PDF(484 KB)
PDF(484 KB)
PDF(484 KB)
我国人工智能伦理监管需求分析及对策研究
Artificial Intelligence Ethics Supervision in China: Demand Analysis and Countermeasures
人工智能（ AI）产业高速发展，伴生了多种社会伦理风险，且相关后果已经逐步显现；让人类在充分安全的条件下享用智能技术带来的有利收益，成为 AI 监管过程的重要任务。本文从 AI 伦理焦点问题着手，对智能技术的机器权利与人权分配、社会信任危机、数据及算法安全性、确权与责任归属等已经出现的风险问题进行细致梳理；总结了国内外 AI 产业的发展路径和政策现状，据此多维度开展我国 AI 领域伦理监管的需求分析。研究认为，应根据 AI 技术进展，分阶段延伸 AI 治理的监管范围；建立伦理、法律、政策相结合的多维度监管框架，提供相对充分的社会言论空间，确保各利益相关方参与 AI 安全公共讨论；有序完善多层级的科技伦理监管组织机构，积极参与 AI 国际规则制定，为我国 AI 产业的全球化发展机遇创造良好条件。
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) industry is accompanied by various social ethical risks, and the consequences of these risks have gradually emerged. Allowing humans to securely enjoy the major benefits of AI technology has become an important task of AI supervision. In this article, we first analyze the focus issues of AI ethics, including the distribution of machine and human rights, social trust crisis of AI, security of data and algorithms, as well as confirmation of rights and attribution of liability. Subsequently, we summarize the development paths and policy status of AI industry in China and abroad, and analyze the demand for AI ethical supervision in China from multiple dimensions. Furthermore, we suggest that the supervision scope of AI should be extended in a staged manner based on the technical progress of AI. To create better global development opportunities for China’s AI industry, a multi-dimensional supervision framework that combines ethics, law, and policy should be established, a sufficient social discussion space should be provided for all stakeholders to participate in public discussion on AI security, scientific and technological ethics supervision organizations of multiple levels should be improved in an orderly manner, and China should actively participate in the formulation of AI international rules.
artificial intelligence (AI) / governance structure / ethical supervision / ethics committee
| [1] |
吴红, 杜严勇. 人工智能伦理治理: 从原则到行动 [J]. 自然辩证 法研究, 2021, 37(4): 49–54. Wu H, Du Y Y. Artificial intelligence ethical governance: Translating principles into practices [J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2021, 37(4): 49–54.
|
| [2] |
李茂久, 张静. 人工智能危害风险的理性审视与治理体系研究 [J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 42(3): 15–23. Li M J, Zhang J. A rational review of harmful risks of the artificial intelligence and a governance system [J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences), 2021, 42(3): 15–23.
|
| [3] |
王立, 王洁. 我国自动驾驶汽车管理与法制保障研究——以道 路交通安全管理为视角 [J]. 北京警察学院学报, 2021 (1): 8–12. Wang L, Wang J. Research on the management and legal guarantee of China’s automatic driving vehicle: From the perspective of road traffic safety management [J]. Journal of Beijing Police College, 2021 (1): 8–12.
|
| [4] |
赛迪智库信息化形势分析课题组. 2020年中国信息化发展形势 展望 [N]. 中国计算机报, 2020-01-20(12). CCID Think Tank Informationization Situation Analysis Group. Prospects for China’s information development in 2020 [N]. China Information World, 2020-01-20(12).
|
| [5] |
Future of Life Institute. Asilomar AI principles [EB/OL]. (2017- 01-17)[2021-03-15]. https://futureoflife.org/ai-principleschinese/?cn-reloaded=1.
|
| [6] |
徐玖玖. 数据法治安全与发展价值的衡平路径——以《数据安 全法（草案）》的突破与困境为视角 [J]. 山东科技大学学报(社 会科学版), 2021, 23(2): 38–43. Xu J J. Equitable path of security and development value in data under the rule of law—From the perspective of the breakthrough and dilemma of the Data security law (“Draft”) [J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences), 2021, 23(2): 38–43.
|
| [7] |
李安. 算法影响评价: 算法规制的制度创新 [J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(3): 146–152. Li A. Algorithm impact assessments: Institutional innovation of algorithm regulation [J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2021, 40(3): 146–152.
|
| [8] |
彭兰. 网络传播概论（第四版） [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2017. Peng L. Introduction to network communication (4th Edition) [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2017.
|
| [9] |
Shemtov D N. A study on inventorship in inventions involving AI activity [EB/OL]. (2019-10-10)[2021-03-15]. https://www. uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Carl-Yelland_RFC-84- FR-44889.pdf.
|
| [10] |
高超. 大数据技术的“隐私”与“知悉”伦理反思 [J]. 西部学刊, 2021 (4): 20–23. Gao C. Ethical reflections on “privacy” and “knowing” of big data technology [J]. West Journal, 2021 (4): 20–23.
|
| [11] |
巩辰. 全球人工智能治理——“未来”到来与全球治理新议程 [J]. 国际展望, 2018, 10(5): 36–55. Gong C. Global AI governance: The early arrival of future and a new agenda global review [J]. Global Review, 2018, 10(5): 36–55.
|
| [12] |
王国豫. 推进新时代科技伦理学新发展 [N]. 中国社会科学报, 2020-01-14(6). Wang G Y. Promoting the new development of ethics of science and technology in the new era [N]. China Social Sciences Today, 2020-01-14(6).
|
| [13] |
梁俊兰. 信息伦理学: 新兴的交叉科学 [J]. 国外社会科学, 2002 (1): 46–50. Liang J L. Information ethics: A new interdisciplinary science [J]. Social Sciences Abroad, 2002 (1): 46–50.
|
| [14] |
雷瑞鹏, 邱仁宗. 新兴技术中的伦理和监管问题 [J]. 山东科技 大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 21(4): 1–11. Lei R P, Qiu R Z. Ethical and regulatory issues in emerging technologies [J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences), 2019, 21(4): 1–11.
|
| [15] |
刘志辉, 孙帅. 大科学时代我国科技伦理中待解决的问题—— 以“主体–工具–价值”为框架的分析 [J]. 中国高校科技, 2020 (11): 69–73. Liu Z H, Sun S. Problems to be solved in the ethics of science and technology in the big science era: An analysis based on the framework of “subject-tool-value” [J]. Chinese University Science & Technology, 2020 (11): 69–73.
|
| [16] |
国家信息化专家咨询委员会秘书处. 中国信息化形势分析与预 测（2018—2019）[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019. Secretariat of Advisory Committee for State Informatization. Analysis and forecast of China’s informatization forms (2018— 2019) [M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (China), 2019.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
