
“双碳”背景下我国废钢资源高质循环利用战略研究
王国栋, 张龙强, 付静, 王方杰, 储满生, 任江涛, 赵成林, 王厚昕, 于彩红, 孙野, 邓想涛, 贾涛, 期治博, 孙杰
中国工程科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3) : 63-73.
“双碳”背景下我国废钢资源高质循环利用战略研究
High-Quality Recycling and Utilization of China's Steel Scrap Resources in the Context of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality
废钢是再生绿色资源,也是钢铁工业不可或缺的铁素资源。在“双碳”战略背景下,重构废钢循环利用技术体系和创新废钢资源管理模式,从根本上破解废钢高质循环利用的瓶颈问题对钢铁工业的绿色低碳转型至关重要。本文对比分析了全球废钢行业的发展现状,科学预测了我国粗钢产量和废钢资源量的变化趋势,提出了2060年左右可能存在的全废钢冶炼这一中国特色问题;凝练了废钢行业规范化、信息化、数字化、智能化发展方向;系统梳理了我国废钢循环利用在标准制度体系、精确分类回收、基于生产者责任延伸(EPR)制度的材料设计和数字化标识解析等方面存在的问题与挑战;在此基础上,创新提出了废钢资源“四全五化”高质循环利用新模式,清晰给出了组织框架和实施策略方案,即面向可能到来的全废钢时代,从钢铁材料全生命周期、全生产流程、全产业链(“四全”)协同贯彻EPR制度,实现废钢资源的科学分类管理、循环和再利用,同时加强全流程生产管理的数字化、信息化、标识化、网络化,并逐渐过渡到优质废钢拆解回收机器人化(“五化”)。研究建议:完善钢铁领域贯彻EPR的制度、技术和管理体系,加强废钢行业标准体系建设,加强钢铁材料全生命周期全产业链数字化标识解析,强化重点行业废钢分类回收和循环利用等,为全面实施废钢资源“四全五化”高质循环利用新模式做好坚实保障。
Steel scraps are renewable resources and indispensable iron resources for the iron and steel industry. In the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, it is crucial to reconstruct the technology system for steel scrap recycling and utilization and innovate the management mode of steel scrap resources, so as to fundamentally crack the bottleneck of high-quality recycling and utilization of steel scraps for the green and low-carbon transformation of the iron and steel industry. This study analyzes the development status of the global steel scrap industry by comparison, predicts the changing trend of raw steel output and steel scrap resources in China, and proposes the possible existence of full steel scrap smelting in China around 2060. Moreover, the development directions of standardization, informatization, digitalization, and intelligentization of the steel scrap industry are summarized. The pressing problems and challenges regarding steel scrap recycling and utilization in China are systematically sorted out in terms of standards and institutional system, precise classification and recycling, material design based on extended producer responsibility (EPR), and digital identity parsing. On this basis, a new "4F5Z" pattern is innovatively proposed for the high-quality recycling and utilization of steel scrap resources, and its organizational framework and implementation strategy are clearly given. Specifically, the EPR system should be implemented in a coordinated manner toward a possible era of full steel scraps and from the aspects of the full life cycle, full production process, and full industrial chain ("4F") of steel materials, thus to realize the sorted management, recycling, and reuse of steel scrap resources. Meanwhile, the digitalization, informatization, labelling, and networking of full production process management should be strengthened and gradually transition to the robotization of high-quality steel scrap dismantling and recycling ("5Z"). Furthermore, to provide a solid guarantee for the full implementation of the "4F5Z" pattern, we propose the following suggestions: (1) improving the system, technology, and management for EPR implementation in the iron and steel industry, (2) strengthening the construction of a standards system for the steel scrap industry, (3) strengthening the digital labelling and analysis of the entire industrial chain and the whole life cycle of iron and steel materials, and (4) reinforcing the sorted collection, recycling, and reuse of steel scraps in key industries.
废钢 / 分类回收 / 高质循环利用 / 全生命周期 / 数字化标识
steel scrap / sorted collection / high-quality recycling and utilization / full life cycle / digitalized labelling
[1] |
张龙强. 超百亿吨钢铁积蓄如何助推行业实现双碳目标? [J]. 资源再生, 2021 (7): 31‒33, 37.
Zhang L Q. How can the savings of more than 10 billion tons of steel help the industry achieve the dual carbon goal? [J]. Resource Recycling, 2021 (7): 31‒33, 37.
|
[2] |
魏一鸣, 余碧莹, 唐葆君, 等. 中国碳达峰碳中和时间表与路线图研究 [J]. 北京理工大学学报 (社会科学版), 2022, 24(4): 13‒26.
Wei Y M, Yu B Y, Tang B J, et al. Roadmap for achieving China's carbon peak and carbon neutrality pathway [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 24(4): 13‒26.
|
[3] |
World Steel Association. Steel statisitical yearbook 2023 [R]. Brussels: World Steel Association, 2023.
|
[4] |
崔志峰, 上官方钦, 王方杰, 等. 2022—2060年中国废钢资源量分析预测 [J]. 钢铁, 2023, 58(6): 126‒133.
Cui Z F, Shangguan F Q, Wang F J, et al. Analysis and prediction of scrap resources in China from 2022 to 2060 [J]. Iron & Steel, 2023, 58(6): 126‒133.
|
[5] |
Dworak S, Fellner J. Steel scrap generation in the EU-28 since 1946—Sources and composition [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 173: 105692.
|
[6] |
Bureau of International Recycling. World steel recyclingin figures 2018—2022 [R]. Brussels: Bureau of International Recycling, 2018—2022.
|
[7] |
Omura A, Todorova N, Li B, et al. Steel scrap and equity market in Japan [J]. Resources Policy, 2016, 47: 115‒124.
|
[8] |
王婷婷. 日本废钢产业对中国钢企的启示 [J]. 中国钢铁业, 2019 (12): 31‒33, 45.
Wang T T. What Chinese steel mill can get from Japan scrap steel industry [J]. China Steel, 2019 (12): 31‒33, 45.
|
[9] |
美国再生资源回收发展情况及启示 [J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2012, 30(8): 12‒13.
The development and enlightenment of renewable resource recycling in the United States [J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2012, 30(8): 12‒13.
|
[10] |
Goldstein A. Developments in U.S. ferrous scrap markets [R]. New York: AMM & WSD Steel Survival Strategies XXXII, 2017.
|
[11] |
田春健, 臧喜民, 张利武, 等. 转炉高废钢比炼钢技术的发展状况与探讨 [J/OL]. 钢铁研究学报: 1‒17[2024-04-14]. https://doi.org/10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1001-0963.20230273.
Tian C J, Zang X M, Zhang L W, et al. Development status and discussion on high scrap steel ratio converter steelmaking technology [J/OL]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research: 1‒17[2024-04-14]. https://doi.org/10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1001-0963.20230273.
|
[12] |
吴优, 于峰, 程明刚. 提高转炉废钢比实践 [J]. 鞍钢技术, 2018 (5): 52‒54.
Wu Y, Yu F, Cheng M G. Practice of increasing scrap ratio for steelmaking in converter [J]. Angang Technology, 2018 (5): 52‒54.
|
[13] |
张龙强. 发达国家粗钢产量达峰后发展历程分析 [N]. 世界金属导报, 2022-12-14(F1).
Zhang L Q. Analysis of the evolution of crude steel production after peaking in developed countries [J]. World Metals, 2022-12-14(F1).
|
[14] |
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World population prospects 2022 [R]. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2022.
|
[15] |
中国钢铁工业协会. 我国电炉短流程炼钢发展研究报告 [R]. 北京: 中国钢铁工业协会, 2023.
China Iron & Steel Association. Study on the development of electric furnace short-process steelmaking in China [R]. Beijing: China Iron & Steel Association, 2023.
|
[16] |
上官方钦, 郦秀萍, 周继程, 等. 中国废钢资源发展战略研究 [J]. 钢铁, 2020, 55(6): 8‒14.
Shangguan F Q, Li X P, Zhou J C, et al. Strategic research on development of steel scrap resources in China [J]. Iron & Steel, 2020, 55(6): 8‒14.
|
[17] |
吕林. 重塑废钢行业生态 助力"双碳" 目标实现 [N]. 中国冶金报, 2023-06-14(5).
Lyu L. Reshape the ecology of the scrap industry and help achieve the "double carbon" goal [N]. China Metallurgical News, 2023-06-14(5).
|
[18] |
Liu Y, Cui M Y, Gao X B. Building up scrap steel bases for perfecting scrap steel industry chain in China: An evolutionary game perspective [J]. Energy, 2023, 278: 127742.
|
[19] |
Xu W G, Xiao P C, Zhu L G, et al. Classification and rating of steel scrap using deep learning [J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 123: 106241.
|
[20] |
张凯东. 对我国电炉炼钢发展痛点的思考 [J]. 冶金管理, 2023 (20): 21‒25.
Zhang K D. Thoughts on the development pain points of electric furnace steelmaking in China [J]. China Steel Focus, 2023 (20): 21‒25.
|
[21] |
马飞跃. 废钢分类判级的现状分析与展望 [J]. 环境工程, 2023, 41(S2): 1163‒1166.
Ma F Y. Present situation analysis and prospect of scrap classification and grading [J]. Environmental Engineering, 2023, 41(S2): 1163‒1166.
|
[22] |
肖鹏程, 徐文广, 常金宝, 等. 基于深度学习的废钢分类评级方法研究 [J]. 工程科学与技术, 2023, 55(2): 184‒193.
Xiao P C, Xu W G, Chang J B, et al. Classification and rating of scrap steel based on deep learning [J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2023, 55(2): 184‒193.
|
[23] |
王国栋, 刘振宇, 张殿华, 等. 钢铁企业创新基础设施及研究进展 [J]. 钢铁, 2023, 58(9): 2‒14.
Wang G D, Liu Z Y, Zhang D H, et al. Steel Enterprise Innovation Infrastructure(SEII) and its research development [J]. Iron & Steel, 2023, 58(9): 2‒14.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |