[ 1 ] Nicolaou KC, Vourloumis D, Winssinger N, Baran PS. The art and science of total synthesis at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Angew Chem Int Ed 2000;39(1):44‒122. link1

[ 2 ] Nicolaou KC, Rigol S, Yu R. Total synthesis endeavors and their contributions to science and society: a personal account. CCS Chem 2019;1(1):3‒37. link1

[ 3 ] Schneider G. Trends in virtual combinatorial library design. Curr Med Chem 2002;9(23):2095‒101. link1

[ 4 ] Corey EJ, Wipke WT. Computer-assisted design of complex organic syntheses: pathways for molecular synthesis can be devised with a computer and equipment for graphical communication. Science 1969;166(3902):178‒92. link1

[ 5 ] Chen J, Baldi P. No electron left behind: a rule-based expert system to predict chemical reactions and reaction mechanisms. J Chem Inf Model 2009;49(9): 2034‒43. link1

[ 6 ] Szymkuć S, Gajewska EP, Klucznik T, Molga K, Dittwald P, Startek M, et al. Computer-assisted synthetic planning: the end of the beginning. Angew Chem Int Ed 2016;55(20):5904‒37. link1

[ 7 ] Liu B, Ramsundar B, Kawthekar P, Shi J, Gomes J, Nguyen QL, et al. Retrosynthetic reaction prediction using neural sequence-to-sequence models. ACS Cent Sci 2017;3(10):1103‒13. link1

[ 8 ] Yan C, Ding Q, Zhao P, Zheng S, Yang J, Yu Y, et al. RetroXpert: decompose retrosynthesis prediction like a chemist. In: Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2020); 2020 Dec 6‒12; online. 2020. p. 11248‒58. link1

[ 9 ] Raymond JW, Willett P. Maximum common subgraph isomorphism algorithms for the matching of chemical structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2002;16(7):521‒33. link1

[10] Dai H, Li C, Coley CW, Dai B, Song L. Retrosynthesis prediction with conditional graph logic network. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2019); 2019 Dec 8‒14; Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2019. p. 8872‒82.

[11] Coley CW, Rogers L, Green WH, Jensen KF. Computer-assisted retrosynthesis based on molecular similarity. ACS Cent Sci 2017;3(12):1237‒45. link1

[12] Fick R, Ihlenfeldt WD, Gasteiger J. Computer-assisted design of syntheses for heterocyclic compounds. Heterocycles 1995;40(2):993‒1007. link1

[13] Mikulak-Klucznik B, Gołe˛biowska P, Bayly AA, Popik O, Klucznik T, Szymkuć S, et al. Computational planning of the synthesis of complex natural products. Nature 2020;588(7836):83‒8. link1

[14] Coley CW, Thomas DA, Lummiss JAM, Jaworski JN, Breen CP, Schultz V, et al. A robotic platform for flow synthesis of organic compounds informed by AI planning. Science 2019;365(6453). eaax1566. link1

[15] Schwaller P, Petraglia R, Zullo V, Nair VH, Haeuselmann RA, Pisoni R, et al. Predicting retrosynthetic pathways using transformer-based models and a hyper-graph exploration strategy. Chem Sci 2020;11(12):3316‒25. link1

[16] Weininger D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1988;28(1):31‒6. link1

[17] Shi C, Xu M, Guo H, Zhang M, Tang J. A graph to graphs framework for retrosynthesis prediction. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2020 Jul 12‒18; online. 2020. p. 8818‒27.

[18] Chen WL, Chen DZ, Taylor KT. Automatic reaction mapping and reaction center detection. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 2013;3(6):560‒93. link1

[19] Zheng S, Rao J, Zhang Z, Xu J, Yang Y. Predicting retrosynthetic reactions using self-corrected transformer neural networks. J Chem Inf Model 2020;60(1): 47‒55. link1

[20] Corey EJ, Cheng XM. The logic of chemical synthesis. New York City: Willey; 1991.

[21] Chen B, Li C, Dai H, Song L. Retro*: learning retrosynthetic planning with neural guided A* search. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2020 Jul 12‒18; online. 2020. p. 1608‒16.

[22] Segler MHS, Preuss M, Waller MP. Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI. Nature 2018;555(7698):604‒10. link1

[23] Sutskever I, Vinyals O, Le QV. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2014); 2014 Dec 8‒13; Montreal, QC, Canada. 2014. p. 3104‒12. link1

[24] Cho K, van Merriënboer B, Gulcehre C, Bahdanau D, Bougares F, Schwenk H, et al. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. 2014. arXiv:1406.1078. link1

[25] Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. 2014. arXiv:1409.0473.

[26] Luong MT, Pham H, Manning CD. Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. 2015. arXiv:1508.04025. link1

[27] Gehring J, Auli M, Grangier D, Yarats D, Dauphin YN. Convolutional sequence to sequence learning. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2017 Aug 6‒11; Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2017. p. 1243‒52. link1

[28] Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, et al. Attention is all you need. In: Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017); 2017 Dec 4‒9; Long Beach, CA, USA. 2017. p. 5998‒6008.

[29] Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. 2018. arXiv:1810.04805. link1

[30] Radford A, Wu J, Child R, Luan D, Amodei D, Sutskever I. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog; 2019.

[31] Gori M, Monfardini G, Scarselli F. A new model for learning in graph domains. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks; 2005 Jul 31‒Aug 4; Montreal, QC, Canada. 2005. p. 729‒34. link1

[32] Sperduti A, Starita A. Supervised neural networks for the classification of structures. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1997;8(3):714‒35. link1

[33] Scarselli F, Gori M, Tsoi AC, Hagenbuchner M, Monfardini G. The graph neural network model. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2009;20(1):61‒80. link1

[34] Gallicchio C, Micheli A. Graph echo state networks. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN); 2010 Jul 18‒23; Barcelona, Spain. 2010. p. 2159‒66. link1

[35] Henaff M, Bruna J, LeCun Y. Deep convolutional networks on graphstructured data. 2015. arXiv:1506.05163.

[36] Shuman DI, Narang SK, Frossard P, Ortega A, Vandergheynst P. The emerging field of signal processing on graphs: extending high-dimensional data analysis to networks and other irregular domains. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2013;30(3):83‒98. link1

[37] Bruna J, Zaremba W, Szlam A, LeCun Y. Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs. 2013. arXiv:1312.6203.

[38] Micheli A. Neural network for graphs: a contextual constructive approach. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2009;20(3):498‒511. link1

[39] Atwood J, Towsley D. Diffusion-convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2016); 2016 Dec 5‒10; Barcelona, Spain. 2016. p. 1993‒2001.

[40] Kipf TN, Welling M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. 2016. arXiv:1609.02907.

[41] Veličković P, Cucurull G, Casanova A, Romero A, Liò P, Bengio Y. Bengio Graph attention networks. 2017. arXiv:1710.10903.

[42] Li Y, Tarlow D, Brockschmidt M, Zemel R. Gated graph sequence neural networks. 2015. arXiv:1511.05493.

[43] Cao S, Lu W, Xu Q. Deep neural networks for learning graph representations. In: Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2016 Feb 12‒17; Phoenix, AZ, USA. 2016. p. 1145‒52. link1

[44] De Cao N, Kipf T. MolGAN: an implicit generative model for small molecular graphs. 2018. arXiv:1805.11973. link1

[45] Yan S, Xiong Y, Lin D. Spatial temporal graph convolutional networks for skeleton-based action recognition. In: Thirty-second AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. 2018 Feb 2‒7; OrleansNew, LA, USA. 2018. p. 7444‒52. link1

[46] Pearl J. Heuristics: intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving. Upper Saddle River: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.; 1984.

[47] Reddy DR. Speech understanding systems: a summary of results of the fiveyear research effort. Report. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University; 1977.

[48] Zeng W, Church RL. Finding shortest paths on real road networks: the case for A*. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 2009;23(4):531‒43. link1

[49] Coulom R. Efficient selectivity and backup operators in Monte‒Carlo Tree Search. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computers and Games (CG 2006); 2006 May 29‒31; Turin, Italy. Berlin: Springer; 2007. p. 72‒83. link1

[50] Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, Guez A, Sifre L, van den Driessche G, et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 2016;529(7587):484‒9. link1

[51] Kaelbling LP, Littman ML, Moore AW. Reinforcement learning: a survey. J Artif Intell Res 1996;4:237‒85. link1

[52] Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, Graves A, Antonoglou I, Wierstra D, et al. Playing Atari with deep reinforcement learning. 2013. arXiv:1312.5602.

[53] Hessel M, Modayil J, Van Hasselt H, Schaul T, Ostrovski G, Dabney W, et al. Rainbow: combining improvements in deep reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2018 Feb 2‒7; OrleansNew, LA, USA. 2018. p. 3215‒22. link1

[54] Moerland TM, Broekens J, Plaat A, Jonker CM. Model-based reinforcement learning: a survey. 2020. arXiv:2006.16712.

[55] Lillicrap TP, Hunt JJ, Pritzel A, Heess N, Erez T, Tassa Y, et al. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. 2015. arXiv:1509.02971.

[56] Mnih V, Badia AP, Mirza M, Graves A, Lillicrap TP, Harley T, et al. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning; 2016 Jun 20‒22; New York City, NY, USA. 2016. p. 1928‒37.

[57] Nair A, Pong V, Dalal M, Bahl S, Lin S, Levine S. Visual reinforcement learning with imagined goals. 2018. arXiv:1807.04742.

[58] Kulkarni TD, Narasimhan K, Saeedi A, Tenenbaum J. Hierarchical deep reinforcement learning: integrating temporal abstraction and intrinsic motivation. In: Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2016); 2016 Dec 5‒10; Barcelona, Spain. 2016. p. 3675‒83.

[59] Horling B, Lesser V. A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms. Knowl Eng Rev 2004;19(4):281‒316. link1

[60] Schrittwieser J, Antonoglou I, Hubert T, Simonyan K, Sifre L, Schmitt S, et al. Mastering Atari, Go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model. Nature 2020;588(7839):604‒9. link1

[61] Akkaya I, Andrychowicz M, Chociej M, Litwin M, McGrew B, Petron A, et al. Solving Rubik’s cube with a robot hand. 2019. arXiv:1910.07113.

[62] Sallab AE, Abdou M, Perot E, Yogamani S. Deep reinforcement learning framework for autonomous driving. Electron Imaging 2017;2017 (19):70‒6. link1

[63] Jeon W, Kim D. Autonomous molecule generation using reinforcement learning and docking to develop potential novel inhibitors. Sci Rep 2020;10 (1):22104. link1

[64] Silver D, Singh S, Precup D, Sutton RS. Reward is enough. Artif Intell 2021;299:103535. link1

[65] Weininger D, Weininger A, Weininger JL. 2. SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1989;29(2):97‒101. link1

[66] Fraser J, Owen RJ, Morgan DD, Costas M, Morgan DR. Assessment of DNA and protein molecular fingerprinting methods for strain identification of Helicobacter pylori. In: Malfertheiner P, Ditschuneit H, editors. Helicobacter pylori, gastritis and peptic ulcer. Berlin: Springer; 1990. p. 23‒8. link1

[67] Cereto-Massagué A, Ojeda MJ, Valls C, Mulero M, Garcia-Vallvé S, Pujadas G. Molecular fingerprint similarity search in virtual screening. Methods 2015;71:58‒63. link1

[68] Morgan HL. The generation of a unique machine description for chemical structures—a technique developed at chemical abstracts service. J Chem Doc 1965;5(2):107‒13. link1

[69] Rogers D, Hahn M. Extended-connectivity fingerprints. J Chem Inf Model 2010;50(5):742‒54. link1

[70] Zagidullin B, Wang Z, Guan Y, Pitkänen E, Tang J. Comparative analysis of molecular fingerprints in prediction of drug combination effects. Brief Bioinforma 2021;22(6). bbab291. link1

[71] Kearnes S, McCloskey K, Berndl M, Pande V, Riley P. Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2016;30(8):595‒608. link1

[72] Schwaller P, Probst D, Vaucher AC, Nair VH, Kreutter D, Laino T, et al. Mapping the space of chemical reactions using attention-based neural networks. Nat Mach Intell 2021;3(2):144‒52. link1

[73] Varnek A, Fourches D, Hoonakker F, Solov’ev VP. Substructural fragments: an universal language to encode reactions, molecular and supramolecular structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2005;19(9):693‒703. link1

[74] Nugmanov RI, Mukhametgaleev RN, Akhmetshin T, Gimadiev TR, Afonina VA, Madzhidov TI, et al. CGRtools: Python library for molecule, reaction, and condensed graph of reaction processing. J Chem Inf Model 2019;59(6):2516‒21. link1

[75] Fortunato ME, Coley CW, Barnes BC, Jensen KF. Data augmentation and pretraining for template-based retrosynthetic prediction in computer-aided synthesis planning. J Chem Inf Model 2020;60(7):3398‒407. link1

[76] Segler MHS, Waller MP. Neural-symbolic machine learning for retrosynthesis and reaction prediction. Chemistry 2017;23(25):5966‒71. link1

[77] Corey EJ, Jorgensen WL. Computer-assisted synthetic analysis. Synthetic strategies based on appendages and the use of reconnective transforms. J Am Chem Soc 1976;98(1):189‒203. link1

[78] Avramova S, Kochev N, Angelov P. RetroTransformDB: a dataset of generic transforms for retrosynthetic analysis. Data 2018;3(2):14. link1

[79] Hartenfeller M, Eberle M, Meier P, Nieto-Oberhuber C, Altmann KH, Schneider G, et al. A collection of robust organic synthesis reactions for in silico molecule design. J Chem Inf Model 2011;51(12):3093‒8. link1

[80] Gelernter H, Rose JR, Chen C. Building and refining a knowledge base for synthetic organic chemistry via the methodology of inductive and deductive machine learning. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1990;30(4):492‒504. link1

[81] Satoh H, SOPHIAFunatsu K., a knowledge base-guided reaction prediction system—utilization of a knowledge base derived from a reaction database. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1995;35(1):34‒44. link1

[82] Funatsu K. A novel approach to retrosynthetic analysis utilizing knowledge bases derived from reaction databases. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2005); 2005 Sep 14‒16; Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 169‒75. link1

[83] Law J, Zsoldos Z, Simon A, Reid D, Liu Y, Khew SY, et al. Route Designer: a retrosynthetic analysis tool utilizing automated retrosynthetic rule generation. J Chem Inf Model 2009;49(3):593‒602. link1

[84] Coley CW, Green WH, Jensen KF. RDChiral: an RDKit wrapper for handling stereochemistry in retrosynthetic template extraction and application. J Chem Inf Model 2019;59(6):2529‒37.

[85] Landrum G. RDKit: open-source cheminformatics software [Internet]. RDKit; 2016 Aug 26 [cited 2021 Jun 24]. Available from: http://www.rdkit.org/. link1

[86] Szymkuć S, Badowski T, Grzybowski BA. Is organic chemistry really growing exponentially? Angew Chem Int Ed 2021;133(50):26430‒6. link1

[87] Gobbi A, Poppinger D. Genetic optimization of combinatorial libraries. Biotechnol Bioeng 1998;61(1):47‒54. link1

[88] Dice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 1945;26(3):297‒302. link1

[89] Tanimoto TT. An elementary mathematical theory of classification and prediction. Report. New York City: International Business Machines Corporation; 1958 Nov.

[90] Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychol Rev 1977;84(4):327‒52. link1

[91] Bjerrum EJ, Thakkar A, Engkvist O. Artificial applicability labels for improving policies in retrosynthesis prediction. Mach Learn Sci Technol 2020;2(1):017001. link1

[92] Seidl P, Renz P, Dyubankova N, Neves P, Verhoeven J, Segler M, et al. Modern Hopfield networks for few- and zero-shot reaction template prediction. 2021. arXiv:2104.03279. link1

[93] Dai H, Dai B, Song L. Discriminative embeddings of latent variable models for structured data. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning; 2016 Jun 20‒22; New York City, NY, USA. 2016. p. 2702‒11.

[94] Schlichtkrull M, Kipf TN, Bloem P, van den Berg R, Titov I, Welling M. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the 15th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2018); 2018 Jun 3‒7; Heraklion, Greece. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 593‒607. link1

[95] Somnath VR, Bunne C, Coley CW, Krause A, Barzilay R. Learning graph models for retrosynthesis prediction. In: Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021); 2021 Dec 6‒14; online. 2021. p. 9405‒15.

[96] Gilmer J, Schoenholz SS, Riley PF, Vinyals O, Dahl GE. Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2017 Aug 6‒11; Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2017. p. 1263‒72.

[97] Sacha M, Błaż M, Byrski P, Dąbrowski-Tumański P, Chromiński M, Loska R, et al. Molecule edit graph attention network: modeling chemical reactions as sequences of graph edits. J Chem Inf Model 2021;61 (7):3273‒84. link1

[98] You J, Ying R, Ren X, Hamilton W, Leskovec J. GraphRNN: generating realistic graphs with deep auto-regressive models. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2018 Jul 10‒15; Stockholm, Sweden. 2018. p. 5708‒17.

[99] Schuster M, Paliwal KK. Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process 1997;45(11):2673‒81. link1

[100] Karpov P, Godin G, Tetko IV. A transformer model for retrosynthesis. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN 2019); 2019 Sep 17‒19; Munich, Germany. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 817‒30. link1

[101] Sun R, Dai H, Li L, Kearnes S, Dai B. Towards understanding retrosynthesis by energy-based models. In: Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021); 2021 Dec 6‒14; online. 2021. p. 10186‒94.

[102] Dugundji J, Ugi I. An algebraic model of constitutional chemistry as a basis for chemical computer programs. In: Houk KN, Hunter CA, Krische MJ, Lehn JM, Ley SV, Olivucci M, editors. Computers in chemistry. Berlin: Springer; 1973. p. 19‒64. link1

[103] Kraut H, Eiblmaier J, Grethe G, Löw P, Matuszczyk H, Saller H. Algorithm for reaction classification. J Chem Inf Model 2013;53(11):2884‒95. link1

[104] Kotera M, Okuno Y, Hattori M, Goto S, Kanehisa M. Computational assignment of the EC numbers for genomic-scale analysis of enzymatic reactions. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126(50):16487‒98. link1

[105] NextMove Software [Internet]. Cambridge: NextMove Software; c2022 [cited 2021 Jun 24]. Available from: https://www.nextmovesoftware.com. link1

[106] Schneider N, Lowe DM, Sayle RA, Landrum GA. Development of a novel fingerprint for chemical reactions and its application to large-scale reaction classification and similarity. J Chem Inf Model 2015;55(1):39‒53. link1

[107] Ghiandoni GM, Bodkin MJ, Chen B, Hristozov D, Wallace JEA, Webster J, et al. Development and application of a data-driven reaction classification model: comparison of an electronic lab notebook and medicinal chemistry literature. J Chem Inf Model 2019;59(10):4167‒87. link1

[108] Coley CW, Rogers L, Green WH, Jensen KF. SCScore: synthetic complexity learned from a reaction corpus. J Chem Inf Model 2018;58(2):252‒61. link1

[109] Cadeddu A, Wylie EK, Jurczak J, Wampler-Doty M, Grzybowski BA. Organic chemistryas a languageandtheimplications ofchemical linguistics for structural and retrosynthetic analyses. Angew ChemInt Ed 2014;53(31):8108‒12. link1

[110] Skoraczyń ski G, Dittwald P, Miasojedow B, Szymkuć S, Gajewska EP, Grzybowski BA, et al. Predicting the outcomes of organic reactions via machine learning: are current descriptors sufficient? Sci Rep 2017;7:3582. link1

[111] Schwaller P, Vaucher AC, Laino T, Reymond JL. Prediction of chemical reaction yields using deep learning. Mach Learn Sci Technol 2021;2(1):015016. link1

[112] Heifets A, Jurisica I. Construction of new medicines via game proof search. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2012 Jul 22‒26; Toronto, ON, Canada. Palo Alto: AAAI Press; 2012. p. 1564‒70. link1

[113] Schreck JS, Coley CW, Bishop KJM. Learning retrosynthetic planning through simulated experience. ACS Cent Sci 2019;5(6):970‒81. link1

[114] Kishimoto A, Buesser B, Chen B, Botea A. Depth-first proof-number search with heuristic edge cost and application to chemical synthesis planning. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2019); 2019 Dec 8‒14; Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2019. p. 7226‒36.

[115] Jeong J, Lee N, Shin Y, Shin D. Intelligent generation of optimal synthetic pathways based on knowledge graph inference and retrosynthetic predictions using reaction big data. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 2022;130:103982. link1

[116] Allis LV, van der Meulen M, van den Herik HJ. Proof-number search. Artif Intell 1994;66(1):91‒124. link1

[117] Lowe DM. Extraction of chemical structures and reactions from the literature [dissertation]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge; 2012.

[118] Schneider N, Stiefl N, Landrum GA. What’s what: the (nearly) definitive guide to reaction role assignment. J Chem Inf Model 2016;56(12):2336‒46. link1

[119] Lowe DM. Chemical reactions from US patents (1976‒Sep2016) [Internet]. Cambridge: Figshare; [cited 2021 Jun 24]. Available from: https://figshare. com/articles/dataset/Chemical_reactions_from_US_patents_1976-Sep2016_/ 5104873. link1

[120] Mo Y, Guan Y, Verma P, Guo J, Fortunato ME, Lu Z, et al. Evaluating and clustering retrosynthesis pathways with learned strategy. Chem Sci 2021;12 (4):1469‒78. link1

[121] Corey EJ, Cramer III RD, Howe WJ. Computer-assisted synthetic analysis for complex molecules. Methods and procedures for machine generation of synthetic intermediates. J Am Chem Soc 1972;94(2):440‒59. link1

[122] Corey EJ, Wipke WT, Cramer III RD, Howe WJ. Computer-assisted synthetic analysis. Facile man‒machine communication of chemical structure by interactive computer graphics. J Am Chem Soc 1972;94(2):421‒30. link1

[123] Wipke WT, Ouchi GI, Krishnan S. Simulation and evaluation of chemical synthesis—SECS: an application of artificial intelligence techniques. Artif Intell 1978;11(1‒2):173‒93.

[124] Klucznik T, Mikulak-Klucznik B, McCormack MP, Lima H, Szymkuć S, Bhowmick M, et al. Efficient syntheses of diverse, medicinally relevant targets planned by computer and executed in the laboratory. Chem 2018;4 (3):522‒32. link1

[125] Genheden S, Thakkar A, Chadimová V, Reymond JL, Engkvist O, Bjerrum E. AiZynthFinder: a fast, robust and flexible open-source software for retrosynthetic planning. J Cheminf 2020;12(1):70. link1

[126] Schwaller P, Laino T, Gaudin T, Bolgar P, Hunter CA, Bekas C, et al. Molecular Transformer: a model for uncertainty-calibrated chemical reaction prediction. ACS Cent Sci 2019;5(9):1572‒83. link1

[127] Thakkar A, Kogej T, Reymond JL, Engkvist O, Bjerrum EJ. Datasets and their influence on the development of computer assisted synthesis planning tools in the pharmaceutical domain. Chem Sci 2020;11(1):154‒68. link1

[128] Bollacker K, Evans C, Paritosh P, Sturge T, Taylor J. Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 2008 Jun 9‒12; Vancouver, BC, Canada. New York City: Association for Computing Machinery; 2008. p. 1247‒50. link1

[129] Carlson A, Betteridge J, Kisiel B, Settles B, Hruschka ER, Mitchell TM. Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2010 Jul 11‒15; Atlanta, GA, USA. AAAI; 2010. p. 1306‒13. link1