College of Environmental Science and Engineer, Nankai University, Tianjin300071, China

Ren Changxing,Wu Zongzhi,Liu Mao

Strategic Study of CAE ›› 2007, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (8) : 72 -76.

PDF (490KB)
Strategic Study of CAE ›› 2007, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (8) : 72 -76.

College of Environmental Science and Engineer, Nankai University, Tianjin300071, China

Author information +
History +
PDF (490KB)

Abstract

Selecting route for hazardous materials (Hazmat) transportation by road is a bilateral decision between local government and the carriers,  involving safety,  environmental and economic factors.  Among them,  the quantitative risk assessment is an important method.  However,  there has been no agreement among researchers on the proper model of the associated transport risk and dfferent models to quantify risk in different ways.  In this paper,  the most common Hazmat transport risk models in the literature are reviewed,  which are divided into five classes including traditional risk model and models derived from it,  perceived risk,  conditional risk,  catastrophe avoidance models and modified traditional risk models.  Moreover,  it is discussed in detail on multiple trips multi-accident.  Finall y,  an example used by these models is evaluated,  and the challenging development of risk model is proposed.

Keywords

hazardous materials / routing / road transportation / quantitative risk assessment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ren Changxing,Wu Zongzhi,Liu Mao. College of Environmental Science and Engineer, Nankai University, Tianjin300071, China. Strategic Study of CAE, 2007, 9(8): 72-76 DOI:

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (490KB)

268

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/