
我国设立法医局的必要性及其管理模式
Developing Medical Examiner Offices in China: Necessity and Administration Mode
深化司法体制改革,健全统一司法鉴定管理体制是推进全面依法治国的重要组成部分。理顺法医鉴定管理制度是完善统一司法鉴定管理体制的重中之重。本文通过国内外法医鉴定管理制度比较,分析了我国法医鉴定领域管理部门分散、执业环境过度市场化、区域发展失衡、科研力量分散等弊端,探讨了我国成立法医局管理模式的可行性和必要性。研究阐述了法医局的运行和职责定位,认为应充分整合我国现有的各部门法医学资源,发挥现有的法医学专业人才力量,建立统一的、独立于公检法系统的国家级、省级、地市级三级法医局,不断提高法医鉴定权威性和公信力;建议由法医局承担司法鉴定、科学研究、职称评定、人才培养等职责,负责制定法医鉴定技术标准和工作指南。
Deepening the reform of the judicial system in China and improving the unified management system for judicial authentication are important in promoting the overall law-based governance of the country. Straightening out the management system of forensic identification is the top priority to establish a unified management system for judicial authentication. In this paper, different management systems of forensic identification are compared and the current disadvantages in forensic identification in China are analyzed, including decentralized management departments, excessive marketization, unbalanced regional development, and insufficient research investment. Based on this, the feasibility and necessity of establishing an administration mode of medical examiner offices in China are investigated. Moreover, the operating mechanism and responsibilities of the medical examiner offices are elaborated. We propose that China should integrate its forensic resources in different departments and strengthen the forensic professionals to establish a unified medical examiner office system which is independent of the judicial system and covers the national, provincial, and municipal levels, thus to improve the authority and credibility of forensic identification. The medical examiner offices should be responsible for judicial authentication, scientific research, professional title assessment, personnel training, and for formulating technical standards and guidelines for forensic identification.
the administration of judicial authentication / bureau of medical examiner / administration mode / social governance
[1] |
霍宪丹. 司法鉴定管理是社会管理与公共服务的统一 [J]. 中国 司法, 2011 (9): 94–96. Huo X D. Forensic identification management is the unity of social management and public services [J]. Justice of China, 2011 (9): 94–96.
|
[2] |
常林. 谁是司法鉴定的 “守门人” ? [J]. 证据科学, 2010, 18(5): 618–632 . Chang L. Who is the “gate-keeper” of expert opinions? [J]. Evidence Science, 2010, 18 (5): 618–632.
|
[3] |
司法部司法鉴定管理局. 两大法系法医鉴定制度的观察与借鉴 [M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2008. Judicial Authenticationl Bureau of the Ministry of Justice. Observation and application of the Judicial Authentication System of the Two Law System [M]. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2008.
|
[4] |
陈如超. 司法鉴定管理体制改革的方向与逻辑 [J]. 法学研究, 2016, 38(1): 187–208. Chen R C. The direction and logic of the reform of the forensic authentication management system [J].Chinese Journal of Law, 2016, 38 (1): 187–208.
|
[5] |
霍宪丹. 司法鉴定统一管理机制研究 [M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2017. Huo X D. Research on unified management mechanism of forensic authentication [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2017.
|
[6] |
陈永生. 我国刑事误判问题透视——以20起震惊全国的刑事冤 案为样本的分析 [J]. 中国法学, 2007 (3): 45–61. Chen Y S. Perspective of China’s criminal misjudgment: Analysis based on 20 criminal wrong cases that shocking the Country [J]. China Legal Science, 2007 (3): 45–61.
|
[7] |
郭华. 健全统一司法鉴定管理体制的实施意见的历程及解读 [J]. 中国法医鉴定, 2017 (5): 1–7. Guo H. History and interpretation of the implementation opinions on perfecting the unified judicial authentication management system [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Science, 2017 (5): 1–7.
|
[8] |
司法部司法鉴定管理局. 司法部司鉴局简报 [R]. 北京: 司法部 司法鉴定管理局, 2015. Judicial Authentication Administration of the Ministry of Justice. Brief report about the judicial authentication [R]. Beijing: Judicial Authentication Administration of the Ministry of Justice, 2015.
|
[9] |
党凌云, 张效礼. 2017年度全国司法鉴定情况统计分析 [J]. 中 国法医鉴定, 2018 (3): 96–100. Dang L Y, Zhang X L. Statistical analysis of national forensicauthentication in 2017 [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Science, 2018 (3): 96–100.
|
[10] |
国家自然科学基金委员会. 关于公布2019年度国家自然科学 基金申请项目评审结果的通告 [EB/OL]. (2019-08-16)[2019- 12-21]. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab442/info76217. htm. National Natural Science Foundation of China. Announcement on the announcement of the evaluation results of the National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2019 [EB/OL]. (2019-08- 16)[2019-12-21]. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab442/ info76217.htm.
|
[11] |
National Institute of Justice. National Institute of Justice’s “2019 National Institute of Justice Funding List”[EB / OL)]. (2019-12-20) [2020-04-15]. https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/list?field_award_ status_value=All&state=All&field_fiscal_year_value=2019&-combine_awards=&awardee=&city=&sort_by=field_fiscal_year_ value&sort_order=DESC.
|
[12] |
王红健. 对基层公安法医队伍建设的思考 [J]. 法医学杂志, 2015, 31(4): 314–316. Wang H J. Thinking about the construction of grassroots public security forensic team [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2015, 31 (4): 314–316.
|
[13] |
李友梅. 中国社会治理转型(1978—2018)[M]. 北京: 社会科 学文献出版社, 2018. Li Y M. Transformation of China’s social governance (1978— 2018) [M]. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press, 2018.
|
[14] |
霍宪丹, 盛小列. 让科技为正义说话 [M]. 北京: 中国科学技术 出版社, 2013. Huo X D, Sheng X L. Let science and technology speak for justice [M]. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 2013.
|
[15] |
顾敏. 我省首次集中清理54家司法鉴定机构 [N]. 新华日报, 2019-11-13 (3). Gu M. 54 forensic authentication agencies in our province were cleaned up for the first time [N]. Xinhua Daily, 2019-11-13, (3).
|
[16] |
樊崇义, 阮娜. 北京司法鉴定行业社会调查报告 [J]. 中国司法, 2016 (9): 54–59. Fan C Y, Ruan N. Social investigation report of Beijing forensic authentication industry [J]. Justice of China, 2016 (9): 54–59.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |