Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Strategic Study of CAE >> 2017, Volume 19, Issue 3 doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2017.03.012

A Study on the Essence of Process Manufacturing

1. Center for Industrial Ecology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;

2. Central Iron and Steel Research Institute, Beijing 100081, China

Funding project:中国工程院咨询项目“制造强国战略研究(二期)”(2015-ZD-15);中国工程院咨询项目“流程制造业本质性研究及创新发展战略”(2015-ZCQ-009);国家自然科学基金项目(L1522024) Received: 2017-04-25 Revised: 2017-05-13 Available online: 2017-07-10 14:18:17.000

Next Previous

Abstract

Process manufacturing is an important pillar of China's economic development, and its orderly and healthy development is of great significance to China’s economic and social development. However, the development of process manufacturing is constrained by its enormous consumption of resources and energy and its serious environmental impact. To reach a deeper understanding of the future development of process manufacturing, this study extends an analytical perspective from a single industry to all forms of process manufacturing. Based on the concepts of thermodynamics and entropy, this study analyzes the essence of process manufacturing. Three groups of key factors are used to build the analysis framework: flow and process; material, energy, and information; and scale and efficiency. A chemical engineering process and a phosphorus chemical process are then analyzed using this framework. The results show that the fundamental direction of the development of process manufacturing is to minimize the entropy increments of the whole system, rather than only those of the process system, while ignoring the entropy increments of the system of the external environment. In order to minimize the entropy increments of the whole system, it is necessary not only to pay attention to the economic benefits of the process system, but also to improve resource, energy, and environmental efficiency. To improve efficiency, the technology involved requires improvement, upgrading, and innovation. Improving and upgrading the technology can slightly improve the efficiency of a process system, while revolutionary innovation in the technology may greatly improve the efficiency.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

References

[ 1 ] Zhang C X, Wang H F, Zhang S R, et al. Strategic study on green development of Chinese steel industry [J]. Iron and Steel, 2015, 50(10): 1–7. Chinese. link1

[ 2 ] Yin R Y. Three major functions of steel mills and industry trans-formation and upgrading [J]. Sci-tech Innovations and Brands, 2013 (11): 21. Chinese. link1

[ 3 ] Xu L J. The green development of iron and steel industry [J]. China Investment, 2008 (7): 70. Chinese. link1

[ 4 ] Cheng Z M, An X. Green development and resource comprehen-sive utilization in iron and steel enterprises [J]. Environmental Engineering, 2013, 31(4): 102–104. Chinese. link1

[ 5 ] Hu C P. Technology progress: A great tool in nonferrous metal industry development [J]. China Nonferrous Metals Industry, 2005 (12): 38–39. Chinese. link1

[ 6 ] Shao Z Q, Tian F. Green development and technology transfor-mation of non-ferrous metal industry in China [J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2016, 42(2): 18–21. Chinese. link1

[ 7 ] Liu M F. Green development for green future [J]. China Nonfer-rous Metals, 2016 (15): 40–41. Chinese. link1

[ 8 ] Chen Z D. Build a new pattern of building materials industry green development [J]. Guangdong Economy, 2010 (7): 26–28. Chinese. link1

[ 9 ] Li H F. Thoughts on green development of building materials industry in the 13th Five-Year Plan period [J]. China Building Ma-terials, 2015 (11): 108–111. Chinese. link1

[10] Ji Y Q. Study on development of green building material in China [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2001, 11(1): 115–118. Chinese. link1

Related Research