天山北坡经济带工业绿色发展政策建议研究

谢明辉, 白卫南, 白璐, 卢庆治, 乔琦

中国工程科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4) : 79-87.

PDF(650 KB)
PDF(650 KB)
中国工程科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4) : 79-87. DOI: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2017.04.013
专题研究

天山北坡经济带工业绿色发展政策建议研究

作者信息 +

Policy Recommendations for Industrial Green Development in the Tianshan Mountain Northern Slope Economic Belt

Author information +
History +

摘要

天山北坡经济带是中国“一带一路”战略中最大的综合经济带,其绿色发展模式将为“一带一路”沿线国家实现区域绿色发展提供借鉴。本文采用绩效评估方法,从区域和产业两个维度对天山北坡经济带各经济区环境绩效进行评估,并根据评估结果将天山北坡经济带六个经济区划分为三翼:北翼(奎屯—克拉玛依—乌苏经济区)环境绩效最佳,南翼(伊宁—霍城—察布查尔经济区、乌鲁木齐—昌吉经济区、吐鲁番—哈密经济区)环境绩效其次,中翼(石河子—玛纳斯—沙湾经济区、博乐—精河—阿拉山口经济区)环境绩效较差。最后,基于环境绩效评估结果和区域产业发展定位,对三翼工业绿色发展提出战略建议。

Abstract

The Tianshan Mountain Northern Slope Economic Belt is the largest economic belt in China, and is undergoing a development focus as part of the Belt and Road Initiative. Green development in this economic belt provides an important reference for other countries along the Belt and Road route. This study assesses the environmental performances of the Tianshan Mountain Northern Slope Economic Belt based on regional and industrial levels. Three wings of this economic belt—the south wing, middle wing, and north wing—are defined using the environmental performance assessment results. The environmental performance of the north wing (which includes the Kuytun–Karamay–Wusu economic zones) is best, followed by that of the south wing (which includes the Gulja–Korgas–Qapqel economic zones, the Urumqi–Changji economic zones, and the Turpan–Kumul economic zones). The environmental performance of the middle wing (which includes the Shihezi–Manas–Shawan economic zones and the Bortala–Jinghe–Alashankou economic zones) ranks lowest. Strategies for the green industrial development of these three wings are suggested based on the assessment results.

关键词

天山北坡经济带 / 环境绩效评估 / 工业绿色发展 / 政策建议 / 产业

Keywords

Tianshan Mountain Northern Slope Economic Belt / environmental performance assessment / green industrial development / policy suggestion / industry

引用本文

导出引用
谢明辉, 白卫南, 白璐. 天山北坡经济带工业绿色发展政策建议研究. 中国工程科学. 2017, 19(4): 79-87 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-SSCAE-2017.04.013

参考文献

[1]
顾华详, 罗辑. 天山北坡经济带发展战略构想 [J]. 新疆经济管理干部学院学报, 2000 (6): 2–6.
[2]
王庆民. 对哈密发展市场农业有关问题的思考 [J]. 实事求是, 2000 (6): 67–68.
[3]
海热提 • 涂尔逊, 叶文虎, 蒙雪琰, 等. 西部大开发与新疆大发展战略基本思路 [J]. 干旱区地理, 2000, 23(3): 193–198.
[4]
李新琪, 王永嘉. 基于RS/GIS 的天山北坡经济带生态环境质量综合评价研究 [J]. 新疆环境保护, 2003, 25(2): 1–4.
[5]
唐宏, 杨德刚, 孙聪, 等. 基于AHP 方法的天山北坡经济带生态环境综合评价 [J]. 干旱区地理, 2010, 33(4): 659–665.
[6]
赵向豪, 姚娟, 马静. 基于GINI 系数的新疆水资源承载力演化的灰色分析——以天山北坡经济带为例 [J]. 节水灌溉, 2016 (5): 85–88.
[7]
张盼盼. 天山北坡经济带城市综合承载力评价研究 [D]. 石河子: 石河子大学(硕士学位论文), 2015.
[8]
哈尚辰, 阿里木江• 卡斯木. 天山北坡经济带城市人居环境质量与城市化水平协调性评价 [J]. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(1): 303–308.
[9]
李东. 天山北坡经济带新型城镇化发展研究 [D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学 (硕士学位论文), 2016.
[10]
于明, 张谦, 过利敏. 新疆绿色食品产业发展策略 [J]. 新疆农业科学, 2003 (S2): 38–40.
[11]
孙新安, 柳奇, 贾钧山. 把新疆水泥工业发展成绿色产业的思路 [J]. 中国建材, 2000 (12): 59–61.
[12]
Kushwaha1 G S, Sharma N K. Green initiatives: A step towards sustainable development and firm’s performance in the automobile industry [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 121: 116– 129.
[13]
Lei K, Pan H Y, Lin C Y. A landscape approach towards ecological restoration and sustainable development of mining areas [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 90: 320–325.
[14]
Dai H C, Xie X X, Xie Y, et al. Green growth: The economic impacts of large-scale renewable energy development in China [J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 162: 435–449.
[15]
Foo K Y. A vision on the opportunities, policies and coping strategies for the energy security and green energy development in Malaysia [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 51: 1477–1498.
[16]
新疆维吾尔自治区统计局. 新疆统计年鉴2015 [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2015.
[17]
International Organisation for Standardisation Technical. ISO 14031:2013 Environmental management–environmental performance evaluation–guidelines [S].
基金
中国工程院咨询项目“新疆天山北坡经济带生态文明建设战略研究”(2014-ZD-4)、“新时期我国重点行业清洁生产技术发展战略研究”(2014-XZ-18)
PDF(650 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/