[ 1 ] Zhu Y, Gao T, Fan L, Huang S, Edmonds M, Liu H, et al. Dark, beyond deep: a paradigm shift to cognitive AI with humanlike common sense. Engineering 2020;6(3):310‒45. link1

[ 2 ] Shulman LS. Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harv Educ Rev 1987;57(1):1‒23. link1

[ 3 ] Tomasello M. Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2010.

[ 4 ] Holyoak KJ, Thagard P. Mental leaps: analogy in creative thought. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995. link1

[ 5 ] Lake BM, Salakhutdinov R, Tenenbaum JB. Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science 2015;350(6266):1332‒8. link1

[ 6 ] Premack D, Woodruff G. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci 1978;1(4):515‒26. link1

[ 7 ] Clark HH. Using language. New York City: Cambridge University Press; 1996.

[ 8 ] Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948;27(3):379‒423. link1

[ 9 ] Valiant LG. A theory of the learnable. Commun ACM 1984;27(11):1134‒42. link1

[10] Grice HP. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan J, editors. Syntax and semantics: speech acts. New York City: Academic Press; 1975. link1

[11] Levinson SC. Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2000. link1

[12] Goodman ND, Stuhlmüller A. Knowledge and implicature: modeling language understanding as social cognition. Top Cogn Sci 2013;5:173‒84. link1

[13] Eaves BS, Schweinhart Jr AM, Shafto P. Tractable Bayesian teaching. In: Jones M, editor. Big data in cognitive science. New York City: Psychology Press; 2015. link1

[14] Eaves Jr BS, Feldman NH, Griffiths TL, Shafto P. Infant-directed speech is consistent with teaching. Psychol Rev 2016;123(6):758‒71. link1

[15] Ho MK, Littman ML, MacGlashan J, Cushman F, Austerweil JL. Showing versus doing: teaching by demonstration. In: Lee D, Sugiyama M, Luxburg U, Guyon I, Garnett R, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems. Barcelona: Curran Associates, Inc.; 2016. link1

[16] Samuel AL. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J Res Dev 1959;3(3):210‒29. link1

[17] Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York City: Springer; 2006.

[18] Shalev-Shwartz S, Ben-David S. Understanding machine learning: from theory to algorithms. New York City: Cambridge University Press; 2014. link1

[19] Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, Li LJ, Li K, Li FF. Imagenet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: Proceedings of 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2009 Jun 20‒25; Miami, FL, USA; 2009. link1

[20] Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM 2017;60(6):84‒90. link1

[21] Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, Malik J. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2014 Jun 23‒28; Columbus, OH, USA; 2014. link1

[22] Girshick R. Fast R-CNN. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision; 2015 Dec 11‒18; Santiago, Chile; 2015. link1

[23] He K, Gkioxari G, Dollár P, Girshick R. Mask R-CNN. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision; 2017 Oct 22‒29; Venice, Italy; 2017. link1

[24] Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. 2018. arXiv:1810.04805. link1

[25] Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, Graves A, Antonoglou I, Wierstra D, et al. Playing Atari with deep reinforcement learning. 2013. arXiv:1312.5602.

[26] Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, Guez A, Sifre L, van den Driessche G, et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 2016;529(7587):484‒9. link1

[27] He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2016 Jun 27‒30; Las Vegas, NV, USA; 2016. link1

[28] Angluin D. Queries and concept learning. Mach Learn 1988;2(4):319‒42. link1

[29] Settles B. Active learning literature survey. Technical report. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2010.

[30] Argall BD, Chernova S, Veloso M, Browning B. A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robot Auton Syst 2009;57(5):469‒83. link1

[31] Shafto P, Goodman ND, Griffiths TL. A rational account of pedagogical reasoning: teaching by, and learning from, examples. Cogn Psychol 2014;71:55‒89. link1

[32] Milli S, Abbeel P, Mordatch I. Interpretable and pedagogical examples. 2017. arXiv:1711.00694.

[33] Yang SCH, Yu Y, Givchi A, Wang P, Vong WK, Shafto P. Optimal cooperative inference. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics; 2018 Apr 9‒11; Lanzarote, Spain; 2018.

[34] Chen Y, Aodha OM, Su S, Perona P, Yue Y. Near-optimal machine teaching via explanatory teaching sets. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics; 2018 Apr 9‒11; Lanzarote, Spain; 2018.

[35] Chen Y, Singla A, Aodha OM, Perona P, Yue Y. Understanding the role of adaptivity in machine teaching: the case of version space learners. 2018. arXiv:1802.05190.

[36] Hadfield-Menell D, Russell SJ, Abbeel P, Dragan A. Cooperative inverse reinforcement learning. In: Lee D, Sugiyama M, Luxburg U, Guyon I, Garnett R, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems. Barcelona: Curran Associates, Inc.; 2016. link1

[37] Ho MK, Littman ML, Cushman F, Austerweil JL. Effectively learning from pedagogical demonstrations. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; 2018 Jul 25‒28; Madison, WI, USA; 2018.

[38] Cakmak M, Lopes M. Algorithmic and human teaching of sequential decision tasks. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2012 Jul 22‒26; Toronto, ON, Canada; 2012.

[39] Zhu X. Machine teaching for Bayesian learners in the exponential family. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2013 Dec 9‒12; Lake Tahoe, NV, USA; 2013.

[40] Zhu X. Machine teaching: an inverse problem to machine learning and an approach toward optimal education. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2015 Jan 25‒30; Austin, TX, USA; 2015. link1

[41] Liu W, Dai B, Humayun A, Tay C, Yu C, Smith LB, et al. Iterative machine teaching. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2017 Aug 6‒11; Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2017.

[42] Fan Y, Tian F, Qin T, Li XY, Liu TY. Learning to teach. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Representations; 2018 Apr 30‒May 3; Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2018.

[43] Jiang L, Zhou Z, Leung T, Li LJ, Li FF. MentorNet: learning data-driven curriculum for very deep neural networks on corrupted labels. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2018 Jul 10‒15; Stockholm, Sweden; 2018.

[44] Han B, Yao Q, Yu X, Niu G, Xu M, Hu W, et al. Co-teaching: robust training of deep neural networks with extremely noisy labels. In: Proceedings of the 32th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2018 Dec 3‒8; Montreal, QC, Canada; 2018.

[45] Wang P, Wang J, Paranamana P, Shafto P. A mathematical theory of cooperative communication. In: Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2020 Dec 6‒12; Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2020.

[46] Gweon H, Tenenbaum JB, Schulz LE. Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107(20):9066‒71. link1

[47] Csibra G, Gergely G. Social learning and social cognition: the case for pedagogy. In: Munakata Y, Johnson MH, editors. Processes of change in brain and cognitive development—attention and performance XXI. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. link1

[48] Csibra G, Gergely G. Natural pedagogy. Trends Cogn Sci 2009;13(4):148‒53. link1

[49] Xu F, Denison S. Statistical inference and sensitivity to sampling in 11-monthold infants. Cognition 2009;112(1):97‒104. link1

[50] Xu F, Tenenbaum JB. Sensitivity to sampling in Bayesian word learning. Dev Sci 2007;10(3):288‒97. link1

[51] Gweon H, Shafto P, Schulz L. Development of children’s sensitivity to overinformativeness in learning and teaching. Dev Psychol 2018;54(11):2113‒25. link1

[52] Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell; 1986.

[53] Peltola T, Çelikok MM, Daee P, Kaski S. Machine teaching of active sequential learners. In: Proceedings of the 33th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2019 Dec 8‒14; Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2019.

[54] Shafto P, Goodman N. Teaching games: statistical sampling assumptions for learning in pedagogical situations. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; 2008 Jul 23‒26; Washiton, DC, USA; 2008.

[55] Wang J, Wang P, Shafto P. Sequential cooperative Bayesian inference. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2020 Jul 13‒18; Vienna, Austria; 2020.

[56] Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. New York City: Springer; 2009.

[57] Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York City: Springer; 1999. link1

[58] Rivest RL. Cryptography and machine learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptology: Advances in Cryptology; 1991 Nov 11‒14; Fujiyoshida, Japan; 1991.

[59] Zilles S, Lange S, Holte R, Zinkevich MA. Models of cooperative teaching and learning. J Mach Learn Res 2011;12:349‒84.

[60] Weaver W. Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication. ETC Rev Gen Semant 1953;10(4):261‒81.

[61] Fagin R, Halpern JY, Moses Y, Vardi MY. Reasoning about knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2003. link1

[62] Doshi P, Gmytrasiewicz PJ. Monte Carlo sampling methods for approximating interactive POMDPs. J Artif Intell Res 2009;34:297‒337. link1

[63] Albrecht SV, Stone P. Autonomous agents modelling other agents: a comprehensive survey and open problems. Artif Intell 2018;258:66‒95. link1

[64] Foerster J, Chen RY, Al-Shedivat M, Whiteson S, Abbeel P, Mordatch I. Learning with opponent-learning awareness. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems; 2018 Jul 10‒15; Stockholm, Sweden; 2018.

[65] De Weerd H, Verbrugge R, Verheij B. Theory of mind in the Mod game: an agent-based model of strategic reasoning. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Social Intelligence; 2014 Nov 3‒5; Barcelona, Spain; 2014. link1

[66] De Weerd H, Verbrugge R, Verheij B. Higher-order theory of mind in the Tacit Communication Game. Biol Inspired Cogn Archit 2015;11:10‒21. link1

[67] Zhu SC, Mumford D. A stochastic grammar of images. Found Trends Comput Graph Vis 2007;2(4):259‒362. link1

[68] Qi S, Zhu Y, Huang S, Jiang C, Zhu SC. Human-centric indoor scene synthesis using stochastic grammar. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 2018 Jun 18‒22; Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2018. link1

[69] Liu C, Chai JY, Shukla N, Zhu SC. Task learning through visual demonstration and situated dialogue. In: Workshops at the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2016 Feb 12‒17; Phoenix, AZ, USA; 2016. link1

[70] Liu C, Yang S, Saba-Sadiya S, Shukla N, He Y, Zhu SC, et al. Jointly learning grounded task structures from language instruction and visual demonstration. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing; 2016 Nov 1‒5; Austin, TX, USA; 2016. link1

[71] Shukla N, He Y, Chen F, Zhu SC. Learning human utility from video demonstrations for deductive planning in robotics. In: Proceedings of Conference on Robot Learning; 2017 Nov 13‒15; Mountain View, CA, USA; 2017.

[72] Edmonds M, Gao F, Xie X, Liu H, Qi S, Zhu Y, et al. Feeling the force: integrating force and pose for fluent discovery through imitation learning to open medicine bottles. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2017 Sep 24‒28; Vancouver, BC, Canada. New York City: IEEE; 2017. p. 3530‒7. link1

[73] Fire A, Zhu SC. Learning perceptual causality from video. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2015;7(2):1‒22. link1

[74] Zhao Y, Holtzen S, Tao G, Zhu SC. Represent and infer human theory of mind for human‒robot interaction. In: AAAIFall Symposia; 2015 Nov 12‒14; Arlington, VA, USA; 2015.

[75] Zhu Y, Zhao Y, Zhu SC. Understanding tools: task-oriented object modeling, learning and recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2015 Jun 7‒12; Boston, MA, USA; 2015. link1

[76] Huang SH, Huang I, Pandya R, Dragan AD. Nonverbal robot feedback for human teachers. 2019. arXiv:1911.02320.

[77] Balbach FJ. Measuring teachability using variants of the teaching dimension. Theor Comput Sci 2008;397(1‒3):94‒113.

[78] Goldman SA, Kearns MJ. On the complexity of teaching. J Comput Syst Sci 1995;50(1):20‒31. link1

[79] CausalityPearl J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

[80] Bradley RA, Terry ME. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 1952;39(3‒4):324‒45.

[81] Ramachandran D, Amir E. Bayesian inverse reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2007 Jan 6‒12; Hyderabad, India; 2007.

[82] Baker CL, Saxe R, Tenenbaum JB. Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition 2009;113(3):329‒49. link1

[83] Goodman ND, Frank MC. Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic inference. Trends Cogn Sci 2016;20(11):818‒29. link1

[84] Yu X, Han B, Yao J, Niu G, Tsang I, Sugiyama M. How does disagreement help generalization against label corruption? In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2019 Jun 10‒15; Long Beach, CA, USA; 2019.

[85] Li J, Socher R, Hoi SCH. DivideMix: learning with noisy labels as semisupervised learning. 2020. arXiv:2002.07394.

[86] Berthelot D, Roelofs R, Sohn K, Carlini N, Kurakin A. AdaMatch: a unified approach to semi-supervised learning and domain adaptation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations; 2022 Apr 25‒29; online; 2022.

[87] Yuan L, Fu Z, Shen J, Xu L, Shen J, Zhu SC. Emergence of pragmatics from referential game between theory of mind agents. In: Emergent Communication Workshop, 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2019 Dec 8‒14; Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2019.

[88] Lazaridou A, Peysakhovich A, Baroni M. Multi-agent cooperation and the emergence of (natural) language. In: International Conference on Learning Representations; 2017 Apr 24‒26; Toulon, France; 2017.

[89] Lazaridou A, Hermann KM, Tuyls K, Clark S. Emergence of linguistic communication from referential games with symbolic and pixel input. In: International Conference on Learning Representations; 2018 Apr 30‒May 3; Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2018.

[90] Watkins CJ, Dayan P. Q-learning. Mach Learn 1992;8(3‒4):279‒92.

[91] Williams RJ. Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Mach Learn 1992;8(3‒4):229‒56.

[92] Chen X, Cheng Y, Tang B. On the recursive teaching dimension of VC classes. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2016 Dec 5‒10; Barcelona, Spain; 2016.

[93] Doliwa T, Fan G, Simon HU, Zilles S. Recursive teaching dimension, VCdimension and sample compression. J Mach Learn Res 2014;15:3107‒31.

[94] Mitchell TM. Machine learning. New York City: McGraw-Hill; 1997.

[95] Yuan L, Zhou D, Shen J, Gao J, Chen JL, Gu Q, et al. Iterative teacher-aware learning. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2021 Dec 6‒14; online; 2021.

[96] Babes M, Marivate V, Subramanian K, Littman ML. Apprenticeship learning about multiple intentions. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11); 2011 Jun 28‒Jul 2; Bellevue, WA, USA; 2011.

[97] MacGlashan J, Littman ML. Between imitation and intention learning. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2015 Jul 25‒Aug 1; Buenos Aires, Argentina; 2015.

[98] De Weerd H, Verbrugge R, Verheij B. Negotiating with other minds: the role of recursive theory of mind in negotiation with incomplete information. Auton Agent Multi-Ag 2017;31(2):250‒87. link1

[99] Ziebart BD, Maas AL, Bagnell JA, Dey AK. Maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI); 2008 Jul 13‒17; Chicago, IL, USA; 2008.

[100] Vroman MC. Maximum likelihood inverse reinforcement learning [dissertation]. New Jersey: Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick; 2014.

[101] Liu W, Dai B, Li X, Liu Z, Rehg J, Song L. Towards black-box iterative machine teaching. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2018 Jul 10‒15; Stockholm, Sweden; 2018. link1

[102] Wu L, Tian F, Xia Y, Fan Y, Qin T,Lai J, et al. Learning to teach with dynamic loss functions. In: Proceedings of the 32th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2018 Dec 3‒8; Montreal, QC, Canada; 2018. link1

[103] Gao X, Gong R, Zhao Y, Wang S, Shu T, Zhu SC. Joint mind modeling for explanation generation in complex human‒robot collaborative tasks. In: Proceedings of 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN); 2020 Aug 31‒Sep 4; Naples, Italy; 2020. link1

[104] Yuan T, Liu H, Fan L, Zheng Z, Gao T, Zhu Y, et al. Joint inference of states, robot knowledge, and human (false-) beliefs. In: Proceedings of 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2020 May 31‒Aug 31; Paris, France; 2020. link1

[105] Yuan L, Gao X, Zheng Z, Edmonds M, Wu YN, Rossano F, et al. In situ bidirectional human‒robot value alignment. Sci Robot 2022;7(68): eabm4183. link1

[106] Russell S. Human compatible: artificial intelligence and the problem of control. New York City: Viking; 2019.

[107] Tang N, Stacy S, Zhao M, Marquez G, Gao T. Bootstrapping an Imagined We for cooperation. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci); 2020 Jul 29‒Aug 1; online; 2020.

[108] Stacy S, Zhao Q, Zhao M, Kleiman-Weiner M, Gao T. Intuitive signaling through an “Imagined We”. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci); 2020 Jul 29‒Aug 1; online; 2020. link1

[109] Bara CP, Ch-Wang S, Chai J. MindCraft: theory of mind modeling for situated dialogue in collaborative tasks. In: Proceedings of the conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP); 2018 Nov 2‒4; Brussels, Belgium; 2018.

[110] Fan L, Qiu S, Zheng Z, Gao T, Zhu SC, Zhu Y. Learning triadic belief dynamics in nonverbal communication from videos. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 2021 Jun 20‒25; Nashville, TN, USA; 2021. link1

[111] Arora S, Doshi P. A survey of inverse reinforcement learning: challenges, methods and progress. Artif Intell 2021;297:103500. link1

[112] Blumer A, Ehrenfeucht A, Haussler D, Warmuth M. Learnability and the Vapnik‒Chervonenkis dimension. J ACM 1989;36(4):929‒65. link1

[113] Bartlett PL, Bousquet O, Mendelson S. Localized Rademacher complexities. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Learning Theory; 2022 Jul 2‒5; London, UK; 2002. link1

[114] Chapelle O, Schölkopf B, Zien A. An augmented PAC model for semisupervised learning. In: Chapelle O, Schölkopf B, Zien A, editors. Semisupervised learning. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2006. link1

[115] Barbu A, Pavlovskaia M, Zhu SC. Rates for inductive learning of compositional models. In: Workshops at the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2013 Jul 14‒18; Bellevue, WA, USA; 2013.

[116] Hintikka J. Knowledge and belief: an introduction to the logic of the two notions. Stud Log 1962;16:119‒22.

[117] Aumann RJ. Agreeing to disagree. Ann Stat 1976;4(6):1236‒9. link1

[118] Halpern JY, Moses Y. Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment. J ACM 1990;37(3):549‒87. link1

[119] Smith NJ, Goodman ND, Frank MC. Learning and using language via recursive pragmatic reasoning about other agents. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2013 Dec 5‒10; Lake Tahoe, NV, USA; 2013.

[120] Carston R. Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. Pragmat Beyond New Ser 1998;37:179‒238. link1

[121] Vogel A, Bodoia M, Potts C, Jurafsky D. Emergence of Gricean maxims from multi-agent decision theory. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies; 2013 Jun 9‒14; Atlanta, GA, USA; 2013.

[122] Turing AM. On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proc Lond Math Soc 1937;2(1):230‒65.

[123] Stone P, Kraus S. To teach or not to teach? Decision making under uncertainty in ad hoc teams. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems; 2010 May 10‒14; Toronto, ON, Canada; 2010. link1

[124] Zhang A, Sodhani S, Khetarpal K, Pineau J. Learning robust state abstractions for hidden-parameter block MDPs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations; 2020 Apr 26‒May 1; online; 2020.

[125] Barrett S, Rosenfeld A, Kraus S, Stone P. Making friends on the fly: cooperating with new teammates. Artif Intell 2017;242:132‒71. link1