Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.08.021

Airline Disruption Management: A Review of Models and Solution Methods

a School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
b Xiamen Airlines, Xiamen 361006, China
c Department of Industrial Engineering and Institute for Advanced Data Analytics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
d Center for Applied Optimization, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

Received: 2020-04-19 Revised: 2020-06-26 Accepted: 2020-08-03 Available online: 2021-02-09

Next Previous

Abstract

The normal operation of aircraft and flights can be affected by various unpredictable factors, such as severe weather, airport closure, and corrective maintenance, leading to disruption of the planned schedule. When a disruption occurs, the airline operation control center performs various operations to reassign resources (e.g., flights, aircraft, and crews) and redistribute passengers to restore the schedule while minimizing costs. We introduce different sources of disruption and corresponding operations. Then, basic models and recently proposed extensions for aircraft recovery, crew recovery, and integrated recovery are reviewed, with the aim of providing models and methods for different disruption scenarios in the practical implementation of airlines. In addition, we provide suggestions for future research directions in these topics.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

References

[ 1 ] The International Air Transport Association. Infographic: economics air passenger demand [Internet]. Montreal: The International Air Transport Association; 2019. Available from: https://www.iata.org/en/iata-repository/ publications/economic-reports/Infographic_Economics_Air_Passenger_Demand_ 2019/. link1

[ 2 ] Eltoukhy AEE, Chan FTS, Chung SH. Airline schedule planning: a review and future directions. Ind Manage Data Syst 2017;117(6):1201–43. link1

[ 3 ] Zhou L, Liang Z, Chou CA, Chaovalitwongse WA. Airline planning and scheduling: models and solution methodologies. Front Eng Manag 2020;7:1–26. link1

[ 4 ] Civil Aviation Administration of China. Statistical bulletin of civil aviation industry development in 2019. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China; 2020. Chinese.

[ 5 ] OAG. Punctuality League [Internet]. Luton: OAG; 2020. Available from: https:// www.oag.com/punctuality-league-2020-report?submissionGuid=8ba7ac6c475b-4821-9456-4c8203499733. link1

[ 6 ] Clarke MDD. Irregular airline operations: a review of the state-of-the-practice in airline operations control centers. J Air Transp Manage 1998;4(2):67–76. link1

[ 7 ] Filar JA, Manyem P, White K. How airlines and airports recover from schedule perturbations: a survey. Ann Oper Res 2001;108(1–4):315–33. link1

[ 8 ] Kohl N, Larsen A, Larsen J, Ross A, Tiourine S. Airline disruption management— perspectives, experiences and outlook. J Air Transp Manage 2007;13 (3):149–62. link1

[ 9 ] Clausen J, Larsen A, Larsen J, Rezanova NJ. Disruption management in the airline industry—concepts, models and methods. Comput Oper Res 2010;37 (5):809–21. link1

[10] Belobaba P, Odoni A, Barnhart C, editors. The global airline industry. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.; 2009.

[11] Barnhart C, Smith B, editors. Quantitative problem solving methods in the airline industry: a modeling methodology handbook. Berlin: Springer; 2012.

[12] Floudas CA, Pardalos PM, editors. Encyclopedia of optimization. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2009.

[13] Hane CA, Barnhart C, Johnson EL, Marsten RE, Nemhauser GL, Sigismondi G. The fleet assignment problem: solving a large-scale integer program. Math Program 1995;70(1–3):211–32. link1

[14] Yan S, Yang DH. A decision support framework for handling schedule perturbation. Transp Res Pt B Methodol 1996;30(6):405–19. link1

[15] Yan S, Lin CG. Airline scheduling for the temporary closure of airports. Transport Sci 1997;31(1):72–82. link1

[16] Andersson T, Värbrand P. The flight perturbation problem. Transp Plann Technol 2004;27(2):91–117. link1

[17] Bard JF, Yu G, Argüello MF. Optimizing aircraft routings in response to groundings and delays. IIE Trans 2001;33(10):931–47. link1

[18] Thengvall BG, Bard JF, Yu G. Balancing user preferences for aircraft schedule recovery during irregular operations. IIE Trans 2000;32(3):181–93. link1

[19] Thengvall BG, Yu G, Bard JF. Multiple fleet aircraft schedule recovery following hub closures. Transp Res Pt A Policy Pract 2001;35(4):289–308. link1

[20] Vos HWM, Santos BF, Omondi T. Aircraft schedule recovery problem—a dynamic modeling framework for daily operations. Transp Res Procedia 2015;10:931–40. link1

[21] Vink J, Santos BF, Verhagen WJC, Medeiros I, Filho R. Dynamic aircraft recovery problem—an operational decision support framework. Comput Oper Res 2020;117:104892. link1

[22] Argüello MF, Bard JF, Yu G. A grasp for aircraft routing in response to groundings and delays. J Comb Optim 1997;1(3):211–28. link1

[23] Rosenberger JM, Johnson EL, Nemhauser GL. Rerouting aircraft for airline recovery. Transport Sci 2003;37(4):408–21. link1

[24] Eggenberg N, Salani M, Bierlaire M. Constraint-specific recovery network for solving airline recovery problems. Comput Oper Res 2010;37(6):1014–26. link1

[25] Wu Z, Li B, Dang C, Hu F, Zhu Q, Fu B. Solving long haul airline disruption problem caused by groundings using a distributed fixed-point computational approach to integer programming. Neurocomputing 2017;269:232–55. link1

[26] Liang Z, Xiao F, Qian X, Zhou L, Jin X, Lu X, et al. A column generation-based heuristic for aircraft recovery problem with airport capacity constraints and maintenance flexibility. Transp Res Pt B Methodol 2018;113:70–90. link1

[27] Aktürk MS, Atamtürk A, Gürel S. Aircraft rescheduling with cruise speed control. Oper Res 2014;62(4):829–45. link1

[28] Jarrah AIZ, Yu G, Krishnamurthy N, Rakshit A. A decision support framework for airline flight cancellations and delays. Transport Sci 1993;27(3):266–80. link1

[29] Thengvall BG, Bard JF, Yu G. A bundle algorithm approach for the aircraft schedule recovery problem during hub closures. Transport Sci 2003;37 (4):392–407. link1

[30] Andersson T. Solving the flight perturbation problem with meta heuristics. J Heuristics 2006;12(1–2):37–53. link1

[31] Liu TK, Jeng CR, Chang YH. Disruption management of an inequality-based multi-fleet airline schedule by a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Transp Plann Technol 2008;31(6):613–39. link1

[32] Wei G, Yu G, Song M. Optimization model and algorithm for crew management during airline irregular operations. J Comb Optim 1997;1(3):305–21. link1

[33] Teodorovic´ D, Stojkovic´ G. Model to reduce airline schedule disturbances. J Transp Eng 1995;121(4):324–31. link1

[34] Stojkovic´ M, Soumis F, Desrosiers J. The operational airline crew scheduling problem. Transport Sci 1998;32(3):232–45. link1

[35] Lettovsky´ L, Johnson EL, Nemhauser GL. Airline crew recovery. Transport Sci 2000;34(4):337–48. link1

[36] Yu G, Argüello M, Song G, McCowan SM, White A. A new era for crew recovery at continental airlines. Interfaces 2003;33(1):5–22. link1

[37] Guo Y, Suhl L, Thiel MP. Solving the airline crew recovery problem by a genetic algorithm with local improvement. Oper Res 2005;5(2):241–59. link1

[38] Medard CP, Sawhney N. Airline crew scheduling from planning to operations. Eur J Oper Res 2007;183(3):1013–27. link1

[39] Stojkovic´ M, Soumis F. An optimization model for the simultaneous operational flight and pilot scheduling problem. Manage Sci 2001;47 (9):1290–305. link1

[40] Stojkovic´ M, Soumis F. The operational flight and multi-crew scheduling problem. Yugosl J Oper Res 2005;15(1):25–48. link1

[41] Abdelghany A, Ekollu G, Narasimhan R, Abdelghany K. A proactive crew recovery decision support tool for commercial airlines during irregular operations. Ann Oper Res 2004;127(1–4):309–31. link1

[42] Desrochers M, Soumis F. A generalized permanent labeling algorithm for the shortest path problem with time windows. Inf Syst Res 1988;26(3):191–212. link1

[43] Nissen R, Haase K. Duty-period-based network model for crew rescheduling in European airlines. J Sched 2006;9(3):255–78. link1

[44] Chang SC. A duty based approach in solving the aircrew recovery problem. J Air Transp Manage 2012;19:16–20. link1

[45] Bratu S, Barnhart C. Flight operations recovery: new approaches considering passenger recovery. J Sched 2006;9(3):279–98. link1

[46] Abdelghany KF, Abdelghany AF, Ekollu G. An integrated decision support tool for airlines schedule recovery during irregular operations. Eur J Oper Res 2008;185(2):825–48. link1

[47] Petersen JD, Sölveling G, Clarke JP, Johnson EL, Shebalov S. An optimization approach to airline integrated recovery. Transport Sci 2012;46(4): 482–500. link1

[48] Maher SJ. A novel passenger recovery approach for the integrated airline recovery problem. Comput Oper Res 2015;57:123–37. link1

[49] Zhang D, Henry Lau HYK, Yu C. A two stage heuristic algorithm for the integrated aircraft and crew schedule recovery problems. Comput Ind Eng 2015;87:436–53. link1

[50] Maher SJ. Solving the integrated airline recovery problem using column-androw generation. Transport Sci 2016;50(1):216–39. link1

[51] Arıkan U, Gürel S, Aktürk MS. Flight network-based approach for integrated airline recovery with cruise speed control. Transport Sci 2017;51 (4):1259–87. link1

[52] Arıkan U, Gürel S, Aktürk MS. Integrated aircraft and passenger recovery with cruise time controllability. Ann Oper Res 2016;236(2):295–317. link1

[53] Marla L, Vaaben B, Barnhart C. Integrated disruption management and flight planning to trade off delays and fuel burn. Transport Sci 2017;51(1):88–111. link1

[54] Jafari N, Zegordi SH. The airline perturbation problem: considering disrupted passengers. Transp Plann Technol 2010;33(2):203–20. link1

[55] Jafari N, Zegordi SH. Simultaneous recovery model for aircraft and passengers. J Franklin Inst 2011;348(7):1638–55. link1

[56] Hu Y, Xu B, Bard JF, Chi H, Gao M. Optimization of multi-fleet aircraft routing considering passenger transiting under airline disruption. Comput Ind Eng 2015;80:132–44. link1

[57] Bisaillon S, Cordeau JF, Laporte G, Pasin F. A large neighbourhood search heuristic for the aircraft and passenger recovery problem. 4OR-Q J Oper Res 2011;9(2):139–57. link1

[58] Sinclair K, Cordeau JF, Laporte G. Improvements to a large neighborhood search heuristic for an integrated aircraft and passenger recovery problem. Eur J Oper Res 2014;233(1):234–45. link1

[59] Sinclair K, Cordeau JF, Laporte G. A column generation post-optimization heuristic for the integrated aircraft and passenger recovery problem. Comput Oper Res 2016;65:42–52. link1

[60] Jozefowiez N, Mancel C, Mora-Camino F. A heuristic approach based on shortest path problems for integrated flight, aircraft, and passenger rescheduling under disruptions. J Oper Res Soc 2013;64(3):384–95. link1

[61] Hu Y, Song Y, Zhao K, Xu B. Integrated recovery of aircraft and passengers after airline operation disruption based on a GRASP algorithm. Transport Res E-Log 2016;87:97–112. link1

Related Research