基础模拟方式对泰州大桥地震响应的影响

韩磊()、彭天波、赵艺

中国工程科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 51-56.

PDF(895 KB)
PDF(895 KB)
中国工程科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 51-56.

基础模拟方式对泰州大桥地震响应的影响

  • 韩磊()、彭天波、赵艺

作者信息 +

Influence of soil foundation interaction simulation method on seismic response of Taizhou Bridge

  • Han Lei、Peng Tianbo、Zhao Yi

Author information +
History +

摘要

建立了3种基础-土相互作用模拟方式,分别为考虑一定桩身柔性的固结独塔模型,基于“m”法的线性独塔模型,以及采用“p-y”曲线法的非线性独塔模型。采用El-Centro和Kobe两种地震波分别对3个模型进行计算分析,结果发现,基于“m”法的线性独塔沉井模型与“p-y”曲线法的非线性独塔沉井模型相比响应偏大,而基于“m”法的线性独塔群桩基础模型则与“p-y”曲线法的非线性独塔群桩基础模型有较好的吻合。

Abstract

Three different models are discussed in this paper, which are consolidation single tower model with body flexibility considered, linear single tower model based on m analysis method and nonlinear single tower model based on p-y curve analysis method, respectively. Seismic responses of these models are analyzed under ground motion inputs of El-Centro Earthquake and Kobe Earthquake and the calculation results are compared in this paper. The result turns out that the simulation method of linear single tower model of open caisson based on m analysis method produces larger structual response than that of the nonlinear single tower model based on p-y curve analysis method. While the simulation method of linear single tower model of pile group foundation based on m analysis method matches very well with that of nonlinear single tower method based on py curve analysis method.

关键词

泰州大桥 / 基础模拟方式 / 地震动输入 / 结构响应

Keywords

Taizhou Bridge / foundation simulation method / ground motion input / structual response

引用本文

导出引用
韩磊,彭天波,赵艺. 基础模拟方式对泰州大桥地震响应的影响. 中国工程科学. 2012, 14(5): 51-56

参考文献

基金
国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2009BAG15B01); 交通行业联合科技攻关项目(2008-353-332-190)
PDF(895 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/