard F. Visible light photoinitiation of cell-adhesive gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for stereolithography 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018;10(32):26859–69. link1

[104] Galarraga JH, Kwon MY, Burdick JA. 3D bioprinting via an in situ crosslinking technique towards engineering cartilage tissue. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):19987. link1

[105] Kwak H, Shin S, Lee H, Hyun J. Formation of a keratin layer with silk fibroin– polyethylene glycol composite hydrogel fabricated by digital light processing 3D printing. J Ind Eng Chem 2019;72:232–40. link1

[106] Kumar SA, Alonzo M, Allen SC, Abelseth L, Thakur V, Akimoto J, et al. A visible light-cross-linkable, fibrin–gelatin-based bioprinted construct with human cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2019;5(9):4551–63. link1

[107] Clark EA, Alexander MR, Irvine DJ, Roberts CJ, Wallace MJ, Yoo J, et al. Making tablets for delivery of poorly soluble drugs using photoinitiated 3D inkjet printing. Int J Pharm 2020;578:118805. link1

Related Research