Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Strategic Study of CAE >> 2016, Volume 18, Issue 5 doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2016.05.014

Experience and Inspiration from Construction of United States National Parks and Gateway Communities

Planning Department, City of Aurora, Colorado 80124, USA

Funding project:中国工程院重大咨询项目“秦巴山脉绿色循环发展战略研究”(2015-ZD-05) Received: 2016-07-26 Revised: 2016-08-12 Available online: 2016-09-14 10:59:13.000

Next Previous

Abstract

This year is the one-hundredth-year anniversary of the United States National Park Service (US NPS). Over the last one hundred years, the national park system of the United States had become an important national asset that had played a significant role in stimulating economic development and growth as well as enhancing quality of life, especially for the gateway communities. This paper provides a brief overview of the US NPS, including its history, mission, and key planning process and approaches. This paper focuses the discussion on the interdependent relationship between the gateway communities and the national park system, as well as the issues and challenges associated with the recent significant growth of tourists in the parks and of visitors and residents in the gateway communities for both those communities and the parks. This paper uses Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) and the town of Estes Park, RNMP's main gateway community, as a case to study and discuss specific issues and successful experiences, and provides a list of lessons learned that can be considered by the research project of the Qinba Mountain Area green & circular development.

References

[ 1 ] National Park Service, US Department of the Interior. National park service history: National park system timeline [EB/OL]. (2016-07-03) [2016-08-12].

[ 2 ] National Park Service, US Department of the Interior. National park service overview [R/OL]. (2016-02-12) [2016-08-10].

[ 3 ] US National Park Service. National park service fiscal year 2017 budget justifications [R/OL]. (2016-02-12) [2016-08-10].

[ 4 ] Staff of Rocky Mountain National Park, the Denver Service Center Planning Division and the Intermountain Region Park. Foundation document—Rocky Mountain National Park [R]. Colorado: Na-tional Park Service, US Department of Interior, 2013.

[ 5 ] Thomas C C, Huber C, Koontz L. 2014 National Park visitor spending effects: economic contributions to local communities, states, and the nation. Natural resource report NPS/NRSS/EQD/NRR—2015/947 [R]. Colorado: National Park Service, US De-partment of Interior, 2015. link1

[ 6 ] Steer K, Chambers N. Gateway opportunities: A guide to federal programs for rural gateway communities [R]. Washington DC: National Park Service Social Science Program, 1998.

[ 7 ] Gomez V L. Tourism and preservation in gateway communities: a case study of the towns surrounding Mesa Verde National Park (Mas-ter’s thesis) [D]. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania, 2005. link1

[ 8 ] US National Park Service. Annual park recreation visitation [R]. Washington DC: National Park Service, US Department of Interi-or, 2015.

[ 9 ] Buck B B. Rocky is all about wilderness, wildlife and wonder [EB/OL]. (2015-02-10) [2016-08-10].

[10] Buck B B. 100 years of Rocky Mountain National Park [EB/OL]. (2015-07-09) [2016-08-10].

[11] Contor R. Rocky Mountain National Park 1976 master plan [R]. Colorado: National Park Service, Department of Interior, 1976.

[12] Staff of Department of Community Development. Estes Park val-ley comprehensive plan [R]. Colorado: Town of Estes Park, 2013.

[13] Avalanche Consulting, Inc. Estes Park valley economic develop-ment strategy [R]. Colorado: Estes Park Economic Development, Inc., 2015.

Related Research