Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.06.005

Addressing Frequency Control Challenges in Future Low-Inertia Power Systems: A Great Britain Perspective

Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XW, UK

Received: 2020-08-27 Revised: 2021-01-10 Accepted: 2021-03-29 Available online: 2021-06-24

Next Previous

Abstract

The ambitious global targets on decarbonization present the need for massive integration of renewable generation in power systems, resulting in a significant decrease in the system inertia. In addition to the reduction in system inertia, the transmission system in Great Britain (GB) faces some unique challenges owing to its relatively small capacity, while being decoupled from other transmission systems and with the renewable resources largely non-uniformly distributed across the system. This paper presents opinions and insights on the challenges associated with frequency control in a low-inertia system and the potential solutions from a GB perspective. In this paper, we focus on three main techniques that act over different time scales: synchronous condensers, inertia emulation, and fast frequency response. We evaluate their relative advantages and limitations with learnings from recent research and development projects in GB, along with the opinions on their roles in addressing the frequency control challenges in future low-inertia systems.  

 

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

References

[ 1 ] Zhu J, Booth CD, Adam GP, Roscoe AJ, Bright CG. Inertia emulation control strategy for VSC-HVDC transmission systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2013;28 (2):1277–87. link1

[ 2 ] Milano F, Dörfler F, Hug G, Hill DJ, Verbicˇ G. Foundations and challenges of lowinertia systems (invited paper). In: Proceedings of 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC); 2018 Jun 11–15; Dublin, Ireland. New York: IEEE; 2018. p. 1–25.

[ 3 ] Ratnam KS, Palanisamy K, Yang G. Future low-inertia power systems: requirements, issues, and solutions—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2020;124:109773. link1

[ 4 ] Future energy scenario. Report. Warwick: National Grid ESO; 2020 Jul.

[ 5 ] System operability framework 2016. Report. Warwick: National Grid; 2016 Nov.

[ 6 ] Interconnector register by 30 July 2020 [Internet]. Warwick: National Grid ESO; c2021 [cited 2020 Aug 26]. Available from: https://data.nationalgrideso. com/data-groups/connection-registers. link1

[ 7 ] Operating a low inertia system—a system operability framework document. Report. Warwick: National Grid ESO; 2020 Feb.

[ 8 ] Hong Q, Nedd M, Norris S, Abdulhadi I, Karimi M, Terzija V, et al. Fast frequency response for effective frequency control in power systems with low inertia. J Eng 2019;16:1696–702. link1

[ 9 ] Hong Q, Karimi M, Sun M, Norris S, Bagleybter O, Wilson D, et al. Design and validation of a wide area monitoring and control system for fast frequency response. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2020;11(4):3394–404. link1

[10] Tzelepis D, Dys´ko A, Booth C. Performance of loss-of-mains detection in multigenerator power islands. In: Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Development in Power System Protection 2016 (DPSP); 2016 Mar 7–10; Edinburgh, UK. London: IET; 2016. p. 1–6.

[11] Operability strategy 2019. Report. Warwick: National Grid ESO; 2019.

[12] ENTSO-E System Protection & Dynamics Sub Group. Frequency stability evaluation criteria for the synchronous zone of continental Europe. Report. Brussels: European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E); 2016 Mar.

[13] Poolla BK, Bolognani S, Dörfler F. Optimal placement of virtual inertia in power grids. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 2017;62(12):6209–20. link1

[14] Xu T, Jang W, Overbye TJ. Investigation of inertia’s locational impacts on primary frequency response using large-scale synthetic network models. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI); 2017 Feb 23–24; Champaign, IL, USA. New York: IEEE; 2017. p. 1–7. link1

[15] Martínez-Sanz I, Chaudhuri B, Junyent-Ferré A, Trovato V, Strbac G. Distributed vs. concentrated rapid frequency response provision in future Great Britain system. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM); 2016 Jul 17–21; Boston, MA, USA. New York: IEEE; 2016. p. 1–5. link1

[16] Brown G. Distributed restart: Ofgem project progress. Report. Warwick: National Grid ESO; 2020 Dec. link1

[17] Operability impact of distributed storage and electric vehicles—a system operability framework document. Report. Warwick: National Grid ESO; 2020 Apr.

[18] Low frequency demand disconnection. Report. Bristol: Western Power Distribution; 2018 Jun.

[19] Kundur P. Power system stability and control. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional; 1994. link1

[20] System operability framework—whole system short circuit levels. Report. Warwick: National Grid ESO; 2018 Dec.

[21] Li R, Zhu J, Hong Q, Booth C, Dys´ko A, Roscoe A, et al. Impact of low (zero) carbon power systems on power system protection: a new evaluation approach based on a flexible modelling and hardware testing platform. IET Renew Power Gener 2020;14(5):906–13. link1

[22] Cai D, Wall P, Osborne M, Terzija V. Roadmap for the deployment of WAMPAC in the future GB power system. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2016;10(7):1553–62. link1

[23] Hong Q, Booth C, Dys´ko A, Catterson V. Design of an intelligent system for comprehensive validation of protection settings. In: Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Development in Power System Protection. Edinburgh, UK; London: IET; 2016. p. 1–7. link1

[24] Fang Y, Jia K, Yang Z, Li Y, Bi T. Impact of inverter-interfaced renewable energy generators on distance protection and an improved scheme. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2019;66(9):7078–88. link1

[25] Jia J, Yang G, Nielsen AH, Rønne-Hansen P. Impact of VSC control strategies and incorporation of synchronous condensers on distance protection under unbalanced faults. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2019;66(2):1108–18. link1

[26] Oliver JA, Ware BJ, Carruth RC. 345 MVA fully water-cooled synchronous condenser for Dumont station part I. Application considerations. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 1971;PAS-90(6):2758–64. link1

[27] Moeini A, Kamwa I. Analytical concepts for reactive power based primary frequency control in power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2016;31 (6):4217–30. link1

[28] Nguyen HT, Yang G, Nielsen AH, Jensen PH. Combination of synchronous condenser and synthetic inertia for frequency stability enhancement in lowinertia systems. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2019;10(3):997–1005. link1

[29] Tzelepis D, Hong Q, Booth C, Papadopoulos PN, Ramachandran J, Yang G. Enhancing short-circuit level and dynamic reactive power exchange in GB transmission networks under low inertia scenarios. In: Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST); 2019 Sep 9–11; Porto, Portugal. New York: IEEE; 2019. p. 1–6. link1

[30] Marrazi E, Yang G, Weinreich-Jensen P. Allocation of synchronous condensers for restoration of system short-circuit power. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy 2018;6(1):17–26. link1

[31] Tzelepis D, Tsotsopoulou E, Nikolaidis V, Dys´ko A, Papaspiliotopoulos V, Hong Q, et al. Impact of synchronous condensers on transmission line protection in scenarios with high penetration of renewable energy sources. In: Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Developments in Power System Protection; 2020 Mar 29–Apr 1; Manchester, UK; 2020.

[32] Igbinovia FO, Fandi G, Ahmad I, Muller Z, Tlusty J. Modeling and simulation of the anticipated effects of the synchronous condenser on an electric-power network with participating wind plants. Sustainability 2018;10(12):4834. link1

[33] Rousis AO, Tzelepis D, Pipelzadeh Y, Strbac G, Booth CD, Green TC. Provision of voltage ancillary services through enhanced TSO-DSO interaction and aggregated distributed energy resources. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2021;12 (2):897–908. link1

[34] Katsuya Y, Mitani Y, Tsuji K. Power system stabilization by synchronous condenser with fast excitation control. In: Proceedings of 2000 International Conference on Power System Technology; 2000 Dec 4–7; Perth, WA, Australia. New York: IEEE; 2020. p. 1563–8. link1

[35] Jia J, Yang G, Nielsen AH, Gevorgian V. Investigation on the combined effect of VSC-based sources and synchronous condensers under grid unbalanced faults. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2019;34(5):1898–908. link1

[36] Zhou G, Wang D, Atallah A, McElvain F, Nath R, Jontry J, et al. Synchronous condenser applications: under significant resource portfolio changes. IEEE Power Energy Mag 2019;17(4):35–46. link1

[37] Hume C. PHOENIX project progress report 2019. Report. Glasgow: SP Energy Networks; 2020 Feb. link1

[38] D’Arco S, Suul JA. Virtual synchronous machines—classification of implementations and analysis of equivalence to droop controllers for microgrids. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference; 2013 Jun 16– 20; Grenoble, France. New York: IEEE; 2013. p. 1–7. link1

[39] Morren J, de Haan SWH, Kling WL, Ferreira JA. Wind turbines emulating inertia and supporting primary frequency control. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2006;21 (1):433–4. link1

[40] Bao W, Wu Q, Ding L, Huang S, Terzija V. A hierarchical inertial control scheme for multiple wind farms with BESSs based on ADMM. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2021;12(2):751–60. link1

[41] Wang X, Harnefors L, Blaabjerg F. Unified impedance model of grid-connected voltage-source converters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 2018;33(2):1775–87. link1

[42] Demonstration of virtual synchronous machine control of a battery system [Internet]. London: Energy Networks Association (ENA); 2019 Jun [cited 2020 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.smarternetworks.org/project/nia_ ngso0026. link1

[43] Control and protection challenges in future converter dominated power systems [Internet]. London: Energy Networks Association (ENA); 2013 Oct [cited 2020 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.smarternetworks.org/ project/nia_nget0106. link1

[44] Hybrid grid forming converter [Internet]. London: Energy Networks Association (ENA); 2018 Nov [cited 2020 Aug 26]. Available from: https:// www.smarternetworks.org/project/nia_ngso0019. link1

[45] Roscoe A, Brogan P, Elliott D, Knueppel, Gutierrez I, Campion JCP, et al. Practical experience of operating a grid forming wind park and its response to system events. In: Proceedings of 2019 18th Wind Integration Workshop; 2019 Oct 16–18; Dublin, Ireland; 2019.

[46] ENTSO-E Technical Group on High Penetration of Power Electronic Interfaced Power Sources. High penetration of power electronic interfaced power sources and the potential contribution of grid forming converters. Report. Brussels: European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSOE); 2020 Jan.

[47] Beck HP, Hesse R. Virtual synchronous machine. In: Proceedings of 2007 9th International Conference on Electrical Power Quality and Utilisation; 2007 Oct 9–11; Barcelona, Spain. New York: IEEE; 2007. p. 1–6.

[48] Zhong QC, Weiss G. Synchronverters: inverters that mimic synchronous generators. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2011;58(4):1259–67. link1

[49] Meng L, Zafar J, Khadem SK, Collinson A, Murchie KC, Coffele F, et al. Fast frequency response from energy storage systems—a review of grid standards, projects and technical issues. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2020;11(2):1566–81. link1

[50] Vasudevan KR, Ramachandaramurthy VK, Babu TS, Pouryekta A. Synchronverter: a comprehensive review of modifications, stability assessment, applications and future perspectives. IEEE Access 2020;8: 131565–89. link1

[51] Natarajan V, Weiss G. Synchronverters with better stability due to virtual inductors, virtual capacitors, and anti-windup. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2017;64(7):5994–6004. link1

[52] D’Arco S, Suul JA, Fosso OB. A virtual synchronous machine implementation for distributed control of power converters in SmartGrids. Electr Power Syst Res 2015;122:180–97. link1

[53] Beltran H, Harrison S, Egea-Àlvarez A, Xu L. Techno-economic assessment of energy storage technologies for inertia response and frequency support from wind farms. Energies 2020;13(13):3421. link1

[54] Firm frequency response (FFR)—interactive guidance. Report. Warwick: National Grid ESO; 2017 Dec.

[55] Li Z, Wei Z, Zhan R, Li Y, Tang Y, Zhang XP. Frequency support control method for interconnected power systems using VSC-MTDC. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2021;36(3):2304–13. link1

[56] DS3 system services qualification trials process outcomes and learnings. Report. Dublin: EirGrid; 2017 Nov.

[57] Dys´ko A, Egea-Àlvarez A, Hong Q, Khan A, Ernst P, Singer R, et al. Testing characteristics of grid forming converters part III: inertial behaviour. In: Proceedings of 2020 19th Wind Integration Workshop; 2020 Nov 11–12; online conference.

[58] System needs and product strategy. Report. Warwick: National Grid ESO; 2017 Jun.

[59] Nguyen HT, Yang G, Nielsen AH, Jensen PG, Pal B. Applying synchronous condenser for damping provision in converter-dominated power system. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy. In press.

[60] Nguyen HT, Yang G, Nielsen AH, Jensen PG. Hardware- and software-in-theloop simulation for parameterizing the model and control of synchronous condensers. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2019;10(3):1593–602. link1

Related Research