Analysis of Foreign Classical Policy Tools for Strategic Emerging Industries—Government Procurement and Subsidy Policies

Guannan Xu; Xiuqin Wang; Meijuan Pan; Yuan Zhou

doi:10.15302/J-SSCAE-2016.04.017

PDF(230 KB)

Strategic Study of CAE ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) : 113-120. DOI: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2016.04.017

Study on Overseas Practice

Analysis of Foreign Classical Policy Tools for Strategic Emerging Industries—Government Procurement and Subsidy Policies

Author information +

History +

Abstract

At present, the strategic emerging industry has become the key to upgrading a country's industrial structure and to winning a priority of economic development. Various countries start to consider the development of emerging industries as a national level strategy and apply a portfolio of policy tools to promote the development of emerging industries. Therefore, research of the important measures adopted by other countries in promoting the development of emerging industries offers important reference for China to carry out relevant policies. This paper mainly analyzes two classical policy tools adopted by developed countries, including government procurement and government subsidiary, so as to provide reference for China to cultivate and develop its strategic emerging industries.

Keywords

emerging industry / policy tools / government procurement / government subsidiary / industrial policy analysis

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download citation ▾

Guannan Xu, Xiuqin Wang, Meijuan Pan, Yuan Zhou. Analysis of Foreign Classical Policy Tools for Strategic Emerging Industries—Government Procurement and Subsidy Policies. Strategic Study of CAE, 2016, 18(4): 113‒120 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-SSCAE-2016.04.017

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	郭旭红, 李玄煜. 大力发展战略性新兴产业[N]. 人民日报, 2015-12-31(7).

[2]	宁骚. 公共政策学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2011.

[3]	Rothwell R, Zegveld W. Reindustrialization and technology [M]. New York: M. E. Sharp, Inc, 1985.

[4]	Nemet G F. Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change [J]. Research Pol-icy, 2009, 38(5): 700–709.

[5]	赵筱媛, 苏竣. 基于政策工具的公共科技政策分析框架研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2007, 25(1): 52–56.

[6]	Stefano G D, Gambardella A, Verona G. Technology of push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions [J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(8): 1283–1295.

[7]	Peters M, Schneider M, Griesshaber T, et al. The impact of tech-nology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change—Does the locus of policies matter? [J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(8): 1296–1308.

[8]	韦结余, 洪志生, 许冠南. “十二五” 期间战略性新兴产业相关政策回顾分析. 中国战略性新兴产业发展报告（2015）[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2014.

[9]	宋河发, 穆荣平, 任中保. 促进自主创新的政府采购政策与实施细则关联性研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(2): 291–299.

[10]	郭爱芳, 周建中. 美国政府采购支持技术创新的做法及其借鉴意义[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2003, 24(1): 49–51.

[11]	刘军民. 英国政府采购制度简析与启示[J]. 财政研究, 2013(3): 69–74.

[12]	Georghiou L, Edler J, Uyarra E, et al. Policy instruments for pub-lic procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 86: 1–12.

[13]	Uyarra E, Edler J, Garcia-Estevez J, et al. Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective [J]. Technova-tion, 2014, 34(10): 631–645.

[14]	王丛虎. 论我国政府采购促进自主创新[J]. 科学学研究, 2006, 24(6): 967–970.

[15]	Edquist C, Zabala-Iturriagagoitia J M. Pre-commercial procure-ment: A demand or supply policy instrument in relation to innova-tion? [J]. R&D Management, 2015, 45(2): 147–160.

[16]	Dufek L. Public procurement: A panel data approach [J]. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, 25: 535–542.

[17]	樊琦, 韩民春. 政府R&D 补贴对国家及区域自主创新产出影响绩效研究——基于中国 28 个省域面板数据的实证分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2011, 25(3): 183–188.

[18]	王书平, 余螟, 闫晓峰. 主要发达国家新能源政策及其对中国的启示[C]// 王震. 低碳经济与能源企业发展: 第四届中国能源战略国际论坛论文集. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2009.

[19]	Mock P, Yang Z F. Driving electrification: A global comparison of fiscal incentive policy for electric vehicles [R/OL]. (2014-05-06) [2016-04-22].