
Evaluating the Methods for Assessing Implementation Effects of River Chief System in China
Hailong Yin, Jia’ning Ge, Zuxin Xu, Jin Xu
Strategic Study of CAE ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5) : 169-176.
Evaluating the Methods for Assessing Implementation Effects of River Chief System in China
Establishing a river chief system is stipulated in the newly amended Law of the People’s Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, which clarifies the liability of party or administrative heads at various levels for water environment rehabilitation in their own administrative regions. In this article, we analyze the implementation effects of the river chief in China, current assessment methods, and their deficiencies, and propose two quantitative assessing methods: (1) comprehensive water quality assessment for the cross sections of rivers and lakes and (2) assessment using the pollutant load intercepting rate of sewer networks, aiming to improve the scientific rationality for effect assessment of the river chief system. With Suzhou Creek rehabilitation in Shanghai as an example, application of the comprehensive water quality assessment method was introduced. By analyzing the pollutant load intercepting rate in various provinces (autonomous regions or municipalities) in China, we find that on average 34% wastewater is still discharged into water courses in an untreated state, leading to repeated occurrence of water quality deterioration. Introducing the comprehensive water quality assessment and the pollutant load intercepting rate into the river chief assessment will effectively push the government at all levels to concentrate their human, material, and financial resources onto urban drainage network correction and the interception of pollution sources discharged into watercourses.
river chief system / comprehensive water quality / water environmental quality / pollution load / sewage collection / water pollution prevention and control
[1] |
王亚华 , 陈相凝 . 河长制实施进展的评价与展望 [J]. 中国水利 , 2021 23 : 21 ‒ 24, 27 .
|
[2] |
生态环境部办公厅 . 关于印发《地级及以上城市国家地表水考核断面水环境质量排名方案试行》的函 [EBOL]. 2019-05-05 [ 2021-08-15 ]. https: www.mee.gov.cnxxgk2018xxgkxxgk06201905t20190507_702103.html .
|
[3] |
吉林省河长制办公室 . 关于印发2018年全省河长制湖长制工作安排意见及2018年吉林省河长制湖长制考核评分细则的通知 [EBOL]. 2018-04-28 [ 2021-08-15 ]. http: xxgk.jl.gov.cnzcbmfgw_98042xxgkmlqy201901t20190114_5695040.html .
|
[4] |
中共北京市委办公厅 , 北京市人民政府办公厅 . 关于印发《北京市进一步全面推进河长制工作方案》的通知 [EBOL]. 2017-07-22 [ 2021-08-15 ]. http: www.beijing.gov.cnzhengcezhengcefagui201905t20190522_60409.html .
|
[5] |
上海市水务局 . 关于印发2020年度"河长制湖长制"和"水资源管理实行最严格水资源管理制度"考核指标分解表及工作评分表的通知 [EBOL]. 2020-06-30 [ 2022-06-15 ]. http: swj.sh.gov.cnswyw2020091038b03a13eeb340c0b6a3f6fc6f27c3c3.html .
|
[6] |
安徽省水利厅 . 安徽省2018年度河长制湖长制省级考核办法 [EBOL]. 2018-06-04 [ 2022-06-15 ]. http: slt.ah.gov.cnpublic2173175339161.html .
|
[7] |
国家环境保护总局 . GB 3838—2002 地表水环境质量标准 [S]. 北京 : 中国环境科学出版社 , 2002 .
|
[8] |
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部 . 城市黑臭水体整治工作指南 [EBOL]. 2015-08-28 [ 2022-06-11 ]. http: www.mohurd.gov.cnwjfb201509t20150911_224828.html .
|
[9] |
Xu Z X , Xu J , Yin H L , et al . Urban river pollution control in developing countries [J]. Nature Sustainability , 2019 , 2 3 : 158 ‒ 160 .
|
[10] |
徐祖信 . 我国河流单因子水质标识指数评价方法研究 [J]. 同济大学学报自然科学版 , 2005 , 33 3 : 321 ‒ 325 .
|
[11] |
徐祖信 . 我国河流综合水质标识指数评价方法研究 [J]. 同济大学学报自然科学版 , 2005 , 33 4 : 482 ‒ 488 .
|
[12] |
徐祖信 , 尹海龙 . 城市水环境管理中的综合水质分析与评价 [M]. 北京 : 中国水利水电出版社 , 2012 .
|
[13] |
张舒 . 上海青浦区中小河道水体黑臭评价方法的对比评估 [J]. 中国水运 , 2017 , 17 7 : 170 ‒ 173 .
|
[14] |
中华人民共和国住房与城乡建设部 . 2020年城乡建设统计年鉴 [M]. 北京 : 中国统计出版社 , 2021 .
|
[15] |
陈玮 , 徐慧纬 , 高伟 , 等 . 基于产污系数法测算城镇污水处理系统的主要污染物削减效能提升潜力 [J]. 给水排水 , 2018 , 54 7 : 24 ‒ 29 .
|
[16] |
邓军 , 龙艳琼 . 德国污水处理厂进水水质参数分析 [J]. 市政技术 , 2009 , 27 5 : 501 ‒ 502 .
|
[17] |
唐建国 . 德国污水处理厂水质状况介绍 [J]. 给水排水 , 2006 , 32 9 : 15 ‒ 16 .
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |