General Method for Fault Return-to-Zero of Equipment System

Huitao Fan, Tonghe Zhang, Yanke Xu

Strategic Study of CAE ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1) : 248-257.

PDF(1031 KB)
PDF(1031 KB)
Strategic Study of CAE ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1) : 248-257. DOI: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2024.07.024

General Method for Fault Return-to-Zero of Equipment System

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The development of equipment system is a continuous process of solving technical problems, and fault return-to-zero is a normalized work in model development. It is necessary to learn from problems and faults and clarify the general laws and methods for fault return-to-zero. This study focuses on faults and tracks the entire process from fault occurrence to fault resolution. It summarizes the common laws of and general methods for fault return-to-zero in model development from the aspects of definition and values of faults, thinking mode of fault return-to-zero, and methods for fault return-to-zero. Moreover, it explores the four values of faults, four basic concepts of system thinking, and four common methods for fault troubleshooting, and elaborates on the six key links of fault return-to-zero: fault location, fault cause and mechanism analysis, fault recurrence design, improvement measure verification, extrapolation, and extraction of guidelines and inspirations. This study aims to prevent repetitive, simple, and low-level faults that might occur during model development and use, significantly reduce high-level and complex problems caused by insufficient understanding, and achieve complete technical return-to-zero with high quality and efficiency when faults occur.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

equipment system / fault location / fault return-to-zero / technology return-to-zero / tactical missile / system thinking

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Huitao Fan, Tonghe Zhang, Yanke Xu. General Method for Fault Return-to-Zero of Equipment System. Strategic Study of CAE, 2025, 27(1): 248‒257 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-SSCAE-2024.07.024

References

[1]
承文‍‍. 一次成功与系统预防: 中国航天工业质量管理要略 [M]‍. 北京: 中国宇航出版社, 2019‍.
Cheng W‍. One time success and systematic prevention: A strategy for quality management in China's aerospace industry [M]‍. Beijing: China Astronautic Publishing House, 2019‍.
[2]
杨世立, 王圆春, 刘金霞‍. GJB 5000B原因分析与问题归零实践 [J]‍. 电子质量, 2024 (4): 125‒129‍.
Yang S L, Wang Y C, Liu J X‍. Reason analysis and problem zeroing practice of GJB 5000B [J]‍. Electronics Quality, 2024 (4): 125‒129‍.
[3]
卢黄丽‍. 装备质量问题"双归零"的科学应用 [J]‍. 中国军转民, 2017 (5): 65‒67‍.
Lu H L‍. Scientific application of "double zeroing" in equipment quality problems [J]‍. Defence Industry Conversion in China, 2017 (5): 65‒67‍.
[4]
范春萍‍. "双归零"与负责任创新: 中国航天质量保障案例研究 [J]‍. 工程研究—跨学科视野中的工程, 2017, 9(5): 465‒473‍.
Fan C P‍. Double closed loops and responsible innovation: The case research in China space industry quality assurance [J]‍. Journal of Engineering Studies, 2017, 9(5): 465‒473‍.
[5]
余军‍. 基于系统工程的双五归零方法在信息系统质量问题中的应用 [J]‍. 机械制造, 2020, 58(12): 75‒77, 80‍.
Yu J‍. Application of double-five return to zero method based on system engineering in quality issue of information system [J]‍. Machinery, 2020, 58(12): 75‒77, 80‍.
[6]
陶帅, 马晓蕊‍. 装备建设与运用—质量管理与监督篇 [M]‍. 西安: 西安电子科技大学出版社, 2022‍.
Tao S, Ma X R‍. Equipment construction and utilization: Quality management and supervision [M]‍. Xi'an: Xidian University Press, 2022‍.
[7]
谭振, 苏红, 李国春, 等‍. 航天型号发射场"双想"工作方法研究与实践 [J]‍. 质量与可靠性, 2014 (6): 36‒38‍.
Tan Z, Su H, Li G C, et al‍. Research and practice on "double thinking" working method of space model launch site [J]‍. Quality and Reliability, 2014 (6): 36‒38‍.
[8]
Shannon C E‍. A mathematical theory of communication [J]‍. Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(3): 379‒423‍.
[9]
薛文娟‍. 基于知识管理的航天器单机产品质量问题快速归零方法的研究 [J]‍. 质量与可靠性, 2022 (6): 10‒18‍.
Xue W J‍. Research on fast closed loop solving method of spacecraft products' quality problems based on knowledge management [J]‍. Quality and Reliability, 2022 (6): 10‒18‍.
[10]
赵思腾, 桂林, 张琦雪, 等‍. 大型发电机及其机端外接元件单相接地故障定位 [J]‍. 中国电力, 2020, 53(3): 119‒125‍.
Zhao S T, Gui L, Zhang Q X, et al‍. Ground fault location of large generator and external components [J]‍. Electric Power, 2020, 53(3): 119‒125‍.
[11]
刘智卿, 万越, 杨梦洁, 等‍. 航天质量问题归零精细化管理与实践 [J]‍. 航天工业管理, 2022 (6): 62‒64‍.
Liu Z Q, Wan Y, Yang M J, et al‍. Delicacy management and practice on the aerospace quality problem close loop [J]‍. Aerospace Industry Management, 2022 (6): 62‒64‍.
[12]
张琪, 任国勋, 魏鑫, 等‍. 某制导系统目标探测故障分析研究 [J]‍. 新技术新工艺, 2023 (5): 72‒76‍.
Zhang Q, Ren G X, Wei X, et al‍. Research on fault analysis of target detection of a guidance system [J]‍. New Technology & New Process, 2023 (5): 72‒76‍.
[13]
刘博龙, 丛杨, 胡云, 等‍. 解构"洋葱"与认别"冰山"——质量问题如何彻底归零 [J]‍. 质量与可靠性, 2020 (5): 44‒49‍.
Liu B L, Cong Y, Hu Y, et al‍. Deconstructing "onion" and recognizing "iceberg"—How do quality problems really closed loop [J]‍. Quality and Reliability, 2020 (5): 44‒49‍.
[14]
郭济鸣, 齐金平, 李兴运‍. 故障树分析法的现状与发展 [J]‍. 装备机械, 2018 (2): 61‒66‍.
Guo J M, Qi J P, Li X Y‍. The status quo and development of fault tree analytial method [J]‍. The Magazine on Equipment Machinery, 2018 (2): 61‒66‍.
[15]
姜美娟, 朱慧丽, 王勇‍. 故障树分析在型号排故中的运用 [R]‍. 嘉兴: 第六届中国航空科学技术大会, 2023‍.
Jiang M J, Zhu H L, Wang Y‍. Use of fault tree analysis in model troubleshooting [R]‍. Jiaxing: The 6th China Aviation Science and Technology Conference, 2023‍.
[16]
王环, 王建, 李爱民, 等‍. 质量问题归零中举一反三工作的闭环管理 [J]‍. 质量与可靠性, 2019 (2): 53‒57‍.
Wang H, Wang J, Li A M, et al‍. Closed-loop management for drawing inferences about other cases from one instance in quality problem closed loop [J]‍. Quality and Reliability, 2019 (2): 53‒57‍.
[17]
韩峰岩‍. 装备测试性试验与评价的综合设计 [J]‍. 测控技术, 2014, 33(11): 150‒152, 155‍.
Han F Y‍. Synthesized solution for testability certification and validation [J]‍. Measurement & Control Technology, 2014, 33(11): 150‒152, 155‍.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1031 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/