Metamaterials: The Art in Materials Science

Jingbo Sun , Ji Zhou

Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 153 -169.

PDF (5828KB)
Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) :153 -169. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.12.011
Research Next Ten Years: Create a Better Future—Review
research-article
Metamaterials: The Art in Materials Science
Author information +
History +
PDF (5828KB)

Abstract

Composed of natural materials but constructed using artificial structures through ingenious design, metamaterials possess properties beyond nature. Unlike traditional materials studies, metamaterials research requires great human creativity in order to realize the desired properties and thereby the required functionalities through design. Such properties and functionalities are not necessarily available in nature, and their design can break through the existing materials ideology. This paper reviews progress in metamaterials research over the past 20 years in terms of the materials innovations that have achieved the designation of “meta.” In particular, we discuss future trends in metamaterials in the fields of both fundamental science and engineering.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Metamaterials / Metasurface / Artificial intelligence / Origami / Kirigami / Artistry

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jingbo Sun, Ji Zhou. Metamaterials: The Art in Materials Science. Engineering, 2025, 44(1): 153-169 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2024.12.011

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Introduction

Art is a creative human activity that encompasses visual arts such as drawing, sculpting, and architecture and other forms such as literature, music, dance, and more. Art has been integral to the emergence and development of human civilization, serving as an essential component of human society. From prehistoric times to the present, people have utilized art to document real life, imagine future possibilities, and express reverence for the unknown forces of nature. Art is a powerful form of expression, embodying human thoughts, creativity, and ideals.

In the material world, the most basic element is the materials that have accompanied the emergence and development of human civilization. From the simple tools used by prehistoric humans to today’s highly developed modern civilization, various historical stages such as the Stone Age, Bronze Age, and Iron Age fully expressed the progress of material technology, while occurring within the confines of the materials existing in nature. At the turn of the century, the emergence of the concept of metamaterials revolutionized human understanding of materials [1]. Just as art comes from life but goes beyond it, metamaterials are composed of natural materials but can exhibit properties beyond those found in nature. Metamaterials, which are analogous to the art of materials science, are a form of human creativity that breaks through the existing materials ideology and turns fantasies that have only existed in art for tens of thousands of years into reality.

2. Origin

The concept of metamaterials first originated from a thought experiment by the Soviet scientist Victor Veselago, who hypothesized the existence of materials with a negative refractive index [2]. The refractive index is a basic optical property of materials that is always positive in conventional materials and never negative in naturally occurring materials. Therefore, it was originally impossible to observe and experimentally verify a material of negative refractive index and its related novel physical effects. At the end of the 20th century, the British scientist John B. Pendry proposed the theoretical design of artificial structures: the metal wires [3] and split rings [4]—that could respectively realize an effective negative permittivity and negative magnetic permeability. Later on, the American scientist David R. Smith constructed negative refractive index materials by using these two structures as a unit cell, successfully observing negative refraction experimentally for the first time [5], [6]. At this point, metamaterials were presented to the public as an art that subverts human cognition.

Metamaterials are artistic—not only because they usually have delicate structures but also because of their unique physical properties that originate from an artificially designed unit cell known as the “meta-atom.” As shown in Fig. 1, metamaterials’ extraordinary physical properties stem from the intricate structures of the meta-atom rather than the intrinsic properties of their component materials. The realization of the metamaterials is full of design and creativity—the same artistic inspiration that gives humans an almost infinite ability to create ideas that are not found in nature, allowing us to utilize our imaginations to the extreme.

To realize negative refractive index metamaterials, a negative dielectric constant and negative permeability can be obtained by generating certain electromagnetic resonances through the design of artificial structures. This means that many extraordinary electromagnetic properties—such as large positive refractive index values, near-zero refractive index values, and high loss—can be achieved in the same way [7], [8], [9], as shown in Fig. 2 [6], [8], [9], [10]. Thus, metamaterials with any desirable permittivity, permeability, and refractive index values can be realized with greater freedom than ever before. In addition to such extraordinary properties, the construction of a metamaterial with certain arrangements of meta-atoms may also give rise to new material properties. For example, by modifying the refractive index, in combination with a specific ordering of meta-atoms, it is possible to realize spatial transformations of propagating electromagnetic waves, which has given rise to a new field known as “transformation optics” [11], [12], [13], [14]. One of the most striking results of this field is the invisibility cloak [10], [15], [16], which turns the idea of invisibility from literature and dramas into a reality.

3. Artistic development of metamaterials

Metamaterials were originally realized in microwave range [5], [6], [10]; this was mostly due to the relatively easier realization in fabrication in that field, since the exotic properties of metamaterials are described by the effective medium theory, which requires the unit cell size to be deep sub-wavelength of the incident wave. Yet the fascinating exotic properties of metamaterials make this concept contagious throughout the entire physics community. Over the subsequent two decades of vigorous development, metamaterials have expanded to many fields, including optics [17], [18], [19], [20], mechanics [21], [22], [23], [24], acoustics [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], and thermal sciences [30], [31], [32], [33]. Here, instead of reviewing the history of metamaterials based on conventional timelines or subject areas, we explore the unique artistry of metamaterials from the perspective of new designs and ideas. The key to designing metamaterials lies in understanding what makes them “meta.” In general, they can be thought of as possessing extraordinary properties, property reinforcement, and strong manipulation, among other unique features.

3.1. Extraordinary properties

In this context, “extraordinary properties” refer to special properties that do not exist in natural materials, such as negative refractive index [5], [6] and zero refractive index [7], [8]. These electromagnetic properties were widely studied in the microwave field initially and then extended to other fields involving wave propagation, such as optics and acoustics. In the field of electromagnetics and optics, negative refraction behavior and the resulting evanescent wave enhancement [34], along with the reversed Doppler effect [35], [36] and anomalous Cherenkov effect [37], [38], were hot topics in the early days of metamaterials research. In negative index materials, since the wave vector is reversed, the electric field, magnetic field, and wave vector of the electromagnetic wave obey the left-hand rule. Thus, negative index metamaterials also appeared as “left-handed” metamaterials in the literature [39], [40], [41], [42]. The reversal of the wave vector causes evanescent waves—which usually experience exponential decay in conventional materials—to experience an exponential increase instead. This phenomenon allows for the creation of a flat lens with super-resolution capabilities: the “superlens” [34], [43], [44], [45]. Based on a principle similar to the negative refractive index, by selecting an appropriate frequency, a metamaterial with a refractive index close to zero can be obtained [46], [47], [48]. Through careful design while considering the special energy band characteristics of photonic crystals, a zero index can also be achieved [49], [50], [51], [52]. With a zero index, the wavelength of electromagnetic waves tends to infinity, showing a tunneling-like effect and the ability to shape the wavefront [53], [54].

Similar to electromagnetic properties, anomalous mechanical properties can also exhibit negative values, such as a negative Poisson’s ratio [55], [56]. This concept was proposed much earlier and can be achieved through artificially purely designed structures, such as concave hexagonal honeycomb structures [57]; certain natural materials, such as pyrite [58] and zeolite [59]; or composite materials, such as polymer foams [60] and fibers [61]. The concept of metamaterials combines both structural and material properties but from the materials perspective; thus, abnormal mechanical properties are realized through such structural designs. Negative Poisson’s ratio metamaterials exhibit unique mechanical properties such as high shear resistance [62], [63] and impact resistance [64], [65], and increased resistance to indentation [66]. Making use of these unique properties, Ren et al. [67] carried out a comprehensive study on how to design a high-performance auxetic nail, as shown in Fig. 3(a). These types of metamaterials are lightweight and can be used for energy dissipation [68], [69], vibration isolation [70], [71], defense applications [72], [73], and structural support [74], [75], all of which have promising applications in the aerospace, military, and medical fields. This trend is not limited to Poisson’s ratio but extends to other mechanical properties as well, such as negative stiffness [76], [77] and zero stiffness [78], [79], [80], which previously only existed as theoretical concepts but can now be achieved through metamaterials.

The special energy-transfer mechanism of negative stiffness metamaterials can also be used for energy dissipation. By combining this with the bi-stability mechanism, functionalities such as self-locking and reconfiguration can be designed, which are highly desired in soft robotics [81], [82]. Since negative stiffness materials can also produce sensations like that of a sudden collapse or a missed step, Zhang et al. [83] at Westlake University applied this concept to provide multi-sensory feedback in virtual reality (VR) technology, greatly enhancing the immersive experience, as shown in Fig. 3(b). Zero stiffness materials are mainly used for vibration isolation materials; similar to zero refractive index materials, they represent a theoretical absolute value. Therefore, for a long time, the concept of zero stiffness was viewed as a quasi-zero stiffness that only approached zero stiffness. However, Wu et al. [84] successfully achieved true zero stiffness for the first time using a constant-force energy-circulation mechanism through capacity cycling. As shown in Fig. 3(c) [84], metamaterials with absolutely zero stiffness can be used for energy shielding across the entire frequency range, thereby achieving truly perfect vibrational isolation.

3.2. Property reinforcement

The properties that are enhanced through reinforcement in the field of metamaterials are those that exist in natural materials but are insufficiently strong, which greatly limits their applications. The most typical of these is optical anisotropy, which is usually rather weak, given that the differences between the main elements in a dielectric tensor are mostly in the range of 0.01–0.50 [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91]. By using metal/dielectric structures, such as multilayered structures [92], [93], [94], [95], [96] or metal nanowire arrays [97], [98], [99], permittivities along different orientations can vary greatly, such that the main elements in a dielectric tensor can have opposite signs, resulting in extreme anisotropy. Based on the form of the dielectric tensor in mathematics, which is defined as an indefinite tensor, this type of materials was originally referred to as “indefinite media” [100]. Later on, they became widely referred to as “hyperbolic metamaterials,” since their isofrequency contour is hyperbolic [101], as illustrated in Fig. 4(a) [95]. It should also be noted that hyperbolic anisotropy can occur in magnetic properties, with an indefinite permeability tensor [102], [103]. Due to a strong anisotropy (either dielectric or magnetic), an all-angle negative refraction can be obtained regarding the energy flow (the Poynting vector), despite the refractive index (of the wave vector) still being positive.

The most significant effect of hyperbolic anisotropy is the ability to support the propagation of evanescent waves, which decay exponentially in conventional materials yet grow exponentially in left-handed materials, as discussed in Section 3.1 [101]. By combining this phenomenon with the control of the evanescent wave energy flow through strong anisotropy, hyperbolic metamaterials can transform evanescent waves into propagating waves below the diffraction limit, as shown in Fig. 4(b) [104], [105]. Therefore, optical lenses made of hyperbolic metamaterials, called “hyperlenses,” can be used to achieve super-resolution in optical microscopy [96], [101], [104], [106]. Hyperlens super-resolution imaging was first demonstrated by Liu et al. [104] in the ultraviolet range, where 50 nm feature size patterns were successfully imaged using 365 nm illumination. In 2015, Sun et al. [106] demonstrated a visible hyperlens with a slinky-like structure, which successfully enabled 80 nm resolution using a 780 nm illumination source. By using an inverse setup, a hyperlens can demagnify optical images to a scale below the diffraction limit, enabling non-diffraction-limited photolithography [107], [108]. Based on this theory, Sun and Litchinitser [105] developed a visible photolithography method, achieving a 80 nm linewidth with h-line (405 nm) technology. Liu et al. [109] realized a 55 nm linewidth under 365 nm illumination with a hyperlens.

Properties such as chirality, absorbance, and optical nonlinearity can also be greatly enhanced using metamaterials. Chirality is a ubiquitous feature in nature and has extremely important applications in biology, chemistry, optics, medicine, and other fields [110], [111], [112]. Chirality in natural materials usually originates from chiral microstructures, including mirror-asymmetric molecular structures [113], [114], [115], [116] and crystal structures [117]. However, because chiral molecules or supramolecular structures are much smaller than optical wavelengths and are randomly oriented, such materials’ overall chirality is weak. As shown in Fig. 4(c) [118], by artificially constructing chiral structures and arranging them in the same orientation, strong chirality can be obtained by metamaterials in a direct way [118], [119], [120], [121], [122], [123]. Although absorption is a very common material property, 100% perfect absorption is a characteristic that natural materials do not have. As illustrated in Fig. 4(d), Landy et al. [124] proposed a scheme for metamaterials with high loss and impedance matching, achieved by designing meta-atoms with equal permittivity and permeability. Such materials can eliminate all incident electromagnetic waves within sub-wavelength distances and simultaneously ensure zero back reflection [124], [125], [126]. This complete absorption of electromagnetic waves is extremely important in stealth technology.

Optical nonlinearity refers to nonlinear polarization behavior in materials under a strong electric field, accompanied by the excitations of high harmonics. Among such effects, due to the coupling between materials polarization and symmetry, even-order nonlinear effects can only be found in materials whose crystal structures lack central symmetries [127]. Through the design of artificial structures, the magnetic field of the light can be enhanced and coupled with the optical electric field, simultaneously driving the carriers to produce second harmonic generations [128], [129], as shown in Fig. 4(e). This design not only overcomes the limitations of the intrinsic crystal structure of a material but also provides a feasible way to obtain second harmonic generation in specific wavebands, such as the terahertz frequency band, where natural materials hardly show any second-order nonlinearity, since the intrinsic polarization effect of natural materials is rather weak [130]. In addition to the great enhancements that have been achieved in the abovementioned attributes themselves, knowing how to broaden the working bandwidth of each attribute as much as possible is highly desired [131]. These enhancements have paved the way for the design of many high-performance devices.

In mechanics, metamaterials with ultra-strong stiffness, ultra-strong toughness, ultra-light mass, and high energy dissipation have been widely studied [132], [133]. Titanium alloy metamaterials based on hollow pillar structures can achieve strength close to the Gibson–Ashby upper limit, with densities of only 1–1.8 g∙cm−3. Combining negative Poisson’s ratio metamaterials with aluminum foam can greatly improve the energy absorption performance of the aluminum foam itself, nearly tripling the specific energy absorption [134].

3.3. Strong manipulation of physical fields

Metamaterials’ strong control over physical fields originates from the significant influence they have on physical fields, such as the ability to confine the intensity distribution of electromagnetic waves or modulate the phase and polarization of light as it passes through a two-dimensional (2D) structure with an ultra-thin longitudinal scale. In general, there are two primary manifestations of metamaterials’ control: One is their strong control of electromagnetic wave propagation behavior, as shown in Figs. 5(a)–(e) [135], [136], [137], [138], [139], and the other is their strong manipulation of the wave vector, polarization state, and phase, as shown in Figs. 5(f)–(j) [140], [141], [142], [143].

First, let us investigate the method of propagation control. Based on the polaritons generated by the strong interaction between the material interface and electromagnetic waves, the energy of the electromagnetic waves is localized at the interface, with its electric field attenuating exponentially in the direction away from the interface, making light an optical surface wave transmitted along the material interface. Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) are a commonly used type of surface wave based on interactions with metal interfaces [135], [136], [144], [145], [146], [147]. As shown in Fig. 5(b), due to their 2D propagation properties, they can be used in the next generation of integrated photonic circuits with a high level of integration. Metallic nano-structures can also be used as resonators to generate surface plasmon resonance, which can significantly enhance the local field and has important applications in biological and chemical detection, sensors, and so on [148], [149], [150], [151], [152], [153]. In addition, anisotropic material interfaces that meet particular conditions can support the propagation of these surface waves [154], as shown in Figs. 5(c)–(e). For example, in the mid-to-far infrared band, hyperbolic polaritons are generated as a result of phonon resonance at the interface of van der Waals materials [138], [155], [156], [157]. Dyakonov surface waves (DSWs) are also observed at anisotropic crystal interfaces in the visible light band [137], [158], [159]. Compared with the high loss in metals in the visible light band, the DSWs along transparent crystal interfaces can achieve nearly loss-free, highly directional 2D transmission, making them promising for use in 2D photonic circuits [160], [161].

Second, let us examine the method by which metasurfaces—that is, the 2D forms of metamaterials—realize the strong manipulation of wave vector, phase, and polarization states [140], [142], [162], [163], [164]. Bulky devices based on conventional materials or metamaterials usually rely on geometric shapes to modulate the phase of a light beam or electromagnetic wave. However, fabrication challenges greatly limit the realization of a bulky metamaterial on its way to high frequency, especially in the optical range. Thus, the strong effect achieved by a thin metamaterial is always desirable, which has led to the emergence of metasurfaces. Through strong control of the wave phase by means of a single layer of meta-atoms, metasurfaces can achieve strong phase modulation with a uniform thickness of less than one wavelength, thereby realizing functions such as focusing, beam deflection, and the generation of orbital angular momentum. In 2011, Yu et al. [140] at Harvard University proposed a concept based on the generalized Snell’s law and demonstrated how a gradient phase distribution of transmitted light could be obtained based on a single-layer metal nano-antenna array (Fig. 5(g)), achieving beam deflection and orbital angular momentum loading. Since then, the concept of metasurfaces has received increasingly widespread attention. Many behaviors related to optical phase modulation—such as lens focusing (Fig. 5(h)), structured light generation (Fig. 5(i)), holography (Fig. 5(j)), and even cloaking—can be realized using metasurfaces [141], [143], [165], [166], [167], [168], [169], [170], [171]. Physical mechanisms that can produce phase modulations, such as a geometric phase based on polarization conversion, a transmission phase based on scattering mechanisms, and the phase change in electromagnetic resonance, are widely used in the design of metasurfaces [164], [169], [170], [171]. This strong control of phase and polarization can greatly reduce the size of optical devices, making metasurfaces an important approach toward ultra-compact optical systems.

Another strong manipulation ability of metamaterials involves the strong confinement of a field, such as the bound states in the continuum phenomenon. An extremely high-Q resonant mode can be obtained through metamaterials with specific periodic dielectric constant distribution conditions [172], [173], [174], [175]. In addition to the aforementioned control of the light field achieved through the metamaterials with specific distribution of refractive index to realize optical invisibility [176], [177], many other types of cloaks can be created using similar approaches; examples include the cloaking of acoustic waves to produce sonar invisibility, shown in Fig. 6(a) [178], [179], [180], [181]; the control of heat flow in efficient thermal management, shown in Fig. 6(b) [182]; and the cloaking of seismic waves, which can be used to protect civil infrastructures in an earthquake, as shown in Fig. 6(c) [183], [184]. All of these examples perfectly illustrate the artistic manipulation of metamaterials.

4. Future trends in metamaterials

4.1. Using metamaterials to boost fundamental sciences

The construction of metamaterials in itself makes metamaterials an important platform in basic research. Phenomena and effects that previously existed only at the theoretical level or could only be observed under extreme experimental conditions can now be experimentally verified by constructing these specific conditions through metamaterials, which can be fully illustrated by the birth of the metamaterials itself. Given the synergy between metamaterials and various other disciplinary fields, metamaterials offer many ways to boost the progress of fundamental sciences, as shown in Fig. 7 [185], [186], [187], [188], [189]. This is well presented in the field of optical sciences. In optical quantum science, the photonic spin Hall effect [186], [190], [191], [192], parity–time (PT) symmetry [193], [194], [195], [196], [197], supersymmetry [198], [199], electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) [200], [201], and the aforementioned bound states in the continuum [172], [173], [174] can be obtained by constructing specific metamaterials. In topological photonics, metamaterials can be used to construct structures with specific topological photonic states. Concepts such as topological insulators [187], [202], Weyl crystals [185], [203], Moiré patterns [188], and the polar skyrmions [204], [205] in solid-state physics can be transplanted into photonics and realized through metamaterials [188]. The realization of these new concepts and effects has become one of the most important directions in the development of modern photonics and provides new ideas for the design and development of new devices.

4.2. Increasing intelligence in metamaterials

As early as in 2014, Professor Engheta at the University of Pennsylvania proposed the concept of computational metamaterials that realize computationally streamlined functions such as differentiation, integration, and convolution, as shown in Fig. 8(a) [206]. In 2019, Engheta’s team started to experimentally implement metamaterials that could carry out calculation-based functions in the microwave band, which can be used to solve the Fredholm integral equation, as shown in Fig. 8(b) [207]. Recently, this capability was successfully demonstrated in the optical frequency band as well. This design of combining metamaterials and waveguides can easily be integrated with an on-chip design [208]. There are no intermediate steps, and no storage is required in the calculation process; moreover, it allows for photonic calculations to occur in parallel without any crosstalk. Thanks to these advantages, this design holds great significance in the development of a new generation of photonic chips.

At almost the same time, advances in metasurfaces were moving toward more intelligent design, too. Cui et al. at Southeast University proposed the concept of intelligent metasurfaces in 2014 [209]. Making the meta-atoms of a metasurface programmable enhances the metasurface’s capability for signal processing. Such a design integrates the sending, receiving, and processing of signals, thereby creating a so-called “information metasurface” for system-level applications, as shown in Fig. 8(c) [210]. Currently, Cui’s team is working on single-antenna super-resolution imaging based on digital metamaterials, gigahertz-frame-rate programmable holographic imaging, and large-scale electromagnetic data mining [211], [212], [213], [214], [215].

With the development of information technology and artificial intelligence (AI), the amount of data has increased sharply, leading to increased requirements for computational efficiency and energy consumption. An integrated storage and computing framework can avoid the cost caused by the transfer of data between storage and calculation components in traditional computing processes, thereby greatly reducing energy consumption and improving computational efficiency. The key device in a computer that integrates storage and calculations is a component that combines memory and processing functions. In an electronic computer, this is a memristor [216], [217], [218]. The realization of such a component with memory functions through metamaterials is not limited to the memory of electrical signals but can also be extended to optical memory functionalities that directly participate in the calculation process [219]. This is another important direction for the development of metamaterials.

Not only are electromagnetic/optical metamaterials being intelligentized, but mechanical metamaterials are also on the way. The approaches used to design programmable mechanical metamaterials can be quite artistic, such as the use of the traditional art of origami and kirigami to build exquisite architectures with paper. Fig. 9 [220], [221], [222], [223], [224], [225], [226], [227], [228], [229], [230], [231] illustrates the logic of the origami and kirigami used in metamaterials design. The paper is 2D, while the final architecture is three-dimensional (3D)—a transformation that is achieved by merely folding or cutting the paper. Moreover, through different ways of folding or cutting, miscellaneous 3D structures can be built from the same piece of paper. All these 3D structures are reversible, as they can be transformed back to the 2D form of the original paper. Such practices provide a valuable guideline for building 3D metamaterials that exhibit unique and programmable mechanical properties, such as shape morphing [232], flexibility [233], a tunable Poisson’s ratio [229], tunable stiffness [234], and multistability [230].

When designing mechanical metamaterials through origami/kirigami, the starting material does not have to be paper; metals [220], [235], [236], polymers [237], hydrogels [225], [238], graphene [226], and DNA [222], [223], [224] have also been used, ranging from the macroscale to the microscale [239] or even the nanoscale [236]. The special properties of mechanical metamaterials grant them the capabilities of energy harvesting, sensing, actuation, self-adaptation, and even calculation and information processing, making them applicable in many fields, such as intelligent materials [240], [241], [242], [243], flexible electronics [244], [245], [246], [247], medical devices [248], and robotics [234], [249], [250], [251], [252], [253].

Regarding intelligence in metamaterials, the compliant mechanisms of origami/kirigami greatly enhance metamaterials’ programmability and reconfigurability and are thus widely used in realizing computational functionalities mechanically [254]. Ranging from logic gates—the most fundamental element (e.g., AND, OR, NOT) [255]—and functional elements such as actuators [256] to memories [257], almost all types of components found in a conventional electronic computer can be realized through origami/kirigami metamaterials. These mechanical computers not only diversify how computation is performed but are also very helpful in carrying out the computations in severe environments, like cold weather, high radiation, or a lack of electrical power.

4.3. Artificial intelligence

AI, machine learning, and materials genome engineering have received widespread attention in traditional materials research. Through machine learning and big data analysis, materials design and performance development can be well guided from the microscopic composition level. Similarly, AI is becoming an important tool in metamaterials design. Traditional metamaterials design usually starts from theoretical physics research. After that, specific performance characteristics can be optimized through numerical simulation of the structural and geometric parameters of the meta-atoms. The main challenge in this design method lies in creating new metamaterial configurations based on physical mechanisms, which can be thought of as similar to a creation by a famous artist. Continuing with this analogy, most people are only able to follow and copy famous works. Similarly, most classic metamaterials—such as split-ring resonators (SRRs) [5], [6], [9], [10], cut-wires [18], fishnet structures [18], [19], multilayer film structures [92], [95], and high-permittivity Mie scattering particles [171]—were proposed by a few pioneer scientists in the early stages of the development of metamaterials. Most subsequent metamaterials have been developed based on these designs while being modified to meet various requirements. Taking certain structures as a starting point, enhanced performance can be obtained through optimization via numerical simulations; these are usually performed by parameter scanning and may consume a large amount of computational resources and time. As early as in 2011, Freitas et al. [258] proposed a machine learning method that can accurately predict the dispersion behavior of a classic configuration of left-handed materials (SRR + metal wire) by means of a trained artificial neural network (ANN), for use in achieving structural optimizations of metamaterial primitives. For metamaterials or metasurfaces with relatively simple configurations and single functions, the advantages of machine learning tools are not yet obvious. Under normal circumstances, the functionality of metamaterials/metasurfaces is positively related to their complexity. For those metamaterials/metasurfaces containing a large number of meta-atoms with different shapes, the optimization efficiency is extremely low using the optimization method of trial and error, requiring a huge number of numerical simulations. This can be well explained in the design of achromatic metasurface lenses, as shown in Fig. 10 [259]. The size of the meta-atoms in a metalens is generally at the scale of 1/10 of the working wavelength (λ), and the overall size of a metalens is 40λ–50λ. According to its inherent symmetry, a metasurface lens may consist of about 20 configurations of meta-atoms and around 20 000 meta-atoms in total [259]. If the configuration is known, the light-modulation capability (the Fresnel transmission coefficient in physics) of this configuration can be obtained by running these numerical simulations, where the determination from configuration to light-modulation functionality is a one-to-one relationship. In a metalens design, the desired phase and group delay are first calculated from achromatic focusing. There is no direct way to determine the configuration of the meta-atoms from the required phase and group delay. To solve this problem, one feasible way is to establish a data library of meta-atoms with as many configurations as possible, to aid in discovering desired effects through massive numerical simulations, such that meta-atoms with the required performance characteristics can be chosen from this library to construct an achromatic lens [258], [259], [141], [260], [261], [262], [263], [264].

Establishing a data library through numerical simulations consumes an unrealistic amount of computing power and time. If the accurate phase control capability obtained through numerical simulations of small-scale configurations is used as a training database to train machine learning tools, the trained machine learning tools can then generate a massive database in a very short time for use in metasurface design [265], [266], [267], [268]. As shown in Fig. 11(a) [269], this method is known as forward design and is usually implemented via deep learning; it is widely used in the design of various optical devices, including metamaterials. Wang et al. [268] carried out a study on the whole process of the design, fabrication, and characterization of a visible-light achromatic metalens based on machine learning. In their work, the time consumption at each step in the theoretical design (i.e., the establishment of the training database, training of machine learning tools, generation of a performance database, and configuration searching) was carefully analyzed, fully demonstrating the important role of machine learning tools in accelerating the design of metasurfaces. Their results showed that the fabricated metalens designed via machine learning had excellent achromatic performance, competitive with those of human-designed metalenses, as well as a configuration that is easier in nanofabrication.

In forward design, machine learning tools utilize highly efficient predictions to accelerate performance optimization; in inverse design, while machine learning tools based on the inverse design become the designer of the metamaterials, as shown in Fig. 11(b) [269]. The pixelated configuration of meta-atoms can easily be digitally generated into patterns. A well-trained machine learning tool can theoretically predict the performance of all possible configurations by testing different pixel compositions, thereby establishing a data library for metasurface design [269], [270], [271], [272], [273], [274], [275], [276]. During this process, fabrication limits can also be considered, so that configurations that are too complex and difficult to fabricate can be removed to make the metasurface design more practical.

Thus far, numerical simulations are still required to establish a training database in both forward and inverse design, which still requires numerical simulations. Although the amount of calculation for a training database is affordable, it is the most time-consuming part of the design process [269]. Further combining data-driven and physical models, instead of completely relying on the black box of data training, is a very promising method to overcome this bottleneck.

Aside from the widely used machine learning tools mentioned above, large language models (LLMs), which are primarily designed for natural language processing, have recently appeared in metamaterials design [277]. LLMs are usually deep-learning-based models based on transformer architectures, such as generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) [278] and bidirectional encoder representations from transformer (BERTs) [279]; they are trained on vast amounts of data and are thus capable of processing, generating, and understanding human language. For example, ChatGPT is now being used by the general public for tasks such as generating AI art. It is very likely that LLMs can greatly assist the development of metamaterials thanks to their powerful generative designs and properties predictions; they may also enable the further development of intelligent metamaterials/metasurfaces, as discussed in Section 4.2. This trend has recently been emerging in academic conferences (e.g., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 2024 conference in San Diego) [280], [281].

4.4. Multi-property coupling and decoupling

The intersection of multiple fields in physics plays an important role in materials science. In conventional materials, properties such as mechanics, heat, light, electricity, and magnetism are coupled with each other, resulting in extremely important physical effects, including (inverse) piezoelectricity, thermoelectricity, and pyroelectricity; the electro-optic effect, magneto-optic effect, and photoelectric effect; electromagnetic induction (Faraday); and the Hall effect, among others. These effects cover almost all areas of modern science and technology. That said, due to the inherent limitations of natural materials, many expected properties are still being studied. For example, the working principle of light detection is based on the photoelectric effect caused by the particle nature of light. When materials’ band gaps are smaller than the incident photon energy, an electric signal can be generated through photocarriers, allowing the incident light to be detected. However, for long-wavelength bands, from mid- to far-infrared and even up to the terahertz range, the wave nature of light is stronger (where the photon energy is very tiny). With regards to materials, the band gap of semiconductor materials is very narrow; thus, the photoelectric effect is mostly hidden by the intrinsic carrier excitation of the material at room temperature. Therefore, despite its extremely fast response speed, detection technology based on semiconductor materials in the mid- and far-infrared bands (e.g., mercury cadmium telluride) can only work at low temperatures through a cooling system in order to suppress the noise caused by intrinsic thermal excitation [282]. To solve this problem, Wen and Zhou [283] proposed a completely new way of obtaining electric signals from the electric field in a light beam, resulting in an ultra-fast response in photoelectric detection without any cooling. This approach holds promise in the field of mid-infrared imaging and detection.

The decoupling of properties also holds great significance in materials design. The properties of a material originate from its microscopic composition and structure. Therefore, when a material exhibits one desired property due to its specific composition or structure, it can lead to limitations in other aspects. If the desired property can provide excellent performance in a certain device, while its other properties do not impede the device’s functionality, the performance of the device can be further improved by enhancing that property. In many cases, however, a dilemma occurs in which the material has a desired property that is inextricably coupled with an undesirable shortcoming. For example, a material with a high stiffness usually has limited ductility. As another example, an electric conductor is an excellent thermal conductor, but this property may seriously limit its efficiency in a thermoelectric device [284], [285], [286], [287], [288]. If the two correlated (or even conflicting) properties are first decoupled—meaning that they are obtained independently through different meta-atom designs—and then re-coupled by combining the two meta-atoms together, a material with the required composite properties can be constructed artificially. This is analogous to a famous painting originally created by a master through professional control over the colors: Once the colors are discretized and pixelated, even a beginner can create a copy of the painting by filling in the right colors.

The design of left-handed materials is realized by combining structures with a negative dielectric constant and a negative magnetic permeability together to obtain a negative refractive index [6]. The invisibility cloak mentioned earlier is constructed from meta-atoms with certain refractive indices as pixels, which enables transformation optics through the spatial arrangement of each meta-atom [10]. The decoupling of material properties is very likely to realize the digitization and pixelation of material properties, making materials design similar to using a Lego set, as shown in Fig. 12. This approach holds great promise for true on-demand customization and the ultimate development of an “omnipotent” material.

4.5. Engineering

With more than two decades of development, metamaterials are gradually moving from the realm of fundamental research to that of engineering. In this process, the advantage of metamaterials lies in their ability to “create” materials based on needs, making it possible to avoid the struggle of “discovering” materials based on needs, as in the traditional technological framework. When looking for materials for a specific purpose, we are always facing the challenges that suitable natural materials may not exist, or the material’s properties may not be good enough. In contrast, metamaterials can be customized to meet specific needs in order to solve critical challenges in engineering [288]. Therefore, knowing how to transform the extraordinary properties of metamaterials into excellent device performance is a key step. A metamaterial created in the laboratory is similar to a work of art, with exquisite structures and extraordinary properties. The question of how to turn such an “artwork” into a “craft” suitable for mass production is the main obstacle hindering the widescale use of metamaterial-based devices in industry. The preparation of metamaterials—ranging from mechanical manufacturing and circuit printing to fine nanofabrication processing—requires a great deal of technological prowess and advanced skills. Although the properties of many different metamaterials have been fully demonstrated in laboratories, achieving the low-cost mass production of these materials has always been a barrier to their industrialization.

In the field of electromagnetic/optical metamaterials, the meta-atom size of a metamaterial is proportional to the working wavelength. Therefore, microwave, radio frequency, and longer band metamaterials can be realized through traditional processing techniques, and industrialization is developing rapidly in this area. One of the most well-developed applications is the electromagnetic antenna based on metamaterials. In 2017, the American company Kymeta Corporation launched a satellite antenna product. As shown in Fig. 13(a) [289], the Kymeta u7 terminal, which operates in the Ku band, efficiently enables high-throughput communication between satellites and mobile platforms such as vehicles, ships, and aircrafts. Another successful metamaterial-based product is the radiofrequency (RF) coil, which is the essential component of enhancing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image in terms of the signal uniformity, signal-to-noise ratio, and image resolution. A cylindrical metasurface-based RF coil developed by the start-up TsingMeta, Ltd., incubated by Zhao’s research team at Tsinghua University [290], can significantly enhance the RF magnetic field in commercial MRI equipment. In the clinical validation, a 1.5 T MRI with the metasurface coil can greatly improve the image, comparable to that supplied by a 3 T MRI. The device is wireless and passive, and do not need to establish a protocol interface with the commercial MRI. Besides of the use in a hospital, the products are also widely used in animal experiments, in order to fulfill the requirement of the strong magnetic field, aiming at 9.4 T or even higher, which is not available to the animal experiment yet, as shown in Fig. 13(b) [291].

With advancements in communication technologies, the increase in operational frequency bands used in communication-system devices is resulting in a decrease in the polarization of materials, making it difficult to provide high-performance transmission, isolation, and reception of signals. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure the miniaturization and lightweight nature of these devices. These demands have prompted the industry to focus on metamaterials, with the aim of solving these problems through structural design.

Challenges in optical metamaterials mainly come from processing costs and inefficiencies in production. Metamaterials in research laboratories are mostly prepared through fine nanofabrication methods, such as electron beam lithography or ion beam etching. This type of processing method has extremely high precision but comes with a high cost [18], [19], [141], [143], [165], [166], [167], [168], [169], [170], [259], [260], [261], [263], [264]. Furthermore, the low output and yield of such methods make mass production difficult to realize. At present, many universities and companies engaged in optical metamaterial research are trying to achieve mass production based on prototypes in laboratories by merging them with current existing semiconductor manufacturing processes. That said, even if high-end micro-/nano-processing technology is used, the limit of the feature size that can be obtained is on the scale of tens of nanometers. For visible light, such a feature size will still cause strong scattering losses, resulting in deterioration of the device performance.

Although mechanical metamaterials are large in scale, they typically include complex structures and rely on additive manufacturing for mold-less production, primarily through the use of 3D printing. The production of resin-based materials via 3D printing is relatively mature, but selective melting technologies for metals do not yet meet the requirements for mechanical metamaterial preparation. In addition, the low yield rate of 3D printing is a major bottleneck in the industrialization of mechanical metamaterials.

5. Conclusion and outlook

Metamaterials are artificial materials that can be designed and customized by humans but are also a new way for humans to understand nature at a high level. In the past, people were limited to the materials found in nature. When natural materials cannot satisfy human needs, it is necessary to break through the old ideological framework of searching and improving natural materials and move toward creating metamaterials through intelligent design. The ideal goal of metamaterials is to make huge progress in methodology, enabling materials science to greatly expand its borders.

Metamaterials design is a very creative study. Researchers can use their imagination and creativity to overcome challenges in realizing applications and achieving technological progress. At the same time, they can engage in scientific exploration and transform theoretical ideas, phenomena, and laws into tangible materials that allow people to gain a more direct understanding and perception, promoting progress in materials science.

In industry, metamaterials can bring advancements in technology and thereby lead to huge economic growth. With the entry of metamaterial products on the market, metamaterials are creating huge economic value. In 2023, the global metamaterials market size reached 1.4 billion USD; by 2030, this market size is expected to exceed 3.5 billion USD, with an expected compound annual growth rate reaching 57% [292].

Metamaterials are changing human life: As an advanced science and technology, they improve people’s quality of life by promoting technological progress, including more convenient communication, medical advancements, increased traffic safety, and more. Metamaterials will eventually be fully integrated into human society to serve humanity.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFB3806000) and the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52332006).

We thank Mr. Youcheng Xu’s effort in formatting the references and Mr. Maxwell Wallace’s help with the language polishing.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Jingbo Sun and Ji Zhou declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

References

[1]

Ziolkowski RW. Metamaterials: the early years in the USA. EPJ Appl Metamat 2014; 1:5.

[2]

Decree of the Praesidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on the award of the Order of Lenin to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Russ Math Surv 1974;29(3):1.

[3]

Pendry JB, Holden AJ, Robbins DJ, Stewart WJ. Low frequency plasmons in thin-wire structures. J Phys Condens Matter 1998; 10(22):4785-4809.

[4]

Pendry JB, Holden AJ, Robbins DJ, Stewart WJ. Magnetism from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 1999; 47(11):2075-2084.

[5]

Smith DR, Kroll N. Negative refractive index in left-handed materials. Phys Rev Lett 2000; 85(14):2933-2936.

[6]

Shelby RA, Smith DR, Schultz S. Experimental verification of a negative index of refraction. Science 2001; 292(5514):77-79.

[7]

Silveirinha M, Engheta N. Design of matched zero-index metamaterials using nonmagnetic inclusions in epsilon-near-zero media. Phys Rev B 2007; 75(7):075119.

[8]

Mahmoud AM, Engheta N. Wave–matter interactions in epsilon-and-mu-near-zero structures. Nat Commun 2014; 5:5638.

[9]

Tao H, Landy NI, Bingham CM, Zhang X, Averitt RD, Padilla WJ. A metamaterial absorber for the terahertz regime: design, fabrication and characterization. Opt Express 2008; 16(10):7181.

[10]

Schurig D, Mock JJ, Justice BJ, Cummer SA, Pendry JB, Starr AF, et al. Metamaterial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies. Science 2006; 314(5801):977-980.

[11]

Chen H, Chan CT, Sheng P. Transformation optics and metamaterials. Nat Mater 2010; 9(5):387-396.

[12]

Leonhardt U. Optical conformal mapping. Science 2006; 312(5781):1777-1780.

[13]

McCall M, Pendry JB, Galdi V, Lai Y, Horsley SAR, Li J, et al. Roadmap on transformation optics. J Opt 2018; 20(6):063001.

[14]

Schurig D, Pendry JB, Smith DR. Calculation of material properties and ray tracing in transformation media. Opt Express 2006; 14(21):9794.

[15]

Pendry JB, Schurig D, Smith DR. Controlling electromagnetic fields. Science 2006; 312(5781):1780-1782.

[16]

Valentine J, Li J, Zentgraf T, Bartal G, Zhang X. An optical cloak made of dielectrics. Nat Mater 2009; 8(7):568-571.

[17]

Cai W, Chettiar UK, Kildishev AV, Shalaev VM. Optical cloaking with metamaterials. Nat Photonics 2007; 1(4):224-227.

[18]

Shalaev DM, Cai W, Chettiar UK, Yuan HK, Sarychev AK, Drachev VP, et al. Negative index of refraction in optical metamaterials. Opt Lett 2005; 30(24):3356-3358.

[19]

Valentine J, Zhang S, Zentgraf T, Ulin-Avila E, Genov DA, Bartal G, et al. Three-dimensional optical metamaterial with a negative refractive index. Nature 2008; 455(7211):376-379.

[20]

Soukoulis CM, Wegener M. Past achievements and future challenges in the development of three-dimensional photonic metamaterials. Nat Photonics 2011; 5(9):523-530.

[21]

Jiao P, Mueller J, Raney JR, Zheng X, Alavi AH. Mechanical metamaterials and beyond. Nat Commun 2023; 14:6004.

[22]

Surjadi JU, Gao L, Du H, Li X, Xiong X, Fang NX, et al. Mechanical metamaterials and their engineering applications. Adv Eng Mater 2019; 21(3):1800864.

[23]

Lu C, Hsieh M, Huang Z, Zhang C, Lin Y, Shen Q, et al. Architectural design and additive manufacturing of mechanical metamaterials: a review. Engineering 2022; 17:44-63.

[24]

Yu X, Zhou J, Liang H, Jiang Z, Wu L. Mechanical metamaterials associated with stiffness, rigidity and compressibility: a brief review. Prog Mater Sci 2018; 94:114-173.

[25]

Lu Q, Li X, Zhang X, Lu M, Chen Y. Perspective: acoustic metamaterials in future engineering. Engineering 2022; 17:22-30.

[26]

Ma G, Sheng P. Acoustic metamaterials: from local resonances to broad horizons. Sci Adv 2016; 2(2):e1501595.

[27]

Craster RV, Guenneau S.Acoustic metamaterials: negative refraction, imaging, lensing and cloaking. Springer, Dordrecht (2013).

[28]

Cummer SA, Christensen J, Al Aù. Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials. Nat Rev Mater 2016; 1(3):16001.

[29]

Gao N, Zhang Z, Deng J, Guo X, Cheng B, Hou H. Acoustic metamaterials for noise reduction: a review. Adv Mater Technol 2022; 7(6):2100698.

[30]

Wegener M. Metamaterials beyond optics. Science 2013; 342(6161):939-940.

[31]

Wang J, Dai G, Huang J. Thermal metamaterial: fundamental, application, and outlook. iScience 2020; 23(10):101637.

[32]

Li Y, Li W, Han T, Zheng X, Li J, Li B, et al. Transforming heat transfer with thermal metamaterials and devices. Nat Rev Mater 2021; 6(6):488-507.

[33]

Ju R, Xu G, Xu L, Qi M, Wang D, Cao P, et al. Convective thermal metamaterials: exploring high-efficiency, directional, and wave-like heat transfer. Adv Mater 2023; 35(23):2209123.

[34]

Pendry JB. Negative refraction makes a perfect lens. Phys Rev Lett 2000; 85(18):3966-3969.

[35]

Lee SH, Park CM, Seo YM, Kim CK. Reversed Doppler effect in double negative metamaterials. Phys Rev B 2010; 81(24):241102.

[36]

Ziemkiewicz D, Zieli Sńska-Raczyńska. Complex Doppler effect in left-handed metamaterials. J Opt Soc Am B 2015; 32(3):363.

[37]

Duan Z, Wu BI, Lu J, Kong JA, Chen M. Cherenkov radiation in anisotropic double-negative metamaterials. Opt Express 2008; 16(22):18479.

[38]

Duan Z, Tang X, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Chen X, Chen M, et al. Observation of the reversed Cherenkov radiation. Nat Commun 2017; 8:14901.

[39]

Al Aù, Salandrino A, Engheta N. Negative effective permeability and left-handed materials at optical frequencies. Opt Express 2006; 14(4):1557.

[40]

Zhou J, Economon EN, Koschny T, Soukoulis CM. Unifying approach to left-handed material design. Opt Lett 2006; 31(24):3620.

[41]

Kafesaki M, Tsiapa I, Katsarakis N, Koschny T, Soukoulis CM, Economou EN. Left-handed metamaterials: the fishnet structure and its variations. Phys Rev B 2007; 75(23):235114.

[42]

Bai Y, Chen H, Zhang J, Luo Y, Li B, Ran L, et al. Left-handed material based on ferroelectric medium. Opt Express 2007; 15(13):8284-8289.

[43]

Zhang X, Liu Z. Superlenses to overcome the diffraction limit. Nat Mater 2008; 7(6):435-441.

[44]

Haxha S, AbdelMalek F, Ouerghi F, Charlton MDB, Aggoun A, Fang X. Metamaterial superlenses operating at visible wavelength for imaging applications. Sci Rep 2018; 8:16119.

[45]

Fang N, Lee H, Sun C, Zhang X. Sub-diffraction-limited optical imaging with a silver superlens. Science 2005; 308(5721):534-537.

[46]

Konstantinidis K, Feresidis AP. Broadband near-zero index metamaterials. J Opt 2015; 17(10):105104.

[47]

Kinsey N, DeVault C, Boltasseva A, Shalaev VM. Near-zero-index materials for photonics. Nat Rev Mater 2019; 4(12):742-760.

[48]

Turpin JP, Wu Q, Werner DH, Martin B, Bray M, Lier E. Near-zero-index metamaterial lens combined with AMC metasurface for high-directivity low-profile antennas. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 2014; 62(4):1928-1936.

[49]

Liu Y, Dong T, Qin X, Luo W, Leng N, He Y, et al. High-permittivity ceramics enabled highly homogeneous zero-index metamaterials for high-directivity antennas and beyond. eLight 2024; 4:4.

[50]

Moitra P, Yang Y, Anderson Z, Kravchenko II, Briggs DP, Valentine J. Realization of an all-dielectric zero-index optical metamaterial. Nat Photonics 2013; 7(10):791-795.

[51]

Dong T, Liang J, Camayd-Muñoz S, Liu Y, Tang H, Kita S, et al. Ultra-low-loss on-chip zero-index materials. Light Sci Appl 2021; 10(1):10.

[52]

Li Y, Chan CT, Mazur E. Dirac-like cone-based electromagnetic zero-index metamaterials. Light Sci Appl 2021; 10(1):203.

[53]

Liu R, Cheng Q, Hand T, Mock JJ, Cui TJ, Cummer SA, et al. Experimental demonstration of electromagnetic tunneling through an epsilon-near-zero metamaterial at microwave frequencies. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 100(2):023903.

[54]

Silveirinha M, Engheta N. Tunneling of electromagnetic energy through subwavelength channels and bends using ε-near-zero materials. Phys Rev Lett 2006; 97(15):157403.

[55]

Xue X, Lin C, Wu F, Li Z, Liao J. Lattice structures with negative Poisson’s ratio: a review. Mater Today Commun 2023; 34:105132.

[56]

Milton GW. Composite materials with Poisson’s ratios close to −1. J Mech Phys Solids 1992; 40(5):1105-1137.

[57]

Almgren RF. An isotropic three-dimensional structure with Poisson’s ratio = −1. J Elast 1985; 15(4):427-430.

[58]

Silberschmidt VV, Matveenko VP, editors. Mechanics of advanced materials: analysis of properties and performance. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015.

[59]

Grima JN, Gatt R, Zammit V, Williams JJ, Evans KE, Alderson A, et al. Natrolite: a zeolite with negative Poisson’s ratios. J Appl Phys 2007; 101(8):086102.

[60]

Lakes R. Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Science 1987; 235(4792):1038-1040.

[61]

Miller W, Ren Z, Smith CW, Evans KE. A negative Poisson’s ratio carbon fibre composite using a negative Poisson’s ratio yarn reinforcement. Compos Sci Technol 2012; 72(7):761-766.

[62]

Jin S, Korkolis YP, Li Y. Shear resistance of an auxetic chiral mechanical metamaterial. Int J Solids Struct, 174–175 2019; 28-37.

[63]

Zhang W, Ma Z, Hu P. Mechanical properties of a cellular vehicle body structure with negative Poisson’s ratio and enhanced strength. J Reinf Plast Compos 2014; 33(4):342-349.

[64]

Yuan R, Zhou Y, Fan X, Lu Q. Negative-Poisson-ratio polyimide aerogel fabricated by tridirectional freezing for high- and low-temperature and impact-resistant applications. Chem Eng J 2022; 433:134404.

[65]

Hai H, Chen C, Wang W, Xu W. Impact resistance of a double re-entrant negative Poisson’s ratio honeycomb structure. Phys Scr 2024; 99(2):025919.

[66]

Alderson KL, Fitzgerald A, Evans KE. The strain dependent indentation resilience of auxetic microporous polyethylene. J Mater Sci 2000; 35(16):4039-4047.

[67]

Ren X, Shen J, Tran P, Ngo TD, Xie YM. Auxetic nail: design and experimental study. Compos Struct 2018; 184:288-298.

[68]

Ma H, Wang K, Zhao H, Shi W, Xue J, Zhou Y, et al. Energy dissipation and shock isolation using novel metamaterials. Int J Mech Sci 2022; 228:107464.

[69]

Ma H, Wang K, Zhao H, Hong Y, Zhou Y, Xue J, et al. Energy dissipation in multistable auxetic mechanical metamaterials. Compos Struct 2023; 304:116410.

[70]

Ji JC, Luo Q, Ye K. Vibration control based metamaterials and origami structures: a state-of-the-art review. Mech Syst Signal Process 2021; 161:107945.

[71]

Saddek AA, Lin TK, Chang WK, Chen CH, Chang KC. Metamaterials of auxetic geometry for seismic energy absorption. Materials 2023; 16(15):5499.

[72]

Liu Y, Zhao C, Xu C, Ren J, Zhong J. Auxetic meta-materials and their engineering applications: a review. Eng Res Express 2023; 5(4):042003.

[73]

Nguy Hễn, Fangueiro R, Ferreira F, Nguy Qễn. Auxetic materials and structures for potential defense applications: an overview and recent developments. Text Res J 2023; 93(23–24):5268-5306.

[74]

Balan PM, Mertens AJ, Bahubalendruni MVAR. Auxetic mechanical metamaterials and their futuristic developments: a state-of-art review. Mater Today Commun 2023; 34:105285.

[75]

Wallbanks M, Khan MF, Bodaghi M, Triantaphyllou A, Serjouei A. On the design workflow of auxetic metamaterials for structural applications. Smart Mater Struct 2022; 31(2):023002.

[76]

Gholikord M, Etemadi E, Imani M, Hosseinabadi M, Hu H. Design and analysis of novel negative stiffness structures with significant energy absorption. Thin-Walled Struct 2022; 181:110137.

[77]

Sun M, Zhang K, Guo X, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Zhang G, et al. A novel negative stiffness metamaterials: discrete assembly and enhanced design capabilities. Smart Mater Struct 2023; 32(9):095036.

[78]

Cai C, Zhou J, Wu L, Wang K, Xu D, Ouyang H. Design and numerical validation of quasi-zero-stiffness metamaterials for very low-frequency band gaps. Compos Struct 2020; 236:111862.

[79]

Liu W, Zhang Q, Wu L, Sun J, Zhou J. Design of quasi-zero stiffness metamaterials with high reliability via metallic architected materials. Thin-Walled Struct 2024; 198:111686.

[80]

Zhang Q, Guo D, Hu G. Tailored mechanical metamaterials with programmable quasi-zero-stiffness features for full-band vibration isolation. Adv Funct Mater 2021; 31(33):2101428.

[81]

Khajehtourian R, Kochmann DM. Soft adaptive mechanical metamaterials. Front Robot AI 2021; 8:673478.

[82]

Rafsanjani A, Bertoldi K, Studart AR. Programming soft robots with flexible mechanical metamaterials. Sci Robot 2019; 4(29):eaav7874.

[83]

Zhang Z, Xu Z, Emu L, Wei P, Chen S, Zhai Z, et al. Active mechanical haptics with high-fidelity perceptions for immersive virtual reality. Nat Mach Intell 2023; 5(6):643-655.

[84]

Wu L, Wang Y, Zhai Z, Yang Y, Krishnaraju D, Lu J, et al. Mechanical metamaterials for full-band mechanical wave shielding. Appl Mater Today 2020; 20:100671.

[85]

Tudi A, Han S, Yang Z, Pan S. Potential optical functional crystals with large birefringence: recent advances and future prospects. Coord Chem Rev 2022; 459:214380.

[86]

Zelmon DE, Small DL, Jundt D. Infrared corrected Sellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 mol% magnesium oxide-doped lithium niobate. J Opt Soc Am B 1997; 14(12):3319.

[87]

DeVore JR. Refractive indices of rutile and sphalerite. J Opt Soc Am 1951; 41(6):416.

[88]

Dodge MJ. Refractive properties of magnesium fluoride. Appl Opt 1984; 23(12):1980.

[89]

Ghosh G. Dispersion-equation coefficients for the refractive index and birefringence of calcite and quartz crystals. Opt Commun 1999; 163(1–3):95-102.

[90]

Luo HT, Tkaczyk T, Dereniak EL, Oka K, Sampson R. High birefringence of the yttrium vanadate crystal in the middle wavelength infrared. Opt Lett 2006; 31(5):616.

[91]

Zhou G, Xu J, Chen X, Zhong H, Wang S, Xu K, et al. Growth and spectrum of a novel birefringent α-BaB2O4 crystal. J Cryst Growth 1998; 191(3):517-519.

[92]

Hoffman AJ, Alekseyev L, Howard SS, Franz KJ, Wasserman D, Podolskiy VA, et al. Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials. Nat Mater 2007; 6(12):946-950.

[93]

Bang S, So S, Rho J. Realization of broadband negative refraction in visible range using vertically stacked hyperbolic metamaterials. Sci Rep 2019; 9:14093.

[94]

Gric T, Hess O. Investigation of hyperbolic metamaterials. Appl Sci 2018; 8(8):1222.

[95]

Yan R, Wang T, Wang H, Yue X, Wang L, Wang Y, et al. Effective excitation of bulk plasmon-polaritons in hyperbolic metamaterials for high-sensitivity refractive index sensing. J Mater Chem C 2022; 10(13):5200-5209.

[96]

Lee YU, Nie Z, Li S, Lambert CH, Zhao J, Yang F, et al. Ultrathin layered hyperbolic metamaterial-assisted illumination nanoscopy. Nano Lett 2022; 22(14):5916-5921.

[97]

Liu Y, Bartal G, Zhang X. All-angle negative refraction and imaging in a bulk medium made of metallic nanowires in the visible region. Opt Express 2008; 16(20):15439.

[98]

Yao J, Liu Z, Liu Y, Wang Y, Sun C, Bartal G, et al. Optical negative refraction in bulk metamaterials of nanowires. Science 2008; 321(5891):930.

[99]

Shekhar P, Atkinson J, Jacob Z. Hyperbolic metamaterials: fundamentals and applications. Nano Converg 2014; 1(1):14.

[100]

Smith DR, Schurig D. Electromagnetic wave propagation in media with indefinite permittivity and permeability tensors. Phys Rev Lett 2003; 90(7):077405.

[101]

Jacob Z, Alekseyev LV, Narimanov E. Optical hyperlens: far-field imaging beyond the diffraction limit. Opt Express 2006; 14:8247-8256.

[102]

Smith DR, Kolinko P, Schurig D. Negative refraction in indefinite media. J Opt Soc Am B 2004; 21(5):1032.

[103]

Sun J, Kang L, Wang R, Liu L, Sun L, Zhou J. Low loss negative refraction metamaterial using a close arrangement of split-ring resonator arrays. New J Phys 2010; 12(8):083020.

[104]

Liu Z, Lee H, Xiong Y, Sun C, Zhang X. Far-field optical hyperlens magnifying sub-diffraction-limited objects. Science 2007; 315(5819):1686.

[105]

Sun J, Litchinitser NM. Toward practical, subwavelength, visible-light photolithography with hyperlens. ACS Nano 2018; 12(1):542-548.

[106]

Sun J, Shalaev MI, Litchinitser NM. Experimental demonstration of a non-resonant hyperlens in the visible spectral range. Nat Commun 2015; 6:7201.

[107]

Sun J, Litchinitser NM. The route to visible light photolithography using hyperlens. J Opt 2018; 20(4):044008.

[108]

Sun J, Xu T, Litchinitser NM. Experimental demonstration of demagnifying hyperlens. Nano Lett 2016; 16(12):7905-7909.

[109]

Liu L, Liu K, Zhao Z, Wang C, Gao P, Luo X. Sub-diffraction demagnification imaging lithography by hyperlens with plasmonic reflector layer. RSC Adv 2016; 6(98):95973-95978.

[110]

Prelog V. Chirality in chemistry. Science 1976; 193(4247):17-24.

[111]

Botta O, Bada JL, Gomes-Elvira J, Javaux E, Selsis F, Summons R.Strategies of life detection. Springer, New York City (2008).

[112]

Stachelek P, MacKenzie L, Parker D, Pal R. Circularly polarised luminescence laser scanning confocal microscopy to study live cell chiral molecular interactions. Nat Commun 2022; 13:553.

[113]

Jia S, Tao T, Xie Y, Yu L, Kang X, Zhang Y, et al. Chirality supramolecular systems: helical assemblies, structure designs, and functions. Small 2024; 20(11):2307874.

[114]

Li Q, Huang Y, Duan J, Wu L, Tang G, Zhu Y, et al. Sucrose as chiral selector for determining enantiomeric composition of metalaxyl by UV–vis spectroscopy and PLS regression. Spectrochim Acta A 2013; 101:349-355.

[115]

Song Z, Liu X, Yang C, Wu Q, Guo X, Liu G, et al. Methanol-induced crystallization of chiral hybrid manganese(II) chloride single crystals for achieving circularly polarized luminescence and second harmonic generation. Adv Opt Mater 2024; 12(2):2301272.

[116]

Yang S, Zhao L, Yu C, Zhou X, Tang J, Yuan P, et al. On the origin of helical mesostructures. J Am Chem Soc 2006; 128(32):10460-10466.

[117]

Manabe K, Tsai SY, Kuretani S, Kometani S, Ando K, Agata Y, et al. Chiral silica with preferred-handed helical structure via chiral transfer. JACS Au 2021; 1(4):375-379.

[118]

Wang X, Tang Z. Circular dichroism studies on plasmonic nanostructures. Small 2017; 13(1):1601115.

[119]

Ma X, Huang C, Pu M, Pan W, Wang Y, Luo X. Circular dichroism and optical rotation in twisted Y-shaped chiral metamaterial. Appl Phys Express 2013; 6(2):022001.

[120]

Oh SS, Hess O. Chiral metamaterials: enhancement and control of optical activity and circular dichroism. Nano Converg 2015; 2(1):24.

[121]

Rogacheva AV, Fedotov VA, Schwanecke AS, Zheludev NI. Giant gyrotropy due to electromagnetic-field coupling in a bilayered chiral structure. Phys Rev Lett 2006; 97(17):177401.

[122]

Gansel JK, Wegener M, Burger S, Linden S. Gold helix photonic metamaterials: a numerical parameter study. Opt Express 2010; 18(2):1059.

[123]

Zhao R, Koschny T, Economou EN, Soukoulis CM. Comparison of chiral metamaterial designs for repulsive Casimir force. Phys Rev B 2010; 81(23):235126.

[124]

Landy NI, Sajuyigbe S, Mock JJ, Smith DR, Padilla WJ. Perfect metamaterial absorber. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 100(20):207402.

[125]

Watts CM, Liu X, Padilla WJ. Metamaterial electromagnetic wave absorbers. Adv Mater 2012; 24(23):OP98-OP120.

[126]

Wang B, Xu C, Duan G, Xu W, Pi F. Review of broadband metamaterial absorbers: from principles, design strategies, and tunable properties to functional applications. Adv Funct Mater 2023; 33(14):2213818.

[127]

Boyd RW.Nonlinear optics. (3rd ed.), Academic Press, Cambridge (2008).

[128]

Wen Y, Zhou J. Artificial nonlinearity generated from electromagnetic coupling metamolecule. Phys Rev Lett 2017; 118(16):167401.

[129]

Klein MW, Enkrich C, Wegener M, Linden S. Second-harmonic generation from magnetic metamaterials. Science 2006; 313(5786):502-504.

[130]

Wen Y, Giorgianni F, Ilyakov I, Quan B, Kovalev S, Wang C, et al. A universal route to efficient non-linear response via Thomson scattering in linear solids. Natl Sci Rev 2023; 10:nwad136.

[131]

Sun J, Liu L, Dong G, Zhou J. An extremely broad band metamaterial absorber based on destructive interference. Opt Express 2011; 19(22):21155.

[132]

Song K, Li D, Liu T, Zhang C, Xie YM, Liao W. Crystal-twinning inspired lattice metamaterial for high stiffness, strength, and toughness. Mater Des 2022; 221:110916.

[133]

Berger J. A mechanical metamaterial with extreme stiffness and strength. TechConnect Br 2017; 1:237-240.

[134]

Zhong H, Das R, Gu J, Qian M. Low-density, high-strength metal mechanical metamaterials beyond the Gibson–Ashby model. Mater Today 2023; 68:96-107.

[135]

Bozhevolnyi SI, Volkov VS, Devaux E, Laluet JY, Ebbesen TW. Channel plasmon subwavelength waveguide components including interferometers and ring resonators. Nature 2006; 440(7083):508-511.

[136]

Lin J, Mueller JPB, Wang Q, Yuan G, Antoniou N, Yuan XC, et al. Polarization-controlled tunable directional coupling of surface plasmon polaritons. Science 2013; 340(6130):331-334.

[137]

Takayama O, Artigas D, Torner L. Lossless directional guiding of light in dielectric nanosheets using Dyakonov surface waves. Nat Nanotechnol 2014; 9(6):419-424.

[138]

Martín-Sánchez J, Duan J, Taboada-Guti Jérrez, Voronin KV, Prieto I, et al. Focusing of in-plane hyperbolic polaritons in van der Waals crystals with tailored infrared nanoantennas. Sci Adv 2021; 7(41):eabj0127.

[139]

Li Y, Sun J, Wen Y, Xiong X, Zhou L, Zhou J. Spin photonics-based on a twinning hyperbolic metamaterial. Adv Funct Mater. In press.

[140]

Yu N, Genevet P, Kats MA, Aieta F, Tetienne JP, Capasso F, et al. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 2011; 334(6054):333-337.

[141]

Khorasaninejad M, Chen WT, Devlin RC, Oh J, Zhu AY, Capasso F. Metalenses at visible wavelengths: diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging. Science 2016; 352(6290):1190-1194.

[142]

Shalaev MI, Sun J, Tsukernik A, Pandey A, Nikolskiy K, Litchinitser NM. High-efficiency all-dielectric metasurfaces for ultracompact beam manipulation in transmission mode. Nano Lett 2015; 15(9):6261-6266.

[143]

Almeida E, Bitton O, Prior Y. Nonlinear metamaterials for holography. Nat Commun 2016; 7:12533.

[144]

Zhang J, Zhang L, Xu W. Surface plasmon polaritons: physics and applications. J Phys D Appl Phys 2012; 45(11):113001.

[145]

Zayats AV, Smolyaninov II, Maradudin AA. Nano-optics of surface plasmon polaritons. Phys Rep 2005; 408(3–4):131-314.

[146]

Berini P. Long-range surface plasmon polaritons. Adv Opt Photonics 2009; 1(3):484.

[147]

Barnes WL, Dereux A, Ebbesen TW. Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 2003; 424(6950):824-830.

[148]

Nguyen H, Park J, Kang S, Kim M. Surface plasmon resonance: a versatile technique for biosensor applications. Sensors 2015; 15(5):10481-10510.

[149]

Homola J. Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species. Chem Rev 2008; 108(2):462-493.

[150]

Zhou L, Zhang N, Hsu CC, Singer M, Zeng X, Li Y, et al. Super-resolution displacement spectroscopic sensing over a surface “rainbow”. Engineering 2022; 17:75-81.

[151]

Yang S, Ni X, Yin X, Kante B, Zhang P, Zhu J, et al. Feedback-driven self-assembly of symmetry-breaking optical metamaterials in solution. Nat Nanotechnol 2014; 9(12):1002-1006.

[152]

Yang S, Wang Y, Zhang X. Curvature sculptured growth of plasmonic nanostructures by supramolecular recognition. Phys Rev Mater 2019; 3(11):116002.

[153]

Yang S, Wang Y, Ni X, Zhang X. Optical modulation of aqueous metamaterial properties at large scale. Opt Express 2015; 23(22):28736.

[154]

D I’yakonov. New type of electromagnetic wave propagating at an interface. Sov Phys JETP 1988; 67:714-716.

[155]

Qu Y, Chen N, Teng H, Hu H, Sun J, Yu R, et al. Tunable planar focusing based on hyperbolic phonon polaritons in α-MoO3. Adv Mater 2022; 34(23):2105590.

[156]

Wang H, Kumar A, Dai S, Lin X, Jacob Z, Oh SH, et al. Planar hyperbolic polaritons in 2D van der Waals materials. Nat Commun 2024; 15:69.

[157]

Li P, Dolado I, Alfaro-Mozaz FJ, Casanova F, Hueso LE, Liu S, et al. Infrared hyperbolic metasurface based on nanostructured van der Waals material. Science 2018; 359(6378):892-896.

[158]

Takayama O, Crasovan L, Artigas D, Torner L. Observation of Dyakonov surface waves. Phys Rev Lett 2009; 102(4):043903.

[159]

Li Y, Sun J, Wen Y, Zhou J. Controllable selective coupling of Dyakonov surface waves at a liquid-crystal-based interface. Phys Rev Applied 2020; 13(2):024024.

[160]

Dyakonov M. From Dyakonov–Cherenkov radiation to Dyakonov surface optics. Light Sci Appl 2022; 11:10.

[161]

Li Y, Sun J, Wen Y, Zhou J. Spin-dependent visible Dyakonov surface waves in a thin hyperbolic metamaterial film. Nano Lett 2022; 22(2):801-807.

[162]

Yu N, Capasso F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nat Mater 2014; 13(2):139-150.

[163]

Buchnev O, Podoliak N, Kaczmarek M, Zheludev NI, Fedotov VA. Electrically controlled nanostructured metasurface loaded with liquid crystal: toward multifunctional photonic switch. Adv Opt Mater 2015; 3(5):674-679.

[164]

Staude I, Miroshnichenko AE, Decker M, Fofang NT, Liu S, Gonzales E, et al. Tailoring directional scattering through magnetic and electric resonances in subwavelength silicon nanodisks. ACS Nano 2013; 7(9):7824-7832.

[165]

Mei A, Li X, Liu L, Ku Z, Liu T, Rong Y, et al. A hole-conductor-free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability. Science 2014; 345(6194):295-298.

[166]

Ni X, Kildishev AV, Shalaev VM. Metasurface holograms for visible light. Nat Commun 2013; 4:2807.

[167]

Genevet P, Capasso F. Holographic optical metasurfaces: a review of current progress. Rep Prog Phys 2015; 78(2):024401.

[168]

Ni X, Wong ZJ, Mrejen M, Wang Y, Zhang X. An ultrathin invisibility skin cloak for visible light. Science 2015; 349(6254):1310-1314.

[169]

Ding X, Monticone F, Zhang K, Zhang L, Gao D, Burokur SN, et al. Ultrathin Pancharatnam–Berry metasurface with maximal cross-polarization efficiency. Adv Mater 2015; 27(7):1195-1200.

[170]

Sun J, Wang X, Xu T, Kudyshev ZA, Cartwright AN, Litchinitser NM. Spinning light on the nanoscale. Nano Lett 2014; 14(5):2726-2729.

[171]

Zhao Q, Zhou J, Zhang F, Lippens D. Mie resonance-based dielectric metamaterials. Mater Today 2009; 12(12):60-69.

[172]

Liu Z, Guo T, Tan Q, Hu Z, Sun Y, Fan H, et al. Phase interrogation sensor based on all-dielectric BIC metasurface. Nano Lett 2023; 23(22):10441-10448.

[173]

Wang B, Liu W, Zhao M, Wang J, Zhang Y, Chen A, et al. Generating optical vortex beams by momentum-space polarization vortices centred at bound states in the continuum. Nat Photonics 2020; 14(10):623-628.

[174]

Zhen B, Hsu CW, Lu L, Stone AD, Solja Mčić. Topological nature of optical bound states in the continuum. Phys Rev Lett 2014; 113(25):257401.

[175]

Hu H, Lu W, Antonov A, Bert Ré, Maier SA, Tittl A. Environmental permittivity-asymmetric BIC metasurfaces with electrical reconfigurability. Nat Commun 2024; 15:7050.

[176]

Alitalo P, Tretyakov S. Electromagnetic cloaking with metamaterials. Mater Today 2009; 12(3):22-29.

[177]

Shin D, Urzhumov Y, Jung Y, Kang G, Baek S, Choi M, et al. Broadband electromagnetic cloaking with smart metamaterials. Nat Commun 2012; 3:1213.

[178]

Zigoneanu L, Popa BI, Cummer SA. Three-dimensional broadband omnidirectional acoustic ground cloak. Nat Mater 2014; 13(4):352-355.

[179]

Basiri Z, Fakheri MH, Abdolali A, Shen C. Non-closed acoustic cloaking devices enabled by sequential-step linear coordinate transformations. Sci Rep 2021; 11:1845.

[180]

Xue Y, Zhang X. Self-adaptive acoustic cloak enabled by soft mechanical metamaterials. Extreme Mech Lett 2021; 46:101347.

[181]

Bi Y, Jia H, Lu W, Ji P, Yang J. Design and demonstration of an underwater acoustic carpet cloak. Sci Rep 2017; 7:705.

[182]

Dede EM, Zhou F, Schmalenberg P, Nomura T. Thermal metamaterials for heat flow control in electronics. J Electron Packag 2018; 140(1):010904.

[183]

Br Sûlé, Javelaud EH, Enoch S, Guenneau S. Experiments on seismic metamaterials: molding surface waves. Phys Rev Lett 2014; 112(13):133901.

[184]

Br Sûlé, Enoch S, Guenneau S. Emergence of seismic metamaterials: current state and future perspectives. Phys Lett A 2020; 384(1):126034.

[185]

Zangeneh-Nejad F, Fleury R. Zero-index Weyl metamaterials. Phys Rev Lett 2020; 125(5):054301.

[186]

Yin X, Ye Z, Rho J, Wang Y, Zhang X. Photonic spin Hall effect at metasurfaces. Science 2013; 339:1405-1407.

[187]

Chern RL, Shen YJ, Yu YZ. Photonic topological insulators in bianisotropic metamaterials. Opt Express 2022; 30(6):9944.

[188]

Wu Z, Zheng Y. Moiré metamaterials and metasurfaces. Adv Opt Mater 2018; 6(3):1701057.

[189]

Li W, LaMountain J, Simmons E, Clabeau A, Bekele RY, Myers JD, et al. Nano-focusing of vortex beams with hyperbolic metamaterials. 2024. arXiv: 2406.05016.

[190]

Takayama O, Sukham J, Malureanu R, Lavrinenko AV, Puentes G. Photonic spin Hall effect in hyperbolic metamaterials at visible wavelengths. Opt Lett 2018; 43(19):4602.

[191]

Sheng L, Chen Y, Yuan S, Liu X, Zhang Z, Jing H, et al. Photonic spin Hall effect: physics, manipulations, and applications. Prog Quantum Electron, 91–92 (2023), Article 100484.

[192]

Bliokh KY, Smirnova D, Nori F. Quantum spin Hall effect of light. Science 2015; 348(6242):1448-1451.

[193]

Droulias S, Katsantonis I, Kafesaki M, Soukoulis CM, Economou EN. Chiral metamaterials with PT symmetry and beyond. Phys Rev Lett 2019; 122(21):213201.

[194]

Zhao H, Feng L. Parity–time symmetric photonics. Natl Sci Rev 2018; 5(2):183-199.

[195]

Feng L, El-Ganainy R, Ge L. Non-Hermitian photonics based on parity–time symmetry. Nat Photonics 2017; 11(12):752-762.

[196]

Feng L, Wong ZJ, Ma RM, Wang Y, Zhang X. Single-mode laser by parity–time symmetry breaking. Science 2014; 346(6212):972-975.

[197]

Miao P, Zhang Z, Sun J, Walasik W, Longhi S, Litchinitser NM, et al. Orbital angular momentum microlaser. Science 2016; 353(6298):464-467.

[198]

Huang C, Song Q. Guiding flow of light with supersymmetry. Light Sci Appl 2022; 11(1):290.

[199]

Yim J, Chandra N, Feng X, Gao Z, Wu S, Wu T, et al. Broadband continuous supersymmetric transformation: a new paradigm for transformation optics. eLight 2022; 2:16.

[200]

Zhang S, Genov DA, Wang Y, Liu M, Zhang X. Plasmon-induced transparency in metamaterials. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 101(4):047401.

[201]

Ndukaife TA, Yang S. Slot driven dielectric electromagnetically induced transparency metasurface. Opt Express 2023; 31(17):27324.

[202]

Krishnamoorthy HNS, Dubrovkin AM, Adamo G, Soci C. Topological insulator metamaterials. Chem Rev 2023; 123(8):4416-4442.

[203]

Westström A, Ojanen T. Designer curved-space geometry for relativistic fermions in Weyl metamaterials. Phys Rev X 2017; 7(4):041026.

[204]

Tokura Y, Kanazawa N. Magnetic skyrmion materials. Chem Rev 2021; 121(5):2857-2897.

[205]

Nahas Y, Prokhorenko S, Louis L, Gui Z, Kornev I, Bellaiche L. Discovery of stable skyrmionic state in ferroelectric nanocomposites. Nat Commun 2015; 6:8542.

[206]

Silva A, Monticone F, Castaldi G, Galdi V, Al Aù, Engheta N. Performing mathematical operations with metamaterials. Science 2014; 343(6167):160-163.

[207]

Mohammadi N Estakhri, Edwards B, Engheta N. Inverse-designed metastructures that solve equations. Science 2019; 363(6433):1333-1338.

[208]

Nikkhah V, Pirmoradi A, Ashtiani F, Edwards B, Aflatouni F, Engheta N. Inverse-designed low-index-contrast structures on a silicon photonics platform for vector–matrix multiplication. Nat Photon 2024; 18(5):501-508.

[209]

Cui TJ, Qi MQ, Wan X, Zhao J, Cheng Q. Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials. Light Sci Appl 2014; 3(10):e218.

[210]

Li L, Zhao H, Liu C, Li L, Cui TJ. Intelligent metasurfaces: control, communication and computing. eLight 2022; 2:7.

[211]

Zhang L, Chen XQ, Liu S, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Dai JY, et al. Space-time-coding digital metasurfaces. Nat Commun 2018; 9:4334.

[212]

Fu X, Wang P, Liu Y, Fu Y, Cai Q, Wang Y, et al. Fundamentals and applications of millimeter-wave and terahertz programmable metasurfaces. J Materiomics 2025; 11(1):100904.

[213]

Ma Q, Cui TJ. Information metamaterials: bridging the physical world and digital world. PhotoniX 2020; 1:1.

[214]

Wu H, Bai GD, Liu S, Li L, Wan X, Cheng Q, et al. Information theory of metasurfaces. Natl Sci Rev 2020; 7(3):561-571.

[215]

Cui TJ, Liu S, Zhang L. Information metamaterials and metasurfaces. J Mater Chem C 2017; 5(15):3644-3668.

[216]

John LK, Swartzlander EE. Memristor-based computing. IEEE Micro 2018; 38(5):5-6.

[217]

Wang T, Meng J, Zhou X, Liu Y, He Z, Han Q, et al. Reconfigurable neuromorphic memristor network for ultralow-power smart textile electronics. Nat Commun 2022; 13:7432.

[218]

Xiao Y, Jiang B, Zhang Z, Ke S, Jin Y, Wen X, et al. A review of memristor: material and structure design, device performance, applications and prospects. Sci Technol Adv Mater 2023; 24(1):2162323.

[219]

Goi E, Zhang Q, Chen X, Luan H, Gu M. Perspective on photonic memristive neuromorphic computing. PhotoniX 2020; 1:3.

[220]

Liu J, Ou H, Zeng R, Zhou J, Long K, Wen G, et al. Fabrication, dynamic properties and multi-objective optimization of a metal origami tube with Miura sheets. Thin-Walled Struct 2019; 144:106352.

[221]

Ionov L. Polymer origami: programming the folding with shape. E-Polymers 2014; 14(2):109-114.

[222]

Tokura Y, Jiang Y, Welle A, Stenzel MH, Krzemien KM, Michaelis J, et al. Bottom-up fabrication of nanopatterned polymers on DNA origami by in situ atom-transfer radical polymerization. Angew Chem Int Ed 2016; 55(19):5692-5697.

[223]

Hannewald N, Winterwerber P, Zechel S, Ng DYW, Hager MD, Weil T, et al. DNA origami meets polymers: a powerful tool for the design of defined nanostructures. Angew Chem Int Ed 2021; 60(12):6218-6229.

[224]

Wang P, Gaitanaros S, Lee S, Bathe M, Shih WM, Ke Y. Programming self-assembly of DNA origami honeycomb two-dimensional lattices and plasmonic metamaterials. J Am Chem Soc 2016; 138(24):7733-7740.

[225]

Kang J, Kim H, Santangelo CD, Hayward RC. Enabling robust self-folding origami by pre-biasing vertex buckling direction. Adv Mater 2019; 31(39):0193006.

[226]

Blees MK, Barnard AW, Rose PA, Roberts SP, McGill KL, Huang PY, et al. Graphene kirigami. Nature 2015; 524(7564):204-207.

[227]

Lyu S, Qin B, Deng H, Ding X. Origami-based cellular mechanical metamaterials with tunable Poisson’s ratio: construction and analysis. Int J Mech Sci 2021; 212:106791.

[228]

Yang Y, Vallecchi A, Shamonina E, Stevens CJ, You Z. A new class of transformable kirigami metamaterials for reconfigurable electromagnetic systems. Sci Rep 2023; 13:1219.

[229]

Lv C, Krishnaraju D, Konjevod G, Yu H, Jiang H. Origami based mechanical metamaterials. Sci Rep 2014; 4:5979.

[230]

Zhai Z, Wang Y, Jiang H. Origami-inspired, on-demand deployable and collapsible mechanical metamaterials with tunable stiffness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018; 115(9):2032-2037.

[231]

Zhang H, Paik J. Kirigami design and modeling for strong, lightweight metamaterials. Adv Funct Mater 2022; 32(21):2107401.

[232]

Dudte LH, Vouga E, Tachi T, Mahadevan L. Programming curvature using origami tessellations. Nat Mater 2016; 15(5):583-588.

[233]

Bertoldi K, Vitelli V, Christensen J, Van M Hecke. Flexible mechanical metamaterials. Nat Rev Mater 2017; 2(11):17066.

[234]

Zhai Z, Wang Y, Lin K, Wu L, Jiang H. In situ stiffness manipulation using elegant curved origami. Sci Adv 2020; 6:eabe2000.

[235]

Harris JA, McShane GJ. Impact response of metallic stacked origami cellular materials. Int J Impact Eng 2021; 147:103730.

[236]

Liu Z, Du H, Li J, Lu L, Li ZY, Fang NX. Nano-kirigami with giant optical chirality. Sci Adv 2018; 4(7):eaat4436.

[237]

Guo X, Ni X, Li J, Zhang H, Zhang F, Yu H, et al. Designing mechanical metamaterials with kirigami-inspired, hierarchical constructions for giant positive and negative thermal expansion. Adv Mater 2021; 33(3):2004919.

[238]

Silverberg JL, Na JH, Evans AA, Liu B, Hull TC, Santangelo CD, et al. Origami structures with a critical transition to bistability arising from hidden degrees of freedom. Nat Mater 2015; 14(4):389-393.

[239]

Lin Z, Novelino LS, Wei H, Alderete NA, Paulino GH, Espinosa HD, et al. Folding at the microscale: enabling multifunctional 3D origami-architected metamaterials. Small 2020; 16(35):2002229.

[240]

Xia K, Liu J, Li W, Jiao P, He Z, Wei Y, et al. A self-powered bridge health monitoring system driven by elastic origami triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy 2023; 105:107974.

[241]

Silverberg JL, Evans AA, McLeod L, Hayward RC, Hull T, Santangelo CD, et al. Using origami design principles to fold reprogrammable mechanical metamaterials. Science 2014; 345:647-650.

[242]

Li F, Anzel P, Yang J, Kevrekidis PG, Daraio C. Granular acoustic switches and logic elements. Nat Commun 2014; 5:5311.

[243]

Tan T, Yan Z, Zou H, Ma K, Liu F, Zhao L, et al. Renewable energy harvesting and absorbing via multi-scale metamaterial systems for Internet of Things. Appl Energy 2019; 254:113717.

[244]

Song Z, Ma T, Tang R, Cheng Q, Wang X, Krishnaraju D, et al. Origami lithium-ion batteries. Nat Commun 2014; 5:3140.

[245]

Song Z, Wang X, Lv C, An Y, Liang M, Ma T, et al. Kirigami-based stretchable lithium-ion batteries. Sci Rep 2015; 5:10988.

[246]

Zhang K, Jung YH, Mikael S, Seo JH, Kim M, Mi H, et al. Origami silicon optoelectronics for hemispherical electronic eye systems. Nat Commun 2017; 8:1782.

[247]

Gao B, Elbaz A, He Z, Xie Z, Xu H, Liu S, et al. Bioinspired kirigami fish-based highly stretched wearable biosensor for human biochemical–physiological hybrid monitoring. Adv Mater Technol 2018; 3(4):1700308.

[248]

Bukauskas A, Koronaki A, Lee TU, Ott D, Al MW Asali, Jalia A, et al. Curved-crease origami face shields for infection control. PLoS One 2021; 16(2):e0245737.

[249]

Li S, Vogt DM, Rus D, Wood RJ. Fluid-driven origami-inspired artificial muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017; 114(50):13132-13137.

[250]

Mintchev S, Shintake J, Floreano D. Bioinspired dual-stiffness origami. Sci Robot 2018; 3(20):eaau0275.

[251]

Sareh P, Chermprayong P, Emmanuelli M, Nadeem H, Kovac M. Rotorigami: a rotary origami protective system for robotic rotorcraft. Sci Robot 2018; 3(22):eaah5228.

[252]

Baek SM, Yim S, Chae SH, Lee DY, Cho KJ. Ladybird beetle-inspired compliant origami. Sci Robot 2020; 5(41):eaaz6262.

[253]

Rafsanjani A, Zhang Y, Liu B, Rubinstein SM, Bertoldi K. Kirigami skins make a simple soft actuator crawl. Sci Robot 2018; 3(15):eaar7555.

[254]

Wu L, Lu Y, Li P, Wang Y, Xue J, Tian X, et al. Mechanical metamaterials for handwritten digits recognition. Adv Sci 2024; 11(10):2308137.

[255]

Meng Z, Chen W, Mei T, Lai Y, Li Y, Chen CQ. Bistability-based foldable origami mechanical logic gates. Extreme Mech Lett 2021; 43:101180.

[256]

Treml B, Gillman A, Buskohl P, Vaia R. Origami mechanologic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018; 115(27):6916-6921.

[257]

Li Y, Yu S, Qing H, Hong Y, Zhao Y, Qi F, et al. Reprogrammable and reconfigurable mechanical computing metastructures with stable and high-density memory. Sci Adv 2024; 10(26):eado6476.

[258]

Freitas GMF, Rego SL, Vasconcelos CFL. Design of metamaterials using artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 2011 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference; 2011 Oct 29–Nov 1; Natal, Brazil. New York City: IEEE; 2011. p. 541–5.

[259]

Chen WT, Zhu AY, Sisler J, Bharwani Z, Capasso F. A broadband achromatic polarization-insensitive metalens consisting of anisotropic nanostructures. Nat Commun 2019; 10:355.

[260]

Chen WT, Zhu AY, Sanjeev V, Khorasaninejad M, Shi Z, Lee E, et al. A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible. Nat Nanotechnol 2018; 13(3):220-226.

[261]

Wang S, Wu PC, Su VC, Lai YC, Chen MK, Kuo HY, et al. A broadband achromatic metalens in the visible. Nat Nanotechnol 2018; 13(3):227-232.

[262]

Fan CY, Su GDJ. Time-effective simulation methodology for broadband achromatic metalens using deep neural networks. Nanomaterials 2021; 11(8):1966.

[263]

Ren H, Jang J, Li C, Aigner A, Plidschun M, Kim J, et al. An achromatic metafiber for focusing and imaging across the entire telecommunication range. Nat Commun 2022; 13:4183.

[264]

Fan ZB, Qiu HY, Zhang HL, Pang XN, Zhou LD, Liu L, et al. A broadband achromatic metalens array for integral imaging in the visible. Light Sci Appl 2019; 8(1):67.

[265]

Liu Z, Zhu D, Rodrigues SP, Lee KT, Cai W. Generative model for the inverse design of metasurfaces. Nano Lett 2018; 18(10):6570-6576.

[266]

An S, Fowler C, Zheng B, Shalaginov MY, Tang H, Li H, et al. A deep learning approach for objective-driven all-dielectric metasurface design. ACS Photonics 2019; 6(12):3196-3207.

[267]

Wang F, Zhao S, Wen Y, Sun J, Zhou J. High efficiency visible achromatic metalens design via deep learning. Adv Opt Mater 2023; 11(18):2300394.

[268]

Wang F, Geng G, Wang X, Li J, Bai Y, Li J, et al. Visible achromatic metalens design based on artificial neural network. Adv Opt Mater 2022; 10(3):2101842.

[269]

Khatib O, Ren S, Malof J, Padilla WJ. Deep learning the electromagnetic properties of metamaterials—a comprehensive review. Adv Funct Mater 2021; 31(31):2101748.

[270]

Ghorbani F, Beyraghi S, Shabanpour J, Oraizi H, Soleimani H, Soleimani M. Deep neural network-based automatic metasurface design with a wide frequency range. Sci Rep 2021; 11:7102.

[271]

Ma W, Cheng F, Liu Y. Deep-learning-enabled on-demand design of chiral metamaterials. ACS Nano 2018; 12(6):6326-6334.

[272]

Cheng J, Li R, Wang Y, Yuan Y, Wang X, Chang S. Inverse design of generic metasurfaces for multifunctional wavefront shaping based on deep neural networks. Opt Laser Technol 2023; 159:109038.

[273]

Du Z, Bian T, Ren X, Jia Y, Tang S, Cui T, et al. Inverse design of mechanical metamaterial achieving a prescribed constitutive curve. Theor Appl Mech Lett 2024; 14(1):100486.

[274]

Ha CS, Yao D, Xu Z, Liu C, Liu H, Elkins D, et al. Rapid inverse design of metamaterials based on prescribed mechanical behavior through machine learning. Nat Commun 2023; 14:5765.

[275]

Campbell SD, Sell D, Jenkins RP, Whiting EB, Fan JA, Werner DH. Review of numerical optimization techniques for meta-device design. Opt Mater Express 2019; 9(4):1842.

[276]

Zhu R, Qiu T, Wang J, Sui S, Hao C, Liu T, et al. Phase-to-pattern inverse design paradigm for fast realization of functional metasurfaces via transfer learning. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2974.

[277]

Hu S, Xu J, Li M, Cui T, Li L. Language-controllable programmable metasurface empowered by large language models. Nanophoton 2023; 13(12):2213-2222.

[278]

Devlin J, Chang M, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies; 2019 Jun 2–7; Minneapolis, MN, USA. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2019. p. 4171–86.

[279]

Ray PP. ChatGPT: a comprehensive review on background applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet Things Cyber-Phys Syst 2023; 3:121-154.

[280]

Padilla WJ. Fine-tuned large language models for predicting electromagnetic spectra in metamaterials. In: Engheta N, Noginov MA, Zheludev NI, editors. Proceedings volume PC13109, Metamaterials, Metadevices, and Metasystems 2024; 2024 Aug 18–22; San Diego, CA, USA. Bellingham: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers; 2024. p. PC131091K.

[281]

Hsueh TC, Fainman Y, Lin B. ChatGPT at the speed of light: monolithic photonic–electronic linear-algebra accelerators for large language models. In: Ni X, Cai W, editors. Proceedings volume PC13113, Photonic Computing: From Materials and Devices to Systems and Applications; 2024 Aug 18–23; San Diego, CA, USA. Bellingham: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers; 2024. p. PC131130I.

[282]

Stelzer EL, Schmit JL, Tufte ON. Mercury cadmium telluride as an infrared detector material. IEEE Trans Electron Dev 1969; 16(10):880-884.

[283]

Wen Y, Zhou J. Metamaterial route to direct photoelectric conversion. Mater Today 2019; 23:37-44.

[284]

Jood P, Ohta M, Yamamoto A, Kanatzidis MG. Excessively doped PbTe with Ge-induced nanostructures enables high-efficiency thermoelectric modules. Joule 2018; 2(7):1339-1355.

[285]

Jiang Y, Su B, Yu J, Han Z, Hu H, Zhuang HL, et al. Exceptional figure of merit achieved in boron-dispersed GeTe-based thermoelectric composites. Nat Commun 2024; 15:5915.

[286]

Zhou C, Lee YK, Yu Y, Byun S, Luo ZZ, Lee H, et al. Polycrystalline SnSe with a thermoelectric figure of merit greater than the single crystal. Nat Mater 2021; 20(10):1378-1384.

[287]

Tan G, Zhao LD, Kanatzidis MG. Rationally designing high-performance bulk thermoelectric materials. Chem Rev 2016; 116(19):12123-12149.

[288]

Pendry J, Zhou J, Sun J. Metamaterials: from engineered materials to engineering materials. Engineering 2022; 17:1-2.

[289]

kymetacorp.com [Internet]. Redmond: Kymeta Corporation; [cited 2024 Oct 7]. Available from: https://www.kymetacorp.com/.

[290]

Chi Z, Yi Y, Wang Y, Wu M, Wang L, Zhao X, et al. Adaptive cylindrical wireless metasurfaces in clinical magnetic resonance imaging. Adv Mater 2021; 33(40):202102469.

[291]

tsingmeta.com [Internet]. Bejing: TsingMeta Ltd.; c2024 [cited 2024 Oct 7]. Available from: https://www.tsingmeta.com.

[292]

Metamaterials market 2024 regional growth with industry size, share and demand—developments by 2032 [Internet]. Norfolk: News Channel Nebraska; 2024 Jul 8 [cited 2024 Oct 7]. Available from: https://www.newschannelnebraska.com/story/51000739/Metamaterials-Market.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

THE AUTHOR

PDF (5828KB)

13016

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/