2024, Volume 26, Issue 3
Strategic Study of CAE >> 2024, Volume 26, Issue 3 doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2024.03.015
Construction of a Technological Security Risk Monitoring and Early Warning System
Next Previous
Abstract
The technological revolution under geopolitics has intensified the risks of China’s scientific and technological security. Building a risk monitoring and early warning system in the field of scientific and technological security is of great significance for maintaining scientific and technological security and even national security. In the face of intensified game risks, autonomous loss of control risks, technology mismatch risks, and stable development risks in the field of science and technology in China, decoding the internal logic of the operation of the risk monitoring and early warning system in the field of science and technology security, empowering the construction of the risk monitoring and early warning system through technological means, and proposing guarantee strategies. Research suggests that the monitoring and early warning of technological security risks should be based on six logical prerequisites: institutional support, cross domain cooperation,information sharing, intellectual participation, industrial governance, and technological empowerment; From the perspective of systems theory, a risk monitoring and early warning system in the field of science and technology security is constructed by establishing an indicator system, clarifying the monitoring and early warning process, and building a modular model; To ensure the effective implementation of the monitoring and early warning system, the country needs to improve relevant regulations and implement industry standards, expand the integration of new technologies, improve emergency response mechanisms and collaborative mechanisms, establish monitoring and early warning guidance institutions, strengthen talent cultivation and team building, and promote the integrated development of scientific and technological innovation and technological security to ensure the high-quality operation of the monitoring and early warning system.
Keywords
technology security ; risks of technological security ; risk monitoring and early warning ; technological innovation
References
[ 1 ]
中华人民共和国中央人民政府.习近平主持召开二十届中央国家安全委员会第一次会议 [EB/OL]. (2023-05-30)[2024-04-05].https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202305/content_6883803.htm.
Central People´s Government of the People´s Republic of China.Xi Jinping presided over the first meeting of the 20th Central National Security Committee [EB/OL]. (2023-05-30)[2024-04-05].https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202305/content_6883803.htm.
[ 2 ]
蔡劲松, 谭爽, 武佳奇. 关键科技领域安全风险评估指标体系构建研究 [J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022 (3): 33‒41.
Cai J S, Tan S, Wu J Q. Research on construction of security risk indicator system in key science and technology area [J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2022 (3): 33‒41.
[ 3 ]
郭秋怡, 张斌, 武宇. 面向科技安全的技术预见方法初探 [J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020 (11): 180‒188.
Guo Q Y, Zhang B, Wu Y. A preliminary study on technology foresight method for science and technology security [J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2020 (11): 180‒188.
[ 4 ]
涂永强. 中国海洋经济安全的预警实证研究 [J]. 海洋经济, 2013, 3(1): 12‒17.
Tu Y Q. An empirical study on the warning system of China´s marine economic security [J]. Marine Economy, 2013, 3(1): 12‒17.
[ 5 ]
王刚, 陈伟, 曹秋红. 国防科技工业科技安全能力评价 [J]. 北京理工大学学报 (社会科学版), 2020, 22(5): 107‒112.
Wang G, Chen W, Cao Q H. Evaluation of national defense industry´s science and technology security capability [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(5): 107‒112.
[ 6 ]
李江磊. 国防安全风险评估模型构建 [J]. 国防科技, 2010, 31(2): 41‒46.
Li J L. The construction of the national deferse risk evaluation model [J]. National Defense Science & Technology, 2010, 31(2): 41‒46.
[ 7 ]
陈劲, 朱子钦, 季与点, 等. 底线式科技安全治理体系构建研究 [J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(8): 1345‒1357.
Chen J, Zhu Z Q, Ji Y D, et al. Research on the construction of science and technology security governance system based on bottom line thinking [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(8): 1345‒1357.
[ 8 ]
赵世军, 董晓辉, 旷毓君. 系统论视域下我国科技安全治理的机理和路径研究 [J]. 系统科学学报, 2023, 31(4): 73‒78.
Zhao S J, Dong X H, Kuang Y J. Research on the mechanism and path of science and technology security governance from the perspective of system theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Systems Science, 2023, 31(4): 73‒78.
[ 9 ]
张家年, 赵妍. “结构 – 流程 – 输出” 视阈下科技安全情报体系研究 [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(9): 6‒14.
Zhang J N, Zhao Y. Research on security intelligence of science and technology from the perspective of “structure-process-output” framework [J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2022, 45(9): 6‒14.
[10]
李辉, 曾文, 刘彦君, 等. 面向科技安全的科技情报监测与分析系统构建研究 [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(6): 98‒104.
Li H, Zeng W, Liu Y J, et al. Research on the construction of intelligence monitoring and analysis system for science and technology security [J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2021, 44(6): 98‒104.
[11]
赵世军, 董晓辉. 新时代我国科技安全风险的成因分析及应对策略 [J]. 科学管理研究, 2021, 39(3): 27‒32.
Zhao S J, Dong X H. Causes analysis and countermeasures of science and technology security risks in China in the new era [J]. Scientific Management Research, 2021, 39(3): 27‒32.
[12] Lin Z L. Theoretical study of strategic management of science and technology security [J]. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2007: 16789552.
[13]
孟东晖, 李显君, 梅亮, 等. 核心技术解构与突破: “清华 – 绿控” AMT技术2000—2016年纵向案例研究 [J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(6): 75‒84.
Meng D H, Li X J, Mei L, et al. Core technology deconstruction and breakthrough: A longitudinal case study on “Tsinghua-Lvkon” AMT technology from 2000 to 2016 [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(6): 75‒84.
[14]
曾德明, 张磊生, 禹献云, 等. 高新技术企业研发国际化进入模式选择研究 [J]. 软科学, 2013, 27(10): 25‒28.
Zeng D M, Zhang L S, Yu X Y, et al. Research on the selection of entry mode for high-tech firms´ R & D internationalization [J]. Soft Science, 2013, 27(10): 25‒28.
[15]
黄正元. 科技意识形态化及其风险——风险视域中的科技与意识形态 [J]. 武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 22(6): 12‒15.
Huang Z Y. Science and technology ideologization and its risk—Science and technology and ideology in view of risk [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 22(6): 12‒15.
[16]
宋保振. “数字弱势群体” 权利及其法治化保障 [J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2020, 38(6): 53‒64.
Song B Z. The rights of “digital vulnerable groups” and their legal protection [J]. Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2020, 38(6): 53‒64.
[17]
孙德梅, 吴丰, 陈伟. 我国科技安全影响因素实证分析 [J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(22): 107‒114.
Sun D M, Wu F, Chen W. Empirical analysis of influencing factors of Chinese science and technology security [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2017, 34(22): 107‒114.
[18]
梁梦凡. 科技领军人才健康状况及影响因素研究 [D]. 西安: 西安工程大学(硕士学位论文), 2016.
Liang M F. The research on science and technology leading talents health status and influencing factors [D]. Xi´an: Xi´an Polytechnic University (Master´s thesis), 2016.
[19]
李林, 廖晋平, 张烜工. 科技安全预警机制的建立及完善 [J]. 科技导报, 2019, 37(19): 26‒32.
Li L, Liao J P, Zhang X G. Establishment and improvement of early warning mechanism of science and technology security [J]. Science & Technology Review, 2019, 37(19): 26‒32.
[20]
王路, 张守明, 张笔峰, 等. 系统理论视角下的科技安全研究进展 [J]. 科技导报, 2023, 41(6): 68‒73.
Wang L, Zhang S M, Zhang B F, et al. Research progress of science and technology security from the perspective of system theory [J]. Science & Technology Review, 2023, 41(6): 68‒73.
[21]
王少. 重大突发事件中的科技咨询与政府决策: 问题、利益博弈和优化路径 [J]. 东北大学学报 (社会科学版), 2021, 23(4): 51‒58.
Wang S. Scientific and technological consultation and government decision-making in serious emergencies: Based on problems, interest game and optimization path [J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), 2021, 23(4): 51‒58.
京公网安备 11010502051620号
