
Assessment Method of Industrial System Maturity Levels
Liheng Wang, Zhicheng Zhou, Kunsheng Wang, Chunhua Lu, Hainan Wang, Jian Cui, Xuemei Ma
Strategic Study of CAE ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2) : 91-97.
Assessment Method of Industrial System Maturity Levels
This paper proposes the concept of industrial system maturity level, and introduces a new factor, namely, industry security and controllability level (ISCL), which further comprises the autonomous and controllable ability and the industry leading ability. Corresponding assessment criteria and model are also constructed. This method takes into account whether the supply of industrial elements such as technology, equipment, capital, and products are independent. The assessment results can reflect the basic state of a country’s ISCL. In response to the urgent need for macro-research on China’s strategic emerging industries, this study assessed and analyzed the industrial system maturity levels of 25 emerging industry directions. It shows that, among the 25 directions, the industrial systems of only few industrial directions have entered into a developing or mature stage, and most industrial directions got unsatisfactory assessment results for their ISCLs. Specifically, only the industrial system of the battery electric vehicle industry is in the mature stage and has a high ISCL. The ISCLs of light-weight augmented reality display module, biomedical bioreactor and complete equipment, and emergency vaccine research and preparation, are relatively low; and the autonomous and controllable ability as well as the industry leading ability of these three industrial directions are weak. Many emerging industries in China have prominent shortcomings in the ISCL. In the process of accelerating the construction of an independent and controllable modern industrial system, attention should be paid to improving the domestic capital’s control over the core technologies, raw materials, standards, brand, and other elements.
industrial system maturity level / strategic emerging industries / assessment method / industry security and controllability level (ISCL)
[1] |
Mankins J. Technology readiness and risk assessments TRLs and innovation portfolio management history, practices and future directions [R]. Santa Maria: Artemis Innovation Management Solutions LLC, 2012.
|
[2] |
International Organization for Standardization. Space systemdefinition of the technology readiness levels (TRL) and their criteria of assessment: TC20/SC14/WG5 [S]. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2011.
|
[3] |
袁家军. 航天产品工程 [M]. 北京: 中国宇航出版有限责任公司, 2011. Yuan J J. Aerospace product engineering [M]. Beijing: China Aerospace Publishing Co., Ltd., 2011.
|
[4] |
吴燕生. 技术成熟度及其评价方法 [M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2012. Wu Y S. Technology readiness and its assessment method [M]. Beijing: China Aerospace Publishing Co., Ltd., 2012.
|
[5] |
Crawford J K. Project management maturity model [M]. New York: Auerbach Publications, 2006.
|
[6] |
黎连业, 张晓冬, 吕小刚, 等. 软件能力成熟度模型与模型集成 基础 [M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2011. Li L Y, Zhang X D, Lv X G, et al. Software capability maturity model and model integration basis [M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2011.
|
[7] |
张新国. 国防装备系统工程中的成熟度理论与应用[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2013. Zhang X G. Maturity theory and application in national defense equipment system engineering [M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2013.
|
[8] |
王礼恒, 屠海令, 王崑声, 等. 产业成熟度评价方法研究与实践 [J]. 中国工程科学, 2016, 18(4): 9–17. Wang L H, Tu H L, Wang K S, et al. Assessment of industry maturity levels: Research and practice [J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2016, 18(4): 9–17
|
[9] |
产业成熟度编研组. 产业成熟度评价方法与应用 [M]. 北京: 中 国宇航出版有限责任公司, 2017. Industry Maturity Editing and Research Group. Evaluation method and application of industrial maturity levels [M]. Beijing: China Aerospace Publishing Co., Ltd., 2017.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |