[ 1 ] Grossmann IE, Westerberg AW. Research challenges in process systems engineering. AIChE J 2000;46(9):1700–3. link1

[ 2 ] Shi H, Zhou T. Computational design of heterogeneous catalysts and gas separation materials for advanced chemical processing. Front Chem Sci Eng 2021;15(1):49–59. link1

[ 3 ] Zhou T, Song Z, Sundmacher K. Big data creates new opportunities for materials research: a review on methods and applications of machine learning for materials design. Engineering 2019;5(6):1017–26. link1

[ 4 ] McBride K, Sundmacher K. Overview of surrogate modeling in chemical process engineering. Chem Ing Tech 2019;91(3):228–39. link1

[ 5 ] Von Stosch M, Oliveira R, Peres J, Feyo de Azevedo S. Hybrid semi-parametric modeling in process systems engineering: past, present and future. Comput Chem Eng 2014;60:86–101. link1

[ 6 ] Zhang S, Wang F, He D, Jia R. Batch-to-batch control of particle size distribution in cobalt oxalate synthesis process based on hybrid model. Powder Technol 2012;224:253–9. link1

[ 7 ] Zahedi G, Lohi A, Mahdi KA. Hybrid modeling of ethylene to ethylene oxide heterogeneous reactor. Fuel Process Technol 2011;92(9):1725–32. link1

[ 8 ] Rall D, Schweidtmann AM, Aumeier BM, Kamp J, Karwe J, Ostendorf K, et al. Simultaneous rational design of ion separation membranes and processes. J Membr Sci 2020;600:117860. link1

[ 9 ] Zhou T, McBride K, Zhang X, Qi Z, Sundmacher K. Integrated solvent and process design exemplified for a Diels–Alder reaction. AIChE J 2015;61 (1):147–58. link1

[10] Huster WR, Schweidtmann AM, Mitsos A. Working fluid selection for organic Rankine cycles via deterministic global optimization of design and operation. Optim Eng 2020;21(2):517–36. link1

[11] Zendehboudi S, Rezaei N, Lohi A. Applications of hybrid models in chemical, petroleum, and energy systems: a systematic review. Appl Energy 2018;228:2539–66. link1

[12] McBride K, Sanchez Medina EI, Sundmacher K. Hybrid semi-parametric modeling in separation processes: a review. Chem Ing Tech 2020;92 (7):842–55. link1

[13] Yang S, Navarathna P, Ghosh S, Bequette BW. Hybrid modeling in the era of smart manufacturing. Comput Chem Eng 2020;140:106874. link1

[14] Stephanopoulos G, Reklaitis GV. Process systems engineering: from Solvay to modern bio- and nanotechnology: a history of development, successes and prospects for the future. Chem Eng Sci 2011;66(19):4272–306. link1

[15] Papadopoulos AI, Tsivintzelis I, Linke P, Seferlis P. Computer-aided molecular design: fundamentals, methods, and applications. Ref Module Chem Mol Sci Chem Eng 2018. link1

[16] Zhang L, Babi DK, Gani R. New vistas in chemical product and process design. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 2016;7(1):557–82. link1

[17] Uhlemann J, Costa R, Charpentier JC. Product design and engineering—past, present, future trends in teaching, research and practices: academic and industry points of view. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2020;27:10–21. link1

[18] Fung KY, Ng KM, Zhang L, Gani R. A grand model for chemical product design. Comput Chem Eng 2016;91:15–27. link1

[19] Alshehri AS, Gani R, You F. Deep learning and knowledge-based methods for computer-aided molecular design—toward a unified approach: state-of-theart and future directions. Comput Chem Eng 2020;141:107005. link1

[20] Austin ND, Sahinidis NV, Trahan DW. Computer-aided molecular design: an introduction and review of tools, applications, and solution techniques. Chem Eng Res Des 2016;116:2–26. link1

[21] Ramprasad R, Batra R, Pilania G, Mannodi-Kanakkithodi A, Kim C. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. NPJ Comput Mater 2017;3:54. link1

[22] Zhou T, Song Z, Zhang X, Gani R, Sundmacher K. Optimal solvent design for extractive distillation processes: a multiobjective optimization-based hierarchical framework. Ind Eng Chem Res 2019;58(15):5777–86. link1

[23] Lek-utaiwan P, Suphanit B, Douglas PL, Mongkolsiri N. Design of extractive distillation for the separation of close-boiling mixtures: solvent selection and column optimization. Comput Chem Eng 2011;35(6):1088–100. link1

[24] Kossack S, Kraemer K, Gani R, Marquardt W. A systematic synthesis framework for extractive distillation processes. Chem Eng Res Des 2008;86(7):781–92. link1

[25] Burger J, Papaioannou V, Gopinath S, Jackson G, Galindo A, Adjiman CS. A hierarchical method to integrated solvent and process design of physical CO2 absorption using the SAFT-c Mie approach. AIChE J 2015;61(10):3249–69. link1

[26] McBride K, Sundmacher K. Data driven conceptual process design for the hydroformylation of 1-dodecene in a thermomorphic solvent system. Ind Eng Chem Res 2015;54(26):6761–71. link1

[27] Austin ND, Samudra AP, Sahinidis NV, Trahan DW. Mixture design using derivative-free optimization in the space of individual component properties. AIChE J 2016;62(5):1514–30. link1

[28] Reichardt C. Solvents and solvent effects: an introduction. Org Process Res Dev 2007;11(1):105–13. link1

[29] Reichardt C, Welton T. Solvents and solvent effects in organic chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2011. link1

[30] Song Z, Shi H, Zhang X, Zhou T. Prediction of CO2 solubility in ionic liquids using machine learning methods. Chem Eng Sci 2020;223:115752. link1

[31] Zhao Y, Gao J, Huang Y, Afzal RM, Zhang X, Zhang S. Predicting H2S solubility in ionic liquids by the quantitative structure–property relationship method using Sr-profile molecular descriptors. RSC Adv 2016;6(74):70405–13. link1

[32] Zhao Y, Huang Y, Zhang X, Zhang S. A quantitative prediction of the viscosity of ionic liquids using Sr-profile molecular descriptors. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2015;17(5):3761–7. link1

[33] Zhou T, Jhamb S, Liang X, Sundmacher K, Gani R. Prediction of acid dissociation constants of organic compounds using group contribution methods. Chem Eng Sci 2018;183:95–105. link1

[34] Holderbaum T, Gmehling J. PSRK: a group contribution equation of state based on UNIFAC. Fluid Phase Equilib 1991;70(2–3):251–65. link1

[35] Valencia-Marquez D, Flores-Tlacuahuac A, Vasquez-Medrano R. An optimization approach for CO2 capture using ionic liquids. J Clean Prod 2017;168:1652–67. link1

[36] Hasan MMF, First EL, Floudas CA. Cost-effective CO2 capture based on in silico screening of zeolites and process optimization. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2013;15 (40):17601–18. link1

[37] First EL, Hasan MMF, Floudas CA. Discovery of novel zeolites for natural gas purification through combined material screening and process optimization. AIChE J 2014;60(5):1767–85. link1

[38] Liu T, First EL, Faruque Hasan MM, Floudas CA. A multi-scale approach for the discovery of zeolites for hydrogen sulfide removal. Comput Chem Eng 2016;91:206–18. link1

[39] Wiersum AD, Chang JS, Serre C, Llewellyn PL. An adsorbent performance indicator as a first step evaluation of novel sorbents for gas separations: application to metal–organic frameworks. Langmuir 2013;29(10):3301–9. link1

[40] Leperi KT, Chung YG, You F, Snurr RQ. Development of a general evaluation metric for rapid screening of adsorbent materials for postcombustion CO2 capture. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2019;7(13):11529–39. link1

[41] Khurana M, Farooq S. Adsorbent screening for postcombustion CO2 capture: a method relating equilibrium isotherm characteristics to an optimum vacuum swing adsorption process performance. Ind Eng Chem Res 2016;55 (8):2447–60. link1

[42] Qiao Z, Peng C, Zhou J, Jiang J. High-throughput computational screening of 137953 metal–organic frameworks for membrane separation of a CO2/N2/CH4 mixture. J Mater Chem A 2016;4(41):15904–12. link1

[43] Altintas C, Erucar I, Keskin S. High-throughput computational screening of the metal organic framework database for CH4/H2 separations. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018;10(4):3668–79. link1

[44] Aghaji MZ, Fernandez M, Boyd PG, Daff TD, Woo TK. Quantitative structureproperty relationship models for recognizing metal organic frameworks (MOFs) with high CO2 working capacity and CO2/CH4 selectivity for methane purification. Eur J Inorg Chem 2016;2016(27):4505–11. link1

[45] Gharagheizi F, Tang D, Sholl DS. Selecting adsorbents to separate diverse nearazeotropic chemicals. J Phys Chem C 2020;124(6):3664–70. link1

[46] Shi Z, Yang W, Deng X, Cai C, Yan Y, Liang H, et al. Machine-learning-assisted high-throughput computational screening of high performance metal–organic frameworks. Mol Syst Des Eng 2020;5(4):725–42. link1

[47] Abetz V, Brinkmann T, Dijkstra M, Ebert K, Fritsch D, Ohlrogge K, et al. Developments in membrane research: from material via process design to industrial application. Adv Eng Mater 2006;8(5):328–58. link1

[48] Park HB, Kamcev J, Robeson LM, Elimelech M, Freeman BD. Maximizing the right stuff: the trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science 2017;356(6343):eaab0530. link1

[49] Labban O, Liu C, Chong TH, Lienhard JH. Relating transport modeling to nanofiltration membrane fabrication: navigating the permeability–selectivity trade-off in desalination pretreatment. J Membr Sci 2018;554:26–38. link1

[50] Tula AK, Befort B, Garg N, Camarda KV, Gani R. Sustainable process design & analysis of hybrid separations. Comput Chem Eng 2017;105:96–104. link1

[51] Srivastava RD. Heterogeneous catalytic science. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1988. link1

[52] Cheng J, Hu P. Utilization of the three-dimensional volcano surface to understand the chemistry of multiphase systems in heterogeneous catalysis. J Am Chem Soc 2008;130(33):10868–9. link1

[53] Lausche AC, Hummelshøj JS, Abild-Pedersen F, Studt F, Nørskov JK. Application of a new informatics tool in heterogeneous catalysis: analysis of methanol dehydrogenation on transition metal catalysts for the production of anhydrous formaldehyde. J Catal 2012;291:133–7. link1

[54] Wang Z, Cao XM, Zhu J, Hu P. Activity and coke formation of nickel and nickel carbide in dry reforming: a deactivation scheme from density functional theory. J Catal 2014;311:469–80. link1

[55] Bligaard T, Nørskov JK, Dahl S, Matthiesen J, Christensen CH, Sehested J. The Brønsted–Evans–Polanyi relation and the volcano curve in heterogeneous catalysis. J Catal 2004;224(1):206–17. link1

[56] Wang Z, Wang HF, Hu P. Possibility of designing catalysts beyond the traditional volcano curve: a theoretical framework for multi-phase surfaces. Chem Sci 2015;6(10):5703–11. link1

[57] Schumann J, Medford AJ, Yoo JS, Zhao ZJ, Bothra P, Cao A, et al. Selectivity of synthesis gas conversion to C2+ oxygenates on fcc(111) transition-metal surfaces. ACS Catal 2018;8(4):3447–53. link1

[58] Jacobsen CJH, Dahl S, Boisen A, Clausen BS, Topsøe H, Logadottir A, et al. Optimal catalyst curves: connecting density functional theory calculations with industrial reactor design and catalyst selection. J Catal 2002;205(2):382–7. link1

[59] Thybaut JW, Sun J, Olivier L, Van Veen AC, Mirodatos C, Marin GB. Catalyst design based on microkinetic models: oxidative coupling of methane. Catal Today 2011;159(1):29–36. link1

[60] Goldsmith BR, Esterhuizen J, Liu JX, Bartel CJ, Sutton C. Machine learning for heterogeneous catalyst design and discovery. AIChE J 2018;64(7):2311–23. link1

[61] Quoilin S, Broek MVD, Declaye S, Dewallef P, Lemort V. Techno-economic survey of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013;22:168–86. link1

[62] Lampe M, Stavrou M, Bücker HM, Gross J, Bardow A. Simultaneous optimization of working fluid and process for organic Rankine cycles using PC-SAFT. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014;53(21):8821–30. link1

[63] Wang ZQ, Zhou NJ, Guo J, Wang XY. Fluid selection and parametric optimization of organic Rankine cycle using low temperature waste heat. Energy 2012;40(1):107–15. link1

[64] Schilling J, Lampe M, Gross J, Bardow A. 1-Stage CoMT-CAMD: an approach for integrated design of ORC process and working fluid using PC-SAFT. Chem Eng Sci 2017;159:217–30. link1

[65] Gross J, Sadowski G. Perturbed-chain SAFT: an equation of state based on a perturbation theory for chain molecules. Ind Eng Chem Res 2001;40(4):1244–60. link1

[66] Mourah M, NguyenHuynh D, Passarello JP, de Hemptinne JC, Tobaly P. Modelling LLE and VLE of methanol + n-alkane series using GC-PC-SAFT with a group contribution kij. Fluid Phase Equilib 2010;298(1):154–68. link1

[67] Chimowitz EH, Anderson TF, Macchietto S, Stutzman LF. Local models for representing phase-equilibria in multicomponent, nonideal vapor–liquid and liquid–liquid systems. 1. Thermodynamic approximation functions. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 1983;22(2):217–25. link1

[68] Schweidtmann AM, Huster WR, Lüthje JT, Mitsos A. Deterministic global process optimization: accurate (single-species) properties via artificial neural networks. Comput Chem Eng 2019;121:67–74. link1

[69] Bell IH, Wronski J, Quoilin S, Lemort V. Pure and pseudo-pure fluid thermophysical property evaluation and the open-source thermophysical property library CoolProp. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014;53(6):2498–508. link1

[70] Abhat A. Low temperature latent heat thermal energy storage: heat storage materials. Sol Energy 1983;30(4):313–32. link1

[71] Sharma A, Tyagi VV, Chen CR, Buddhi D. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009;13(2):318–45. link1

[72] Sharma RK, Ganesan P, Tyagi VV, Metselaar HSC, Sandaran SC. Developments in organic solid–liquid phase change materials and their applications in thermal energy storage. Energy Convers Manage 2015;95:193–228. link1

[73] Kenisarin M, Mahkamov K. Solar energy storage using phase change materials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2007;11(9):1913–65. link1

[74] Terasawa N, Tsuzuki S, Umecky T, Saito Y, Matsumoto H. Alkoxy chains in ionic liquid anions; effect of introducing ether oxygen into perfluoroalkylborate on physical and thermal properties. Chem Commun 2010;46(10):1730–2. link1

[75] Zhu J, Bai L, Chen B, Fei W. Thermodynamical properties of phase change materials based on ionic liquids. Chem Eng J 2009;147(1):58–62. link1

[76] Plechkova NV, Seddon KR. Applications of ionic liquids in the chemical industry. Chem Soc Rev 2008;37(1):123–50. link1

[77] Vijayraghavan R, Rana UA, Elliott GD, MacFarlane DR. Protic ionic solids and liquids based on the guanidinium cation as phase-change energy-storage materials. Energy Technol 2013;1(10):609–12. link1

[78] Boukouvala F, Floudas CA. ARGONAUT: algorithms for global optimization of constrained grey-box computational problems. Optim Lett 2017;11 (5):895–913. link1

[79] Schweidtmann AM, Mitsos A. Deterministic global optimization with artificial neural networks embedded. J Optim Theory Appl 2019;180(3):925–48. link1