
Development Strategies for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Standardization in China
Jianjun Pan, Yiren Wang, Xiaozhen Li, Yexi Kang, Hongwei Zhang, Jianxin Guo, Gangyang Zheng, Yanyan Wang
Strategic Study of CAE ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3) : 53-59.
Development Strategies for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Standardization in China
Nuclear fuel cycle standardization is important for the safe and innovative development of the nuclear fuel cycle industry, especially when China has currently entered a high-quality development stage. Therefore, conducting strategic research on nuclear fuel cycle standardization becomes significant for boosting China’s nuclear industry. In this article, we analyze the development status of nuclear fuel cycle standardization in China and abroad, investigate the key problems of nuclear fuel cycle standardization in China from the perspectives of working mechanism, development balance, leading role, and support ability, and propose the major tasks and relevant countermeasures. Specifically, the major tasks involve seven aspects: post-stage standards of the nuclear fuel cycle, standards for key technologies, advanced standards, frontier basic standards, safety and environmental protection standards, international standardization, and basic capacities for standardization. Furthermore, the countermeasures comprise including nuclear fuel cycle standardization into the 14th Five-Year Plan of the nuclear industry, improving the standardization mechanism, increasing investment, and strengthening the construction of standardization talent teams.
nuclear fuel cycle / high-quality development / technical standards / basic ability / international standardization
[1] |
李冠兴, 周邦新, 肖岷, 等. 中国新一代核能核燃料总体发展战 略研究 [J]. 中国工程科学, 2019, 21(1): 6-11. Li G X, Zhou B X, Xiao M, et al. Overall development strategy of China’s new-generation nuclear fuel [J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2019, 21(1): 6-11.
|
[2] |
董芳芳, 李国青, 吴潜. 我国铀矿冶安全环保标准化现状浅析 [J]. 核标准计量与质量, 2016 (2): 12-16. Dong F F, Li G Q, Wu Q. Analysis on the current situation of safety and environmental protection standardization of uranium mining and metallurgy in China [J]. Nuclear Standard Measurement and Quality, 2016 (2): 12-16.
|
[3] |
Taghvaeenezhad M, Shayestehfar M, Moarefvand P, et al. Quantifying the criteria for classification of mineral resources and reserves through the estimation of block model uncertainty using geostatistical methods: A case study of Khoshoumi Uranium deposit in Yazd, Iran [J]. Geosystem Engineering, 2020, 23(4): 216-225.
|
[4] |
Herbst R S, Baron P, Nilsson M. Standard and advanced separation: PUREX processes for nuclear fuel reprocessing [J]. Advanced Separation Techniques for Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing and Radioactive Waste Treatment, 2011: 141-175.
|
[5] |
姜星斗, 赵奔, 沈桢琪, 等. 核设施退役技术标准体系建设探索 [J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2018, 17(9): 77-79. Jiang X D, Zhao B, Shen Z Q, et al. Exploration on the construction of technical standard system for decommissioning of nuclear facilities [J]. Industrial & Science Tribune, 2018, 17(9): 77-79.
|
[6] |
Gopalakrishnan R K. Summary of IAEA safety standards series No. SSG-42: Specific safety guide on “Safety of nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities”(May 2017) [J]. Radiation Protection and Environment, 2017, 40(2): 103-105.
|
[7] |
康椰熙. 核工业技术标准发展战略探讨 [J]. 核标准计量与质量, 2009 (3): 5-13. Kang Y X. Discussion on the development strategy of nuclear industry technical standards [J]. Nuclear Standard Measurement and Quality, 2009 (3): 5-13.
|
[8] |
刘尚源, 孙业丛, 魏然, 等. 关于推进我国核能领域国际标准化 工作的若干思考与建议 [J]. 中国标准化, 2020 (6): 38-46. Liu S Y, Sun Y C, Wei R, et al. Reflections and prospects on promoting China’s participation in the international nuclear energy standardization work [J]. China Standardization, 2020 (6): 38-46.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |