医学专业目录设置的国际比较及对策研究

余中光, 张鹏俊, 张知新, 王辰

中国工程科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1) : 139-145.

PDF(297 KB)
PDF(297 KB)
中国工程科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1) : 139-145. DOI: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2020.01.018
工程管理
Orginal Article

医学专业目录设置的国际比较及对策研究

作者信息 +

International Comparative Study on the Setting of Medical Specialty Catalogue and Countermeasures

Author information +
History +

摘要

医学专业目录设置对于促进医学学科发展、培养合格的医学人才具有重要意义,在高等院校实施一流学科建设的背景下,健全、科学的专业目录显得尤为重要。为助力我国医学学科发展,本文运用文献分析法梳理了我国医学专业设置现状,系统比较了中国、美国、英国的医学专业目录类别与特点。研究发现,当前我国医学专业目录设置存在专业目录不统一、专业设置数量和内容相对滞后、临床医学专业过早专科化、与住院医师规范化培训专业目录衔接不畅等问题;建议采取统一医学专业目录、丰富学科内涵、体现交叉学科特点、建立规范的医学专业准入和退出机制等举措,推进医学专业目录与国际接轨,为培养合格、规范的医学人才提供路径指引。

Abstract

The medical specialty catalogue is of great significance for promoting the development of the medical discipline and cultivating qualified medical talents; therefore, a comprehensive and scientific medical specialty catalogue becomes even more important in the context of constructing first-class disciplines in colleges and universities. To promote the progressive development of medical disciplines in China, this research sorted out the medical specialty category by literature analysis, and systematically compared the features and category of medical specialty among the U.S. and the U.K. and China. Several major problems are raised as follow: non-uniform medical specialty and sub-specialty category, outdated arrangement of specialties in quantities and content, premature entry into sub-specialty training, inconsistent categories with standardized residential training, etc. To tackle the problems above, this research suggests that the medical specialty category should be in track with global standard, unified with interdisciplinary approach,and standardized admission and exit criteria be set up, which will prepare future qualified health professionals and promote the advancement of medical disciplines.

关键词

医学 / 专业目录 / 临床医学 / 比较分析

Keywords

medicine / specialty catalogue / clinical medicine / comparative analysis

引用本文

导出引用
余中光, 张鹏俊, 张知新. 医学专业目录设置的国际比较及对策研究. 中国工程科学. 2020, 22(1): 139-145 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-SSCAE-2020.01.018

参考文献

[1]
陈怡婷, 胡伟力, 谢鹏, 等. 医学教育学科专业目录问题与对策 探究 [J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2010 (7): 15–16. Chen Y T, Hu W L, Xie P, et al. Study on the problems and countermeasures of the specialty catalogue of medical education [J]. China Higher Medical Education, 2010 (7): 15–16.
[2]
Frank J R, Mungroo R, Ahmad Y, et al. Toward a definition of competency-based education in medicine: A systematic review of published definitions [J]. Medical Teacher, 2010, 32(8): 631–637.
[3]
Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta Z A, et al. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world [J]. The Lancet, 2010, 376 (9756): 1923– 1958.
[4]
吴鸿翔, 汪玲, 吴海鸣, 等. 遵循医学教育基本规律 修订医学领 域学科目录 [J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2011, 31(3): 334–337. Wu H X, Wang L, Wu H M, et al. Work report on the revision of the discipline category in the field of medicine [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2011, 31(3): 334–337.
[5]
National Center for Edmcation Statistics. Classification of instructional programs: 2000 edition. [EB/OL]. (2002-05-08) [2019-07- 02]. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002165.pdf.
[6]
张忠福. 美国高校学科专业和课程设置特点及其启示 [J]. 现代 教育科学, 2015 (3): 161–166. Zhang Z F. The feature of the setup for college subjects, majors and curriculums in the United States and the enlightenments [J]. Modern Education Science, 2015 (3): 161–166.
[7]
刘店辉, 刘佳. 中美学科专业目录的差异分析研究 [J]. 长春工 业大学学报 (高教研究版), 2008, 29(4): 114–116. Liu D H, Liu J. A comparative study of American and Chinese discipline specialty [J]. Journal of Changchun University of Technology (Higher Education Study Edition), 2008, 29(4): 114–116.
[8]
Higher Education Statistics Agency. JACS3.0 [EB/OL]. (2013-02- 01) [2019-07-02]. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/support/documentation/ jacs.
[9]
韩双淼, 许为民, 衣龙涛. 英国研究生学科专业目录: 演变轨迹 与启示 [J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2019 (8): 71–77. Han S M, Xu W M , Yi L T. The catalogue of graduate disciplines in UK: Evolution track and enlightenment [J]. Academic Degrees & Graduate Education, 2019 (8): 71–77.
[10]
周建军, 胡伟力, 谢鹏, 等. 医学领域学科专业目录调整的国际 适应性问题探讨 [J]. 西北医学教育, 2010, 18(3): 429–431, 441. Zhou J J, Hu W L, Xie P, et al. International adaptability of discipline and specialty directory adjustment in medical field [J]. Northwest Medical Education, 2010, 18(3): 429–431, 441.
基金
中国工程院咨询项目“中国医生执业现状、问题与发展策略研究”(2017-XZ-21)
PDF(297 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/