
International Comparative Study on the Setting of Medical Specialty Catalogue and Countermeasures
Zhongguang Yu, Pengjun Zhang, Zhixin Zhang, Chen Wang
Strategic Study of CAE ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1) : 139-145.
International Comparative Study on the Setting of Medical Specialty Catalogue and Countermeasures
The medical specialty catalogue is of great significance for promoting the development of the medical discipline and cultivating qualified medical talents; therefore, a comprehensive and scientific medical specialty catalogue becomes even more important in the context of constructing first-class disciplines in colleges and universities. To promote the progressive development of medical disciplines in China, this research sorted out the medical specialty category by literature analysis, and systematically compared the features and category of medical specialty among the U.S. and the U.K. and China. Several major problems are raised as follow: non-uniform medical specialty and sub-specialty category, outdated arrangement of specialties in quantities and content, premature entry into sub-specialty training, inconsistent categories with standardized residential training, etc. To tackle the problems above, this research suggests that the medical specialty category should be in track with global standard, unified with interdisciplinary approach,and standardized admission and exit criteria be set up, which will prepare future qualified health professionals and promote the advancement of medical disciplines.
medicine / specialty catalogue / clinical medicine / comparative analysis
[1] |
陈怡婷, 胡伟力, 谢鹏, 等. 医学教育学科专业目录问题与对策 探究 [J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2010 (7): 15–16. Chen Y T, Hu W L, Xie P, et al. Study on the problems and countermeasures of the specialty catalogue of medical education [J]. China Higher Medical Education, 2010 (7): 15–16.
|
[2] |
Frank J R, Mungroo R, Ahmad Y, et al. Toward a definition of competency-based education in medicine: A systematic review of published definitions [J]. Medical Teacher, 2010, 32(8): 631–637.
|
[3] |
Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta Z A, et al. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world [J]. The Lancet, 2010, 376 (9756): 1923– 1958.
|
[4] |
吴鸿翔, 汪玲, 吴海鸣, 等. 遵循医学教育基本规律 修订医学领 域学科目录 [J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2011, 31(3): 334–337. Wu H X, Wang L, Wu H M, et al. Work report on the revision of the discipline category in the field of medicine [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2011, 31(3): 334–337.
|
[5] |
National Center for Edmcation Statistics. Classification of instructional programs: 2000 edition. [EB/OL]. (2002-05-08) [2019-07- 02]. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002165.pdf.
|
[6] |
张忠福. 美国高校学科专业和课程设置特点及其启示 [J]. 现代 教育科学, 2015 (3): 161–166. Zhang Z F. The feature of the setup for college subjects, majors and curriculums in the United States and the enlightenments [J]. Modern Education Science, 2015 (3): 161–166.
|
[7] |
刘店辉, 刘佳. 中美学科专业目录的差异分析研究 [J]. 长春工 业大学学报 (高教研究版), 2008, 29(4): 114–116. Liu D H, Liu J. A comparative study of American and Chinese discipline specialty [J]. Journal of Changchun University of Technology (Higher Education Study Edition), 2008, 29(4): 114–116.
|
[8] |
Higher Education Statistics Agency. JACS3.0 [EB/OL]. (2013-02- 01) [2019-07-02]. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/support/documentation/ jacs.
|
[9] |
韩双淼, 许为民, 衣龙涛. 英国研究生学科专业目录: 演变轨迹 与启示 [J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2019 (8): 71–77. Han S M, Xu W M , Yi L T. The catalogue of graduate disciplines in UK: Evolution track and enlightenment [J]. Academic Degrees & Graduate Education, 2019 (8): 71–77.
|
[10] |
周建军, 胡伟力, 谢鹏, 等. 医学领域学科专业目录调整的国际 适应性问题探讨 [J]. 西北医学教育, 2010, 18(3): 429–431, 441. Zhou J J, Hu W L, Xie P, et al. International adaptability of discipline and specialty directory adjustment in medical field [J]. Northwest Medical Education, 2010, 18(3): 429–431, 441.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |