Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2022, Volume 15, Issue 8 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.03.016

Unraveling Membrane Fouling Induced by Chlorinated Water Versus Surface Water: Biofouling Properties and Microbiological Investigation

a State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
b University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
c Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK

Received: 2020-10-11 Revised: 2021-02-18 Accepted: 2021-03-05 Available online: 2021-05-06

Next Previous

Abstract

Chlorine is usually applied in the process of urban water treatment to deactivate pathogens and prevent waterborne diseases. As a pre-treatment during water treatment, it remains unclear whether chlorinated water can effectively alleviate the fouling of membranes during ultrafiltration (UF). In this study, tap water was investigated with respect to its impacts on biofilm formation and biofouling in a gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration system. For comparison, the biofilm/biofouling with untreated surface (lake) water was studied in parallel. It was found that more severe membrane fouling occurred with the filtration of tap water than lake water, and larger quantities of polysaccharide and eDNA were present in the tap-water biofilm than in lake-water biofilm. The tap-water biofilm had a densely compact morphology, whereas a porous, spider-like structure was observed for the lake-water biofilm, which was assumed to be associated with the bacteria in the biofilm. The hypothesis was verified by the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing results which demonstrated that Xanthobacter was the dominant taxon in the tap-water biofilm. Additionally, membrane hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity played a minor role in affecting the membrane fouling properties and microbial community. Overall, these findings have revealed the significant role of chlorine-resistant bacteria in biofouling formation and provided a deeper understanding of membrane fouling, which can potentially aid the search for effective ways of controlling membrane fouling.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

References

[ 1 ] Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci Adv 2016;2(2):e1500323. link1

[ 2 ] Desmond P, Morgenroth E, Derlon N. Physical structure determines compression of membrane biofilms during gravity driven membrane (GDM) ultrafiltration. Water Res 2018;143:539–49. link1

[ 3 ] Chawla C, Zwijnenburg A, Kemperman AJB, Nijmeijer K. Fouling in gravity driven point-of-use drinking water treatment systems. Chem Eng J 2017;319:89–97. link1

[ 4 ] Gao W, Liang H, Ma J, Han M, Chen ZL, Han ZS, et al. Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: a review. Desalination 2011;272(1–3):1–8. link1

[ 5 ] Peter-Varbanets M, Hammes F, Vital M, Pronk W. Stabilization of flux during dead-end ultra-low pressure ultrafiltration. Water Res 2010;44(12):3607–16. link1

[ 6 ] Peter-Varbanets M, Margot J, Traber J, Pronk W. Mechanisms of membrane fouling during ultra low pressure ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci 2011;377(1– 2):42–53. link1

[ 7 ] Ding An, Wang J, Lin D, Tang X, Cheng X, Li G, et al. In situ coagulation versus pre-coagulation for gravity-driven membrane bioreactor during decentralized sewage treatment: permeability stabilization, fouling layer formation and biological activity. Water Res 2017;126:197–207. link1

[ 8 ] Ding An, Liang H, Li G, Szivak I, Traber J, Pronk W. A low energy gravity-driven membrane bioreactor system for grey water treatment: permeability and removal performance of organics. J Membr Sci 2017;542:408–17. link1

[ 9 ] Wang Y, Fortunato L, Jeong S, Leiknes T. Gravity-driven membrane system for secondary wastewater effluent treatment: filtration performance and fouling characterization. Sep Purif Technol 2017;184:26–33. link1

[10] Ding A, Wang J, Lin D, Cheng X, Wang H, Bai L, et al. Effect of PAC particle layer on the performance of gravity-driven membrane filtration (GDM) system during rainwater treatment. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 2018;4:48–57. link1

[11] Akhondi E, Wu B, Sun S, Marxer B, Lim W, Gu J, et al. Gravity-driven membrane filtration as pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis: linking biofouling layer morphology with flux stabilization. Water Res 2015;70:158–73. link1

[12] Derlon N, Mimoso J, Klein T, Koetzsch S, Morgenroth E. Presence of biofilms on ultrafiltration membrane surfaces increases the quality of permeate produced during ultra-low pressure gravity-driven membrane filtration. Water Res 2014;60:164–73. link1

[13] Ding An, Liang H, Li G, Derlon N, Szivak I, Morgenroth E, et al. Impact of aeration shear stress on permeate flux and fouling layer properties in a low pressure membrane bioreactor for the treatment of grey water. J Membr Sci 2016;510:382–90. link1

[14] Klein T, Zihlmann D, Derlon N, Isaacson C, Szivak I, Weissbrodt DG, et al. Biological control of biofilms on membranes by metazoans. Water Res 2016;88:20–9. link1

[15] Desmond P, Best JP, Morgenroth E, Derlon N. Linking composition of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) to the physical structure and hydraulic resistance of membrane biofilms. Water Res 2018;132:211–21. link1

[16] Chomiak A, Traber J, Morgenroth E, Derlon N. Biofilm increases permeate quality by organic carbon degradation in low pressure ultrafiltration. Water Res 2015;85:512–20. link1

[17] Pronk W, Ding An, Morgenroth E, Derlon N, Desmond P, Burkhardt M, et al. Gravity-driven membrane filtration for water and wastewater treatment: a review. Water Res 2019;149:553–65. link1

[18] Park KY, Choi SY, Lee S-H, Kweon JH, Song JH. Comparison of formation of disinfection by-products by chlorination and ozonation of wastewater effluents and their toxicity to Daphnia magna. Environ Pollut 2016;215:314–21. link1

[19] Li Z, Liu X, Huang Z, Hu S, Wang J, Qian Z, et al. Occurrence and ecological risk assessment of disinfection byproducts from chlorination of wastewater effluents in East China. Water Res 2019;157:247–57. link1

[20] Deborde M, von Gunten U. Reactions of chlorine with inorganic and organic compounds during water treatment-kinetics and mechanisms: a critical review. Water Res 2008;42(1–2):13–51. link1

[21] Diana M, Felipe-Sotelo M, Bond T. Disinfection byproducts potentially responsible for the association between chlorinated drinking water and bladder cancer: a review. Water Res 2019;162:492–504. link1

[22] Knozowska K, Kujawski W, Zatorska P, Kujawa J. Pervaporative efficiency of organic solvents separation employing hydrophilic and hydrophobic commercial polymeric membranes. J Membr Sci 2018;564:444–55. link1

[23] Zhao L, Wu C, Lu X, Ng D, Truong YB, Zhang J, et al. Theoretical guidance for fabricating higher flux hydrophobic/hydrophilic dual-layer membranes for direct contact membrane distillation. J Membr Sci 2020;596:117608. link1

[24] Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010;8 (9):623–33. link1

[25] Bereschenko LA, Heilig GH, Nederlof MM, van Loosdrecht MC, Stams AJ, Euverink GJ. Molecular characterization of the bacterial communities in the different compartments of a full-scale reverse-osmosis water purification plant. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74(17):5297–304. link1

[26] Wu B, Suwarno SR, Tan HS, Kim LH, Hochstrasser F, Chong TH, et al. Gravitydriven microfiltration pretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO) seawater desalination: microbial community characterization and RO performance. Desalination 2017;418:1–8. link1

[27] Akram KM, Yates LL, Mongey R, Rothery S, Gaboriau DCA, Sanderson J, et al. Live imaging of alveologenesis in precision-cut lung slices reveals dynamic epithelial cell behaviour. Nat Commun 2019;10(1):1178. link1

[28] Teirlinck E, Xiong R, Brans T, Forier K, Fraire J, Van Acker H, et al. Laser-induced vapour nanobubbles improve drug diffusion and efficiency in bacterial biofilms. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):4518. link1

[29] Yu W, Xu L, Graham N, Qu J. Pre-treatment for ultrafiltration: effect of prechlorination on membrane fouling. Sci Rep 2014;4(1):6513. link1

[30] Denis K, Le Bris M, Le Guennec L, Barnier JP, Faure C, Gouge A, et al. Targeting Type IV pili as an antivirulence strategy against invasive meningococcal disease. Nat Microbiol 2019;4(6):972–84. link1

[31] Kuijl C, Savage NDL, Marsman M, Tuin AW, Janssen L, Egan DA, et al. Intracellular bacterial growth is controlled by a kinase network around PKB/ AKT1. Nature 2007;450(7170):725–30. link1

[32] Lawrence JR, Neu TR. Confocal laser scanning microscopy for analysis of microbial biofilms. Methods Enzymol 1999;310:131–44. link1

[33] Schlafer S, Meyer RL. Confocal microscopy imaging of the biofilm matrix. J Microbiol Methods 2017;138:50–9. link1

[34] Castello M, Tortarolo G, Buttafava M, Deguchi T, Villa F, Koho S, et al. A robust and versatile platform for image scanning microscopy enabling superresolution FLIM. Nat Methods 2019;16(2):175–8. link1

[35] Peiffer JA, Spor A, Koren O, Jin Z, Tringe SG, Dangl JL, et al. Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110(16):6548–53. link1

[36] Yuan J, Li M, Lin S, Hoheisel JD. An improved DNA extraction method for efficient and quantitative recovery of phytoplankton diversity in natural assemblages. PLoS ONE 2015;10(7):e0133060. link1

[37] Guo X, Zhou X, Hale L, Yuan M, Ning D, Feng J, et al. Climate warming accelerates temporal scaling of grassland soil microbial biodiversity. Nat Ecol Evol 2019;3(4):612–9. link1

[38] DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72(7):5069–72. link1

[39] Edgar RC. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 2013;10(10):996–8. link1

[40] Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73(16):5261–7. link1

[41] Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013;30 (12):2725–9. link1

[42] Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44 (W1):W242–5. link1

[43] Schmitt J, Flemming HC. FTIR-spectroscopy in microbial and material analysis. Int Biodeter Biodegr 1998;41(1):1–11. link1

[44] Sailakshmi G, Mitra T, Sinha S, Chatterjee S, Gnanamani A, Mandal AB. Suberic acid acts as a dissolving agent as well as a crosslinker for natural polymers (carbohydrate and protein): a detailed discussion on the chemistry behind the interaction. J Macromol Sci Part A Pure Appl Chem 2012;49 (8):619–29. link1

[45] Mann D, Teuber C, Tennigkeit SA, Schröter G, Gerwert K, Kötting C. Mechanism of the intrinsic arginine finger in heterotrimeric G proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016;113(50):E8041–50. link1

[46] Jung H, Pena-Francesch A, Saadat A, Sebastian A, Kim DH, Hamilton RF, et al. Molecular tandem repeat strategy for elucidating mechanical properties of high-strength proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016;113(23):6478–83. link1

[47] Edington SC, Gonzalez A, Middendorf TR, Halling DB, Aldrich RW, Baiz CR. Coordination to lanthanide ions distorts binding site conformation in calmodulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018;115(14):E3126–34. link1

[48] Wiegel J. The genus Xanthobacter. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E, editors. The prokaryotes. Volume 5: Proteobacteria: alpha and beta subclasses. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 290–314. link1

[49] Hill MO. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 1973;54(2):427–32. link1

[50] Causey BD. Parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. J Appl Stat 2002;29(6):925–34. link1

[51] Chao A, Lee SM. Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. J Am Stat Assoc 1992;87(417):210–7. link1

[52] Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer JA, Booksh K. Fluorescence excitation— emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 2003;37(24):5701–10. link1

[53] Stedmon CA, Bro R. Characterizing dissolved organic matter fluorescence with parallel factor analysis: a tutorial. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 2008;6 (11):572–9. link1

[54] Bahram M, Bro R, Stedmon C, Afkhami A. Handling of Rayleigh and Raman scatter for PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence data using interpolation. J Chemometr 2006;20(3-4):99–105. link1

[55] Wünsch UJ, Murphy KR, Stedmon CA. The one-sample PARAFAC approach reveals molecular size distributions of fluorescent components in dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 2017;51(20):11900–8. link1

[56] Yu W, Liu T, Crawshaw J, Liu T, Graham N. Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membrane fouling by natural organic matter: mechanisms and mitigation by pre-ozonation and pH. Water Res 2018;139:353–62. link1

[57] Yu W, Graham NJD, Fowler GD. Coagulation and oxidation for controlling ultrafiltration membrane fouling in drinking water treatment: application of ozone at low dose in submerged membrane tank. Water Res 2016;95:1–10. link1

[58] Yu W, Zhang D, Graham NJD. Membrane fouling by extracellular polymeric substances after ozone pre-treatment: variation of nano-particles size. Water Res 2017;120:146–55. link1

[59] Bae H, Kim H, Jeong S, Lee S. Changes in the relative abundance of biofilmforming bacteria by conventional sand-filtration and microfiltration as pretreatments for seawater reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination 2011;273(2–3):258–66. link1

[60] Abe Y, Zopfi J, Hunkeler D. Effect of molecule size on carbon isotope fractionation during biodegradation of chlorinated alkanes by Xanthobacter autotrophicus GJ10. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 2009;45(1):18–26. link1

[61] Rozeboom HJ, Kingma J, Janssen DB, Dijkstra BW. Crystallization of haloalkane dehalogenase from Xanthobacter autotrophicus Gj10. J Mol Biol 1988;200 (3):611–2. link1

[62] Ling F, Whitaker R, LeChevallier MW, Liu WT. Drinking water microbiome assembly induced by water stagnation. ISME J 2018;12(6):1520–31. link1

[63] Lin W, Yu Z, Zhang H, Thompson IP. Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities at each step of treatment plant for potable water generation. Water Res 2014;52:218–30. link1

[64] Li C, Ling F, Zhang M, Liu WT, Li Y, Liu W. Characterization of bacterial community dynamics in a full-scale drinking water treatment plant. J Environ Sci 2017;51:21–30. link1

[65] Liu G, Ling FQ, van der Mark EJ, Zhang XD, Knezev A, Verberk JQJC, et al. Comparison of particle-associated bacteria from a drinking water treatment plant and distribution reservoirs with different water sources. Sci Rep 2016;6 (1):20367. link1

Related Research