PDF(535 KB)
PDF(535 KB)
PDF(535 KB)
中国耕地空间格局变化对粮食生产的影响
The Impact of Cropland Spatial Pattern Change on Grain Production in China
耕地是粮食生产的基础，近几十年来中国耕地空间格局变化显著，对粮食生产造成一定影响。本研究以1990 年、2000 年、2010 年土地覆被数据为基础，探究耕地空间格局变化，并基于县级农业统计数据和土壤有机质数据得到空间分辨率为1 km的耕地单产数据集，以此作为耕地粮食生产力的代表值。结果表明：1990—2010 年，东北、西北地区耕地开垦剧烈，黄淮海平原耕地面积下降；研究期内新增耕地的主要来源是草地（46.9%），减少的耕地前10 年主要转为林地（36.6%），后10 年转为建设用地（53.0%）；耕地的空间格局变化造成平均粮食生产力下降2.0%，在此期间建设用地多占用优质耕地，而新开垦的耕地粮食生产力普遍较低。
Cropland is the basis of grain production. In recent decades, the spatial pattern of cropland in China has changed significantly, which has caused some impact on grain production. Based on land cover data of 1990, 2000, and 2010, this study explored changes in the spatial pattern of cropland, and constructed a database with a spatial resolution of 1 km based on county-level agricultural statistics and soil organic matter data, which is the representative of crop productivity. The results show that: during the period from 1990 to 2010, drastic reclamation happened in Northeast and Northwest China while the cropland acreage decreased in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain; the main source of new cropland during the study period was grassland (46.9%), and the lost cropland was mainly converted to forest land (36.6%) in the first ten years and then to construction land (53.0%) in the following ten years; the changes in the spatial pattern of cropland have caused a decrease of 2.0% in the average crop productivity, and during this period, the construction land mostly occupied high-quality cropland, while the newly reclaimed cropland had lower crop productivity.
耕地是粮食生产的基础 / 近几十年来中国耕地空间格局变化显著 / 对粮食生产造成一定影响。本研究以1990 / 年土地覆被数据为基础 / 探究耕地空间格局变化 / 并基于县级农业统计数据和土壤有机质数据得到空间分辨率为1 / / 在此期间建设用地多占用优质耕地 / 而新开垦的耕地粮食生产力普遍较低。
| [1] |
刘彦随, 周扬. 中国美丽乡村建设的挑战与对策 [J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2015, 32(2): 97–105.
|
| [2] |
Tan M H, Li X B, Xie H, et al. Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China—A case study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region [J]. Land Use Policy, 2005, 22(3): 187–196.
|
| [3] |
He C Y, Liu Z F, Xu M, et al. Urban expansion brought stress to food security in China: Evidence from decreased cropland net pri-mary productivity [J]. Science of Total Environment, 2017, 576: 660–670.
|
| [4] |
Liu Y Q, Long H L, Li T T, et al. Land use transitions and their effects on water environment in Huang–Huai–Hai Plain, China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 47: 293–301.
|
| [5] |
王丹, 吴世新, 张寿雨. 新疆20 世纪80 年代末以来耕地与建设用地扩张分析 [J]. 干旱区地理, 2017, 40(1): 188–196.
|
| [6] |
聂学海, 宋戈, 王蓓, 等. 内蒙古自治区耕地利用效益时空特征分析 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(4): 206–211.
|
| [7] |
谭永忠, 何巨, 岳文泽, 等. 全国第二次土地调查前后中国耕地面积变化的空间格局 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(2): 186–197.
|
| [8] |
Liu J Y, Liu M L, Tian H Q, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of China’s cropland during 1990—2000: An analysis based on land-sat TM data [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 98(4): 442–456.
|
| [9] |
许丽丽, 李宝林, 袁烨城, 等. 2000—2010 年中国耕地变化与耕地占补平衡政策效果分析 [J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(8): 1543–1551.
|
| [10] |
Liu J Y, Xu X L, Zhuang D F, et al. Impacts of LUCC processes on potential land productivity in China in the 1990s [J]. Science in China D Earth Science, 2005, 48(8): 1259–1269.
|
| [11] |
邱建军, 王立刚, 李虎, 等. 农田土壤有机碳含量对作物产量影响的模拟研究 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(1): 154–161.
|
| [12] |
Liu J Y, Kuang W H, Zhang Z X, et al. Spatiotemporal charac-teristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24(2): 195–210.
|
| [13] |
Shangguan W, Dai Y J, Liu B Y, et al. A China dataset of soil properties for land surface modeling [J]. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2013 (5): 212–224.
|
| [14] |
全国农业区划委员会. 中国综合农业区划片 [M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1981.
|
| [15] |
Wang Z M, Mao D H, Li L, et al. Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 1992—2012 in the Sanjiang Plain of China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 514: 119–130.
|
| [16] |
Song W, Liu M L. Farmland conversion decreases regional and national land quality in China [J]. Land Degradation & Develop-ment, 2017, 28(2): 459–471.
|
| [17] |
程旭, 杨海娟. 城市扩张对大城市周边基本农田的影响——以西安市长安区为例 [J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(8): 25–34.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
