
我国核燃料循环标准化发展战略研究
潘建均, 王毅韧, 李筱珍, 康椰熙, 张宏伟, 郭建新, 郑刚阳, 王妍妍
中国工程科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3) : 53-59.
我国核燃料循环标准化发展战略研究
Development Strategies for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Standardization in China
核燃料循环标准化是核燃料循环产业安全发展、创新发展的重要支撑,特别是在我国进入高质量发展阶段期间,标准化作用显得尤为重要,开展核燃料循环标准化发展战略研究对支撑我国核工业强国建设具有重要战略意义。本文系统分析了国内外核燃料循环标准化的发展现状,从工作机制、发展平衡性、引领作用、保障能力等方面剖析了我国核燃料循环标准化亟待解决的关键问题,并据此提出了今后的主要任务和相关对策建议。研究指出,我国核燃料循环标准化工作今后的七项重点任务为:补齐核燃料循环后段标准短板、加大关键核心技术标准研制、加强先进标准研制、强化前沿基础标准建设、加强安全环保标准建设、深度参与国际标准化工作、强化标准化基础能力建设。最后,本文从将核燃料循环标准化纳入核工业“十四五”规划、健全标准化工作机制、加大经费投入、加强标准化人才队伍建设等方面提出了对策建议。
Nuclear fuel cycle standardization is important for the safe and innovative development of the nuclear fuel cycle industry, especially when China has currently entered a high-quality development stage. Therefore, conducting strategic research on nuclear fuel cycle standardization becomes significant for boosting China’s nuclear industry. In this article, we analyze the development status of nuclear fuel cycle standardization in China and abroad, investigate the key problems of nuclear fuel cycle standardization in China from the perspectives of working mechanism, development balance, leading role, and support ability, and propose the major tasks and relevant countermeasures. Specifically, the major tasks involve seven aspects: post-stage standards of the nuclear fuel cycle, standards for key technologies, advanced standards, frontier basic standards, safety and environmental protection standards, international standardization, and basic capacities for standardization. Furthermore, the countermeasures comprise including nuclear fuel cycle standardization into the 14th Five-Year Plan of the nuclear industry, improving the standardization mechanism, increasing investment, and strengthening the construction of standardization talent teams.
核燃料循环 / 高质量发展 / 技术标准 / 基础能力 / 标准国际化
nuclear fuel cycle / high-quality development / technical standards / basic ability / international standardization
[1] |
李冠兴, 周邦新, 肖岷, 等. 中国新一代核能核燃料总体发展战 略研究 [J]. 中国工程科学, 2019, 21(1): 6-11. Li G X, Zhou B X, Xiao M, et al. Overall development strategy of China’s new-generation nuclear fuel [J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2019, 21(1): 6-11.
|
[2] |
董芳芳, 李国青, 吴潜. 我国铀矿冶安全环保标准化现状浅析 [J]. 核标准计量与质量, 2016 (2): 12-16. Dong F F, Li G Q, Wu Q. Analysis on the current situation of safety and environmental protection standardization of uranium mining and metallurgy in China [J]. Nuclear Standard Measurement and Quality, 2016 (2): 12-16.
|
[3] |
Taghvaeenezhad M, Shayestehfar M, Moarefvand P, et al. Quantifying the criteria for classification of mineral resources and reserves through the estimation of block model uncertainty using geostatistical methods: A case study of Khoshoumi Uranium deposit in Yazd, Iran [J]. Geosystem Engineering, 2020, 23(4): 216-225.
|
[4] |
Herbst R S, Baron P, Nilsson M. Standard and advanced separation: PUREX processes for nuclear fuel reprocessing [J]. Advanced Separation Techniques for Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing and Radioactive Waste Treatment, 2011: 141-175.
|
[5] |
姜星斗, 赵奔, 沈桢琪, 等. 核设施退役技术标准体系建设探索 [J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2018, 17(9): 77-79. Jiang X D, Zhao B, Shen Z Q, et al. Exploration on the construction of technical standard system for decommissioning of nuclear facilities [J]. Industrial & Science Tribune, 2018, 17(9): 77-79.
|
[6] |
Gopalakrishnan R K. Summary of IAEA safety standards series No. SSG-42: Specific safety guide on “Safety of nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities”(May 2017) [J]. Radiation Protection and Environment, 2017, 40(2): 103-105.
|
[7] |
康椰熙. 核工业技术标准发展战略探讨 [J]. 核标准计量与质量, 2009 (3): 5-13. Kang Y X. Discussion on the development strategy of nuclear industry technical standards [J]. Nuclear Standard Measurement and Quality, 2009 (3): 5-13.
|
[8] |
刘尚源, 孙业丛, 魏然, 等. 关于推进我国核能领域国际标准化 工作的若干思考与建议 [J]. 中国标准化, 2020 (6): 38-46. Liu S Y, Sun Y C, Wei R, et al. Reflections and prospects on promoting China’s participation in the international nuclear energy standardization work [J]. China Standardization, 2020 (6): 38-46.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |