
The Obligation of Decryption Assistance by Internet Service Providers: Suggestions on the Amendment of Article 27 of the Network Security Law Draft (Second Draft)
Congcong Cui, Yuxiao Li, Song Han
Strategic Study of CAE ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6) : 34-38.
The Obligation of Decryption Assistance by Internet Service Providers: Suggestions on the Amendment of Article 27 of the Network Security Law Draft (Second Draft)
The obligation of decryption assistance by Internet service providers reflects the conflict between public power (the power of investigation) and the right of privacy (the right of communication privacy, private rights). Internet service providers should gather data under encryption by users on the basis of the principles of controllability and traceability, proportionality, and necessity. Providers should consider choosing their path prudently, supervised by strict procedure. Thus, the overall utility of social governance control, the tranquility of private life, and the business interests of Internet service providers can be maximized. Severe violations of private rights and disorderly situations due to governmental failure can be avoided if these suggestions are carried out.
obligation of decryption assistance / principle of necessity / principle of proportionality / principle of controllability and traceability / remedy measures
[1] |
马民虎, 果园, 马宁. 自解密义务的法律困惑及其本土适用[J].苏州大学学报( 哲学社会科学版), 2016(1): 89–94.
|
[2] |
Jeffrey K. Missing the Metaphor: Compulsory decryption and the fifth amendment[J]. The Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 2015, 24(53): 54–75.
|
[3] |
谢登科 . 论技术侦查中的隐私权保护[J]. 法学论坛 , 2016(3): 32–40.
|
[4] |
霍永库, 冯潇洒. 社会角色理论的网络运营者安全保障义务分析[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2016, 36(1): 62–68.
|
[5] |
唐忠民. 公民通信自由和通信秘密保护的两个问题[J]. 法学,2007(12): 14–17.
|
[6] |
高荣林. 美国电子数据取证之无证搜查与证据排除规则[J]. 上海政法学院学报,2015,30(5): 72–81.
|
[7] |
胡铭. 英法德荷意技术侦查的程序性控制[J]. 环球法律评论, 2013, 35(4): 6–18.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |