Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Strategic Study of CAE >> 2021, Volume 23, Issue 3 doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2021.03.017

Development Strategy of Nuclear Safety Technology in China

1. Institute of Nuclear Physics and Chemistry, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, Sichuan, China;

2. Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730030, China;

3. Science & Technology Commission of STIND, Beijing 100039, China;

4. Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100088, China
 

Funding project:中国工程院咨询项目“中国核科学技术发展战略研究(二期)” (2020-ZD-12) Received: 2021-01-25 Revised: 2021-03-19 Available online: 2021-06-01

Next Previous

Abstract

Nuclear safety is a key component of the national security system, and it is the foundation and lifeline of the nuclear industry. Advanced and reliable nuclear safety technology is crucial for maintaining and improving intrinsic safety. Therefore, conducting strategic research on nuclear safety technologies is important for enhancing the nuclear industry in China. In this article, we conduct an in-depth research on China’s nuclear safety technology system using methods including academician interviews, field surveys, conference discussion, and literature review. The results show that, guiding by the overall national security and the nuclear safety concepts, China’s nuclear safety technology has made significant progress in recent years and its nuclear safety performance is good. However, China’s nuclear safety technology system still face several bottleneck problems. For example, the nuclear safety standards system needs improvement, the overall planning of nuclear safety software research and development is insufficient, and the precision and advanced nuclear safety equipment still depends on foreign countries. To continuously modernize the nuclear safety governance system and governance capacities and strengthen China’s nuclear industry, several suggestions are proposed. First, the nuclear safety standards system should be further improved. Second, independent nuclear safety software with high quality should be promoted by coordinating scientific research resources to tackle key problems. Third, government, industry, university, research, and application need to be coordinated to research and develop high-end nuclear safety equipment.

References

[ 1 ] Lu H. Interpretation of the Nuclear Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China [M]. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House, 2018. Chinese.

[ 2 ] Cai L. Research on development direction of reactor safety technology [C]. Beijing: Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Meeting of the Chinese Nuclear Society, 2017. Chinese.

[ 3 ] Shang Z R, Wang W H. Referring to IAEA system to improve Chinese standards system on nuclear and radiation safety [J]. Nuclear Safety, 2010 (4): 3–13. Chinese. link1

[ 4 ] Deng R Y, Wang F T, Liang X Y, et al. Overview of international and domestic nuclear standards [J]. Nuclear Standard Measurement and Quality, 2017 (1): 4–10. Chinese. link1

[ 5 ] Liu Y S, Zhang C M, Ma S, et al. Research on integral thermal hydraulic test facilities [C]. Beijing: Proceedings of 2013 Annual Meeting of China Nuclear Society, 2013. Chinese.

[ 6 ] He Y L, Li X Y, Wang Y. Current research status and progress of nuclear energy virtual reactor in China and abroad [J]. Nuclear Science and Technology, 2015, 3(2): 41–47. Chinese.

[ 7 ] Yang W, Hu C J, Liu T C, et al. Research progress of China virtual reactor (CVR1.0) [J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2019, 53(10): 1821–1832. Chinese. link1

[ 8 ] Hua F, Du J T, Zheng X T, et al. The recent status and future development trend of nuclear instrumentation technology of nuclear power plants [J]. Nuclear Electronics & Detection Technology, 2019, 39(4): 517–522. Chinese. link1

[ 9 ] Yang J F. Completion of the 12th Five Year Plan: Comprehensive improvement of nuclear safety level [J]. China Nuclear Industry, 2017 (5): 13–15. Chinese. link1

[10] National Nuclear Safety Administration. Annual report of National Nuclear Safety Administration in 2019 [R]. Beijing: National Nuclear Safety Administration, 2019. Chinese.

[11] Liu D, Li Q, Lu Z J, et al. Development of nuclear power design and analysis package NESTOR [J]. China Nuclear Power, 2017, 10(4): 532–536. Chinese. link1

[12] Liu H. The verification and validation of independent software for nuclear power [J]. Science & Technology Vision, 2015 (30): 67–68. Chinese. link1

[13] Wang C, Yang S Y, Peng S T, et al. Automated validation of CGN nuclear software package PCM [J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2018, 39(S2): 46-49. Chinese. link1

[14] Wang M, Fu Z W. Requirement analysis of nuclear power plant decommissioning standard system [J]. Nuclear Standard Measurement and Quality, 2019 (2): 2–7. Chinese. link1

[15] Gao S Y, Song D H, Meng D. Status and recommendations of nuclear safety standardization [J]. Environmental Protection, 2018, 46(20): 50–51. Chinese. link1

[16] Dong R L, Liang X Y, Deng R Y. Strengthening standardization construction and promoting nuclear power “going out” [J]. Nuclear Standard Measurement and Quality, 2017 (1): 2–3. Chinese. link1

[17] Zhang N, Liu D. Research on the quality control in development process of nuclear safety software for design and analysis [J]. Machine Design and Manufacturing Engineering, 2014, 43(11): 63–66. Chinese. link1

[18] Huang Q B, Wang H, Gan L. Radiation monitoring equipment localization progress and direction [J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2016, 35(9): 90–92. Chinese. link1

[19] Liu S H, Guo P, Niu C G, et al. Application and quality supervision of new manufacturing process for nuclear island equipment in Sanmen nuclear power project [J]. General Machinery, 2018 (3): 50–53. Chinese. link1

Related Research