Introduction
Creep strength required for power-plant steels and alloys
Tab.1 Nominal compositions of some Ni-base alloys for A-USC power plants (unit: %, mass fraction). |
Alloy | C | Cr | Mo | Co | Al | Ti | Mn | Si | Ni | Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
617 | 0.10* | 22 | 9.0 | 12 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.0* | 1.0* | Bal | Fe: 3.0*; B: 0.006* |
625 | 0.10* | 21 | 9.0 | 1* | 0.4* | 0.4* | 0.1* | 0.5* | Bal | Fe: 5; Nb: 3.7 |
740 | 0.03 | 25 | 0.5 | 20 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.5 | Bal | Fe: 0.7; Nb: 2.0 |
740H | 0.03 | 25 | 0.5 | 20 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.3 | 0.15 | Bal | Fe: 0.7; Nb: 1.5 |
230 | 0.10 | 22 | 2.0 | 5* | 0.3 | — | 0.5 | 0.4 | Bal | W: 14; Fe: 3*; La: 0.02; B: 0.015* |
263 | 0.06 | 20 | 6.0 | 20 | 0.6* | 2.4* | 0.6* | 0.4* | Bal | Fe: 0.7*; Cu: 0.2* |
282 | 0.06 | 20 | 8.0 | 10 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 0.3* | 0.15* | Bal | Fe: 1.5*; B: 0.005 |
105 | 0.17* | 15 | 5.0 | 20 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 1.0* | 1.0* | Bal | Fe: 1.0*; B: 0.007 |
Waspalloy | 0.02−0.10 | 18−21 | 3.5−5.0 | 12.0−15.0 | 1.2−1.6 | 2.75−3.50 | 0.1* | 0.1* | Bal | Fe: 2.0*; B: 0.003−0.010 |
Note: *maximum. |
Ni-base alloys for highest temperature components of A-USC power plants
Candidate Ni-base alloys in the US
Tab.2 Ni-base alloys under evaluation in the US DOE/OCDO A-USC project. |
Alloy | Component | Comments |
---|---|---|
230 | SH/RH, pipe | Successful welding trials, maximum size limitations for pipe may limit applicability |
CCA 617 | SH/RH, pipe | Higher strength than 617 but not enough data to change ASME code stress values, not suitable for high sulfur coals, only successful SMAW welds in Ni-base alloys, strain-age cracking concerns, low strength limits applicability for turbine rotor |
263 | Castings, rotor | Back-up cast alloy to 282, good castability and weldability, lower strength but good ductility |
740/740H | SH/RH, pipe | Highest strength alloy in ASME B&PV Code to enable A-USC up to 760°C (1400 °F), excellent fireside corrosion resistance, successful fabrication and welding, prome candidate for boiler components, cannot be air cast for valves and shells |
282 | Castings, rotor | Higher creep strength than 740, relatively insensitive to starting microstructural condition, good forging “window” for rotor, can be cast for valves and casings |
Waspalloy | Rotor, bolts, blades | Back-up alloy with good turbine history, cannot be welded reliability, poor ductility |
105 | Bolts, blades | Highest creep strength alloy, only considered for bolting and blading (non-welded components) |
Notes: SMAW—shielded metal arc welding; B&PV—boiler and pressure vessel. |
Candidate Ni-base alloys in Europe
Candidate Ni-base alloys in Japan
Tab.3 Candidate Ni-base alloys for thick section boiler and turbine components of A-USC project in Japan. |
Temperature | Component | Alloy | Chemical compositions |
---|---|---|---|
700°C | Main steam pipe | USC141* | Ni-20Cr-10Mo-1.2Al-1.6Ti |
Alloy 263 | Ni-20Cr-20Co-6Mo-0.6Al-2.4Ti | ||
Alloy 740 | Ni-25Cr-20Co-0.5Mo-0.9Al-1.8Ti-2Nb | ||
Alloy 617 | Ni-22Cr-12Co-9Mo-1.2Al-0.3Ti | ||
HR35* | 50Ni-30Cr-4W-Ti | ||
HR6W* | Ni-23Cr-22Fe-7W | ||
700°C | Turbine rotor | LTES700R* | Ni-12Cr-6Mo-7W-1.6Al-0.7Ti |
FENIX700* | Ni-16Cr-36Fe-1.3Al-1.5Ti-2Nb | ||
TOS1X-2* | Ni-18Cr-9Mo-12.5Co-1.25Al-1.35Ti-TaNb |
Note: *developed in Japan. |
Tab.4 New Ni-base alloys developed in Japan for 700°C A-USC power plants and alloy design philosophy for the modification of original Ni-base alloys. |
New Ni-base alloy | Original alloy for modification | Alloy design philosophy for the modification of original Ni-base alloy |
---|---|---|
USC141 | Alloy 252 (Ni-9.7Mo-18Cr-10Co-1.1Al-2.7Ti) | Elimination of expensive Co, optimization of Al and Ti content for low thermal expansion and high strength |
LTES700R | Refractaloy 26 (Fe-38Ni-18Cr-3Mo-0.2Al-2.6Ti-20Co) | Increase in Mo for low thermal expansion and high strength, increase in Al for γ’ strengthening |
FENIX700 | Alloy 706 (Ni-36Fe-16Cr-3Nb-1.7Ti-0.3Al) | Decrease in Nb for minimum segregation and improved hot workability, increase in Al for γ’ strengthening |
TOS1X-2 | Alloy 617 (Ni-22Cr-12Co-9Mo-1.2Al-0.3Ti) | Increase in Al and addition of Ta and Nb for γ’ strengthening |
Candidate Ni-base alloys in China and India
Mechanical properties and microstructure of candidate Ni-base alloys
Ni-base alloys strengthened by γ’ precipitates: Alloy 740/740H, Alloy 282, and Alloy 617
Tab.5 Solution annealing temperature, grain size and chemical compositions of Alloy 740 base metal. |
Heat (SA temperature,°C) | Grain size (μm) | Composition (wt.%) (Ni balance) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Mn | Fe | S | Si | Cr | Al | Ti | Co | Mo | Nb | P | B | ||
A (1120) | 82.4 | 0.03 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.0010 | 0.54 | 24.43 | 0.94 | 1.81 | 20.00 | 0.55 | 1.98 | 0.005 | 0.0030 |
A (1190) | 165 | |||||||||||||
B (1120) | 188 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.46 | 0.0010 | 0.53 | 24.38 | 0.98 | 1.77 | 19.90 | 0.50 | 1.97 | 0.005 | 0.0043 |
C (1120) | 127 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.46 | 0.0010 | 0.54 | 24.34 | 0.97 | 1.78 | 19.80 | 0.50 | 1.99 | 0.005 | 0.0037 |
D (1200) | 169 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 1.02 | 0.0002 | 0.45 | 24.31 | 0.75 | 1.58 | 19.63 | 0.52 | 1.83 | 0.003 | 0.0006 |
E* (1190) | 89.6 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 0.69 | 0.0060 | 0.48 | 24.86 | 1.20 | 1.41 | 19.90 | 0.53 | 2.05 | 0.004 | 0.0010 |
E (1120) | 113** | |||||||||||||
F (1121) | — | 0.04 | 0.31 | 1.05 | 0.0100 | 0.30 | 24.28 | 1.30 | 1.50 | 19.88 | 0.53 | 1.57 | 0.002 | 0.0007 |
G | — | — | 0.30 | 1.07 | — | 0.20 | 24.35 | 1.28 | 1.45 | 20.08 | 0.53 | 1.53 | 0.002 | — |
Notes: *material furnished in hot-rolled condition; **bimodal grain size distribution, average grain size reported (center region grain size= 92.4 μm and outer sample region grain size= 145.1 μm); SA—solution annealed. |